SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance window. The CPU, an Alder Lake-S part with 6 cores and 12 threads, delivers a strong single-thread foundation, while the GPU, built on RDNA 3.0 with 16 GB of memory, provides substantial rasterization power. The combined system sits at the 62nd percentile of all CPU-GPU pairings, with an average FPS across tested games of 147.6 at 1080p ultra settings. The benchmark data reveals a pairing where the GPU is the clear performance leader, and the CPU provides enough throughput to keep frame rates high in most scenarios, though certain workloads will expose the processor's limits.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, with a die size of 163 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a cache hierarchy comprising 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The multiplier is locked, and the launch MSRP is $174.

Benchmark scores for the 12400F show a clear strength in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The single-thread score in 3DMark is 909, while the 2-thread score is 1699, nearly double the single-thread figure, indicating excellent scaling up to two threads. The 4-thread score of 3067 and 8-thread score of 4779 show continued scaling, but the rate diminishes as more threads are added. The 16-thread score of 5895 and max-thread score of 5912 are nearly identical, suggesting that the 12 threads reach their practical limit and additional parallelism does not yield significant gains. This pattern is typical for a 6-core/12-thread processor: it handles everyday tasks and moderate multi-threading well, but heavy all-core workloads will not see further improvement.

Cinebench results corroborate this interpretation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12380, while the single-core score is 1680, giving a multicore-to-single-core ratio of about 7.4x, which is below the theoretical 12x from having 12 threads. This indicates that the processor does not achieve perfect scaling in heavily threaded rendering workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 9472 and single-core score of 1964 follow the same trend. PassMark tests show the processor scoring 59995 in integer math and 46759 in floating-point math, with a multithread score of 19433 and a single-thread score of 3481. The data compression score of 233327 is notably high, indicating strong performance in compression tasks, while the find prime numbers score of 72 is comparatively low, suggesting weaker performance in certain algorithmic workloads.

In terms of relative standing, the 12400F has a percentile rank of 73 among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 73% of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047 and a delta of 0%, the Intel Core 3 201E with a score of 19056 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-1335U with a score of 18982 and a delta of 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 7773X with a score of 18979 and a delta of 0.3%. These deltas are all within 0.3% of the 12400F's average benchmark score of 19039, indicating that the 12400F is functionally equivalent in overall benchmark performance to these processors, despite being a more traditional desktop part compared to some mobile or server variants.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data shows that this pairing is well-suited to 1080p and 1440p. In Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 228.2 FPS at 1080p and 150.2 FPS at 1440p, while Valorant runs at 436 FPS at 1080p and 411.6 FPS at 1440p. These frame rates are far above the 144 Hz threshold, confirming that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU in esports titles. The single-thread score of 909 in 3DMark supports this, as such games rely heavily on single-core performance.

For streaming, the 12400F's 6 cores and 12 threads provide a reasonable foundation. The PassMark multithread score of 19433 indicates that the processor can handle encoding overhead while gaming, but the max-thread score of 5912 in 3DMark suggests that the processor is nearing its limit when all threads are active. In a game like Call of Duty: Warzone, which runs at 136 FPS at 1080p, the CPU would need to allocate resources for both the game and the stream encoder, and the limited thread count could cause frame dips in more demanding scenes.

For video editing, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 shows that the processor can handle 4K video timelines with moderate effects, but it will not be as fast as higher-core-count alternatives. The data compression score of 233327 suggests that the CPU is efficient at handling compressed video codecs, which is beneficial for editing workflows. However, the 12-thread limit means that rendering long projects will take longer than with a 16-core or 24-thread processor.

For 3D rendering, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6980 and R15 multicore score of 1759 indicate that the 12400F is a capable entry-level rendering CPU. It will complete single-frame renders in a reasonable time, but for complex scenes or batch rendering, the processor will lag behind higher-tier CPUs. The floating-point math score of 46759 in PassMark shows that the CPU can handle the mathematical operations required for 3D geometry, but the lack of additional cores limits throughput.

For software development, the Geekbench multicore score of 9472 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 suggest that the 12400F can compile code efficiently for small to medium projects. The PassMark integer math score of 59995 indicates strong performance in the type of arithmetic operations common in compilation. The processor's single-thread performance is also useful for interactive development environments and code analysis tools.

For student and office work, the 12400F is more than sufficient. The single-thread score of 3481 in PassMark and the 3DMark single-thread score of 909 show that the processor handles everyday applications like web browsers, word processors, and spreadsheets with ease. The low TDP of 65 W also means that the system will not generate excessive heat, making it suitable for a quiet workstation environment.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing. The CPU has a percentile rank of 73 among all CPUs, while the GPU has a percentile rank of 51 among all GPUs. This means that the CPU is relatively stronger in the broader market, but the GPU's absolute performance is what drives frame rates in games. The combined percentile of the system is 62, which is lower than the CPU's percentile, suggesting that the GPU is the limiting factor in overall system performance.

Examining FPS scaling across resolutions provides further evidence. In Cyberpunk 2077, the system runs at 67.8 FPS at 1080p, 49.3 FPS at 1440p, and 33.6 FPS at 2160p. The frame rate drops by about 27% from 1080p to 1440p and by another 32% from 1440p to 2160p. This scaling is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering resolution directly impacts the GPU's workload. The CPU's performance remains constant, so the frame rate decline is almost entirely due to the GPU.

However, in some games, the CPU can become a bottleneck at lower resolutions. In Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 228.2 FPS at 1080p to 150.2 FPS at 1440p and then to 85.9 FPS at 2160p. The large drop from 1440p to 2160p (43%) is more than what would be expected from resolution alone, indicating that the CPU may be limiting the frame rate at 1440p, where the GPU is not fully saturated. The single-thread score of 909 in 3DMark suggests that the 12400F's single-core performance is adequate but not exceptional, and in very high-FPS scenarios, it may prevent the GPU from reaching its full potential.

The pair rank of 1236 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 147.6 across games, puts this combination in the upper third of all measured pairs. The data suggests that the CPU is well-matched to the GPU for 1440p gaming, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck, but at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread limits may surface in esports titles that demand extreme frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suitable for gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rates. The data shows that in most AAA titles, the system achieves frame rates above 60 FPS at 1440p ultra settings. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 121 FPS, Control runs at 71.7 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 44.3 FPS. The latter is below the 60 FPS threshold, but the game is known for being demanding, and the 12400F's performance in this title is adequate for a smooth experience at medium settings.

For 1080p gaming, this pairing is overkill in most titles, as the GPU can push frame rates far beyond what the CPU can deliver. The CPU's single-thread score of 909 in 3DMark limits the maximum frame rate in games like Counter-Strike 2, which runs at 228.2 FPS at 1080p but would likely run higher with a stronger CPU. However, for gamers who prefer 1440p, the balance is ideal.

For content creators who edit video or work with 3D graphics, the 12400F provides a solid foundation, but the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are more relevant for GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 is sufficient for light to moderate workloads, but creators with heavy rendering needs should consider a higher-core-count CPU.

For developers, the 12400F's performance in compilation tasks, as indicated by the Geekbench multicore score of 9472, is adequate for most projects. The system's 16 GB of GPU memory also allows for large dataset processing in machine learning or data analysis tasks, where the GPU can handle the heavy lifting.

For students and small business workstations, this pairing offers a balance of CPU efficiency and GPU capability. The CPU's TDP of 65 W keeps power consumption low, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it suitable for tasks like CAD, 3D modeling, and video rendering. The system's overall tier is in the upper third of all pairings, making it a capable general-purpose workstation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 19039, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 11627, placing it at the 51st percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 62, indicating that this pairing outperforms a majority of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU's 3DMark scores show a progression from 909 in single-thread to 5912 in max-thread, with a 16-thread score of 5895. The near-identical 16-thread and max-thread scores confirm that the processor's 12 threads are fully utilized, and there is no additional headroom for more demanding workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 is a strong result for a 6-core processor, while the single-core score of 1680 is typical for Alder Lake.

The GPU's benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4157, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 18290, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 54228. The PassMark G3D score of 24176 and GPU compute score of 13473 further illustrate the GPU's capabilities. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with an average score of 11680 and a delta of -0.5%, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M with a score of 11528 and a delta of 0.9%, and the NVIDIA Tesla K20c with a score of 11479 and a delta of 1.3%. These deltas are all within 1.8% of the RX 7800 XT's average score, indicating that the GPU's overall benchmark performance is similar to these older or lower-tier cards, despite the RX 7800 XT having significantly more modern features and memory.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is based on actual testing, as indicated by the dataIsMeasured field being true. Across a wide range of games, the system demonstrates strong 1080p performance, with many titles exceeding 100 FPS. For example, CS:GO runs at 502.6 FPS at 1080p, Minecraft runs at 226 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 273 FPS. At 1440p, these titles still maintain high frame rates, with CS:GO at 345 FPS, Minecraft at 143 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 179 FPS.

In more demanding AAA titles, the system still performs well at 1080p. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 67.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 59.4 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 81.2 FPS. At 1440p, these frame rates drop to 49.3 FPS, 44.3 FPS, and 67 FPS respectively, which are playable but not at high refresh rates. At 2160p, the system struggles in the most demanding titles, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 33.6 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32.8 FPS.

The system excels in esports and competitive titles. Valorant runs at 436 FPS at 1080p and 411.6 FPS at 1440p, while Counter-Strike 2 runs at 228.2 FPS at 1080p and 150.2 FPS at 1440p. The data shows that the system is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p competitive gaming, where high frame rates are critical. The pair's average FPS across all games is 147.6, and the pair rank of 1236 out of 3732 indicates that this is a strong performer among all measured combinations.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. The chip, codenamed Navi 32, contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The GPU has 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 60 ray tracing cores. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The memory clock is 2438 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU's clocks include a base of 1295 MHz, a boost of 2430 MHz, and a game clock of 2124 MHz. The pixel rate is 233.3 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 583.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 37.32 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 37.32 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has a dual-slot design, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 600 W with a TDP of 263 W.

The GPU's benchmark scores show strong compute performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 18290 and Vulkan score of 54228 indicate that the GPU is well-suited for compute-heavy tasks like rendering and machine learning. The PassMark G3D score of 24176 and GPU compute score of 13473 further support this. The DirectX 12 score of 93 in PassMark is relatively low, but this is a synthetic test that may not reflect real-world gaming performance. The GPU's percentile rank of 51 among all GPUs is modest, but this is based on a broad range of GPUs, including older and more specialized cards. The 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage for modern games that require large texture pools, as well as for professional workloads like 3D modeling and video editing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is future-proof for next-generation storage and GPUs. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, as the bus is backward compatible.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 263 W, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. This gives a total system power draw of approximately 328 W, leaving a comfortable headroom of over 270 W for other components like storage, cooling, and motherboard. The suggested PSU of 600 W provides enough power for the system to run stably under load, and the headroom allows for additional components without needing a PSU upgrade.

The upgrade path for this platform is limited by the socket. The Intel Socket 1700 supports 12th Gen Alder Lake processors, and the 12400F is an entry-level part in this generation. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-tier 12th Gen processor with more cores, such as an i7 or i9, which would improve multi-threaded performance in rendering and compilation tasks. However, the current 12400F's single-thread performance is already strong, so the main benefit of upgrading would be in all-core workloads.

For the GPU, the RX 7800 XT is a high-end card, and an upgrade would require moving to a higher-tier RDNA 3 card or a next-generation GPU. The 16 GB of VRAM is already generous, so the primary reason to upgrade would be for increased compute performance or ray tracing capabilities. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is not a bottleneck, and the system has enough power headroom to support a more powerful GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded benchmarks?

A: The CPU scores 909 in 3DMark single-thread and 3481 in PassMark single-thread, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1680.

Q: What is the system's average FPS across all measured games?

A: The average FPS across all measured games is 147.6, with a pair rank of 1236 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank among all CPUs?

A: The CPU's percentile rank is 73, meaning it outperforms 73% of all CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, which provides headroom for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 263 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-12400F with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Alder Lake processor with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and the GPU is a RDNA 3.0 card with 16 GB of VRAM and 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The combined system percentile is 62, placing it in the upper third of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. The CPU's percentile rank of 73 is higher than the GPU's 51, but the GPU is the primary driver of gaming performance, with an average FPS of 147.6 across all tested games. This pairing is well-suited for 1440p gaming and content creation, offering a strong balance of CPU efficiency and GPU capability for a desktop workstation.