SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT form a desktop pairing that lands in the 79th combined percentile, placing it above most systems in the benchmark database. The data shows a CPU that sits at the 73rd percentile among all processors, paired with a GPU at the 85th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a configuration built around a strong graphics foundation with a capable six-core processor driving it, and the measured frame rates across dozens of titles confirm that the pairing works best at 1440p, where the GPU can stretch its legs without being held back by the CPU's limits.

Balance and Bottleneck

The fundamental balance here is a GPU-heavy system. The RX 6800 XT's 85th percentile ranking is noticeably higher than the i5-12400F's 73rd percentile, so in most gaming scenarios the graphics card is the primary performance driver. The CPU's single-thread score of 909 in 3dmark and 1680 in Cinebench R23 single-core are strong enough to feed the GPU in most titles, but the data shows a clear pattern at lower resolutions where the CPU becomes the limiting factor. At 1080p, the average FPS across games is 152.1 for the pair, but that number hides a wide variance. In esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system hits 520.3 FPS at 1080p, which is so far beyond display refresh rates that the CPU is clearly not the constraint. However, in heavy simulation titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator, the 1080p result is 85.7 FPS, and the gap between 1080p and 1440p results is only 16.8 FPS, suggesting the CPU is starting to limit the GPU's output.

The bottleneck shifts depending on workload. For multi-threaded productivity, the i5-12400F's 6 cores and 12 threads produce a Passmark multithread score of 19433 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380, which are respectable but place it in the middle of the pack among modern CPUs. The GPU, meanwhile, offers 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, making it a much stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming at 1440p, the data shows the GPU is the dominant factor. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 69.9 FPS at 1080p to 52.5 FPS at 1440p, a 24.9% reduction that tracks with GPU load, while the CPU utilization remains relatively constant. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck, with many titles dropping below 60 FPS, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 at 30.2 FPS and Control at 48.3 FPS.

The CPU's 3dmark 16-thread score of 5895 is nearly identical to its max-thread score of 5912, which indicates the processor is fully utilized with 12 threads and has little headroom beyond that. The 2-thread score of 1699 versus the single-thread score of 909 shows that scaling from one to two threads is efficient, but the jump from 8 threads at 4779 to 16 threads at 5895 is only a 23.4% improvement, highlighting that the processor is not a high-core-count monster. For gaming, the practical bottleneck is the CPU in lightly-threaded scenarios at 1080p. In Counter-Strike 2, the 1080p result of 233.1 FPS drops to 154.5 FPS at 1440p, a 33.7% reduction, which is a larger drop than the GPU's raw power would suggest, indicating the CPU is saturating at the lower resolution. The takeaway is clear: this is a system where the GPU is the star, and the CPU is adequate but not exceptional, so users targeting 1080p high-refresh will feel the CPU limit in some titles, while 1440p and 4K users will be firmly GPU-bound.

FAQ

Q: How does the i5-12400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 and the Intel Core 3 201E at 19056. It sits 0.3% above the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982 and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979, meaning the performance difference is negligible in aggregate.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does that mean for its competitive position?

A: The RX 6800 XT ranks in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 48477 puts it 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile at 47743, but 2.5% behind the Intel Arc A550M at 49737 and 3% behind both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor in gaming?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios because of its high percentile rank. However, at 1080p in specific esports or CPU-heavy titles, the CPU can become the constraint. Evidence shows the 3dmark single-thread score of 909 is modest, and in games like Counter-Strike 2 the frame rate drops by 33.7% going from 1080p to 1440p, suggesting the CPU is saturated at the lower resolution.

Q: What kind of memory and platform does this CPU support?

A: The i5-12400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with an Alder Lake architecture and a 10 nm process node. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but it does not support ECC memory and the multiplier is locked.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The measured data shows 4K performance varies widely by title. Games like Valorant hit 366.6 FPS at 4K, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 208.7 FPS, but demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 33.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 30.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 11 FPS. It is playable for light or older titles, but not for max-settings AAA gaming at 4K.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The RX 6800 XT has a TDP of 300 W and the suggested power supply is 700 W. The card requires two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot design measuring 267 mm in length, so case and PSU compatibility should be checked accordingly.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded versus multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU's single-thread performance is solid for its class, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3481 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1964. Multi-threaded performance is moderate, with a Passmark multithread score of 19433 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380. The 3dmark results show scaling from 909 single-thread to 5912 max-thread, which is a 6.5x improvement from 6 cores and 12 threads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor that is competitive in its segment but not a leader. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 and single-core score of 1680 are typical for a six-core Alder Lake part. The Geekbench multicore score of 9472 and single-core score of 1964 place it in the upper mid-range of desktop CPUs. The Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: data compression at 233327 and integer math at 59995 are strong, while floating point math at 46759 and extended instructions at 15834 are more moderate. The find prime numbers score of 72 is notably low, indicating weaker performance in certain integer-heavy algorithms. The average benchmark score of 19039 puts it at the 73rd percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at a 0% delta and the Intel Core 3 201E at -0.1% delta, meaning the i5-12400F is essentially performance-neutral against these competitors.

The GPU's benchmark results are where this system shines. The Passmark G3D score of 24980 is strong, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 171304 indicates robust compute performance. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3689 reflects modern gaming capability. The GPU's average benchmark score of 48477 places it at the 85th percentile, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile at a 1.5% delta (meaning the RX 6800 XT is ahead), while the Intel Arc A550M is 2.5% ahead and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is 3% ahead. The combined picture is a system where the GPU is a top-tier performer relative to its peers, while the CPU is adequate but not distinguished. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this asymmetry, with the GPU pulling the overall ranking upward.

The pair's rank by FPS is 1136 out of 3732 pairs, which places it in the top 30% of all CPU+GPU combinations tracked. The average FPS across all measured games is 152.1, which is skewed upward by esports titles. The data is measured, not estimated, so these figures represent real-world testing results. The CPU's 3dmark max-thread score of 5912 shows it can fully utilize 12 threads, but the 16-thread score of 5895 being nearly identical suggests the processor is already at its ceiling with 12 threads, and additional threads would not help. This is a balanced pairing for 1440p gaming, where the GPU's 85th percentile can be fully leveraged without the CPU becoming a significant drag.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1440p and are willing to accept compromises at 4K. The measured FPS data shows that at 2560x1440, the system delivers playable frame rates in nearly all titles, with esports games like Valorant at 416.2 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 355.9 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 184 FPS. At 4K, the system is suitable for older or less demanding games, but AAA titles will require settings adjustments. The target user is a gamer with a 1440p high-refresh monitor who wants to max out settings in most games without spending on a higher-end CPU.

For content creators, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for light video editing and 3D rendering, but the Passmark multithread score of 19433 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 indicate it is not a powerhouse for heavy multi-threaded workloads. The GPU's compute performance, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 171304 and FP32 of 20.74 TFLOPS, makes it useful for GPU-accelerated rendering and video encoding tasks. This is a viable system for a freelance video editor who works with 1080p or light 4K footage, but not for a studio rendering complex 3D scenes around the clock.

Software developers will find the CPU adequate for compilation tasks, with the Passmark data encryption score of 11679 and data compression score of 233327 indicating reasonable performance for code builds and data processing. Students and small business users will find this system overkill for office work and web browsing, but the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM provides headroom for future software requirements. The system is not ideal for users who need high CPU throughput for scientific computing or heavy virtualization, as the 73rd CPU percentile shows there are many faster processors available. The sweet spot is a gaming-focused build for a user who also does occasional content creation or development work, where the GPU's strength compensates for the CPU's mediocrity.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor has no integrated graphics, which is why the F suffix is used, and the multiplier is locked, preventing easy overclocking. The launch MSRP was $174, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with balanced single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. The 3dmark single-thread score of 909 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1680 show that single-thread performance is competitive for gaming and everyday tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 3481 confirms this. The multi-threaded results are moderate: the 3dmark 16-thread score of 5895 is only slightly lower than the max-thread score of 5912, indicating that the processor has no more threads to leverage beyond 12. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 is about 7.4x the single-core score, which is reasonable for 6 cores with hyperthreading. The Geekbench multicore score of 9472 is about 4.8x the single-core score of 1964, which is lower than the Cinebench scaling, showing that different workloads utilize the cores differently.

In real workloads, the CPU's performance is best described as capable but not exceptional. The Passmark integer math score of 59995 and floating point math score of 46759 are good for general productivity, but the find prime numbers score of 72 is low, indicating weaker performance in specific algorithmic tasks. The data encryption score of 11679 and data compression score of 233327 are solid for file archiving and encryption tasks. The 73rd percentile ranking means the CPU is faster than about 73% of all processors in the database, but it is not a top-tier part. For gaming, the single-thread performance is sufficient to drive high frame rates in most titles, but the 3dmark 2-thread score of 1699 shows that even dual-thread workloads can be a limiting factor in some scenarios. The CPU is a good match for the RX 6800 XT in most games, but users who play CPU-intensive titles at 1080p may see the CPU as a bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system delivers exceptional frame rates in esports titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 520.3 FPS, Valorant at 439.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 281 FPS. These numbers are far beyond any display's refresh rate, making the system ideal for competitive gamers who need maximum frame rates. At 1440p, the system still delivers high refresh rates in esports, with Valorant at 416.2 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 154.5 FPS, but the CPU begins to limit performance in some titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads can handle streaming encoding while gaming, but the Passmark multithread score of 19433 suggests there is limited headroom. Streaming at 1080p with x264 encoding will work, but users may need to use the GPU's hardware encoder instead, which is supported by the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The GPU's compute performance, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 171304, indicates it can handle encoding tasks without significant impact on gaming performance.

Video editing: The GPU is the main asset for video editing, with 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth handling large video files and effects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 is adequate for timeline editing and rendering, but export times will be slower than with higher-core-count CPUs. The Passmark data compression score of 233327 helps with video file compression tasks. For 1080p editing, this system is more than sufficient, but 4K editing will be GPU-accelerated, making the CPU less of a bottleneck.

3D rendering: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads produce a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380, which is moderate for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's FP32 performance of 20.74 TFLOPS and its OpenCL score of 171304 make it a strong option for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar software. The 16 GB of VRAM is beneficial for large scenes. Users doing heavy CPU rendering will be limited, but those using GPU rendering will find the system capable.

Software development: The CPU handles compilation and code execution well, with a Passmark integer math score of 59995 and data encryption score of 11679. The 3dmark max-thread score of 5912 indicates that multi-threaded builds will use all available threads efficiently. The 73rd percentile ranking means the CPU is faster than most processors, but slower than high-end workstation parts. For a developer working on medium-sized projects, this system is a solid choice, with the GPU providing compute acceleration for testing or machine learning workloads.

Student and office work: This system is far more powerful than needed for typical student or office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1964, ensures snappy response in everyday applications. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking is overkill for these tasks, but the system will never struggle with office workloads. The 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth are wasted on such tasks, but they provide future-proofing for more demanding applications.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this system spans a wide range of titles, and the data is measured, not estimated. At 1080p, the system is a powerhouse in esports and light titles, but struggles with the most demanding AAA games. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leads at 520.3 FPS, followed by Valorant at 439.4 FPS, Roblox at 306.8 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at 283.1 FPS. Minecraft runs at 233 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 233.1 FPS. However, more demanding titles show the limits: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 69.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 62.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 34 FPS. The Medium runs at 49.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

At 1440p, the system is still strong in esports, with Valorant at 416.2 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 355.9 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 184 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 154.5 FPS. The demanding titles show a noticeable drop: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 52.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 47.1 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 22 FPS. The Medium runs at 39.9 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 68.9 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for the system, as it balances CPU load with GPU capability, delivering playable frame rates in most titles.

At 4K, the system is only suitable for lighter games. Valorant still runs at 366.6 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 208.7 FPS. Roblox hits 117.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 101.7 FPS. However, demanding AAA titles are not playable at high settings: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 33.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 30.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11 FPS. The Medium runs at 30.3 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 51.1 FPS. Users targeting 4K gaming will need to significantly lower settings or use upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-12400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is forward-looking, but the motherboard choice will determine memory type and PCIe configuration. The CPU's TDP of 65 W is low, and the GPU's TDP of 300 W with a suggested PSU of 700 W means the power supply is the main upgrade consideration. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot design, so the case must accommodate its 267 mm length.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, but the data shows the current CPU is already at the 73rd percentile, so the gains would be moderate for gaming. The GPU, at the 85th percentile, is the stronger component, and upgrading it would provide the most benefit for gaming, but the CPU would then become a more significant bottleneck. For users who want to improve multi-threaded performance, upgrading to a CPU with more cores on the LGA 1700 platform is the logical path, but the locked multiplier on the current CPU means overclocking is not an option. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so future GPUs that use this interface will be compatible, but the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives users flexibility in choosing a motherboard and memory kit, but the choice will affect overall system performance. The CPU's dual-channel memory bus means that two sticks are optimal for bandwidth. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for current games. The system's upgrade path is limited by the CPU's 65 W TDP and the socket's lifespan, but for a user looking to extend the system's life, upgrading the GPU would be the most impactful change, as the current GPU is already at the 85th percentile and a newer GPU would push the system to the top tier.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-12400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, resulting in a combined percentile of 79. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 300 W RDNA 2.0 card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The system ranks 1136 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS of 152.1 across all measured games. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 places it at the 73rd percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at a 0% delta, making the CPU a mid-range performer. The GPU's average benchmark score of 48477 places it at the 85th percentile, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile at a 1.5% delta, making the GPU a high-end performer.

The overall tier of this system is upper-mid-range, with the GPU being the standout component. The 85th percentile GPU ranking means it outperforms 85% of all GPUs in the database, while the 73rd percentile CPU ranking is more modest. The combined 79th percentile reflects the GPU's strength pulling the system upward. The measured FPS data confirms this is a 1440p gaming system, with strong performance in esports and acceptable performance in most AAA titles at that resolution. At 1080p, the system excels in esports but shows CPU limitations in the most demanding titles. At 4K, the system is only suitable for lighter games or lower settings.

For a user building a new system, this pairing represents a balanced choice for 1440p gaming with some productivity capabilities. The CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios, and the GPU provides excellent performance for its class. The system is best suited for gamers who want high frame rates in competitive titles and can run modern AAA games at high settings at 1440p. The CPU's 6 cores are sufficient for current games, and the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM provides headroom for future titles. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving users flexibility in their build choices, and the PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future components. This is a practical, performance-focused build that prioritizes graphics performance over CPU throughput, making it a sensible choice for most gamers.