SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Usage Scenarios

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop combination that targets high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with solid but less consistent 4K capability. The measured data shows average FPS across all tested games at 162.3 frames per second, placing this pairing at rank 880 out of 3,732 CPU+GPU combinations. That top-quartile position indicates a system built for smooth competitive play rather than maximum visual fidelity at ultra-high resolutions.

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 delivers 255.9 FPS at 1080p and 168.6 FPS at 1440p, while Valorant reaches 435.4 FPS at 1080p and 411.7 FPS at 1440p. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 302.7 FPS at 1080p. These figures comfortably exceed the refresh rates of most high-end monitors, making this a strong choice for players who prioritize response time and frame consistency.

Streaming and content creation workloads benefit from the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, which produce a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 9,472. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory provides ample headroom for encoding buffers and simultaneous game capture. The Radeon RX 9070 XT's 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute also assists with real-time video effects, though the CPU's mid-range multi-threaded performance means software encoding at high bitrates will be more limited than dedicated streaming rigs.

Video editing in applications like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve relies on both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 19,433 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 17,428 indicate a balanced platform for 1080p and 1440p timeline editing, with the 16 GB VRAM accommodating large project files and multiple effects layers. The 4K export times will be moderate; the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs suggests it handles this workload adequately but not exceptionally.

3D rendering and CAD work show a clear GPU advantage. The RX 9070 XT's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260 and Passmark G3D score of 26,795 dominate CPU-bound rendering tasks. However, the i5-12400F's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6,980 and R15 multi-core score of 1,759 indicate that CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray will be a bottleneck. Users doing heavy CPU rendering should look at higher-core-count alternatives.

Software development compiles and testing benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and the platform's DDR4/DDR5 memory support. The Passmark data compression score of 233,327 and integer math score of 59,995 show capable build performance for code compilation. The GPU's compute capabilities accelerate machine learning inference tasks, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 15,864 supporting local model training experiments.

Student and office workloads are easily served by this configuration. The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 3,481 and Geekbench single-core score of 1,964 deliver responsive application launching and web browsing. The GPU provides more than enough power for spreadsheet rendering, video conferencing, and multi-monitor productivity setups, though the 304 W TDP GPU is overkill for these tasks alone.

# Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data from ultra settings across 54 games provides a comprehensive picture of this pairing's gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system averages well above 60 FPS in nearly every title tested. Competitive shooters lead the pack: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 559.3 FPS, Valorant reaches 435.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 302 FPS. These numbers indicate the CPU+GPU combination is not limiting esports performance at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for most titles. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 168.6 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 120.8 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58.8 FPS. The 1440p results show a 30-40% average reduction from 1080p across the game library, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. The RX 9070 XT's 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 256-bit bus help sustain frame rates at this resolution.

The 3840x2160 results reveal the limits of this pairing. While lighter titles like Valorant (383 FPS) and Roblox (124.4 FPS) remain playable, demanding AAA games struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 39.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 34 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 9.4 FPS. The GPU's 55th percentile ranking versus all GPUs partially explains this, but the CPU's 73rd percentile also contributes to frame pacing issues at 4K.

Heavily CPU-bound games show interesting scaling patterns. Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 252 FPS at 1080p but only 79.6 FPS at 4K, indicating the GPU becomes the limiter at higher resolutions. Conversely, lighter simulation titles like Inside maintain 219 FPS at 1080p and 99 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU's raw fill rate capabilities. The dual-slot, 2x 8-pin powered GPU sustains these results without thermal throttling according to the benchmark data.

The data confirms this pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, 45 of the 54 tested games exceed 100 FPS, while at 1440p, 38 games exceed 60 FPS. Only at 4K does the system show significant weakness, with just 12 games maintaining above 60 FPS. Users targeting 4K should expect to lower settings or use upscaling technologies.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and connects via Intel Socket 1700 with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The benchmark scores position this CPU at the 73rd percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19,039. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, scores 19,047 — a 0% delta. This near-identical performance suggests the i5-12400F is well-matched against contemporary mid-range mobile processors. The Intel Core 3 201E (19,056, -0.1% delta) and Intel Core i5-1335U (18,982, 0.3% delta) bracket it closely, indicating consistent mid-tier performance.

Multi-threaded workloads show the CPU's 12 threads deliver solid throughput. The 3DMark max threads score of 5,912 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 represent capable content creation performance. However, the Passmark find prime numbers score of 72 is notably low, suggesting the architecture prioritizes general-purpose integer and floating-point work over specialized mathematical operations. The floating point math score of 46,759 and integer math score of 59,995 confirm this balance.

Single-thread performance is strong for the class. The 3DMark single-thread score of 909, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,680, and Passmark single-thread score of 3,481 all indicate responsive application behavior. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz on a 10 nm process contributes to these results, though the 163 mm² die size and 80 KB L1 cache per core suggest a mature, optimized design rather than a state-of-the-art one.

The cache hierarchy — 1.25 MB L2 per core and 18 MB shared L3 — provides adequate data locality for most workloads. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU allow high-bandwidth GPU communication, though the RX 9070 XT uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support gives builders flexibility in platform cost and performance tuning.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays are the primary audience for this pairing. The measured FPS data shows 45 of 54 tested games exceed 100 FPS at 1080p ultra settings, with esports titles like Valorant (435.4 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (559.3 FPS) far exceeding 240 Hz monitor capabilities. Players with 144 Hz or 165 Hz displays will find this system rarely leaves performance on the table.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will find the 16 GB VRAM and 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute sufficient for editing and effects. The CPU's multi-threaded score of 12,380 in Cinebench R23 handles proxy editing and basic color grading, while the GPU accelerates exports through OpenCL (17,428 score). Those producing 4K content regularly should consider a higher-core CPU.

Software developers building applications, particularly those using containerized builds or parallel compilation, benefit from the 12 threads and 18 MB L3 cache. The Passmark data compression score of 233,327 supports fast build artifact handling. Developers working with machine learning can leverage the GPU's compute score of 15,864 for local model training and inference.

Students and small business users building a single workstation for mixed use will appreciate the balance. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking ensures responsive productivity, while the GPU handles occasional gaming or visualization tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP combined with a 304 W GPU TDP means a modest power supply suffices — the suggested PSU of 700 W provides headroom for typical system loads.

Small business workstations requiring CAD or 3D visualization will see strong GPU acceleration. The GPU's texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s handle complex viewport rendering. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory prevents texture swapping in large assemblies, though the CPU's single-thread performance may limit some single-threaded CAD operations.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent mid-range performer. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,895 and max threads score of 5,912 indicate the 6-core/12-thread configuration scales well up to 16 threads. The 2-thread score of 1,699 and 4-thread score of 3,067 show diminishing returns beyond 8 threads (4,779), typical for a 6-core design. The single-thread score of 909 confirms the architecture's efficiency at lower thread counts.

Cinebench results reinforce this pattern. The R15 multi-core score of 1,759 versus single-core 244 gives a multi-to-single ratio of 7.2x, close to the theoretical 12-thread maximum. The R20 multi-core score of 6,980 and single-core 985 show similar scaling, while R23 multi-core 12,380 and single-core 1,680 confirm the CPU's sustained multi-threaded performance under longer workloads.

Geekbench results place the CPU at 1,964 single-core and 9,472 multi-core. Passmark tests show a multithread score of 19,433, with specialized tests revealing strengths in data encryption (11,679) and extended instructions (15,834) but weaknesses in prime number finding (72). The average benchmark score of 19,039 aligns with the 73rd percentile ranking, with nearest rivals within 0.3% performance delta.

The GPU benchmarks show a different character. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260 indicates strong modern API performance, while Geekbench Vulkan score of 65,879 and OpenCL score of 17,428 demonstrate broad API support. Passmark results show G3D score of 26,795, GPU compute of 15,864, and DirectX 11 score of 292 versus DirectX 12 score of 78, suggesting the architecture favors newer APIs.

The GPU's 55th percentile ranking versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13,543, places it near the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (13,536, 0.1% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (13,515, 0.2% delta). These comparisons are misleading given the age of those rival GPUs, but the percentile reflects the GPU's position in the current market. The combined percentile of 64 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates a balanced mid-to-high-tier system.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-12400F's socket and platform?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and belongs to the Core 12th Gen series with the Alder Lake-S architecture. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon RX 9070 XT have?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also has 4,096 shading units and 64 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power draw of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 304 W TDP. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 700 W, which provides adequate headroom for the full system.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160 ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39.4 FPS. At 2560x1440 it reaches 58.8 FPS, and at 1920x1080 it achieves 72.3 FPS. The 4K experience requires settings reduction or upscaling.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 19,039 places it at the 73rd percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, scores 19,047 (0% delta), while the Intel Core 3 201E scores 19,056 (-0.1% delta).

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-12400F does not include integrated graphics. The "F" suffix indicates a processor without an iGPU, so the Radeon RX 9070 XT is required for display output.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for these components?

A: The CPU launched with an MSRP of $174, and the GPU launched with an MSRP of 599 USD.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions, while the CPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K. At 1080p, the average FPS of 162.3 across all games shows the GPU's rendering capacity is the constraint — the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking provides enough headroom to feed the GPU. Games like Valorant hitting 435.4 FPS at 1080p demonstrate the CPU can sustain very high frame rates when the GPU is not fully taxed.

At 1440p, the bottleneck shifts toward the GPU. Comparing 1080p to 1440p results, most games show a 30-40% FPS reduction, consistent with GPU-bound scaling. Call of Duty: Warzone drops from 136.7 FPS to 120.8 FPS (11.6% reduction), while Cyberpunk 2077 falls from 72.3 to 58.8 (18.7% reduction). These modest drops suggest the CPU is still keeping up, but the GPU's 55th percentile ranking becomes more relevant.

The 4K results clearly show the GPU as the bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 39.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 9.4 FPS. These dramatic reductions — often 40-60% below 1440p — indicate the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for ultra settings at 4K. The CPU's single-thread performance remains adequate, but the GPU cannot sustain the pixel throughput.

The 55th percentile GPU ranking versus 73rd percentile CPU ranking suggests the CPU is the stronger component. This means users upgrading from this pairing should first consider a GPU upgrade to improve 4K performance, while CPU upgrades would benefit CPU-bound titles like simulation games or heavily modded sandbox games. The pair rank of 880 out of 3,732 confirms this is a balanced mid-tier combination with clear upgrade paths.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core i5-12400F, a 6-core/12-thread Alder Lake processor, with AMD's Radeon RX 9070 XT, a Navi 48-based GPU on RDNA 4.0 architecture. The CPU uses Intel's 10 nm process with a 163 mm² die size, while the GPU uses TSMC's 4 nm process with a 357 mm² die size and 53,900 million transistors.

The combined percentile of 64 places this pairing in the upper-mid tier of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's 73rd percentile and GPU's 55th percentile create a system that excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming, handles content creation reasonably well, and provides solid productivity performance. The average FPS across 54 games is 162.3, with the pair ranking 880th out of 3,732 tested combinations.

This is not a top-tier enthusiast build. The GPU's 55th percentile ranking places it below many high-end cards, and the CPU's 6-core configuration limits heavily threaded workloads. However, the balance between components produces a system that delivers excellent frame rates in most games at mainstream resolutions, with the 16 GB VRAM future-proofing against upcoming titles requiring large texture pools.

The desktop form factor allows for the dual-slot GPU with 2x 8-pin power connectors, and the 700 W suggested PSU provides reasonable headroom. The system supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders cost flexibility. This is a practical mid-range gaming workstation with clear strengths and identifiable limitations.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports the Core 12th Gen series, with the i5-12400F representing the mid-range of that generation. The socket allows upgrades to higher-core-count Alder Lake processors, though the platform does not support newer generations. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide bandwidth for the RX 9070 XT's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, with no bottleneck in data transfer.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. Users building on DDR4 motherboards can save on memory costs, while DDR5 platforms offer higher bandwidth potential. The memory bus width and bandwidth are not specified in the data, but the dual-channel configuration is standard for this socket.

The GPU upgrade path is more flexible. The RX 9070 XT uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is backward and forward compatible. The 700 W suggested PSU provides sufficient power for the current GPU's 304 W TDP, and future GPU upgrades up to similar power draws would not require PSU changes. The dual-slot form factor and 2x 8-pin connectors are standard, ensuring compatibility with most cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, provided the motherboard supports it. The 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for a more power-hungry processor. Alternatively, users could upgrade the GPU to improve 4K performance, though the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking might become a bottleneck with a significantly faster GPU.

The platform's DDR4/DDR5 support means users can choose between budget and performance memory. The 18 MB L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core provide adequate cache for the CPU's 6 cores. For users wanting more PCIe lanes or newer CPU features, a platform change would be required, but the current socket offers a clear upgrade path within the Alder Lake generation.