SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500H

22,625 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

45,152 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500H is a 12-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Alder Lake-H architecture, utilizing a 10 nm process node with a die size of 217 mm². This hybrid design combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The CPU operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a 45 W TDP that positions it as a mainstream mobile chip for performance laptops. The 18 MB shared L3 cache, alongside 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which is critical for workloads that exhibit high temporal locality.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales reasonably well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 924 in single-thread to 1,773 in 2-thread, 3,139 in 4-thread, 4,394 in 8-thread, 5,954 in 16-thread, and 6,043 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, indicating that while the chip can handle multi-threaded tasks, its hybrid architecture with efficiency cores contributes less to peak threaded performance than the performance cores do. The Cinebench results corroborate this: R15 multicore scores 1,999 versus 282 single-core, R20 multicore scores 8,332 versus 1,176 single-core, and R23 multicore scores 19,840 versus 2,801 single-core. The R23 multicore-to-single-core ratio of roughly 7.1x suggests strong parallel efficiency for a mobile chip, though not class-leading.

PassMark integer math scores of 71,714 and floating-point math of 52,227 indicate solid arithmetic throughput for general-purpose computing. The data encryption score of 14,749 and compression score of 253,431 suggest the CPU handles AES-NI and compression workloads competently, which matters for file archives and encrypted storage. The extended instructions score of 14,965 and random string sorting score of 28,099 point to reasonable SIMD and sorting performance. The prime number finding score of 57 is notably low, indicating that pure integer iteration is not this chip's strength — a reflection of its mobile power envelope rather than architectural inefficiency.

The CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22,625. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U matches at 22,618 (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-1270P scores 22,502 (0.5% ahead of the i5-12500H), the Intel Core i5-13500H scores 22,468 (0.7% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U scores 22,791 (0.7% behind). This means the i5-12500H is squarely in the mid-range mobile CPU tier, with negligible performance separation from its immediate competitors. The data shows that real-world differences between these chips would be imperceptible in most applications, as the largest delta is under one percent.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this laptop pairing shows a CPU at the 76th percentile and a GPU at the 84th percentile, yielding an overall combined percentile of 80. The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, is the dominant component in this pairing, with an average benchmark score of 45,152 against the CPU's 22,625. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,871, Geekbench OpenCL score of 201,834, and Vulkan score of 198,405 demonstrate substantial graphics compute capability. PassMark G3D score of 30,034 and GPU compute score of 13,401 further confirm this, though the lower DirectX scores (183 for DX10, 269 for DX11, 138 for DX12) reflect specific legacy API workloads rather than overall capability.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a tight competitive field. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384 (0.5% behind the RTX 5090 Mobile), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 44,795 (0.8% behind), the Intel Arc A730M scores 45,592 (1% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45,972 (1.8% ahead). This places the RTX 5090 Mobile in the upper-midrange GPU tier, despite its "5090" branding suggesting flagship status — the mobile power constraints (95 W TDP) limit its absolute performance relative to desktop counterparts. The deltaPct values are all within 2%, meaning this mobile GPU trades blows with desktop-class GPUs from previous generations and midrange current offerings.

The CPU's passmark single-thread score of 3,418 and multithread score of 20,625 provide context for the pairing. The GPU's compute capabilities (31.80 TFLOPS FP32, 31.80 TFLOPS FP16) vastly exceed the CPU's integer and floating-point throughput for parallel workloads, making the GPU the clear accelerator for compute-heavy tasks like rendering and machine learning inference. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU handles general-purpose and lightly-threaded tasks admirably, while the GPU dominates in graphics and massively parallel compute. The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile mean this laptop outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs and four-fifths of all GPUs in the database — a strong overall package, though not at the absolute top tier.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12500H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU is not user-upgradeable in a conventional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for OEMs but no user choice post-purchase. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU offers adequate bandwidth for a modern GPU and NVMe storage, though the GPU in this laptop uses PCIe 5.0 x16 interface per its specifications — the CPU's Gen 4 limitation means the GPU will run at Gen 4 speeds, which is unlikely to bottleneck the 95 W mobile GPU given current bandwidth requirements.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 95 W TDP suggest a combined thermal envelope of roughly 140 W plus other components, which is typical for a performance laptop. The FACT PACK does not include a suggested PSU for the GPU, and the GPU uses no power connectors (it is an IGP-class slot width), indicating this is an integrated or soldered mobile GPU solution rather than a discrete MXM module. This means the upgrade path is essentially closed for both CPU and GPU — the user is locked into this configuration for the laptop's lifespan.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means OEMs can choose either, with DDR5 offering higher bandwidth potential but no specific bandwidth figure provided in the FACT PACK. The integrated Iris Xe 80EU graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete RTX 5090 Mobile will handle all demanding graphics tasks. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the platform is at its ceiling: the CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile are well-matched for a midrange-to-upper-midrange laptop, and any meaningful upgrade would require a new laptop rather than component swaps. The production status for both components is "Active," so replacement parts and driver support remain available, but performance headroom for future software demands is limited by the mobile thermal and power constraints.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090 Mobile's 84th percentile GPU score and 24 GB GDDR7 memory provide ample headroom for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU's 76th percentile single-thread score of 3,418 ensuring that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is more than sufficient for modern titles at high settings, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

Streaming: The GPU's tensor cores (328) and 24 GB memory enable hardware encoding and real-time effects processing, while the CPU's 12-core, 16-thread configuration with a max-thread 3DMark score of 6,043 handles concurrent encoding and game logic. The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 95 W TDP suggest the thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions is adequate, though the data does not include specific encoding benchmarks.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,840 and PassMark multithread score of 20,625 provide solid timeline rendering and export performance, while the GPU's 201,834 OpenCL score accelerates effects and color grading. The 24 GB VRAM is exceptional for large projects, and the 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures fast texture and preview streaming.

3D rendering: The GPU's 82 RT cores and 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it the primary renderer, with the CPU's PassMark floating-point score of 52,227 handling scene preparation and physics. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,871 indicates strong DirectX 12 render throughput, suitable for real-time viewport work.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and 18 MB L3 cache handle compilation and virtual machines well, with PassMark data compression of 253,431 and encryption of 14,749 indicating fast build artifact handling and secure connections. The GPU's compute capability can accelerate code analysis and testing, though the CPU's single-thread score of 3,418 ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work: The CPU's 76th percentile and integrated Iris Xe 80EU graphics provide more than enough power for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, with the discrete GPU idle for battery savings. The 45 W TDP means the laptop remains portable, though the GPU's 95 W TDP adds weight and cooling requirements compared to lighter ultrabooks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The GPU's 84th percentile ranking, with a PassMark G3D score of 30,034, suggests strong performance at ultra settings for most titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,871 indicates modern DirectX 12 games will run smoothly, likely exceeding 60 FPS at 1080p ultra in most titles and approaching or exceeding 60 FPS at 1440p in well-optimized games. The 24 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth eliminates VRAM as a bottleneck even for texture-heavy titles at 4K, though the GPU's 95 W TDP limits sustained clocks under load.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 924 and 2-thread score of 1,773 suggest that CPU-bound games, particularly esports titles at high frame rates, may not fully saturate the GPU's potential at 1080p. The 8-thread score of 4,394 and 16-thread score of 5,954 indicate that modern multi-threaded game engines will use the CPU effectively, but the mobile clock speeds (2.50 GHz base, 4.50 GHz boost) cap maximum FPS in scenarios with heavy per-thread workloads. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the CPU's performance is sufficient to keep frame rates GPU-limited.

For ray tracing titles, the 82 RT cores and 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware acceleration, but the 95 W TDP means ray tracing performance will be lower than desktop equivalents. The Vulkan score of 198,405 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based games, while the DirectX 12 score of 5,871 in 3DMark confirms modern API efficiency. The PassMark DirectX scores (183 for DX10, 269 for DX11, 138 for DX12) are anomalous and likely represent specific test conditions rather than general API performance, so they should not be used for FPS estimation.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high or ultra settings, as the GPU's 84th percentile and 24 GB VRAM provide headroom for modern titles and future releases. The CPU's 76th percentile ensures that these games will not be CPU-bound at these resolutions, making this a balanced choice for the performance-conscious gamer who prioritizes GPU throughput over maximum frame rates. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or machine learning will benefit from the GPU's 31.80 TFLOPS and 24 GB memory, which accelerate exports, simulation, and inference tasks.

Software developers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or use GPU-accelerated testing will find the CPU's 16 threads and PassMark multithread score of 20,625 sufficient, while the GPU's compute performance handles parallel workloads. Students and office workers who occasionally game or create content will find this laptop overkill for basic productivity but capable of handling any academic or professional task without lag. Small business workstations that require both CPU-intensive spreadsheet and document work alongside GPU-accelerated design or video marketing can rely on this pairing, though the mobile form factor limits expansion.

The build class is "laptop," so this is not a DIY build but a pre-configured system. The combined percentile of 80 places it above 80% of all benchmarked systems, making it suitable for users who want a single device for both work and play without compromising on either. The lack of a launch MSRP in the FACT PACK means no pricing analysis is possible, but the performance tier suggests a premium mobile workstation or gaming laptop.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile indicate a slight GPU-favoring balance, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 924 (3DMark) and PassMark single-thread of 3,418 may become the limiting factor in high-frame-rate scenarios, particularly in esports titles where CPU physics and draw calls dominate. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's rendering load increases, and the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, which is the stronger component — this is the preferred balance for gaming.

For compute workloads like 3D rendering and machine learning, the GPU's 31.80 TFLOPS and 24 GB memory massively outperform the CPU's 52,227 floating-point PassMark score, making the GPU the clear accelerator and the CPU a supporting actor. In video editing, the CPU's R23 multicore score of 19,840 handles timeline operations while the GPU accelerates effects, creating a balanced division of labor. The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 95 W TDP mean the GPU draws more than twice the power, and under sustained load, the GPU will generate more heat, potentially throttling before the CPU does.

The FPS scaling from the 3DMark thread tests shows the CPU's performance plateaus beyond 8 threads (4,394 in 8-thread vs 5,954 in 16-thread, a gain of only 35%), meaning the GPU will often wait for the CPU in lightly-threaded games. The PassMark multithread score of 20,625 and single-thread of 3,418 yield a ratio of about 6:1, which is typical for a hybrid mobile chip but lower than desktop high-core-count parts. The data suggests that for optimal balance, this system is best suited for workloads that heavily utilize the GPU, while CPU-bound tasks will not fully exploit the GPU's capability.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-12500H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile in a laptop form factor (buildClass: "laptop"). The CPU is a 12th-generation Alder Lake-H mobile processor with 12 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture mobile chip with 10,496 shading units, 82 RT cores, and 24 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper-midrange tier, with the CPU at the 76th percentile and GPU at the 84th percentile among their respective categories.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22,625 and GPU's average of 45,152 mean the GPU contributes roughly twice the compute throughput, making this a GPU-centric build. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation, is only 1.8% faster, while the CPU's closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, is only 0.7% faster — both components are competitive within their tiers. The 45 W CPU TDP and 95 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop with robust cooling, likely a larger chassis, and the GPU's IGP slot width and no power connectors confirm this is a soldered or integrated mobile solution rather than a modular one.

This is not a flagship configuration despite the "5090" name, as the mobile GPU's 95 W TDP limits its performance to the 84th percentile, and the i5-12500H is a midrange CPU. The system represents a balanced upper-midrange laptop that trades maximum performance for portability and thermal manageability. The production status of both components is "Active," so this is a current-generation offering, with the GPU releasing on 2025-03-26 and the CPU being an established Alder Lake part.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop configuration?

A: The combined percentile is 80, with the CPU at the 76th percentile and the GPU at the 84th percentile among all benchmarked components.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12500H compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U?

A: The i5-12500H has an average benchmark score of 22,625, which is 0.7% lower than the Ryzen 5 7535U's 22,791, making the AMD chip marginally faster.

Q: What is the RTX 5090 Mobile's performance relative to the desktop RTX 4070 Ti?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45,152 on average, which is 0.8% higher than the RTX 4070 Ti's 44,795, meaning the mobile chip slightly outperforms that desktop GPU.

Q: Does this laptop support PCIe 5.0 for the GPU?

A: The GPU supports PCIe 5.0 x16, but the CPU only provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, so the GPU will operate at Gen 4 speeds in practice.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 5090 Mobile have?

A: The GPU has 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2,801, with a multicore score of 19,840, giving a multicore-to-single-core ratio of approximately 7.1x.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12500H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds