SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 6-core/12-thread Intel Core i5-12400F desktop processor with a flagship-class AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT graphics card. The CPU is an Alder Lake-S part on the LGA 1700 socket, while the GPU uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. Benchmark data shows this combination sits at the 64th percentile overall among all tested CPU-GPU pairs, with a measured average of 173.2 FPS across games at 1080p ultra settings, placing it at rank 689 out of 3,732 pairs. The data indicates a system built for high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, though the processor's mid-range standing creates a notable bottleneck in some titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks at the 64th percentile among all tested combinations, with an average FPS of 173.2 across games at 1080p ultra settings. This places it in the upper-middle tier of desktop builds, ahead of more than half of all recorded pairings.

Q: How does the Core i5-12400F compare to its nearest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19,039, nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS which scores 19,047 (0% delta). It is also within 0.3% of the Intel Core 3 201E and Intel Core i5-1335U, showing the CPU sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to the RX 9070 XT?

A: The RX 7900 XT holds the 55th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 13,745. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, scores 13,543, which is 1.5% lower, meaning the 7900 XT holds a slight edge in this comparison.

Q: Does this build support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory bus. This gives builders flexibility to choose either memory type depending on motherboard selection and budget constraints.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this configuration?

A: The RX 7900 XT has a 300 W TDP and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a quality 700 W unit provides sufficient headroom for the combined system load.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the Core i5-12400F does not support traditional overclocking via multiplier adjustment. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz is the maximum rated frequency for this processor.

Q: What is the measured FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58.2 FPS. This drops to 40 FPS at 4K, while 1080p delivers 82.8 FPS, showing the game is demanding even for this high-end GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks but shows its mid-range positioning in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the i5-12400F scores 1,680 in single-core and 12,380 in multi-core, with the multi-core figure being only 7.4 times the single-core score despite having 6 cores and 12 threads. The Geekbench results show 1,964 single-core and 9,472 multi-core, placing the CPU at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs with an average score of 19,039.

The GPU presents a more complex picture. Despite being a high-end part with 5,376 shading units and 84 ray tracing cores, the RX 7900 XT holds only the 55th percentile among all GPUs. Its Passmark G3D score is 29,009, but the average benchmark score is 13,745, dragged down by lower scores in other tests like Passmark DirectX 10 (158) and DirectX 12 (110). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068 indicate strong modern API performance.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms (73rd vs 55th percentile), yet the pair still achieves a 64th overall percentile. The measured average of 173.2 FPS across games at 1080p ultra demonstrates that the GPU's raw power is sufficient for high frame rates, but the 55th percentile GPU ranking suggests that in some synthetic tests, the card does not dominate as expected. The pair's rank of 689 out of 3,732 places it in the top 18.5% of all recorded builds, which is respectable but not elite.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400F uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports 12th Gen Alder Lake processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, giving builders two distinct platform paths. The PCIe implementation offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the graphics card operates at Gen 4 speeds regardless of the CPU's Gen 5 capability.

The RX 7900 XT requires a 700 W suggested PSU and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors. The card's 300 W TDP combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP leaves roughly 335 W of headroom in a 700 W unit for other components like storage, fans, and motherboard power. The GPU measures 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width, requiring a dual-slot case with sufficient clearance.

A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a higher-core-count LGA 1700 processor, as the socket supports the full 12th Gen lineup. The motherboard would remain compatible, though a BIOS update might be needed depending on the specific board. For memory, the DDR5 path offers higher bandwidth potential, but the CPU's dual-channel controller means the benefit is limited compared to a platform with more channels. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are currently underutilized by the GPU, but future storage devices using Gen 5 NVMe could leverage that bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear bottleneck scenario in CPU-heavy workloads. The i5-12400F sits at the 73rd percentile among CPUs, while the RX 7900 XT holds only the 55th percentile among GPUs. This inverted relationship means the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card in synthetic tests, yet in gaming, the CPU's 6 cores can limit frame rates in titles that scale beyond 12 threads.

Evidence from FPS scaling supports this analysis. In Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 273.4 FPS at 1080p to 101.9 FPS at 4K, a 62.7% reduction. However, in Control, the drop from 113.4 FPS at 1080p to 59.3 FPS at 4K is a 47.7% reduction. The smaller percentage drop in Control suggests the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the larger drop in CS2 indicates the CPU's single-thread performance is less of a constraint at 1080p.

The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,481 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,680 are strong for a 6-core part, but the multi-threaded scores reveal the limitation. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,895 versus the max-thread score of 5,912 shows negligible scaling beyond 16 threads, meaning the 12-thread CPU is already saturated. In games like Ark: Survival Ascended, which shows 39.2 FPS at 1080p and only 12.3 FPS at 4K, the bottleneck shifts between CPU and GPU depending on resolution, but the low overall FPS indicates both components struggle with this demanding title.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 163 mm², and the processor was released in January 2022 with a launch MSRP of $174.

Benchmark results show this CPU is competitive in single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 244 and R20 single-core of 985 are solid for a locked 6-core part. The Geekbench single-core score of 1,964 places it in the upper range for desktop processors. However, multi-threaded performance reveals the core count limitation: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 12,380 is respectable but trails higher-core-count rivals.

The Passmark results show a mix of strengths and weaknesses. The processor scores 59,995 in integer math and 46,759 in floating-point math, indicating strong arithmetic capability. However, the find prime numbers score of 72 is notably low, suggesting some instruction-level inefficiencies. The data encryption score of 11,679 and compression score of 233,327 are moderate, reflecting the 12-thread limitation. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the majority of processors, but in a system with a high-end GPU, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is the primary performance ceiling for multi-threaded workloads.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured 173.2 FPS average across games at 1080p ultra makes it ideal for competitive shooters like Valorant (435 FPS) and CS2 (273.4 FPS). At 1440p, the system still delivers playable frame rates in most titles, with Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 122.9 FPS and Control at 89 FPS. For 4K, the system is less suited, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 40 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 34 FPS.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 12-thread performance adequate but not exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 is moderate for rendering tasks, while the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-based workloads. Software developers compiling code will benefit from the strong single-thread performance, with Geekbench single-core of 1,964, but long multi-threaded builds may be slower than with higher-core CPUs.

Students and small business users running office applications will find this system overpowered for their needs but capable of handling any productivity software. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, while the GPU is excessive for document editing or spreadsheet work. The build is best suited for enthusiasts who want a strong gaming machine with some productivity capability, rather than a dedicated workstation.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings shows this system excels at 1080p competitive gaming. In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system delivers 603.9 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 245.2 FPS at 4K. Valorant achieves 435 FPS at 1080p and still holds 383.3 FPS at 4K. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 325 FPS at 1080p and 118 FPS at 4K. These titles show the GPU's raw power is not the limiting factor; the CPU's single-thread performance supports very high frame rates.

At 1440p, the system delivers strong performance in most titles. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 122.9 FPS, Assetto Corsa runs at 115.6 FPS, and Minecraft achieves 170 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (58.2 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (57.1 FPS) fall below 60 FPS at 1440p ultra, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck in these graphically intensive games. Control runs at 89 FPS at 1440p, showing a balance between CPU and GPU utilization.

4K gaming is possible but requires settings adjustments. The system averages 42 FPS in Allods Online, 40 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077, and 34 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2 at 4K ultra. Lighter titles like Roblox (130.3 FPS) and Minecraft (89 FPS) remain playable, but the 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth are not enough to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding games at 4K. The pair's rank of 689 out of 3,732 confirms the system is above average but not top-tier for 4K gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining a mid-range 12th Gen Intel processor with a high-end RDNA 3.0 graphics card. The Core i5-12400F provides 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, while the RX 7900 XT offers 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus. The GPU's 84 ray tracing cores and 5,376 shading units make it a capable part for modern games, though its 55th GPU percentile suggests it does not dominate as much as its specifications imply.

The overall tier of this build is upper-midrange, with a combined percentile of 64 and an average FPS of 173.2 at 1080p ultra. The CPU's 73rd percentile is the stronger component, while the GPU's 55th percentile is the weaker link. This creates a system that is well-balanced for 1080p gaming but shows its limitations at higher resolutions. The build is best described as a high-refresh 1080p machine with some 1440p capability, rather than a 4K powerhouse.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles, with Valorant at 435 FPS and CS2 at 273.4 FPS. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,680 in Cinebench R23 supports these high frame rates, while the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS ensures no graphical bottleneck at lower resolutions.

Streaming: The 12-thread CPU can handle encoding at moderate bitrates while gaming, though the 65 W TDP and 6-core limit mean simultaneous streaming and gaming in CPU-heavy titles may cause frame drops. The GPU's 84 RT cores and modern architecture can offload some encoding tasks, but the system is better suited for 1080p streaming than 4K.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 provides adequate performance for 1080p video editing in software like Premiere Pro, while the GPU's 20 GB VRAM accelerates effects and color grading. The 4K editing will be slower due to the 12-thread CPU limitation, but the system can handle 1080p timelines smoothly.

3D rendering: The GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 performance make it a strong choice for GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender. The CPU's 12,380 Cinebench R23 score handles CPU-based rendering at a moderate pace, but the GPU is the primary render engine here.

Software development: The Geekbench single-core score of 1,964 provides snappy compilation for single-threaded build steps, while the multi-core score of 9,472 handles parallel builds reasonably. The 18 MB L3 cache supports efficient code caching, and the 20 GB GPU memory can be used for local AI model testing or large data visualization.

Student and office work: This system is massively overqualified for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's 73rd percentile ensures smooth multitasking, while the GPU is idle in these tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw low for long study sessions, and the 20 GB VRAM has no impact on office productivity.