SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12490F

20,802 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i5-12490F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER represents a desktop configuration that combines a mid-range, six-core processor with a high-end, Ada Lovelace-based graphics card. The GPU is positioned at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 74th percentile, creating a combined system percentile of 80. This analysis examines the benchmark data for both components, their relative performance strengths, and the practical implications for various workloads, with the caveat that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the raw benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The memory subsystem is substantial, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. The memory clock operates at 1438 MHz, which translates to 23 Gbps effective, and the base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz. These specifications position the card for high-resolution texture loading and large dataset handling in rendering workloads.

The GPU's compute resources include 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. For ray tracing, the card features 80 RT cores, and for AI-accelerated workloads, it includes 320 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate reaches 816.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 52.22 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these operations. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern graphics APIs used in professional rendering and gaming.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a passmark G3D score of 34,245, which is the primary measure of graphics performance. The passmark GPU compute score is 19,822, indicating strong parallel processing capability for compute-heavy tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,600, and Geekbench scores are 219,065 for OpenCL and 260,075 for Vulkan. These scores collectively place the GPU at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,209. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 0.1% behind the RTX 4080, 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, 2.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and 2.8% behind the AMD Radeon 8060S. This indicates the card performs near the top of its class but is not the absolute fastest in every metric.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB of VRAM, high bandwidth, and 80 RT cores means the card can handle complex scenes with ray-traced lighting and shadows. The 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides substantial raw compute for 3D rendering applications that rely on GPU acceleration. The tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based upscaling techniques, which can improve rendering efficiency in real-time applications. The GPU's power requirement is 320 W TDP, and it requires a 700 W suggested PSU, which should be considered when building a system around this card.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks show a range of performance across different threading scenarios. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 5,923 for 16 threads, 1,727 for 2 threads, 3,133 for 4 threads, 4,811 for 8 threads, 5,936 for max threads, and 946 for single-thread. The Cinebench scores are 1,742 for R15 multi-core and 245 for R15 single-core; 7,259 for R20 multi-core and 1,024 for R20 single-core; and 17,284 for R23 multi-core and 2,440 for R23 single-core. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 20,202, a single-thread score of 3,682, and various specialized scores including 237,304 for data compression, 12,018 for data encryption, 15,993 for extended instructions, 87 for prime numbers, 47,326 for floating-point math, 60,548 for integer math, 1,345 for physics, and 23,791 for random string sorting.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20,802, placing it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6325P with an average score of 20,821 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U with 20,826 (0.1% ahead), the AMD EPYC 7J13 with 20,845 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT with 20,733 (0.3% behind). These deltas are minimal, indicating the i5-12490F sits in a tightly contested performance band where differences between competitors are within fractional percentages.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 54,209, which is significantly higher than the CPU's average score, reflecting the disparity in their market tiers. The combined percentile of 80 suggests that when paired together, this system outperforms the majority of builds but does not reach the top echelon. The GPU's percentile of 86 is notably higher than the CPU's 74, indicating that the graphics card is the stronger component in this pairing. For workloads that are GPU-bound, such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the system will perform near the level of the GPU alone. For CPU-bound tasks, the processor's lower percentile will be more limiting, potentially creating a bottleneck in scenarios that require heavy single-thread or multi-thread processing.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-12490F is a desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake-S architecture. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The processor is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The thermal design power is 65 W, and it supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and it does not include integrated graphics. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported through the CPU multiplier.

The benchmark results indicate a balanced performer for its core count. The 3DMark single-thread score of 946 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,440 demonstrate solid single-thread performance, which is crucial for legacy applications and games that rely on one or two cores. The multi-thread scores, such as Cinebench R23 multi-core of 17,284 and PassMark multi-thread of 20,202, show that the CPU scales reasonably well with additional threads, though the six-core configuration limits absolute throughput compared to higher-core-count processors. The PassMark data compression score of 237,304 and integer math score of 60,548 indicate strong performance in data manipulation tasks, while the floating-point math score of 47,326 suggests adequate capability for scientific computing.

The CPU's 74th percentile ranking places it in the upper-middle tier of all processors. The nearest rival comparisons show that the i5-12490F is virtually tied with several other CPUs, including the Xeon 6325P and the Core Ultra 5 125U, with performance deltas of only 0.1%. This indicates that for most real-world workloads, the processor performs on par with these alternatives. The lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is mandatory, which is already present in this build configuration. For software development, the 12 threads can handle compilation tasks efficiently, and the 20 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. For office work and productivity applications, the single-thread performance is more than adequate, while the multi-thread scores support multitasking scenarios with multiple applications running concurrently.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 80, indicating that this desktop build outperforms 80% of all configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54,209, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080's score of 54,247, making the two cards essentially equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 946 in 3DMark single-thread and 2,440 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while achieving 5,936 in 3DMark max threads and 17,284 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, showing a significant scaling across thread counts.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-12490F does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the specifications.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, while the GPU uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the RTX 4080 SUPER's 86th percentile ranking and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance will drive high frame rates, though the CPU's 74th percentile may limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM accommodates high-resolution textures, and the 80 RT cores enable ray-traced effects without significant performance penalties. Estimated FPS figures are not available, but the GPU's benchmark scores suggest it can handle demanding titles at high settings.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the GPU's tensor cores for encoding and AI-based enhancements, while the CPU's 12 threads handle multitasking between the game, streaming software, and chat applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 20,202 indicates sufficient parallel processing for encoding tasks, and the GPU's compute score of 19,822 supports video processing acceleration.

Video editing workloads rely on both components. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K footage and effects, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,284 provides rendering power for timeline playback and export. The data compression score of 237,304 suggests efficient handling of video codecs.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya will leverage the GPU's 10,240 shading units and 320 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI denoising. The 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance is critical for viewport interactivity and final frame rendering, with the CPU's 20 MB L3 cache aiding scene management.

Software development tasks such as compilation and testing are primarily CPU-bound. The i5-12490F's 12 threads and 4.60 GHz boost clock provide responsive build times, as evidenced by the PassMark integer math score of 60,548 and extended instructions score of 15,993. The GPU is underutilized but available for testing graphics applications.

Student and office work, including document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, are well-served by the CPU's single-thread score of 3,682 in PassMark. The 65 W TDP ensures low power consumption for extended use, though the GPU's 320 W TDP means the system is not particularly energy-efficient under load.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers seeking high-end graphics performance at 1440p or 4K resolutions. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM ensure compatibility with modern game requirements, while the CPU provides adequate support without becoming a major bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the GPU's compute and rendering capabilities, with the CPU handling non-GPU tasks like asset management and application logic.

Software developers can use this build for full-stack development, mobile app creation, and game development. The CPU's multi-thread performance supports parallel builds, and the GPU enables testing of graphics-intensive applications. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU and PCIe 4.0 on the GPU provide fast data transfer for development tools and asset pipelines.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital arts programs will find this system capable of running specialized software like CAD tools, simulation environments, and creative suites. The CPU's 74th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile provide a balanced platform for academic projects that require both processing and graphics power.

Small business workstations for tasks like data analysis, financial modeling, or video production can leverage this build's performance. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 12,018 and floating-point math score of 47,326 support secure transactions and numerical computations, while the GPU accelerates any visualization needs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This platform provides flexibility for memory choices, though the specific motherboard determines which memory type is supported. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring compatibility with the current graphics card and leaving room for future expansion.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 700 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W, meaning a 700 W power supply provides adequate headroom for the current components. The GPU requires a 16-pin power connector, and it is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, so case compatibility must be verified.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more cores or higher single-thread performance, as the GPU is the stronger component and could benefit from a more powerful processor in CPU-bound scenarios. The socket 1700 platform supports newer 12th Gen and potentially 13th Gen processors, though the specific compatibility depends on the motherboard BIOS. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a successor in the GeForce 50 series, as the RTX 4080 SUPER is marked as end-of-life with a successor already announced. The 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth are current standards, but future games may require more memory or bandwidth.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-12490F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, creating a system that balances a mid-range processor with a high-end graphics card. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S processor with a 4.60 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace card with 16 GB GDDR6X memory, 10,240 shading units, and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper tier of all builds, with the GPU's 86th percentile being the primary driver of overall performance.

The CPU's 74th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile indicate a performance gap between the two components, with the GPU being significantly more powerful relative to its peers. This configuration is best suited for workloads that are GPU-intensive, such as gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering, and video editing, where the GPU's capabilities can be fully utilized. The CPU provides sufficient performance for system operations, game logic, and general multitasking, though it may struggle in scenarios requiring extreme multi-threaded processing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU creates a potential bottleneck in certain workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 54,209 is more than 2.5 times the CPU's score of 20,802, indicating that the GPU is the dominant component. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming or ray-traced rendering, the GPU will operate at near-full utilization, and the CPU will have adequate headroom to handle game logic and physics without limiting frame rates.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios, the situation reverses. Games that rely heavily on single-thread performance, such as esports titles at 1080p with low graphics settings, may be limited by the CPU's single-thread scores. The 3DMark single-thread score of 946 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,440 are solid but not exceptional, meaning the CPU could cap frame rates in these scenarios. Similarly, applications that use many threads, such as video encoding or scientific simulations, will be limited by the CPU's six-core, 12-thread configuration, as the GPU cannot compensate for processor throughput.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests that at lower resolutions where the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck, the system's performance will be closer to the CPU's percentile of 74. At higher resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor, performance will approach the GPU's percentile of 86. This means the system is balanced for high-resolution gaming but may underperform expectations in CPU-intensive tasks at lower resolutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 and passmark G3D score of 34,245 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for modern games. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 4,811 and max-thread score of 5,936 suggest adequate multi-threaded support for game engines.

For 1080p gaming, the estimated frame rates will be limited by the CPU in many titles, as the GPU is capable of producing very high frame rates that the processor may not be able to feed. The CPU's single-thread score of 946 in 3DMark and 2,440 in Cinebench R23 indicate moderate single-thread performance, which could result in frame rate caps in CPU-intensive games.

At 1440p, the system becomes more balanced, with the GPU handling the increased resolution and the CPU providing sufficient support. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth ensure that high-resolution textures load quickly, and the 80 RT cores enable ray-traced effects at playable frame rates.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the system's performance will be closer to the GPU's 86th percentile. The 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides substantial compute for 4K rendering, but the CPU's 74th percentile is less likely to limit frame rates at this resolution, as the GPU is typically the limiting factor. The estimated frame rates at 4K will be lower than at 1440p but still high enough for a smooth gaming experience in most titles, assuming the game is not overly CPU-intensive.