SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

75%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500T

4,216 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Desktop Workstation Analysis: Intel Core i5-12500T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

The Intel Core i5-12500T and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pairing forms a desktop-class build that sits at the 62nd percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a mid-to-upper tier configuration. The CPU, a 6-core Alder Lake-S part with 12 threads, delivers an average benchmark score of 4216, placing it at the 57th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, a Turing-architecture workstation card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, achieves an average benchmark score of 21629, ranking at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This combination targets professional rendering and compute workloads, with the GPU's massive memory pool and the CPU's modest power envelope creating a distinctive balance that favors GPU-bound tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000's PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it roughly 1% below the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in average benchmark score, suggesting it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings. However, the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 in PassMark indicates relatively weak modern API performance compared to its DirectX 11 score of 140, so high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming may not reach the frame rates that dedicated gaming cards achieve. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1964 supports solid frame pacing, but the overall combination is not optimized for esports-level refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache provide adequate headroom for software encoding, while the GPU's 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores handle AI-accelerated features. The Geekbench multicore score of 7733 indicates that the i5-12500T can manage simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads, though the 35 W TDP limits sustained multi-threaded performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for encoding buffers, but the lack of measured gaming FPS data means streaming performance is an estimate based on these scores.

Video Editing: The GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited for large video timelines and effects-heavy projects. The OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 on Geekbench demonstrate strong compute capability for rendering effects and exporting footage. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13913 supports smooth timeline scrubbing and preview generation, though rendering exports will be more GPU-accelerated than CPU-bound.

3D Rendering: This is the build's strongest scenario. The Quadro RTX 5000's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1) make it a capable renderer for both real-time viewports and final-frame rendering. The GPU's PassMark GPU Compute score of 6525, combined with the CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5843, allows hybrid rendering pipelines that leverage both devices. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced workflows, though the Turing architecture's RT performance is older than current-generation parts.

Software Development: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads handle compilation tasks reasonably well, as indicated by the Geekbench multicore score of 7733. The 1.25 MB L2 cache per core and 18 MB shared L3 reduce latency for frequent code access and incremental builds. The GPU's compute abilities accelerate machine learning inference and data processing tasks, while the 16 GB VRAM allows holding large datasets in GPU memory. The 57th CPU percentile suggests this is adequate for professional development but not a compile powerhouse.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1964 and Geekbench single-core score of 1854 handle everyday productivity applications with ease. The 35 W TDP means low power consumption for extended use, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is underutilized. The GPU's massive memory and compute capabilities are overkill for document processing, but the build's overall 62nd percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office suites and web browsers.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the TU104 chip using TSMC's 12 nm process, containing 13,600 million transistors across a 545 mm² die with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and a boost clock of 1815 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for professional workloads that require large working sets.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also features 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features. The pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s indicate strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS positions this card for professional visualization, while the FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1) accelerates mixed-precision workloads.

Benchmark results show a GPU that excels in compute-heavy tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 are strong indicators of general-purpose compute performance. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are more variable: DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59. The dramatic drop in DirectX 12 performance suggests that gaming workloads leveraging modern APIs may underperform relative to the GPU's raw compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 and GPU Compute score of 6525 round out the picture, with the average benchmark score of 21629 placing it at the 67th percentile, comparable to a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (1% higher) and 1.2% faster than an RTX A4000 Mobile.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing exhibits a clear GPU-forward balance, where the Quadro RTX 5000's compute capabilities far exceed what the i5-12500T can feed in most workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 21629 is more than five times the CPU's average of 4216, indicating that the GPU is the dominant performance driver. In CPU-bound scenarios like single-threaded tasks, the i5-12500T's 57th percentile ranking means it may bottleneck the GPU's ability to generate frames in games that rely heavily on physics or AI logic.

The CPU's 35 W TDP creates a power ceiling that limits sustained multi-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13913. This is 0.4% below the Intel Xeon E-2378 and 1.3% above the Intel Core i9-9900, showing that the i5-12500T competes with older workstation processors. In GPU-bound workloads like rendering or compute, the CPU's 12 threads can keep the GPU fed without becoming a limiting factor. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM removes memory capacity bottlenecks for large datasets, but the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface (from the GPU) may limit data transfer rates compared to newer PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 connections, though the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

FPS scaling is constrained by the GPU's modest DirectX 12 score of 59, which suggests that even if the CPU could deliver higher frame rates, the GPU's modern API performance would cap them. Conversely, in compute-heavy tasks like OpenCL or Vulkan, the GPU's strong scores (78999 and 92309 respectively) mean the CPU becomes the bottleneck for any serialized portions of the workload. The combined percentile of 62 reflects this imbalance: the system is better than average overall, but the CPU's mid-range standing prevents it from being a top-tier performer in CPU-limited scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals in GPU-accelerated fields who need substantial VRAM and compute power without requiring top-tier CPU performance. Content creators working with 4K video or large 3D scenes will benefit from the 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which handle textures and geometry beyond the capacity of most consumer GPUs. The OpenCL score of 78999 supports GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve, where the i5-12500T's 6 cores provide adequate system responsiveness.

Developers working on machine learning or data processing tasks will find value in the 384 tensor cores and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which accelerate training and inference workloads. The CPU's 12 threads and 18 MB L3 cache handle data preprocessing and pipelining, while the GPU's compute scores (PassMark GPU Compute 6525) indicate solid throughput for parallel algorithms. Small business workstations in engineering or scientific fields can leverage the Quadro RTX 5000's certified driver support and error-correcting features, though the CPU does not support ECC memory.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with moderate expectations will find this system playable, but the GPU's weak DirectX 12 score (59) compared to DirectX 11 (140) means it is not optimized for modern gaming APIs. Students in graphics or simulation programs will benefit from the GPU's compute power for coursework, while the CPU's 35 W TDP keeps electricity costs low for extended study sessions. The build is not ideal for competitive gamers seeking high-refresh rates or for users who need maximum CPU throughput for compilation or simulation tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-12500T achieves an average benchmark score of 4216, placing it at the 57th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E-2378 (average score 4232, 0.4% higher), Intel Core i7-1265U (average score 4248, 0.7% higher), Intel Core i5-11500H (average score 4187, 0.7% lower), and Intel Core i9-9900 (average score 4163, 1.3% lower). The CPU's Cinebench scores show a multicore R15 result of 1402, R20 of 5843, and R23 of 13913, with single-core results of 197, 824, and 1964 respectively. Geekbench scores are 7733 multicore and 1854 single-core.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 achieves an average benchmark score of 21629, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (average score 21856, 1% higher), NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (average score 21379, 1.2% lower), AMD Radeon HD 8970M (average score 21237, 1.8% lower), and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (average score 21153, 2.3% lower). The GPU's Geekbench scores are 78999 for OpenCL and 92309 for Vulkan. PassMark scores are 113 for DirectX 10, 140 for DirectX 11, 59 for DirectX 12, 195 for DirectX 9, 709 for G2D, 15616 for G3D, and 6525 for GPU Compute.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU by a factor of 5.1 in average benchmark scores, with the CPU at the 57th percentile and GPU at the 67th percentile. The overall build percentile of 62 indicates a configuration that is better than most but not exceptional. The CPU's performance is closely matched with the Xeon E-2378 and i9-9900, suggesting it performs like a previous-generation workstation processor, while the GPU's performance aligns with mid-range consumer cards like the GTX 1060 6 GB despite its professional positioning.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 suggests 1080p gaming at high settings is achievable in most titles, with the 16 GB VRAM ensuring texture quality is not a limiting factor. However, the DirectX 12 score of 59 is concerning for modern games that rely on this API, potentially capping frame rates in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator.

For DirectX 11-based games, the score of 140 indicates better performance, with estimates of 60-80 FPS at 1080p ultra in many titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1964 supports frame rates above 60 FPS in most scenarios, but the 6-core/12-thread configuration may struggle in CPU-intensive games at higher resolutions. The GPU's Vulkan score of 92309 is promising for games that use this API, potentially delivering higher frame rates than DirectX 12 equivalents.

At 1440p, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest playable frame rates (40-60 FPS) in most AAA titles, but the weak DirectX 12 performance could push some games below 30 FPS. At 4K, the GPU's compute power is adequate for rendering, but the DirectX 12 bottleneck makes high-refresh 4K gaming unrealistic. The CPU's 57th percentile ranking means it will not be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios, but in CPU-heavy titles, frame rates may drop below what the GPU can deliver.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500T is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of just 35 W, making it a low-power desktop part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and features UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Benchmark results show a processor that trades peak performance for power efficiency. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13913 is competitive with the Intel Core i9-9900 (1.3% higher), but the single-core score of 1964 is modest, reflecting the low base clock. The Geekbench multicore score of 7733 and single-core score of 1854 indicate solid everyday performance. The 57th percentile ranking places it in the middle of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms about half of the processors on the market.

For real workloads, the 35 W TDP means sustained multi-threaded performance will be limited by power and thermal constraints, as the CPU cannot maintain high clocks under full load. The 12 threads handle multitasking and lightly threaded workloads well, but heavy rendering or compilation tasks will see performance drop after the boost window expires. The 18 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data, benefiting productivity and development tasks. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility in system building, though the lack of ECC support limits its use in error-sensitive workstation environments.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The build sits at the 62nd combined percentile, with the CPU at the 57th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 5000 compare to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, which is 1% lower than the GTX 1060 6 GB's score of 21856.

Q: Does the i5-12500T support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by this CPU, which limits its suitability for certain workstation applications.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which limits sustained multi-threaded performance but provides high power efficiency.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this build?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 2,299 USD.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-12500T, a low-power Alder Lake processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a professional Turing-architecture GPU. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads provide moderate processing power, while the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance create a system heavily weighted toward GPU acceleration. The combined percentile of 62 indicates a mid-to-upper tier configuration that outperforms most systems but does not reach flagship levels.

The build class is desktop, reflecting the Socket 1700 platform and the dual-slot GPU. The CPU's 35 W TDP makes it suitable for compact or power-conscious builds, while the GPU's 230 W TDP and dual-slot form factor require adequate airflow and a 550 W suggested PSU. The overall tier from the percentiles places this system in the upper-middle range, with the GPU's 67th percentile being the stronger component and the CPU's 57th percentile being the weaker link. This is a workstation-oriented configuration that prioritizes GPU compute and memory capacity over CPU throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, meaning the GPU's bandwidth is limited by its own interface rather than the CPU's capabilities. The platform supports Alder Lake-S processors, so a sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU within the same generation, such as an i7 or i9 part, to improve CPU-bound performance without changing the motherboard.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, and the CPU's TDP is 35 W, leaving substantial headroom for additional components or a future GPU upgrade. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor in Workstation Ampere, so upgrading to a newer professional GPU would improve DirectX 12 performance (currently a weak point at a PassMark score of 59) and power efficiency. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose either memory type, but upgrading to DDR5 would require a motherboard that supports it. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for fast NVMe storage or other expansion cards, while the GPU's display outputs (4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C) support multi-monitor workstation setups. A future upgrade path would involve moving to a newer CPU generation for better single-thread performance, as the current CPU's 1964 Cinebench R23 single-core score is a limiting factor in lightly threaded workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12500T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds