SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

75%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500TE

4,083 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12500TE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM form a desktop pairing that lands squarely in the middle of the performance spectrum. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S part, is built on Intel's 10 nm process and runs at a base clock of 1900 MHz with a boost up to 4.30 GHz. Its 35 W TDP is notably low for a desktop chip, which signals a design focused on efficiency rather than raw sustained throughput. The benchmark data shows a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13203 and a single-core score of 1863, placing the processor at the 57th percentile among all CPUs. This is not a flagship part, but it is a competent mid-tier performer that holds its own against some unexpected rivals. The GPU, meanwhile, is an Ampere-generation part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its average benchmark score of 15199 also sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. Together, they create a system that is balanced in the sense that neither component drastically outclasses the other, but the data also reveals where each part excels and where it falls short.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-12500TE is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, built on the Alder Lake-S codename. It uses Intel's 10 nm process node and has a die size of 163 mm². The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel setup, though ECC memory is not supported. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the dedicated GPU will handle most workloads. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, which is a forward-looking feature even if the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0.

Looking at the benchmark scores, the 12500TE delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13203 and a single-core score of 1863. In Geekbench, it scores 7781 multicore and 1976 single-core. The avgBenchmarkScore of 4083 places it at the 57th percentile, which is a solid mid-pack position. The nearestRivals data shows how close the competition is: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 4073, a delta of 0.2%, while the Intel Xeon E-2278G scores 4052, a delta of 0.8%. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 4114 (delta -0.8%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 4121 (delta -0.9%). The margins are razor-thin, meaning the 12500TE is virtually interchangeable with these parts in aggregate performance. For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5545 and single-core of 782 translate to a chip that can handle modern productivity tasks without drama. The 4.30 GHz boost clock is respectable, and the low 35 W TDP suggests it can sustain boost frequencies without requiring aggressive cooling. This is a CPU that will feel responsive in everyday use and competent in threaded applications, but it is not going to set records in heavily multithreaded rendering or compilation tasks. The single-core performance, at the 57th percentile, is actually the stronger aspect relative to its multicore showing, which is useful for games and lightly threaded software.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses the GA106 chip, built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The transistor density is 43.5M per mm². The GPU has 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, which means it supports ray tracing and DLSS, though the performance headroom for these features is limited given its position in the market. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost of 1755 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest figure by modern standards, but it is enough for 1080p gaming and lighter content creation work.

The benchmark scores tell a story of a GPU that is competent but not exceptional. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 60740, and the Vulkan score is 57103. In Passmark, the G3D score is 11857, while the GPU compute score is 5779. The avgBenchmarkScore is 15199, placing it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The nearestRivals are telling: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171 (delta 0.2%), the AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270 (delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 scores 15283 (delta -0.5%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 scores 15290 (delta -0.6%). The RTX 3050 OEM is essentially tied with these parts in aggregate, which is remarkable given the GTX 580 is a much older architecture. The FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s. For rendering, this GPU can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles and can do entry-level 1440p with adjustments. The 8 GB of VRAM is adequate for current games at 1080p, but it may become a limiting factor in future titles or with high-resolution textures. The RT and tensor cores are present, so ray tracing and DLSS are available, but the raw compute power means DLSS is the more valuable feature here, as it can offset the performance hit from ray tracing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU has a 35 W TDP, which is remarkably low, and the GPU has a 130 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This means the total system power draw is modest, and a 300 W PSU provides headroom for the components as configured. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design, measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height. It uses PCIe 4.0 x8 for its bus interface, which is sufficient for this class of GPU, though the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, which covers modern monitors well.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the more likely candidate for replacement, but the platform itself has limitations. The CPU's 35 W TDP indicates a power-efficient design, which is good for small form factor builds or systems where thermals are a concern. However, the 12500TE is not unlocked, so overclocking is off the table. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility in choosing the memory subsystem, but the dual-channel bus means memory bandwidth will not be a bottleneck for the CPU. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU is a future-proofing feature, but the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface means it does not take full advantage of the available lanes. If an upgrade is considered, the motherboard and CPU would need to be replaced to move to a newer platform, as Socket 1700 is a specific generation. The 300 W PSU is sufficient for the current build, but a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade as well. The data shows this is a balanced platform for its intended use, but it is not a path to high-end performance; it is a stable, efficient foundation for a mid-range desktop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 57 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates a well-matched system in aggregate terms. Both components sit at the 57th percentile among their respective categories, which suggests neither is drastically holding back the other in a general sense. However, the benchmark data reveals where the bottlenecks lie depending on the workload. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13203 is solid for a 6-core part, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 is also mid-pack. In gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions, because the CPU's single-core performance (Geekbench single-core score of 1976) is adequate for most game engines. The CPU's 57th percentile ranking in single-core tasks means it can feed the GPU without stuttering in most titles, but in CPU-heavy games, the 6-core limit may show. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are the more likely constraints in modern games, particularly with high-resolution textures or ray tracing enabled.

In productivity tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU's multicore performance, while not stellar, is sufficient for compilation, video editing, and office work. The GPU's compute performance, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 5779, is adequate for acceleration in some applications, but it is not a workstation-class part. The data suggests that in rendering tasks that use the GPU, the RTX 3050 OEM will be the bottleneck, as its FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS is modest. In CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, the 12500TE will be the limit, with its Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5545 indicating it is not a heavy hitter. The FPS scaling, which is not measured for this exact combination, would follow the general pattern of being GPU-limited at higher resolutions and CPU-limited at lower resolutions. The key takeaway is that this is a balanced build for 1080p gaming and light productivity, but pushing it into higher-end workloads will expose the limits of both components.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1863 provide a basis for these estimates. At 1080p, this build should handle most modern games at high settings with playable frame rates, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for esports titles and 40-60 FPS for AAA games, depending on the title. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but users may need to lower settings in games with heavy VRAM usage. At 1440p, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB of VRAM will become more significant constraints, and frame rates will likely drop to 30-50 FPS in demanding titles, requiring medium settings for smooth gameplay. Ray tracing is supported via the 18 RT cores, but the performance hit will be substantial; DLSS via the 72 tensor cores is the better option to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU should not be a major bottleneck at 1080p, as its single-core performance is decent, but in CPU-intensive games like simulation titles, the 6-core limit may cause frame dips. Overall, this is a 1080p-oriented gaming system, with 1440p being a stretch that requires careful settings management. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by title and driver optimizations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-12500TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is this build suitable for ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 18 RT cores, so ray tracing is supported, but the FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS is modest. Ray tracing will require lower settings or DLSS to maintain playable frame rates.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, and the GPU has a 130 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the system is 300 W.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?

A: The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore is 4083, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 4114, a delta of -0.8%, meaning the 12500TE is slightly behind but effectively in the same performance class.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of 2022-01-03 and a successor in the GeForce 40 series.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a competent desktop for 1080p gaming and light productivity without demanding high-end performance. The CPU's 57th percentile ranking and the GPU's matching percentile indicate a system that will handle esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs at high frame rates, and it will run AAA games at medium-to-high settings with playable performance. The 8 GB of VRAM is enough for current 1080p titles, but users who want to play at 1440p or with high-resolution texture packs should look elsewhere. Content creators who work with light photo editing, 1080p video editing, or basic 3D modeling will find the CPU's 6 cores and the GPU's CUDA cores sufficient for occasional use, but not for heavy rendering workloads. The low 35 W TDP of the CPU and the 130 W TDP of the GPU make this a good fit for small form factor builds or office environments where power efficiency is a priority. Students and small business users who need a reliable workstation for web development, document editing, and spreadsheet work will find the performance more than adequate, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup if the discrete GPU fails. This is not a build for enthusiasts or professionals who need maximum performance; it is a practical, mid-range desktop for everyday use and casual gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs the Intel Core i5-12500TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ampere-generation card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 130 W TDP. The combined percentile is 57, meaning this system performs better than 57% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. This is a mid-tier desktop configuration, not a budget office PC, but also not a high-end gaming rig. It sits in the middle of the performance curve, with both components delivering similar percentile rankings. The platform uses Intel Socket 1700, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and has a suggested PSU of 300 W, which reflects the low power draw of both parts. This is a coherent, efficient desktop that is well-suited for 1080p gaming and general productivity, with the caveat that it will not excel in heavily threaded or graphically demanding workloads. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range, as indicated by the 57th percentile combined score.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore is 4083, placing it at the 57th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 13203 for multicore and 1863 for single-core, while Geekbench scores are 7781 multicore and 1976 single-core. The GPU's avgBenchmarkScore is 15199, also at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 60740, and its Passmark G3D score is 11857. The combined percentile for the pairing is 57, which is a direct reflection of the individual component percentiles. The CPU is closely matched with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (delta 0.2%), the Intel Xeon E-2278G (delta 0.8%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (delta -0.8%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS (delta -0.9%). The GPU is similarly matched with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (delta 0.2%), the AMD Radeon 680M (delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (delta -0.5%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (delta -0.6%). The combined picture is one of a balanced, mid-pack system. Neither component is a standout, but both are competent for their intended roles. The CPU's single-core performance is its stronger suit, while the GPU's overall compute is average. The data indicates this is a system that will perform consistently across a variety of tasks, without major strengths or weaknesses, making it a predictable and reliable choice for a general-purpose desktop.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12500TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds