SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

75%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400T

4,019 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400T paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop configuration that balances a low-power, efficient CPU with a high-end workstation GPU. The data shows a substantial performance disparity between the two components, with the GPU ranking in the 95th percentile among all GPUs while the CPU sits in the 57th percentile. This pairing is clearly designed for GPU-accelerated professional workloads rather than CPU-bound tasks, and the benchmark results confirm that the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries the system's overall performance profile to a combined 76th percentile. This analysis interprets the available benchmark scores, architectural details, and performance percentiles to define what this build does well, where it falls short, and who should consider it.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the dominant component in this build, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, with a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2175 MHz. The memory subsystem is substantial: 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivers 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This capacity and bandwidth are notable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-application workflows that exceed the VRAM limits of consumer cards.

For rendering and compute workloads, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which directly accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI-driven tasks such as denoising, upscaling, and machine learning inference. The raw throughput figures are impressive: FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating that the GPU handles both precision formats at the same rate. Pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s, providing strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs and game engines.

Benchmark scores reflect this hardware strength. The GPU scored 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 135,218 across its benchmark suite. This places the RTX 4000 Ada Generation in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 95% of tested graphics cards. The nearest rivals are all professional or workstation-class GPUs: the NVIDIA A10M scores essentially identically (deltaPct of 0%), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is 0.1% behind, the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is 0.4% behind, and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 is 0.9% behind. These near-identical scores indicate that the RTX 4000 Ada Generation sits at the top of its professional GPU tier, with no meaningful separation from its closest competitors in raw compute benchmarks.

In rendering contexts, the combination of 20 GB VRAM, 360 GB/s bandwidth, and 48 RT cores suggests strong performance in ray-traced scenes and GPU-accelerated renderers. The 192 tensor cores further enhance workflows that use AI denoising or neural rendering techniques. The single-slot design and 130 W TDP make this a surprisingly power-efficient GPU for its performance class, requiring only a 300 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. Display output is handled via 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor professional setups.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-12400T show a consistent pattern of solid multi-core performance with moderate single-core results. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scored 1,333 multi-core and 188 single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 5,558 multi-core and 784 single-core. The most recent Cinebench R23 run produced 13,234 multi-core and 1,868 single-core. Geekbench scores are 7,144 multi-core and 2,044 single-core. The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 4,019, placing the i5-12400T in the 57th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals provide context for these scores. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G scores 4,010 on average, a 0.2% delta, meaning the i5-12400T is essentially tied with it. The Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 scores 4,004, a 0.4% delta in favor of the i5. The Intel Xeon E-2278G scores 4,052, putting the i5 0.8% behind. The Intel Xeon E-2336 scores 3,985, with the i5 0.9% ahead. These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the i5-12400T performs in a very narrow band around its peers, neither clearly ahead nor behind in aggregate CPU performance.

The GPU benchmark picture is far more dramatic. With an average score of 135,218 and a 95th percentile ranking, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a top-tier performer. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 is notably higher than its Vulkan score of 123,842, suggesting that OpenCL workloads extract more performance from the hardware. The GPU's nearest rivals are within 1% of its average score, as detailed in the GPU Analysis section, confirming that this GPU is highly competitive within its professional class.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is mid-range (57th percentile) while the GPU is near-flagship (95th percentile). The combined percentile of the build is 76, which is a weighted blend of the two components. This means the system as a whole ranks in the top quarter of all builds, but the CPU is clearly the limiting factor for any workload that depends on processor speed. For GPU-bound tasks like rendering, video encoding, or AI inference, the system will perform near the level of the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, simulation, or single-threaded applications, the system will perform at the level of the i5-12400T, which is a modest 6-core processor.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not from direct testing of this CPU+GPU pairing.

Based on the GPU's 95th percentile ranking and its strong raw compute scores, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capable of high-frame-rate gaming at most resolutions. The 20 GB VRAM and 360 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling, though the professional workstation orientation of this GPU means gaming performance is a secondary consideration to its compute capabilities.

The CPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming scenarios. The i5-12400T has a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, which is a reasonable frequency range but not exceptional. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for modern games, but the 57th percentile CPU ranking suggests it will struggle in CPU-intensive scenes, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU may constrain frame rates in games that rely heavily on single-thread performance. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile performance should deliver high frame rates, though exact figures cannot be stated without measured data.

Given the GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842, the Vulkan API appears to be less well-optimized for this hardware, potentially affecting games that use Vulkan natively. DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest DirectX-based titles. The 20 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for any current game at any resolution, and future games are unlikely to exceed this capacity in the near term. However, the professional driver and hardware design of the RTX 4000 Ada Generation may not prioritize gaming optimizations, so users should temper expectations for day-one game performance compared to consumer GeForce cards.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 76, meaning the system outperforms 76% of all builds in the database, driven primarily by the GPU's strong showing.

Q: How does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 135,218. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (-0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (-0.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (-0.9%). All are within 1% of each other.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i5-12400T?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the TDP of each component and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 130 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 300 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-12400T does not support ECC memory, though it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance and how many RT and tensor cores does it have?

A: The GPU delivers 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-12400T is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 163 mm². It belongs to the Core 12th Gen series and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The base clock is 1800 MHz, which is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 4.20 GHz, providing a significant frequency range for burst workloads. The TDP is just 35 W, making this an exceptionally power-efficient processor, ideal for systems where heat and power consumption are concerns.

The cache hierarchy is structured with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a modest amount of cache by modern standards, which may impact performance in workloads that require frequent data access. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory selection, though the lack of ECC support limits its use in mission-critical server environments. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking but likely underutilized by the paired GPU, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output capabilities, but the discrete GPU will handle all rendering tasks.

Benchmark scores indicate a mid-range processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,234 and single-core score of 1,868 are respectable for a 6-core chip. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7,144 and single-core score of 2,044 suggest good general-purpose performance. However, the 57th percentile ranking places this CPU below the majority of desktop processors in the database. The nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score, confirming that it performs as expected for its class.

For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for tasks that are not heavily multi-threaded. The 6 cores and 12 threads handle standard productivity applications, web browsing, and office suites with ease. Compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering that are CPU-bound will see moderate performance, but the low base clock may cause slower performance in sustained all-core workloads compared to higher-clocked alternatives. The 35 W TDP is a significant advantage for small form factor builds or systems that run continuously, as it generates minimal heat and requires less cooling. However, users who need high multi-threaded throughput should look elsewhere, as the i5-12400T is clearly positioned for efficiency rather than raw compute.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need professional-grade GPU compute without requiring high-end CPU performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile ranking and 20 GB VRAM make it ideal for GPU-accelerated rendering, scientific computing, AI model training and inference, and large-scale data visualization. Content creators working with 4K or 8K video, complex 3D scenes, or machine learning frameworks will benefit from the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores.

The 35 W TDP CPU makes this build attractive for small form factor workstations or quiet office environments where power consumption and thermal output are prioritized. The i5-12400T is sufficient for code editing, compiling small projects, running virtual machines, or handling typical office productivity tasks. Students in engineering, computer science, or digital arts programs can use this build for coursework that involves GPU-accelerated software, though the CPU may limit multi-threaded compilation tasks.

Small business workstations that run CAD, 3D modeling, or data analysis software will find the GPU's capabilities beneficial, while the CPU's efficiency keeps operating costs low. The 20 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for professionals who work with large datasets that exceed the 8-12 GB commonly found on consumer GPUs. However, users whose workflows are CPU-intensive — such as heavy software development, large-scale simulation, or 3D scene rendering on the CPU — should consider a more powerful processor, as the i5-12400T will become the bottleneck in those scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 12th Gen Core series. This platform is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on their needs. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, providing headroom for future high-bandwidth devices, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so CPU upgrades are limited to other 12th Gen parts or potentially 13th Gen chips if the motherboard BIOS supports them, though this is not guaranteed for all boards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and a single 16-pin power connector, which is standard for modern cards. The suggested PSU is 300 W, which is modest given the GPU's 130 W TDP and the CPU's 35 W TDP, leaving headroom for additional drives or peripherals. The single-slot design and 245 mm length (9.6 inches) make it compatible with most cases, though the 112 mm height (4.4 inches) should be checked against case clearance.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be a more powerful CPU on the same Socket 1700 platform, such as a higher-core-count 12th Gen i7 or i9, which would reduce the CPU bottleneck in multi-threaded workloads. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 memory could improve system responsiveness. The GPU is already at the 95th percentile, so upgrading it would provide diminishing returns unless specific professional features require a newer architecture. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future NVMe storage or accelerators can be added without changing the motherboard.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12400T with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The pairing is fundamentally a workstation configuration, where the GPU is the primary compute engine and the CPU serves as a supporting component. The i5-12400T is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 35 W TDP, designed for efficiency, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a professional GPU with 20 GB VRAM, 6,144 shading units, and 95th percentile performance.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the combined percentile of 76, placing it in the top quarter of all systems. However, this percentile masks the significant disparity between components: the GPU is near-flagship while the CPU is mid-range. In GPU-bound workloads, this system performs like a top-tier workstation. In CPU-bound workloads, it performs like a modest office PC. The build class is desktop, indicating it is intended for stationary use rather than portable or mobile applications.

The GPU's 130 W TDP and the CPU's 35 W TDP result in a total system draw that is well within the 300 W suggested PSU, making this a relatively power-efficient workstation. The single-slot GPU and compact CPU cooler requirements allow for a small form factor build, though the GPU's 245 mm length may require a mid-tower case for comfortable installation. Overall, this build is a statement of GPU-centric computing, prioritizing professional rendering and compute over general-purpose CPU performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a pronounced bottleneck in this build: the CPU is the limiting factor for any workload that requires significant processor involvement. The CPU's 57th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 95th percentile means the GPU is idle or underutilized in CPU-bound tasks. This is evident in the benchmark scores — the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,234 is modest, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 is exceptional.

In gaming, the bottleneck manifests at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's 6 cores and 1800 MHz base clock may struggle to feed the GPU with enough frames, limiting FPS despite the GPU's capability. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the system's frame rates will be more representative of the GPU's 95th percentile performance. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the hardware characteristics strongly suggest this pattern.

In professional workloads, the bottleneck depends on the task. GPU-accelerated rendering, AI training, and video encoding will be limited by the GPU, which is excellent. CPU-based rendering, simulation, or compilation will be limited by the CPU, which is mediocre. The 35 W TDP CPU is not designed for sustained multi-threaded performance, and the 18 MB L3 cache may cause cache misses in large datasets. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 360 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for most professional workloads, meaning the CPU is the component to upgrade first if system-level performance needs to improve. Upgrading to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 CPU would reduce this bottleneck without requiring a GPU change, as the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is already at the top of its class.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12400T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds