SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500

19,668 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12500 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: A Workstation Duo with Split Personalities

This pairing combines a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake desktop processor with a 16 GB Turing-generation workstation GPU, landing at the 70th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU occupies the 67th percentile among all GPUs, creating an unusual configuration where the processor is marginally stronger than the graphics card in relative standing. The data reveals a system that excels at multi-threaded productivity yet carries a GPU whose nearest rival is a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, a card from a completely different performance tier, suggesting the Quadro's value lies in specialized workstation features rather than raw gaming muscle. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions herein are estimates derived from benchmark scores and percentile positions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12500 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors it to the Alder Lake generation. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to reuse existing DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5 kits, though the FACT PACK does not specify which memory type the benchmark scores were generated with. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, a forward-looking interface that can accommodate modern storage and expansion cards, while the GPU in this pairing operates on PCIe 3.0 x16, meaning the graphics card does not exploit the newer bus standard.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, and the GPU's 230 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550 W indicates a system that does not demand an oversized power supply. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, so any PSU upgrade must include those cables. Sensible next upgrades from this platform would involve swapping the GPU for something with a higher benchmark score, as the processor has headroom relative to its graphics counterpart. The CPU's percentile rank of 73 suggests it can handle more powerful GPUs without becoming the limiting factor in most workloads. The motherboard socket supports 12th Gen Core processors, and the 65 W TDP leaves thermal and power overhead for potential CPU upgrades within the same socket family, though the FACT PACK does not list compatibility with newer generations. The dual-channel memory controller and 18 MB of shared L3 cache are adequate for the current pairing, but a move to a higher-core CPU would benefit from the same platform infrastructure.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-12500 use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform for Alder Lake desktop processors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in multi-threaded performance?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 19668 is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430's 19617, and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 5500's 19593, indicating near-identical multi-threaded performance among these processors.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the GPU support real-time ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 5000 includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, placing it in NVIDIA's Turing architecture that introduced dedicated ray tracing hardware.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing achieves a 70th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 67th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's nearest rival and how close are their scores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is the nearest rival, with an average score of 21856 compared to the Quadro's 21629, a delta of -1% (the Quadro is 1% slower).

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Core i5-12500 includes UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks when the discrete GPU is not utilized.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². The base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and the 65 W TDP classifies it as a mainstream desktop part. Cache allocation includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though ECC memory is not supported.

Benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark multi-threaded scores progress from 1741 at 2 threads to 4862 at 8 threads, reaching 6007 at 16 threads and 6023 at max threads, showing diminishing returns beyond 8 threads as the 6 physical cores saturate. Single-thread performance is robust: 3DMark single-thread scores 951, Cinebench R23 single-core scores 2366, and Geekbench single-core scores 1969. Multi-threaded workloads show corresponding strength, with Cinebench R23 multicore hitting 16759 and Geekbench multicore at 9374.

The PassMark suite reveals workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 61626, floating-point math scores 48004, and extended instructions score 16090, indicating solid general-purpose computation. Data compression scores 238753, while data encryption scores 12033, showing that compression tasks benefit significantly from the architecture. The processor's average benchmark score of 19668 places it at the 73rd percentile, and the nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 at 19617 (0.3% slower), the Intel Core i5-11600KF at 19723 (0.3% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 at 19593 (0.4% slower). This clustering indicates that the i5-12500 sits in a highly competitive mid-range segment where performance differences are minimal.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a CPU-heavy pairing, where the processor's 73rd percentile outpaces the GPU's 67th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics calculations, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the i5-12500 will drive performance, with the PassMark physics score of 1242 and multithread score of 19893 indicating strong computational throughput. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 and compute score of 6525 show that graphics tasks will not match the CPU's relative standing, potentially creating a bottleneck in GPU-intensive scenarios.

The GPU's nearest rival being the GTX 1060 6 GB (with the Quadro being 1% slower) is striking, as that card is a mainstream gaming GPU from a different era. This implies that for gaming, the Quadro RTX 5000's performance will align with that older card, while the CPU could handle much more. Conversely, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are workstation-oriented specifications that exceed what gaming titles typically require, suggesting the bottleneck shifts depending on workload type. In gaming, the GPU will likely limit frame rates; in professional applications that leverage VRAM capacity and compute features, the balance may be more even.

The CPU's 3DMark scores at 8 threads (4862) versus 16 threads (6007) show only a 24% improvement, meaning games that use 8 threads or fewer will see most of the CPU's performance. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 in PassMark is notably low compared to its DirectX 11 score of 140, which could indicate driver maturity or architecture limitations in newer APIs. This split suggests that older DirectX 11 titles may perform better relative to the GPU's overall capability than DirectX 12 titles, potentially affecting bottleneck dynamics in modern games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's comprehensive benchmark results establish it as a capable mid-range processor. Geekbench multicore scores 9374 and single-core scores 1969, while Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 16759 and single-core 2366. PassMark multithread scores 19893, with single-thread at 3666. The average benchmark score is 19668, placing the CPU at the 73rd percentile. The nearest rival comparison shows the i5-12500 is 0.3% slower than the Intel Core i5-11600KF and 0.6% slower than the Intel Core i5-11600K, but 0.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 5500.

