SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500H

22,625 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-12500H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile pairing represents a balanced laptop configuration where the CPU and GPU sit in complementary performance tiers. The CPU achieves a 76th percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 63rd percentile against all GPUs, placing the processor slightly higher in relative standing. The combined percentile for this pairing is 70, indicating that neither component dramatically overshadows the other in a way that would create severe bottlenecking.

The CPU's threading scaling provides clear evidence of workload distribution characteristics. The 3dmark score climbs from 924 in single-thread to 1773 in 2-thread, 3139 in 4-thread, 4394 in 8-thread, then 5954 in 16-thread and 6043 in max-thread tests. This progression shows that performance scales strongly through 8 threads, then nearly plateaus beyond 16 threads. The gap between 16-thread (5954) and max-thread (6043) scores is only 89 points, roughly 1.5 percent, indicating that the 12-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized by the time 16 threads are engaged. Applications that can leverage more than 16 threads will find little additional headroom, but the 8-thread to 16-thread jump of 35.5 percent suggests good scaling for modern multi-threaded workloads.

The GPU's compute capabilities show a different scaling profile. The passmark G3D score of 14423 versus the passmark GPU compute score of 5947 reveals that raw graphics rasterization outpaces general-purpose compute by a factor of roughly 2.4. This disparity suggests the RTX 4050 Mobile is better suited for traditional rendering tasks than for compute-heavy workloads like machine learning training or physics simulation. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 are nearly identical, indicating the GPU maintains consistent performance across different compute APIs.

For gaming workloads, the balance favors the GPU being the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU has sufficient single-thread performance for most gaming scenarios. The single-thread score of 924 in 3dmark and 2801 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate strong per-core performance that can feed the GPU adequately. The CPU's 2-thread score of 1773 is 91.9 percent of the 4-thread score of 3139, showing that lightly threaded workloads like many esports titles will run efficiently. In CPU-intensive scenarios such as high-refresh-rate competitive gaming, the CPU's 76th percentile standing suggests it can sustain high frame rates, but the GPU's 63rd percentile will cap maximum FPS in graphically demanding titles.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not user-upgradeable. The 45 W TDP for the processor and 50 W TDP for the GPU indicate a power envelope typical of a mid-range laptop configuration. The system uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, providing sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 4050 Mobile's 6 GB GDDR6 memory.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus. This flexibility allows the laptop manufacturer to implement either memory generation, though DDR5 would offer higher bandwidth potential. The integrated Iris Xe 80EU graphics provide a fallback display output that can be used when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially saving power. The GPU has no external power connectors, operating entirely within the laptop's power delivery system, and the suggested PSU field is null, meaning no discrete power supply recommendation exists for this mobile configuration.

The upgrade path for this laptop platform is inherently limited by the mobile form factor. The CPU cannot be swapped, and the GPU is also typically soldered in mobile designs. The most sensible upgrade path is memory and storage. Moving from DDR4 to DDR5 is not possible if the motherboard supports only one generation, so the primary memory upgrade would be increasing capacity. The dual-channel memory bus means adding a second module (if only one is present) would improve memory bandwidth significantly. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are possible, as the 20 CPU lanes provide ample connectivity. For users seeking more GPU performance, the only realistic path is a new laptop, as the RTX 4050 Mobile's performance class is fixed by its 50 W TDP and AD107 chip.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500H is a 12-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-H mobile variant. This hybrid architecture combines performance cores and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The die measures 217 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19840 places this CPU in a competitive position among mobile processors. The single-core score of 2801 in R23 demonstrates solid per-thread performance, though the ratio between multicore and single-core (19840/2801 = 7.08) reveals that the 12-core design provides roughly 7x scaling over a single core, which is reasonable given the hybrid architecture and thermal constraints of a 45 W TDP. The Cinebench R20 scores of 8332 multicore and 1176 single-core align with this picture, showing a similar scaling ratio of 7.09.

Passmark results provide additional workload-specific insights. The integer math score of 71714 and floating point math score of 52227 indicate that integer-heavy workloads perform about 37 percent better than floating-point workloads. The data compression score of 253431 is very high relative to other Passmark sub-tests, suggesting the CPU excels at compression algorithms. Data encryption at 14749 and extended instructions at 14965 are moderate scores, while find prime numbers at 57 is a notably low score, indicating this CPU is not optimized for highly parallel integer iteration tasks. The multithread score of 20625 and single-thread score of 3418 show a scaling factor of 6.03, which is lower than the Cinebench scaling, reflecting that Passmark's multithread test may have different parallelization characteristics.

The nearest CPU rivals provide context for the 76th percentile ranking. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135U has an average score of 22618, essentially matching the i5-12500H's 22625 with a 0 percent delta. The Intel Core i7-1270P scores 22502, 0.5 percent lower. The Intel Core i5-13500H scores 22468, 0.7 percent lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U scores 22791, which is 0.7 percent higher. This tight grouping of roughly 1.4 percent spread across four rivals indicates that the i5-12500H sits in a highly competitive mid-range mobile segment where performance differences are marginal.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12500H processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile GPU. The build class is explicitly designated as "laptop," meaning all components are mobile variants designed for power efficiency and thermal constraints. The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 50 W TDP together suggest a total power draw in the range of 95 W for the core components, before accounting for memory, storage, and display.

The combined percentile of 70 indicates this pairing sits above the median of all possible CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU's 76th percentile is higher than the GPU's 63rd percentile, showing that the processor is the stronger component relative to its market segment. This configuration would be classified as a mid-range to upper-mid-range laptop, suitable for mainstream gaming and productivity workloads. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth place it in the entry-level discrete GPU tier for the GeForce 40-series mobile lineup, while the CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads place it in the upper mid-range of mobile processors.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 with a 0.1 percent higher average score, the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 with a 0.1 percent higher score, the NVIDIA Tesla K20m with a 0.2 percent lower score, and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation with a 0.5 percent lower score. This grouping shows the RTX 4050 Mobile is competitive with desktop GPUs from previous generations, despite being a mobile part.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread 3dmark score of 924 and R23 single-core score of 2801 provide sufficient per-core performance for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 14423, however, will limit maximum frame rates in graphically demanding titles. For esports titles with lower graphics requirements, the combination can likely drive high refresh rates, but AAA games at ultra settings will be constrained by the GPU's 63rd percentile standing.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads provide headroom for encoding while gaming. The passmark multithread score of 20625 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19840 indicate the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The GPU also supports Tensor cores (80 of them) and RT cores (20), which could assist with AI-based encoding features, though the specific encoding capabilities are not listed in the FACT PACK.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the 8332 Cinebench R20 multicore score, will handle video rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 84.24 GPixel/s pixel rate provide hardware acceleration for effects and compositing. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p video editing timelines.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s indicate capable rendering performance for entry-level 3D work. The 20 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The passmark GPU compute score of 5947 is lower than the G3D score, suggesting rendering workloads that rely heavily on compute may see reduced performance.

Software development: The CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads handle compilation tasks well. The passmark integer math score of 71714 and data compression score of 253431 indicate strong performance for code compilation and build processes. The single-thread score of 3418 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE performance.

Student and office work: The CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 924 and passmark single-thread score of 3418 provide ample performance for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated Iris Xe 80EU graphics can handle display output when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially extending battery life. The 45 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP are moderate for a laptop, suggesting reasonable power consumption for all-day academic use.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, meaning this configuration performs better than 70 percent of all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U has an average benchmark score of 22791, which is 0.7 percent higher than the Intel Core i5-12500H's average score of 22625.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, provided by 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-12500H does not support ECC memory, according to the specifications.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process node, while the GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process node.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 20 RT cores, which are part of the Ada Lovelace architecture's ray tracing hardware.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a ball-grid array package designed for mobile platforms.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for mainstream tasks. Gamers playing at 1080p resolution with high settings will find the RTX 4050 Mobile's 14423 passmark G3D score and 63rd percentile ranking sufficient for most titles, though ultra settings at higher resolutions will stress the GPU. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensures that gaming performance is not CPU-limited in most scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 19840 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which accelerates export and rendering times. The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports GPU-accelerated effects, while the 6 GB VRAM handles moderate-sized projects. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 12-core, 16-thread configuration, evidenced by the 71714 passmark integer math score.

Students and professionals needing a versatile laptop for coursework, office applications, and light creative work will find the performance adequate without excessive power consumption. The 45 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP suggest the laptop can operate without aggressive cooling requirements. Small business workstations running productivity suites, database applications, or financial modeling tools will perform well given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3418 in Passmark.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 14423 and the CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 924 provide the basis for these estimates.

For esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's 84.24 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest the system can achieve high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking indicates it outperforms 63 percent of all GPUs, which is sufficient for 1080p high-refresh gaming in less demanding titles.

For AAA games at ultra settings, the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting factors at higher resolutions. At 1080p ultra, the GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests playable frame rates in most titles, though heavy ray tracing workloads using the 20 RT cores may reduce performance. At 1440p, the GPU will likely require reduced settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensures it will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, with the GPU being the primary constraint on frame rates.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 22625, placing it at the 76th percentile of all CPUs. The highest individual CPU scores include the passmark multithread score of 20625 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19840. Single-thread performance is led by the passmark single-thread score of 3418 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2801. The 3dmark scores range from 924 in single-thread to 6043 in max-thread, showing a scaling factor of 6.54 from single to max threads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19049, placing it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. The passmark G3D score of 14423 is the primary gaming performance indicator, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 show compute performance. The passmark GPU compute score of 5947 is notably lower than the G3D score, indicating the GPU is better optimized for graphics rendering than general compute tasks.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is 13 percentile points higher than the GPU. This means the CPU has more relative headroom in its market segment than the GPU. For workloads that are CPU-bound, such as compilation or data processing, this configuration will perform strongly. For GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is based on the AD107 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This yields a memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s, which is moderate for a mobile GPU of this class. The base clock is 1455 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. The pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.986 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 8.986 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the TDP is 50 W. The GPU has no external power connectors, operating entirely on the laptop's power delivery. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop model.

The benchmark results show a passmark G3D score of 14423, which is the most relevant metric for gaming performance. The passmark DirectX scores are 79 for DX10, 130 for DX11, 61 for DX12, and 184 for DX9. The higher DX9 and DX11 scores relative to DX12 suggest the GPU may not fully utilize DirectX 12 features, or the benchmark does not optimally test the Ada Lovelace architecture's DX12 capabilities. The G2D score of 633 indicates moderate 2D performance, and the GPU compute score of 5947 shows the compute capability is roughly 41 percent of the G3D performance.

The nearest GPU rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 with an average score of 19036 (0.1 percent higher), the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 with 19030 (0.1 percent higher), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m with 19089 (0.2 percent lower), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation with 18954 (0.5 percent lower). This tight grouping shows the RTX 4050 Mobile performs competitively with both desktop GPUs from the previous generation and workstation GPUs, despite being a mobile part with a 50 W TDP.