SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing that targets the mainstream performance segment. The CPU, based on Alder Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, provides 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The GPU, built on RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip on a 7 nm process, offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth. Together, this combination sits at the 69th percentile among all CPU-GPU pairings, with measured 1080p ultra settings frame rates averaging 106 FPS across a broad game library. The data indicates a system built for smooth 1080p gaming with capability at higher resolutions in less demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Core 12th Gen series, built on the Alder Lake-S architecture using Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz are complemented by a 65 W TDP, making it a power-efficient choice for a desktop build. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and an 18 MB shared L3 cache, which helps with frequently accessed data across workloads. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing modern connectivity options. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported, but the boost clock is sufficient for demanding applications.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 909 in single-thread, to 1699 in 2-thread, 3067 in 4-thread, 4779 in 8-thread, and peak at 5912 in max-thread tests, with 5895 in the 16-thread test. This scaling pattern indicates efficient utilization of all 12 threads, though the gains diminish slightly beyond 8 threads, suggesting that the 6 physical cores handle most of the heavy lifting. In Cinebench, the R23 multicore score of 12380 and single-core score of 1680 show a strong balance; the multicore result is roughly 7.4 times the single-core figure, which is typical for a 6-core part with hyper-threading. The Geekbench scores of 9472 multicore and 1964 single-core reinforce this profile, with the multicore advantage of approximately 4.8 times indicating solid parallel performance for productivity tasks.

The PassMark suite provides insights into real-world workloads. The multithread score of 19433 and single-thread score of 3481 highlight the CPU's capability in both multi-tasking and lightly-threaded applications. Specific workloads show a data compression score of 233327, which is excellent for file archiving and compression tasks, while data encryption at 11679 indicates moderate throughput for security-related operations. Floating point math scores 46759, and integer math scores 59995, with the latter being notably higher, suggesting the architecture favors integer-heavy calculations common in general computing. The extended instructions score of 15834 and random string sorting at 22975 show reasonable performance for specialized tasks. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19039, placing it in the upper-midrange tier. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0% delta), the Intel Core 3 201E (-0.1% delta), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-1335U (0.3% delta) and AMD EPYC 7773X (0.3% delta). This means the 12400F is competitively positioned against both mobile and enterprise parts, though its desktop focus gives it an edge in sustained workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process. The GPU contains 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, with a transistor density of 46.7 million per mm², indicating a dense and efficient design. Clock speeds are substantial: a base clock of 2055 MHz, a game clock of 2410 MHz, and a boost clock of 2635 MHz, with memory clocked at 2190 MHz or 17.5 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray accelerators for RT workloads. Pixel rate is 168.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 337.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 10.79 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.59 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The benchmark data shows the GPU's strengths and limitations. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 1859, which is a modern DirectX 12 test reflecting current gaming workloads. The Geekbench scores are mixed: Metal at 97969 is strong, but OpenCL at 10111 and Vulkan at 81306 show significant variance, with Vulkan being notably higher than OpenCL, suggesting better performance in Vulkan-based games. The PassMark scores provide a clearer picture: DirectX 11 at 169 and DirectX 12 at 62 are relatively low, while DirectX 10 at 109 and DirectX 9 at 215 are higher, which is unusual and may indicate driver or benchmark quirks. The G3D score of 17166 is the most representative of overall gaming performance, while G2D at 918 is for 2D graphics. The GPU compute score of 7532 shows moderate compute capability for non-graphics tasks. The GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19765. Its nearest rivals are professional workstation cards: the NVIDIA Tesla K40m is -0.6% behind, the AMD FirePro D300 is 0.7% ahead, the AMD FirePro W7000 is -0.7% behind, and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 is 0.8% ahead. This places the RX 6650 XT in a similar performance tier to older workstation GPUs, though its gaming features like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support make it more suitable for consumer use.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a CPU at the 73rd percentile and a GPU at the 65th percentile, creating a pairing at the 69th combined percentile. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 is nearly identical to the GPU's average of 19765, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. In 3DMark, the CPU's max-thread score of 5912 and the GPU's Steel Nomad score of 1859 indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately for most games, though the GPU may be the limiting factor in CPU-light scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 for the CPU, combined with the GPU's G3D score of 17166, suggests that productivity tasks will be CPU-bound while gaming will be GPU-bound at lower resolutions.

The pair's rank by FPS is 2435 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the upper third of all CPU-GPU combinations, with an average FPS of 106 across all tested games at ultra settings. This average is pulled up by esports titles like Valorant (371.4 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (357 FPS at 1080p), but dragged down by heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (46.5 FPS at 1080p) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (44.2 FPS at 1080p). The measured data, which is confirmed as measured rather than estimated, shows that the system is capable of high frame rates in competitive games but will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding AAA titles at ultra settings. The combined percentile of 69 indicates that this build outperforms roughly two-thirds of all possible CPU-GPU pairs, making it a solid mid-range choice.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-12400F and the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is generally well-matched, but the data reveals specific bottleneck patterns. The CPU's 73rd percentile versus the GPU's 65th percentile suggests the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers, meaning the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in most scenarios. This is confirmed by the FPS scaling across resolutions: at 1080p, the average FPS of 106 indicates the GPU is working hard to keep up, while at 1440p and 4K, the frame rates drop more steeply, showing the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute limits. For example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the 1080p score of 134.5 FPS drops to 121.6 FPS at 1440p and 102.9 FPS at 4K, a relatively mild decline that suggests the CPU is keeping pace even at higher resolutions. However, in Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p score of 46.5 FPS drops to 36.9 FPS at 1440p and 23.4 FPS at 4K, a steeper decline that indicates the GPU is the clear bottleneck in this title.

In CPU-intensive games, the balance shifts. Counter-Strike 2 shows 161 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 107 FPS at 1440p and 60 FPS at 4K, which is a typical GPU-bound scaling pattern. However, in titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator, the 1080p score of 61 FPS drops to 48.1 FPS at 1440p and 35.7 FPS at 4K, showing that both CPU and GPU are stressed. The CPU's 12 threads are sufficient for modern games, but in heavily threaded titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 (44.2 FPS at 1080p), the CPU's 6 cores may be a limiting factor alongside the GPU. The data suggests that at 1080p, the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most games, but at 1440p and above, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become the limiting factors, as seen in the steep drops in demanding titles. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes ensures the GPU has sufficient bandwidth, even though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is not a bottleneck in practice.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS at ultra settings across 52 games provides a comprehensive picture of gaming performance. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent esports performance: Valorant hits 371.4 FPS, CS:GO reaches 357 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 161 FPS. Roblox runs at 206.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 192 FPS. These titles are well above the 144 Hz threshold for high-refresh monitors. For lighter titles, Barony runs at 138.5 FPS, Inside at 141.3 FPS, and To The Core at 164.4 FPS, all comfortably above 120 FPS. However, the system struggles with modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at only 24 FPS. These are below the 60 FPS target, indicating that ultra settings are too demanding for this GPU in the heaviest games.

At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. Esports titles remain playable: Valorant hits 314 FPS, CS:GO 245 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 107 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 121.6 FPS, which is still smooth. However, many titles fall below 60 FPS: Control at 53.7 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 36.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 34.6 FPS. The Medium drops to 26.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15 FPS, making them unplayable at this resolution. At 3840x2160, only esports and lightweight titles remain viable: Valorant at 252.3 FPS, CS:GO at 145 FPS, and Roblox at 76.5 FPS. Most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 23.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 20.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. The data clearly shows that this system is optimized for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being possible for competitive titles and lighter games, while 4K is only feasible for esports or very low-demand games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The motherboard must be chosen accordingly, as DDR4 and DDR5 are not interchangeable. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes provides headroom for future GPUs, though the current RX 6650 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible. The 65 W TDP of the CPU is modest, and the GPU's 176 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 450 W, means a standard 500-550 W power supply would provide ample headroom for this build. The GPU is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector, which is straightforward to install.

The upgrade path is limited by the platform's maturity. Socket 1700 supports 12th Gen Core processors like this i5-12400F, and potentially 13th and 14th Gen parts with a BIOS update, though the data does not specify this. For a meaningful CPU upgrade, moving to a higher-core-count 12th Gen i7 or i9 would provide more threads for productivity tasks, though the 6-core design is sufficient for most gaming. For the GPU, the RX 6650 XT's successor is listed as Navi III, but the production status is end-of-life, meaning upgrades would require a newer generation card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the GPU is not a bottleneck in current games, but future GPUs might benefit from the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that an upgrade to DDR5 would require a new motherboard, as the two types are not compatible on the same board. Overall, the most sensible upgrade path is to first replace the GPU with a higher-tier card for 1440p gaming, as the CPU has enough headroom to support it, and then consider a CPU upgrade only if productivity workloads demand more threads.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 resolution. The measured FPS data shows that the system delivers over 60 FPS in most games at 1080p ultra, with esports titles exceeding 144 FPS. Gamers who play competitive titles like Valorant, CS:GO, and Counter-Strike 2 will benefit from the high frame rates, which are well above 144 Hz. For casual gamers who play a mix of titles, the system handles most games at 1080p with good settings, though ultra settings in the heaviest AAA titles will require lowering to high or medium. At 1440p, the system is suitable for esports and older or less demanding games, but not for modern AAA titles at ultra settings.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads adequate for moderate workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 and Geekbench multicore score of 9472. The GPU's compute performance, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 7532, can accelerate some rendering tasks, but it is not a professional workstation card. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3481 in PassMark single-thread) for compilation tasks, and the 12 threads for parallel builds. Students and small business workstations will find the system more than capable for office productivity, web browsing, and light multitasking, with the CPU's data compression score of 233327 indicating fast file operations. The 73rd percentile CPU performance and 65th percentile GPU performance make this a well-rounded system for users who need both gaming and productivity in a single desktop.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 280.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 12380 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1680 in single-core.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19765.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games at 1080p ultra settings?

A: The average FPS across all tested games is 106 at 1080p ultra settings, based on measured data.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and the GPU's suggested PSU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 176 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Q: Does the system support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is the system's strongest suit. At 1080p ultra, esports titles like Valorant hit 371.4 FPS and CS:GO reaches 357 FPS, easily driving 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. Even more demanding competitive games like Counter-Strike 2 (161 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (134.5 FPS) stay above 120 FPS. The CPU's 909 single-thread score in 3DMark and the GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance ensure low latency and high frame delivery.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads can handle encoding while gaming, but with a GPU that lacks dedicated encoder hardware (tensor cores are null), software encoding via x264 will use CPU resources. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 suggests adequate headroom for 1080p streaming while gaming, but heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (46.5 FPS at 1080p) may suffer if CPU resources are shared. The system is better suited for streaming esports titles where frame rates are high.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 9472 and PassMark multithread score of 19433 indicate solid performance for video editing software. The GPU's compute score of 7532 can accelerate effects and rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing timelines, and the CPU's 18 MB L3 cache helps with large file operations. For 4K editing, the system may struggle with complex timelines, but it can handle basic 4K cuts.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6980 and the GPU's FP32 performance of 10.79 TFLOPS provide moderate rendering capability. For CPU-based rendering, the 12 threads will complete tasks slower than higher-core-count CPUs, but for GPU-based rendering with OpenCL or Vulkan, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 10111 and Vulkan score of 81306 indicate reasonable performance. The GPU's 32 RT cores support ray-traced rendering, though with only 8 GB VRAM, complex scenes may be limited.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3481 and integer math score of 59995 are strong indicators for compilation speed. The 12 threads allow for parallel builds, and the data compression score of 233327 speeds up version control operations. The system can run multiple VMs or containers, though the 65 W TDP limits sustained all-core load. The PCIe Gen 5 support provides fast storage connectivity for large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 65th percentile make this overkill for basic office tasks, but it handles them effortlessly. The PassMark data encryption score of 11679 ensures secure file operations, and the single-thread performance of 3481 provides snappy application responsiveness. The system can handle spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing with significant headroom, and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM supports multiple 4K displays for productivity.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-12400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in a desktop configuration. The CPU, from the Core 12th Gen series with Alder Lake architecture, provides 6 cores and 12 threads, achieving a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU, from the Radeon RX 6000 series with RDNA 2.0 architecture, offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 2048 shading units, ranking at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 69 places this pairing in the upper-midrange tier of all CPU-GPU combinations, with a rank of 2435 out of 3732 pairs by FPS. The average benchmark scores are closely matched (19039 for CPU, 19765 for GPU), indicating a balanced system. The measured FPS data shows an average of 106 FPS across games at 1080p ultra settings, making this a capable 1080p gaming desktop with enough CPU power for productivity tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and light 1440p gaming, while the CPU's 12 threads and 18 MB L3 cache handle multitasking well. This is a sensible mid-range desktop build for gamers who prioritize 1080p performance and users who need a balanced system for both gaming and daily productivity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12400F

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds