SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
83%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12450H

17,239 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12450H and AMD Radeon RX 7600M form a mobile hardware pairing that targets the upper-midrange of the laptop market. The processor, built on Intel’s Alder Lake architecture, combines eight cores with twelve threads, while the graphics solution, based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, delivers a substantial performance tier. The combined system’s benchmark data shows a pairing that is well-positioned for demanding tasks, though the lack of measured frame rate data means gaming expectations must be derived from synthetic scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12450H is a mobile processor from the Core 12th Gen series, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 217 mm². It features eight physical cores and twelve threads, operating at a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. This configuration, part of the Alder Lake-H codename family, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The processor has a TDP of 45 W and is socketed for Intel BGA 1744, with PCIe Gen 4 connectivity providing 20 lanes from the CPU alone.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. The 3DMark tests reveal a score of 912 in single-thread, which rises to 1743 in 2-thread, 3091 in 4-thread, 4233 in 8-thread, and peaks at 5020 in max-thread tests. This progression indicates efficient utilization of additional cores up to the 8-thread mark, with the max-thread score of 5020 only marginally higher than the 8-thread result. The 16-thread score of 5001 reinforces that the processor’s scaling plateaus after eight threads, consistent with its 8-core, 12-thread design. For real workloads, this means tasks that leverage up to eight threads will see near-linear gains, while heavily threaded applications beyond that point will experience diminishing returns.

Cinebench scores provide further insight into both single and multi-core capability. The R23 multi-core score of 8822.5 and single-core score of 1661 indicate a processor that handles both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks competently. The R20 results show 5671 multi-core and 800 single-core, while R15 yields 1350 multi-core and 238 single-core. These scores place the CPU in a percentile of 71 against all CPUs, suggesting it outperforms roughly 71% of the processors in the database. The average benchmark score of 17239 places it in close competition with several rivals: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17278 with a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Core i5-11400F scores 17177 with a delta of +0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 3 210 scores 17321 with a delta of -0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 scores 17333 with a delta of -0.5%. These tiny percentage differences mean the i5-12450H is statistically indistinguishable from these alternatives in overall CPU performance.

PassMark tests detail specialized workloads. The processor scores 195132 in data compression, 10832 in data encryption, 11992 in extended instructions, and 46 in prime number finding. Floating-point math reaches 40568, integer math hits 54782, and random string sorting achieves 20838. The multithread score of 16265 and single-thread score of 3306 round out the picture. These figures suggest strong performance in data-heavy tasks like compression and sorting, with more modest results in encryption and prime number calculations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 17239 places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, a solid mid-to-upper tier position. Its nearest rivals demonstrate that this performance level is well-established in the market. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is essentially tied at 17278, the Intel Core i5-11400F sits fractionally behind at 17177, and both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 5 4500 are within half a percent ahead at 17321 and 17333 respectively. This clustering indicates that the i5-12450H delivers performance that is highly competitive with several desktop-class processors, despite being a mobile part.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7600M, belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and is built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture. Its benchmark score, derived from Geekbench OpenCL, is 63775, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. This is a notably high position, far above the CPU’s 71st percentile. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63830 with a delta of -0.1%, the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63842 with a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 with a delta of +0.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64212 with a delta of -0.7%. Again, the deltas are minimal, meaning the RX 7600M sits in a very tight performance cluster with these other graphics cards.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 80% of all configurations in the database. This combined figure is higher than the CPU’s individual percentile but lower than the GPU’s, reflecting the balanced nature of the pairing where the graphics card is the stronger component. The average benchmark scores tell the story: the CPU delivers solid mid-range performance, while the GPU provides upper-tier graphics capability. For users, this means the system is likely to excel in graphics-intensive workloads while remaining competent in CPU-bound tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking against all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-12450H sits in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17239.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, a difference of only -0.1%.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of all configurations in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-12450H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Which component has the higher individual percentile, CPU or GPU?

A: The GPU is stronger, sitting in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 71st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the difference in average score between the CPU and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500?

A: The i5-12450H scores 17239, while the Ryzen 5 4500 scores 17333, meaning the Ryzen is 0.5% ahead.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a system where the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 71st percentile means that in graphics-intensive workloads, the Radeon RX 7600M will be the primary driver of performance. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 5020 and single-thread score of 912 suggest it can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios, but the percentile gap suggests that the CPU could become a limiting factor in certain situations.

For CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations or data compression, the processor will be the constraint. The PassMark physics score of 883 and the multithread score of 16265 show a capable but not exceptional processor. In contrast, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 17.27 TFLOPS and texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s indicate high graphical throughput. The balance point appears to be in gaming, where the GPU’s strength in pixel and texture processing will typically outpace the CPU’s ability to prepare frames, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU workload intensifies.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the percentile positions. In scenarios where the GPU is heavily utilized, such as 1440p or 4K gaming, the RX 7600M will likely be the bottleneck, as its performance ceiling is the limiting factor. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance of 912 in 3DMark single-thread and 1661 in Cinebench R23 single-core becomes more relevant, and the processor may constrain frame rates in less graphically demanding titles. The data suggests a system that is well-balanced for high-resolution gaming but may show CPU limitations in esports or older titles at low settings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured but rather derived from the synthetic performance figures. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 suggest strong graphical capability, while the CPU’s 71st percentile indicates adequate processing power. Based on these scores, the pairing should handle modern games at high settings in 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

The GPU’s specifications support this assessment. With 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, the RX 7600M has the raw resources for detailed rendering. Its 28 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate mean it is prepared for modern graphics APIs. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for current game textures at 1080p and most 1440p scenarios. The pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can fill frames rapidly.

Estimated frame rates would likely be high at 1080p in most titles, with the GPU’s performance ceiling being the primary factor. At 1440p, the system should still deliver playable frame rates, though the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute capacity may become more stressed. For esports titles, the CPU’s single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark and 1661 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can keep up with high-refresh-rate demands, though the lack of measured data means these are qualitative estimates. The absence of measured FPS rows means these figures should be treated as projections based on the synthetic benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is a strong use case for this pairing. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the CPU’s solid single-thread performance of 1661 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggest the system can drive high frame rates in competitive titles, though the lack of measured FPS data tempers this assessment. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1743 indicates good responsiveness for game logic and physics.

Streaming while gaming would rely on the CPU’s multi-threading capabilities. The 8-core, 12-thread design, evidenced by Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8822.5, provides enough headroom for encoding alongside gameplay, though the 45 W TDP may limit sustained performance in a laptop chassis.

Video editing benefits from both components. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 195132 handles video codecs efficiently, while the GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and rendering. The 12 MB L3 cache helps with large media files.

3D rendering workloads will favor the GPU heavily. The RX 7600M’s 89th percentile ranking and its FP32 throughput make it well-suited for GPU-accelerated renderers, while the CPU’s Cinebench scores indicate it can handle CPU-based rendering tasks competently.

Software development leverages the CPU’s integer math score of 54782 and extended instructions score of 11992, which handle compilation and code execution. The 12 threads provide parallel compilation capability, and the DDR5 memory support enables fast data access.

Student and office work is well within this system’s capabilities. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3306 in PassMark single-thread ensures snappy response in productivity applications, while the GPU’s capabilities are largely unused in these tasks but available for any graphics work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12450H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU itself is not upgradeable. The system supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in memory choice, though the specific implementation depends on the laptop manufacturer. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for storage and peripheral devices.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is also a mobile component, integrated into the laptop with no upgrade path. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface ensures full bandwidth to the CPU. The GPU has a TDP of 90 W, and the system’s power delivery must accommodate this alongside the CPU’s 45 W TDP, suggesting a combined thermal load that requires adequate cooling.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would involve increasing memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 support can be maximized. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are also possible, given the CPU’s 20 available lanes. The GPU’s lack of a suggested PSU rating, combined with its 90 W TDP, indicates that power headroom is not a primary concern for a laptop design, as the power delivery is fixed by the manufacturer.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12450H processor with the AMD Radeon RX 7600M graphics card. The CPU is an eight-core, twelve-thread mobile processor from Intel’s Alder Lake generation, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 architecture part from AMD’s Radeon RX 7000 series. The pairing achieves a combined percentile of 80, placing it in the upper tier of all systems in the database.

The individual components show a clear hierarchy: the GPU is the stronger performer, sitting in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. This means the system is graphically dominant, with the CPU providing adequate but not exceptional processing power. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 63775 is a significant contributor to the system’s overall position, while the CPU’s 17239 average score is respectable but not leading-edge.

As a laptop configuration, this build is designed for portability without sacrificing performance. The 45 W CPU TDP and 90 W GPU TDP indicate a balance between performance and thermal management. The system’s overall tier, as indicated by the 80th combined percentile, makes it suitable for demanding applications, particularly those that leverage GPU acceleration.

Who Should Build It

Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or solid 1440p performance will find this pairing compelling, given the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the CPU’s adequate single-thread score of 1661 in Cinebench R23. The lack of measured FPS data means these users should expect strong but not guaranteed frame rates based on the synthetic scores.

Content creators working with video or 3D graphics will benefit from the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS and the CPU’s multi-core score of 8822.5 in Cinebench R23. The combination handles both GPU-accelerated and CPU-based rendering workflows effectively.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 54782 and its 12 threads for parallel builds. The DDR5 memory support enables fast compilation and testing cycles, while the GPU can accelerate any graphics or compute tasks in development.

Students and professionals in office environments will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, with the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3306 ensuring responsive application use. The GPU’s capabilities are available for any presentation or design work, though not strictly necessary for basic productivity.

Small business users running data analysis or moderate graphical workloads will find the CPU’s data compression score of 195132 and the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s valuable for processing large datasets. The system’s 80th combined percentile indicates it can handle a wide range of professional tasks without significant bottlenecks.