SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT form a cohesive desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p gaming without unnecessary expense in other areas. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Alder Lake part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, provides a strong balance of single-thread responsiveness and multi-threaded capability. The GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, delivers solid rasterization performance. This analysis examines the measured data to define what this build does well, where its limits are, and who should consider it.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process. It features 6 physical cores and 12 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. With a 65 W TDP, it is a power-efficient part that does not require exotic cooling solutions. The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mainstream chip: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and memory speed, though ECC memory is not supported. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, ensuring compatibility with the latest storage and graphics interfaces.

Benchmark results show a CPU that is clearly strong in single-threaded workloads and more than capable in multi-threaded tasks, though it is not a high-core-count workstation part. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 1680 points in single-core and 12380 points in multi-core. The single-core score indicates excellent responsiveness for daily tasks and games that rely on a few fast threads. The multi-core score is robust for a 6-core chip, allowing it to handle compilation, rendering, and streaming without severe bottlenecks. The Geekbench scores of 1964 single-core and 9472 multi-core reinforce this picture of a balanced performer.

The data from Passmark tests provides insight into specific workload characteristics. The processor scores 59995 in integer math, 46759 in floating-point math, and 15834 in extended instructions. These numbers indicate strong general processing power. Data compression scores 233327, while encryption scores 11679, suggesting that the chip handles archival and security tasks competently. The single-thread Passmark score of 3481 confirms that the boost clock of 4.40 GHz delivers tangible benefits in lightly-threaded scenarios. With a percentile rank of 73 among all CPUs, the 12400F sits above the majority of processors, making it a solid mid-range choice.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i5-12400F is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, which has an average score of 19047 versus the Intel's 19039, a delta of 0%. It is also within 0.3% of the Intel Core 3 201E and the AMD EPYC 7773X, and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-1335U. This shows that the 12400F's multi-threaded performance is competitive with both mobile and enterprise chips, though its real-world advantage lies in its desktop power envelope and upgradeability. The average benchmark score of 19039 places it in a performance tier where it will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a desktop build with a percentile rank of 72 across all CPU and GPU combinations. This places it in the upper third of systems, indicating a capable machine that can handle modern software. The CPU's average benchmark score is 19039, and the GPU's average score is 24442. These scores, when viewed together, suggest a balanced platform where neither component is drastically over or under-powered relative to the other.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, demonstrates its strengths in various API tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1804. In Geekbench, it achieves 88720 in Metal, 80503 in OpenCL, and 72417 in Vulkan. These numbers show strong compute capabilities that extend beyond gaming into content creation and GPU-accelerated workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 16461 and GPU compute score of 7520 further confirm that the card is a capable performer for its class. With a percentile rank of 70 among all GPUs, it outperforms the majority of graphics cards on the market.

The gaming performance data is measured and comprehensive, covering 54 titles. The average FPS across all tested games is 103.1 at the settings tested. This pair ranks 2576 out of 3732 pairs, meaning it outperforms roughly 31% of all CPU-GPU combinations in gaming, though this rank is heavily influenced by the resolution and settings of the test suite. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles, with esports games hitting very high numbers. For example, Valorant runs at 356.8 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 340.8 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at 185.2 FPS. These figures indicate that the system is well-suited for competitive gaming at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, performance remains playable but drops significantly. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 118.5 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 33.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.5 FPS. This shows that the RX 6600 XT is primarily a 1080p card, and 1440p gaming requires careful settings adjustments or lighter titles. At 3840x2160, the system struggles with modern AAA games, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 24.7 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18.5 FPS. However, older or less demanding games like Counter-Strike 2 run at 55.1 FPS at 4K. The data clearly indicates that 1080p is the sweet spot for this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-12400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pair?

A: The average FPS across all tested games is 103.1.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS?

A: They are nearly identical in average benchmark score, with the Ryzen 5 7535HS scoring 19047 and the i5-12400F scoring 19039, a delta of 0%.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile rank among all GPUs?

A: The RX 6600 XT has a percentile rank of 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of all GPUs.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K with high settings?

A: No, at 3840x2160 resolution, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 24.7 FPS, which is not smooth. It is best played at 1080p where it reaches 47.2 FPS.

Who Should Build It

This build is designed for the 1080p gamer who prioritizes high frame rates in competitive titles and smooth gameplay in AAA releases. The measured data shows that at 1920x1080, the system excels in esports, with Counter-Strike 2 at 156.7 FPS, Valorant at 356.8 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 184 FPS. For single-player games, it delivers playable frame rates, with Control at 65 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 89.8 FPS. Gamers who play at 1440p will find the system adequate for less demanding games or with reduced settings, but it is not a 1440p high-refresh machine.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads sufficient for moderate workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 indicates it can handle 1080p video editing and basic 3D rendering, though it will not compete with higher-core-count processors for heavy export tasks. The GPU's compute performance, evidenced by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 80503, can accelerate rendering and effects in supported applications.

Developers and students building a workstation for programming, virtual machines, or general productivity will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the platform's memory flexibility. Small business workstations running office applications, web services, or database tasks will find the i5-12400F's Passmark integer math score of 59995 and data compression score of 233327 more than sufficient. The system's overall percentile rank of 72 places it well above average for a desktop, making it a reliable choice for users who need a responsive and capable machine without requiring extreme multi-core performance.

Gaming Performance

This section relies on measured FPS data from the FACT PACK, with the figures being exact for the 54 games tested. At 1920x1080, the system delivers a strong gaming experience across most genres. The highest frame rates are achieved in esports and older titles: Valorant at 356.8 FPS, CS:GO at 340.8 FPS, Roblox at 200 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 185.2 FPS. These numbers are far above the refresh rate of most monitors, ensuring a smooth and responsive competitive experience.

For modern AAA games at 1080p, the system holds up well, though frame rates are more variable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 137.8 FPS, which is excellent. Minecraft runs at 153 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 89.8 FPS. However, more demanding titles push the system to its limits. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 41.7 FPS, and The Medium at 32 FPS. These games are playable but may require turning down settings from the ultra preset to achieve higher frame rates. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly demanding, running at only 22.5 FPS at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. The average FPS across games falls, with esports titles still playable: Valorant at 299.2 FPS, CS:GO at 237.8 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 120.8 FPS. However, AAA games become more challenging. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 118.5 FPS, but Control drops to 49 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 to 33.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.5 FPS. This resolution is only suitable for competitive games or older titles.

At 3840x2160, the system is not suited for modern gaming. Most AAA games run below 30 FPS, including Cyberpunk 2077 at 24.7 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18.5 FPS. Even less demanding titles like Counter-Strike 2 run at 55.1 FPS, which is below the smoothness threshold for competitive play. The RX 6600 XT's 8 GB of VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient for high-resolution textures and rendering loads. For 4K gaming, a more powerful GPU is required.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports a range of 12th Gen processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, depending on motherboard selection. The memory bus is dual-channel, so using two sticks of RAM is recommended for optimal performance. The platform also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, ensuring that the latest graphics cards and NVMe SSDs will function at their full potential.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This is sufficient for the card's performance, as the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth do not require the full bandwidth of a x16 slot. The card has a TDP of 160 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for the system is 450 W, which provides headroom for a modest overclock or additional drives. Given the CPU's 65 W TDP, the total system power draw is well within the capabilities of a quality 450 W power supply.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should consider a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 from the 12th Gen lineup, to improve multi-threaded performance in rendering and streaming. However, the 12400F's performance is not a bottleneck for the RX 6600 XT in most gaming scenarios. A more impactful upgrade would be the GPU itself, moving to a card with more VRAM and higher bandwidth to enable 1440p or 4K gaming. The platform's PCIe support ensures that a newer GPU will not be limited by the interface. The 450 W PSU may need to be upgraded if the new GPU has a higher TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a well-balanced system where the CPU and GPU are well-matched for 1080p gaming. The CPU's percentile rank of 73 is slightly higher than the GPU's rank of 70, suggesting that the processor has a small edge in overall capability. This means the GPU is likely the limiting factor in gaming workloads, which is typical for a system designed for gaming. The average FPS across games of 103.1, combined with the frame rates in specific titles, supports this conclusion.

At 1080p, the CPU is generally not a bottleneck. In esports titles like Valorant at 356.8 FPS and CS:GO at 340.8 FPS, the CPU's single-thread performance of 1680 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU. However, in some CPU-intensive games, the 6-core/12-thread configuration may show its limits. For example, in Microsoft Flight Simulator at 59 FPS at 1080p, the CPU's multi-threaded performance is being tested, and the game may be limited by the processor's 18 MB of L3 cache or its 2.50 GHz base clock in certain scenarios.

As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck. At 1440p, frame rates drop significantly, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 at 33.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28.5 FPS. This indicates that the RX 6600 XT's compute power, measured at 10.60 TFLOPS FP32, is insufficient for high-resolution rendering. The 8 GB VRAM also becomes a limiting factor, as modern games require more memory for high-resolution textures. At 4K, the GPU is severely underpowered, with most games running below 30 FPS.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is not a bottleneck for the GPU in gaming. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 is close to the GPU's average score of 24442, but the GPU's percentile rank of 70 versus the CPU's 73 shows a slight imbalance. In non-gaming workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU may become the limiting factor, as its 6 cores are not as capable as the GPU's 2048 shading units for parallel compute tasks. For a balanced upgrade, users should look at the GPU first to improve gaming performance at higher resolutions.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class system that pairs the Intel Core i5-12400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. The CPU is a mid-range 12th Gen processor with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the GPU is a mid-range RDNA 2.0 card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile rank of 72 places this system in the upper third of all CPU-GPU pairings, making it a solid choice for mainstream users.

The system's overall tier is defined by its performance at 1080p. The measured average FPS of 103.1 across 54 games shows that it can handle most titles at high settings with smooth frame rates. It is not a high-end system, as its rank of 2576 out of 3732 pairs indicates, but it outperforms a significant portion of the market. The GPU's percentile rank of 70 and the CPU's percentile rank of 73 are closely matched, confirming that this is a balanced build with no obvious weak point.

This pairing is best described as a "sweet spot" for 1080p gaming. It offers high frame rates in competitive titles and playable performance in AAA games, making it an ideal choice for a first gaming PC or an upgrade for a user coming from a lower-end system. The build's class as a desktop means it is easily upgradeable, and its platform support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility. For users who prioritize 1080p performance and want a reliable, balanced system, this is a compelling option.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The GPU chip, Navi 23, contains 11,060 million transistors on a die size of 237 mm². It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, providing a strong foundation for rasterization. The card also includes 32 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though its performance in this area is limited by its 8 GB of memory and bandwidth.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 1968 MHz, a game clock of 2359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. The memory runs at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective, on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming but becomes a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The card's pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s and texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s, which are competitive for its class. Its FP32 performance is 10.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.21 TFLOPS, indicating strong compute capabilities.

Benchmark results show that the RX 6600 XT is a capable mid-range card. Its Passmark G3D score of 16461 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1804 place it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench scores of 88720 in Metal, 80503 in OpenCL, and 72417 in Vulkan demonstrate solid performance in GPU-accelerated workloads, which is useful for content creators using supported software. The card's nearest rivals in terms of average score are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (0.7% higher), Intel Arc A350M (0.8% lower), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (0.8% higher), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (1.1% higher). This shows that the RX 6600 XT performs at a level comparable to much older or lower-tier cards, but its modern features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate provide additional value.

For rendering and gaming, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p with high textures but will be a limiting factor in future titles or at higher resolutions. The card's RT cores allow for ray tracing, but the 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance means that enabling ray tracing will significantly impact frame rates. The GPU's TDP of 160 W is manageable for most power supplies, and its dual-slot design with a single 8-pin connector makes it easy to install in most cases. Overall, the RX 6600 XT is a well-rounded GPU that excels at 1080p rasterization and offers a taste of modern features.