The GPU's benchmark profile is more uneven. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78999 and Vulkan scores 92309, showing strong compute performance. PassMark G3D scores 15616, placing the GPU at the 67th percentile with an average score of 21629. However, the DirectX scores are inconsistent: DirectX 9 scores 195, DirectX 10 scores 113, DirectX 11 scores 140, and DirectX 12 scores 59. The GPU compute score of 6525 is relatively low. The nearest rival is the GTX 1060 6 GB at 21856, which is 1% faster, while the RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% slower at 21379.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative standing. The CPU's 73rd percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile means the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this middle-tier positioning. For productivity workloads that leverage CPU multi-threading, the system will perform well; for graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU will hold the system back relative to what the CPU could support.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need workstation-grade GPU features without sacrificing CPU performance. The 16 GB VRAM and 384 tensor cores on the Quadro RTX 5000 make it suitable for professionals working with large datasets, machine learning inference, or rendering tasks that benefit from GPU compute, despite the GPU's lower gaming benchmark scores. Content creators who use applications that leverage CUDA cores and RT cores will find the GPU's 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores useful for accelerated workflows.

The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 73rd percentile ranking, serve developers compiling code or running virtual machines, where multi-threaded performance matters. The PassMark data compression score of 238753 indicates strong archiving and file-handling capabilities, benefiting small business workstations that handle large files. Students in engineering or design programs will appreciate the GPU's 16 GB memory for CAD or 3D modeling, even if gaming performance is not class-leading.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution may find the GPU's performance acceptable, given its similarity to the GTX 1060 6 GB, but the system is not optimized for high-refresh gaming. The CPU's single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2366) are strong enough for gaming, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor. This build is better suited for users who prioritize professional applications over gaming, where the Quadro's workstation drivers and VRAM capacity provide value beyond raw frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000's benchmark scores suggest performance comparable to the GTX 1060 6 GB, which means 1080p gaming at high settings is feasible, but the GPU's 67th percentile and DirectX 12 score of 59 indicate that modern titles may struggle to maintain high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient, but the GPU will cap FPS in most games.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads handle encoding workloads well, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 16759 providing ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's tensor cores could accelerate AI-based encoding features, but the overall gaming performance ceiling may limit streaming quality at high resolutions.

Video Editing: The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth support large timelines and effects, while the CPU's multi-threaded scores (Geekbench multicore 9374) handle rendering and export tasks. The PassMark floating-point math score of 48004 indicates solid media processing capability, making this a viable entry-level video editing workstation.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 3072 shading units and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide compute power for GPU-accelerated rendering, while the CPU's 6 cores and 18 MB L3 cache handle scene preparation. The combined 70th percentile suggests adequate performance for moderate rendering workloads, though not for heavy production work.

Software Development: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (PassMark multithread 19893) accelerates compilation and testing, while the GPU's compute features support parallel processing tasks. The 65 W TDP keeps the system power-efficient for extended development sessions.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 73rd percentile and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM handle typical productivity applications with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool for classroom or office environments.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12500, a 6-core Alder Lake processor from the Core 12th Gen series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a 16 GB Turing-architecture workstation GPU from the GeForce 50-series naming convention. The CPU was released in January 2022 with a launch MSRP of $212, while the GPU was released in August 2018 with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD, creating a generational gap between the components. The CPU is still in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life, with its predecessor being Quadro Volta and successor being Workstation Ampere.

The pairing achieves a combined percentile of 70, placing it above the majority of systems in the database. The CPU's 73rd percentile and the GPU's 67th percentile indicate a balanced but slightly CPU-favored configuration. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19668 and the GPU's average score of 21629 show that the GPU actually has a higher raw score, but the GPU's percentile is lower due to a wider distribution of high-performing graphics cards. This system sits in the upper-mid range of desktop performance, suitable for professional and prosumer workloads rather than enthusiast gaming.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the TU104 chip using TSMC's 12 nm process, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The base clock is 1620 MHz with a boost clock of 1815 MHz, and memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The GPU's FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The card is dual-slot, measures 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height, and requires 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors, with a 230 W TDP and a suggested 550 W PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16.

Benchmark results show strong compute performance (Geekbench OpenCL 78999, Vulkan 92309) but inconsistent graphics scores. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 places the GPU at the 67th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 21629. The nearest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, is 1% faster, while the RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% slower. The DirectX scores are peculiar: DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59, suggesting the GPU performs better in legacy APIs than modern ones. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 is modest, indicating that raw compute throughput is not the GPU's primary strength despite the tensor cores.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's performance profile. The GPU's similarity to the GTX 1060 6 GB (1% slower in average benchmark score) suggests that gaming performance will closely track that card's capabilities. At 1080p resolution, the system should handle most titles at medium to high settings, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2366) ensuring that processor-bound scenarios are not limiting. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 140 versus DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates that older games may perform better than newer titles that rely on DirectX 12.

At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough memory bandwidth for higher resolutions, but the raw compute power (11.15 TFLOPS FP32) may limit frame rates in demanding games. The GPU's 67th percentile ranking places it below the median of high-end gaming GPUs, so 1440p gaming will likely require reduced settings for smooth gameplay. At 4K, the GPU will struggle with modern titles, as its performance tier aligns with a mid-range card from several generations ago.

The CPU's 3DMark scores show that it can feed the GPU adequately: the 16-thread score of 6007 and single-thread score of 951 indicate no CPU bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. However, the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 is concerning for future titles, as this API is now standard. Gamers should expect playable frame rates at 1080p in less demanding titles, but the Quadro RTX 5000 is not optimized for gaming, and its workstation drivers may not deliver the same performance optimizations as GeForce drivers. The estimated FPS figures should be treated as approximations, and the actual gaming experience will vary significantly by title and API.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12500

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds