SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12490F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12490F

20,802 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12490F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is an unusual combination: a 65 W six-core Alder Lake desktop CPU sitting alongside a 304 W RDNA 4 flagship-class GPU. The pairing lands at a combined percentile of 65 across tracked builds, with the CPU holding a 74th percentile position among all CPUs and the GPU at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. No measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact pairing — all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than recorded gameplay, and is flagged as such throughout.

Gaming Performance

To be explicit up front: this database contains no measuredFps rows for the Core i5-12490F plus RX 9070 XT combination, so the figures gamers care about — average and minimum frame rates by game and resolution — must be inferred qualitatively from the benchmark scores. dataIsMeasured is flagged false for this build, and pairRankByFps is likewise absent.

What can be said with confidence is directional. The RX 9070 XT's compute profile — 48.66 TFLOPS FP32, a 26,795 PassMark G3D score, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 7,260 — places it in territory where 1440p and 4K ultra-settings gaming is the realistic use case. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth mean texture-heavy titles are unlikely to be memory-constrained even at 4K with high-resolution asset packs.

The CPU side is the open question. A single-thread PassMark score of 3,682 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,440 are respectable mainstream results, but a six-core, twelve-thread CPU with a 4.60 GHz boost is not a flagship gaming processor. Estimated frame behavior would likely split by resolution: at 4K ultra, where the GPU is the limiter, frame rates should track the RX 9070 XT's capability closely; at 1080p and high refresh rates, the i5-12490F's six cores would more plausibly become the constraint in CPU-bound titles such as large-scale strategy games, simulators, and competitive shooters where draw calls and physics scale with single-thread throughput. These are estimates from benchmark data, not measured results, and should be treated accordingly.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate picture is coherent: an average benchmark score of 20,802 across the test suite, good for the 74th percentile of all tracked CPUs. The scaling across thread counts is informative. In 3DMark CPU tests, the i5-12490F scores 946 single-threaded, 1,727 at two threads, 3,133 at four, 4,811 at eight, 5,923 at sixteen, and 5,936 at maximum threads. The near-identical sixteen-thread and max-thread scores — a difference of just 13 points — confirm that twelve logical threads saturate the chip; anything beyond that yields nothing. Scaling from one to four threads is strong, at over three times the single-thread score, but the jump from eight threads (4,811) to twelve (5,923) shows diminishing returns typical of a six-core design sharing resources across hyperthreads.

Cinebench tells the same story across generations: R15 multi-core at 1,742 against 245 single-core, R20 at 7,259 versus 1,024, and R23 at 17,284 versus 2,440. The multi-to-single ratio in R23 sits near seven, which is healthy for a 6C/12T part and suggests SMT is pulling real weight in heavily threaded renders. PassMark multithread lands at 20,202.

The nearest-rival data is where things get curious. The i5-12490F's average score of 20,802 is within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Xeon 6325P (20,821, -0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (20,826, -0.1%), and the AMD EPYC 7J13 (20,845, -0.2%), and slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT (20,733, +0.3%). That the desktop i5 clusters with a laptop-class Ultra chip and a server EPYC in aggregate score is a reminder that averaged benchmarks flatten very different architectural profiles into one number.

On the GPU side, the RX 9070 XT posts an average score of 13,543 at the 55th percentile of all GPUs. The suite spans a 7,260 Steel Nomad DX12 score, 65,879 in Geekbench Vulkan against 17,428 in Geekbench OpenCL, and a PassMark GPU compute score of 15,864. Its nearest rivals by average score are an eclectic set — the AMD Radeon HD 7770M at 13,536 (+0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 at 13,515 (+0.2%), the NVIDIA P106-090 at 13,470 (+0.5%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 555 at 13,407 (+1%). The database's averaging method evidently mixes very different test weightings, since these aggregate-level ties do not reflect the enormous raw-specification gulf; the per-test scores above are the more meaningful signal.

GPU Analysis

The RX 9070 XT is built on the Navi 48 die, RDNA 4.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. It packs 53,900 million transistors into a 357 mm² die, working out to a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimetre. The shader engine comprises 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units, with 64 dedicated ray-tracing cores. Notably, the tensor-core field is null — RDNA 4.0 takes a different approach to AI acceleration than its competition, which matters for workloads that expect tensor hardware.

Clock behavior is aggressive: a 1,660 MHz base, a 2,400 MHz game clock, and a 2,970 MHz boost. Those clocks drive a pixel fill rate of 380.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s. The memory subsystem is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus running at 2,518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective), delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. FP32 throughput is 48.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio of the same figure.

What do the benchmark scores imply for rendering? The Geekbench split is the most revealing number: 65,879 in Vulkan against 17,428 in OpenCL. That gap suggests the card is dramatically stronger when software targets its native low-overhead API path — a Vulkan-optimized render engine would extract far more from this GPU than an OpenCL-legacy pipeline. The PassMark G3D score of 26,795 and DX12 score of 78 point toward strong modern-API gaming performance, while the 15,864 GPU compute score indicates solid general-purpose compute. With 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, scene complexity and 4K texture sets are unlikely to be the binding constraint in production rendering.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh 1080p gaming: Estimated, not measured — but the data pattern suggests caution. The i5-12490F's single-thread scores (PassMark 3,682, Cinebench R23 2,440) are solid rather than elite, and six cores can bottleneck high-refresh competitive titles. The RX 9070 XT would be underutilized here.

1440p and 4K ultra gaming: This is where the pairing makes sense on paper. With the GPU doing the heavy lifting — 48.66 TFLOPS, 16 GB VRAM, a 7,260 Steel Nomad score — estimated frame rates should be GPU-bound and comfortably high at ultra settings, with the CPU rarely the limiter at these resolutions.

Streaming: Mixed verdict. The 5,923 sixteen-thread 3DMark score confirms twelve threads are fully used by encoding plus gaming simultaneously, but there is no headroom beyond that. A single-PC stream setup would work, with the caveat that game plus encoder may saturate all logical cores in demanding titles.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,284 and the 16 GB of GPU VRAM support a capable 1080p and 1440p editing workstation; timeline scrubbing and GPU-accelerated effects benefit from the 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Heavy 4K multicam workloads would press against the six-core ceiling.

3D rendering: Viable but not fast. R20 multi-core at 7,259 and R23 at 17,284 place this in mid-tier render territory. The Geekbench Vulkan compute score of 65,879 suggests renderers targeting Vulkan could extract significantly more than the CPU alone delivers.

Software development: Strong fit. The 3,682 PassMark single-thread score handles compilation's serial phases well, twelve threads serve parallel builds adequately, and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support is standard for a dev box. The 74th-percentile CPU position exceeds what most development workloads demand.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best way. Documents, browsing, and web apps barely dent the single-thread headroom, and the combined 65th percentile guarantees years of comfortable general-purpose use.

CPU Analysis

The i5-12490F is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S processor on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 163 mm² die. It runs a 3.00 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost, carries 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and shares 20 MB of L3 cache. The TDP is 65 W, the socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the multiplier is locked — no overclocking.

The benchmark profile reads as a classic strong-mainstream chip. Single-thread results (946 in 3DMark, 2,440 in Cinebench R23) are close behind what games and most consumer software actually need, while the PassMark breakdown shows where the silicon flexes: 60,548 in integer math, 47,326 in floating point, 237,304 in data compression, 12,018 in encryption, and 23,791 in string sorting. The find-prime-numbers score of 87 and physics score of 1,345 indicate per-core throughput that keeps interactive workloads responsive. Extended instructions score 15,993, pointing to competent SIMD utilization.

What does this mean in practice? The 74th-percentile placement says the chip outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs in the database — a strong showing for a 65 W six-core. But the thread-count scaling curve flattens hard after eight threads, so workloads that scale infinitely (rendering, batch transcoding, scientific compute) will outrun it on higher-core rivals. The lack of integrated graphics (the field is null) means the RX 9070 XT is the only display path — worth remembering for troubleshooting.

Who Should Build It

The target builder here is a 1440p or 4K gamer who already owns or has access to an RX 9070 XT and wants a CPU that won't embarrass it at GPU-bound resolutions. Content creators working at 1080p/1440p — video editors, streamers, hobbyist 3D artists — get a machine whose R23 multi-core score of 17,284 and 16 GB of GPU VRAM handle mainstream production software, though professional render farms should look elsewhere.

Software developers and students are arguably the best pure-value fit: the strong single-thread numbers, twelve threads, and dual-channel DDR5 support cover compilation, containers, and everyday work with room to spare. Small businesses building workstations for office productivity, light media work, or analysis will find the 74th-percentile CPU more than sufficient and the ECC-absent platform acceptable for non-critical data. What this build is not: a flagship esports rig chasing maximum frames at 1080p, where the six-core CPU is the estimated limiter, or a multi-GPU rendering box.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 65 masks a component imbalance. The CPU sits at the 74th percentile of all CPUs; the GPU at the 55th percentile of all GPUs — yet by raw capability, the RX 9070 XT (48.66 TFLOPS, 304 W, 16 GB VRAM) is the far more powerful piece of silicon, and its average score is dragged down by the database's mixed-test averaging against legacy parts like the Radeon HD 7770M and GeForce GTX 570.

The realistic bottleneck pattern, inferred from the scores since no measured FPS exists: at 4K ultra the GPU limits, and the i5-12490F's single-thread performance is largely irrelevant. At 1440p, the two are roughly matched. At 1080p high-refresh, the CPU's six cores and 4.60 GHz boost become the estimated constraint — the 3DMark single-thread score of 946 and physics score of 1,345 define the frame-rate ceiling regardless of GPU headroom. Streaming adds load the CPU can absorb but not spare: the sixteen-thread and max-thread scores differing by only 13 points means there is nothing left above twelve threads. A builder intending to game primarily at 1080p would get more balanced performance from a stronger CPU with this GPU, or this CPU with a lighter GPU.

FAQ

Q: Are the FPS numbers in this article measured?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this pairing; dataIsMeasured is false and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty. All frame-rate discussion is estimated from CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: 1440p and 4K ultra gaming. The RX 9070 XT's 48.66 TFLOPS, 16 GB of GDDR6, and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth make it a high-resolution card, while the CPU's strengths matter less at GPU-bound resolutions.

Q: Can the Core i5-12490F be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is unlocked: false, so the 4.60 GHz boost clock is the ceiling.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics as a fallback?

A: No. The integrated graphics field is null, so all display output must come from the RX 9070 XT via its one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs.

Q: How does the i5-12490F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average score of 20,802 is within 0.1% of the Intel Xeon 6325P (20,821) and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (20,826), 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7J13 (20,845), and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT (20,733).

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The RX 9070 XT's suggested PSU is 700 W. The GPU itself draws 304 W via two 8-pin connectors, while the CPU's TDP is only 65 W.

Q: What was the RX 9070 XT's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP was 599 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a mainstream 12th-generation Intel six-core with an RDNA 4.0 high-end Radeon GPU. The overall tier, per the database's combined percentile of 65, sits above the median of tracked systems — a mid-to-upper-tier gaming and light-production machine, held back from a higher tier primarily by the CPU's thread count rather than any GPU weakness. The CPU alone ranks at the 74th percentile of all CPUs; the GPU's 55th percentile figure reflects aggregate-score averaging against legacy hardware more than its competitive position, which the Steel Nomad and Vulkan scores describe more accurately.

The CPU is an Active-production Alder Lake-S part on the 10 nm Intel process, while the GPU is an Active-production Navi 48 die on TSMC's 4 nm node, released March 5, 2025 per its release-date field. Together they form a build whose defining characteristic is asymmetry: workstation-tier graphics attached to a solidly mainstream processor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, which supports the i5-12490F's DDR4 and DDR5 memory options on a dual-channel bus — a useful flexibility, since a builder can start on DDR4 and the platform accepts DDR5 boards depending on the motherboard chosen. PCIe is well covered: the CPU provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface matches it, so no interface bottleneck exists between CPU and graphics.

Power headroom is the practical constraint to plan around. With a 65 W CPU TDP and a 304 W GPU fed by two 8-pin connectors, the suggested 700 W PSU leaves comfortable margin — but a future CPU upgrade within Socket 1700 to a higher-TDP Alder Lake or Raptor Lake part would eat into it, making 700 W the sensible floor rather than an over-spec. The natural upgrade sequence the data supports: first, the CPU, since six cores are the estimated limiter at high-refresh resolutions and Socket 1700 accepts drop-in replacements; second, memory, moving to DDR5 dual-channel if starting from DDR4; the GPU, at 48.66 TFLOPS with 16 GB VRAM, is the component least in need of replacement for years. The card's dual-slot format and modern output set (one HDMI 2.1b, three DisplayPort 2.1a, DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4) keep it current on the display and API side for the foreseeable upgrade cycle.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12490F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12490F

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds