SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

75%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400T

4,019 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400T and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation form a compact desktop pairing that prioritizes efficiency and professional-grade rendering over raw gaming brute force. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Alder Lake-S part with a 35 W TDP, delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13234, placing it at the 57th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 6144 shading units and 20 GB of GDDR6 memory, achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812, landing in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Together, this system targets a niche where low power draw and workstation-class compute matter more than high-refresh gaming, though it retains enough capability for moderate gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400T is a power-sipping desktop processor built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process node. It pairs 6 physical cores with 12 threads via Hyper-Threading, running at a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is unusual for a desktop part because the 35 W TDP is far below typical desktop processors, meaning sustained multi-threaded workloads will be limited by power and thermal headroom rather than core count.

Benchmark results confirm this trade-off. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 13234 points in multi-core and 1868 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is respectable for a 6-core part, but the single-core score of 1868 indicates strong per-thread performance that benefits from the 4.2 GHz boost clock. For real workloads, this means the 12400T handles lightly threaded tasks like web browsing and office documents with ease, while heavier tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering will see performance drop off as the chip hits its 35 W power envelope. The Geekbench scores of 7144 multi-core and 2044 single-core reinforce this pattern: strong single-thread behavior, adequate multi-thread throughput, but not class-leading for heavily parallel workloads.

The nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G scores an average of 4010, which is 0.2% lower than the 12400T's average benchmark score of 4019. The Intel Xeon E-2278G scores 4052, putting it 0.8% ahead, while the Xeon E-2336 trails by 0.9% with a score of 3985. These deltas are tiny, meaning the 12400T sits in a crowded mid-range performance band where architectural differences matter less than power efficiency. The 12400T's advantage is its 35 W TDP, which allows it to be cooled by a passive or low-profile cooler in small form factor builds, something the higher-power Xeon parts cannot match.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from actual gameplay testing. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 109364 suggests strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, while the CPU's single-core scores indicate it will not bottleneck modern game engines that rely on a few fast threads.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should deliver smooth frame rates in most titles, though the 160-bit memory bus and 20 GB GDDR6 at 14 Gbps effective are more suited to professional workloads than high-refresh gaming. Estimated performance at 1440p ultra would be lower, but still playable for many games. At 4K, the GPU's compute power will be stretched, and the 64 ROPs may limit fill-rate-heavy scenes. The CPU's 4.2 GHz boost clock ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, but the 35 W TDP means sustained gaming sessions could cause clock throttling in CPU-bound scenes. These are estimates only; actual FPS will vary by game and driver optimization.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not the ideal build for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. The CPU's single-core score of 1868 in Cinebench R23 is adequate, but the GPU's workstation orientation and 70 W TDP suggest it prioritizes compute over raw rasterization speed. Expect decent 1080p performance, but frame rates may fall short of high-refresh targets in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 12 threads and UHD Graphics 730 iGPU provide some headroom for encoding, but the 35 W TDP limits simultaneous gaming and streaming. The GPU's 192 tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding, but the lack of measured FPS data makes this uncertain. For occasional streaming, the system will cope, but dedicated streamers should look elsewhere.

Video editing: The 20 GB VRAM on the GPU is a standout feature for video editing, allowing large timelines and 4K/8K footage to reside in memory. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5558 indicates adequate performance for proxy editing, though color grading and effects will rely heavily on the GPU's 6144 shading units.

3D rendering: This is where the system shines. The GPU's 48 RT cores and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance are built for ray tracing and compute-heavy renders. The 20 GB VRAM handles large scenes without spillover, and the CPU's 13234 Cinebench R23 score ensures geometry processing keeps pace. Expect render times that rival much larger systems.

Software development: The 6 cores and 12 threads handle compilation tasks reasonably well, with the Geekbench multi-core score of 7144 indicating solid throughput. The single-core score of 2044 is sufficient for IDE responsiveness. The 18 MB L3 cache aids in code locality, but the 35 W TDP means long build times will cause the chip to run at lower clocks.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU's single-core performance accelerates spreadsheet calculations and browser tabs, while the GPU's power is wasted on document editing. The low TDP means quiet operation and low electricity use, making it a good fit for a dorm room or small office where noise and heat are concerns.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals who need workstation-grade GPU compute in a small form factor. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 20 GB VRAM and 48 RT cores make it ideal for 3D artists, architects, and video editors who work with large models or high-resolution footage. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms its high-end positioning, while the CPU's 57th percentile ranking shows it is a mid-range partner. This asymmetry means the build is best suited for GPU-bound workloads like rendering, simulation, or AI inference, where the CPU's lower throughput is less critical.

Gamers at 1080p will find the system capable but not exceptional, with estimated frame rates that are playable but not competitive with dedicated gaming GPUs. Content creators who prioritize GPU acceleration over CPU rendering will appreciate the balance. Developers working on shader compilation or physics simulations will benefit from the CUDA cores, though the 35 W CPU TDP limits compile speed. Small businesses needing a quiet, low-power workstation for CAD or video processing will find the 70 W GPU and 35 W CPU combination easy to cool and house in compact cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is GPU-dominant, with the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scoring in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 57th percentile. This gap means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most workloads that use it heavily, such as rendering or machine learning, because the CPU can feed it data quickly enough. The CPU's single-core score of 1868 in Cinebench R23 is strong, so it will not bottleneck the GPU in single-threaded tasks like game physics or UI rendering.

However, the 35 W TDP on the CPU creates a different bottleneck. In multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or software compilation, the CPU will hit its power limit long before the GPU is fully utilized. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13234 is respectable, but a higher-TDP CPU would push that number higher. The GPU's 70 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU mean the system draws very little power overall, but this efficiency comes at the cost of CPU performance headroom. For workloads that are CPU-bound, such as single-threaded game logic or light scripting, the 4.2 GHz boost clock mitigates the issue, but sustained all-core loads will see clocks drop.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation-focused GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. The base clock is 720 MHz with a boost clock of 1560 MHz, producing 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate. Memory consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding 280.0 GB/s bandwidth at 14 Gbps effective.

This memory configuration is unusual: 20 GB is generous for a 160-bit bus, but the 280 GB/s bandwidth is modest compared to gaming GPUs with wider buses. This trade-off favors capacity over speed, making the card excellent for loading large datasets or textures but less ideal for high-bandwidth gaming scenarios. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, and the FP16 performance matches FP32 at 19.17 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 places it at the 95th percentile, barely trailing the NVIDIA GB10 by 0.3% and the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 by 1.6%, while leading the Tesla V100 SXM2 by 2.4% and RTX A5500 Mobile by 2.8%.

For rendering, the GPU's compute power and VRAM capacity are the key strengths. The 20 GB frame buffer allows complex scenes with high-resolution textures to fit entirely in memory, avoiding PCIe spillover. The RT cores accelerate ray-traced shadows and reflections, while the tensor cores speed up denoising. The 70 W TDP and dual-slot design with no power connectors make it a drop-in upgrade for small workstations, and the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means users can choose between cheaper DDR4 or faster DDR5, and the platform supports both current and previous-generation GPUs. The motherboard socket allows upgrades to higher-TDP 12th-gen parts, but the 35 W TDP of the 12400T suggests the system was designed for power efficiency, so a high-core-count CPU would require adequate cooling and power delivery.

The GPU uses a standard PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and has a suggested PSU rating of 250 W, which is low for a workstation GPU. The 70 W TDP and lack of power connectors mean it draws all power from the PCIe slot, making it compatible with almost any power supply. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase CPU performance by swapping to a higher-TDP 12th-gen i7 or i9, which would improve multi-threaded scores beyond the current 13234 in Cinebench R23. Alternatively, adding more system memory (the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4/DDR5) would benefit memory-sensitive workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs or NVMe drives could reach higher bandwidths, though the current GPU only uses PCIe 4.0.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance compared to its multi-core performance?

A: The CPU scores 1868 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 13234 in multi-core, showing strong single-thread performance that is about 7x faster than its multi-thread result, indicating good per-core efficiency.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is ample for large datasets but lower bandwidth than typical gaming GPUs.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 64 ROPs suggest moderate 4K performance, but the 160-bit memory bus may limit frame rates in high-resolution textures; estimates are uncertain because no measured FPS data exists.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 250 W, and the GPU has a 70 W TDP with no power connectors, so it draws power solely from the PCIe slot.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-12400T has ECC memory support set to false, so it only works with non-ECC DDR4 or DDR5 memory.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 117088 is 0.3% lower than the NVIDIA GB10, 1.6% lower than the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, and 2.4% and 2.8% higher than the Tesla V100 SXM2 and RTX A5500 Mobile, respectively.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and die size?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm², while the GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process with a die size of 294 mm².

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance is best understood by examining the individual component scores. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 4019, placing it at the 57th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G, scores 4010, a 0.2% difference, while the Intel Xeon E-2278G leads by 0.8% with 4052. The CPU's best result is its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1868, which is strong for a 35 W part, while its Geekbench multi-core score of 7144 shows balanced throughput.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 117088, placing it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 is 0.3% below the NVIDIA GB10 and 1.6% below the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, but it leads the Tesla V100 SXM2 by 2.4% and the RTX A5500 Mobile by 2.8%. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109364 is lower than OpenCL, indicating the card performs better in compute-heavy workloads than in graphics-oriented APIs. Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system percentile of 76, reflecting a build that excels in GPU-accelerated tasks but is held back by a mid-range CPU. The data shows a workstation-class GPU paired with an efficiency-focused CPU, creating a system that is greater than the sum of its parts for rendering and AI workloads, but less cohesive for pure gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12400T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds