SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600: A Balanced 1080p Desktop Contender

This desktop pairing combines Intel’s 6-core/12-thread Alder Lake processor with AMD’s RDNA 2-based mainstream GPU, landing at the 68th percentile overall among all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The data shows a system that delivers strong 1080p gaming performance, with the CPU placing in the 73rd percentile and the GPU in the 63rd percentile. The measured frame rates across 49 games indicate the pairing is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p play, while 1440p remains viable in less demanding titles, and 4K is reserved for older or lighter games.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a gamer focused on 1920x1080 resolution who wants high frame rates without stepping into higher price tiers. The measured average of 93.9 FPS across all tested games at ultra settings supports this, with popular esports titles like Valorant hitting 324.5 FPS and CS:GO reaching 312.8 FPS at 1080p. Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance adequate, with Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 and Geekbench multicore score of 9472 indicating solid rendering capability for entry-level workloads.

Software developers compiling code and running virtual machines benefit from the 12 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3481, Geekbench single-core score of 1964) ensures responsive UI interactions and fast compilation of single-threaded tasks. Students and small business users building general-purpose workstations will appreciate the balance: the CPU sits in the 73rd percentile against all processors, and the GPU’s 63rd percentile position indicates consistent performance without extreme strengths or weaknesses.

Enthusiasts targeting 1440p gaming should note that the data shows playable frame rates in lighter titles (Counter-Strike 2 at 95.5 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 119.3 FPS), but demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 31.9 FPS at 2560x1440, making this a 1080p-first configuration. Users who primarily play older or less graphically intensive multiplayer games will find more headroom, as evidenced by Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 169 FPS at 1080p.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the combination excels in competitive titles: Valorant reaches 324.5 FPS, CS:GO hits 312.8 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege achieves 169 FPS. These numbers confirm that the system can drive 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors in esports scenarios. In AAA single-player games, the picture is more mixed — Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 41.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 40.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a demanding 20.5 FPS, all at 1080p ultra, suggesting users should lower settings for smoother play.

Streaming while gaming places load on both components, and the CPU’s 12 threads handle encoding without dedicated hardware, though the 3DMark max threads score of 5912 suggests headroom for mid-bitrate x264 encoding at 1080p. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provides enough capacity for game plus streaming software at 1080p.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits from the 6-core/12-thread configuration, with PassMark multi-thread score of 19433 and data compression score of 233327 indicating reasonable timeline performance for 1080p projects. The GPU’s 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 17.86 TFLOPS FP16 performance assist with effects and color grading, though 4K editing would strain the 8 GB VRAM.

3D rendering workloads show the CPU’s capability: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 places it above many mobile processors, and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 confirms sustained multi-core performance. The GPU’s 28 ray accelerators support DirectX Raytracing, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 suggests RT performance is modest, making it more suitable for non-RT rendering or hybrid workflows.

Software development benefits from the dual memory support (DDR4 and DDR5), allowing builders to choose platforms based on budget. The PassMark integer math score of 59995 and floating point math score of 46759 indicate solid number-crunching for compilation, testing, and data processing, while the extended instructions score of 15834 supports modern SIMD workloads.

For students and office work, the system is overqualified: the single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches, and the 12 threads handle multitasking (browser, office suite, video calls) without strain. The PassMark single-thread score of 3481 and 2-thread 3DMark score of 1699 confirm that everyday tasks run smoothly, while the GPU handles light photo editing and casual gaming during breaks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 uses the Navi 23 chip on TSMC’s 7 nm process, packing 11,060 million transistors into a 237 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, which is adequate for 1080p but explains the steep frame rate drops at higher resolutions.

The GPU includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray accelerators. The pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s provide the raw throughput seen in the measured game data. In PassMark testing, the GPU scores 15096 in G3D, 6554 in compute, 889 in G2D, and shows DirectX 12 performance at 51, DirectX 11 at 152, DirectX 10 at 95, and DirectX 9 at 197.

The 8 GB VRAM is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and in texture-heavy titles. At 3840x2160, many games drop below 30 FPS (Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21.6, Cyberpunk 2077 at 23.0, Ark at 6.7), indicating that the memory bandwidth and capacity are insufficient for 4K ultra settings. The GPU places in the 63rd percentile against all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0% delta), GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (-0.1%), Tesla K20m (-0.3%), and RTX 2000 Ada Generation (0.4%), showing it sits at a performance parity point with older workstation and newer mobile parts.

The RDNA 2 architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with the 28 ray accelerators enabling hardware ray tracing. However, the Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 suggests that RT workloads should be approached with caution. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67623 and OpenCL score of 28850 indicate strong compute capability for non-gaming workloads, while the Metal score of 88398 (though not applicable to Windows) shows the architecture’s efficiency.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are well-matched at 1080p, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 73rd percentile versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile indicates the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, meaning in CPU-bound scenarios (esports titles, strategy games), the GPU can keep up, but in GPU-bound scenarios (AAA games, 4K), the GPU holds back the system.

Frame rate scaling across resolutions confirms this: in Valorant, FPS drops from 324.5 at 1080p to 274.8 at 1440p (a 15% reduction) to 223.2 at 4K (a 31% reduction from 1080p), showing the CPU maintains high frame rates even as resolution increases. In contrast, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 41.6 at 1080p to 31.9 at 1440p (23% reduction) to 23.0 at 4K (45% reduction), a much steeper decline that points to GPU limitation.

The pair rank by FPS places this configuration at 2924 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 93.9 across all tested games. This mid-pack ranking reflects the GPU’s mainstream positioning — it outperforms many older or lower-tier cards but trails higher-end GPUs that would pair with better CPUs. The bottleneck analysis shows that for 1080p gaming, the GPU is the primary constraint in demanding titles, while the CPU handles lighter games with ease.

The CPU’s 3DMark thread scaling provides insight: 2-thread score of 1699, 4-thread of 3067, 8-thread of 4779, and max-thread of 5912. This shows linear scaling from 2 to 8 threads (from 1699 to 4779, a 181% increase with 4x threads), but diminishing returns beyond 8 threads (5912 max versus 4779 at 8 threads, only 24% more with 50% more threads). This indicates the 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for modern games, which typically use 6-8 threads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12400F (Alder Lake-S architecture, 10 nm process, 6 cores/12 threads) with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (RDNA 2.0, 7 nm process, Navi 23 chip). The CPU runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 132 W and requires a 300 W suggested PSU. The combined percentile of 68 places this pairing in the upper-mid range of all tracked builds.

The CPU’s market segment is desktop with an active production status, released in January 2022. The GPU is end-of-life, released in October 2021, meaning builders should check current availability. The pairing represents a mainstream 1080p gaming configuration — not entry-level, but not high-end either. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 63rd percentile indicate that this is a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

The measured FPS data confirms the system’s tier: average 93.9 FPS across all games at 1080p ultra, with esports titles exceeding 140 FPS and demanding AAA games hovering around 40-60 FPS. This places it in the "high-refresh 1080p" category rather than "1440p high-refresh" or "4K capable."

Gaming Performance

The measured frame rates at ultra settings across three resolutions reveal a clear pattern. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most titles: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 135.1 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 141.7 FPS, Minecraft at 140 FPS, and Fortnite at 68.9 FPS. Esports and competitive games exceed 100 FPS consistently, while demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (41.6 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (40.3 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (20.5 FPS) require settings adjustments for smooth play.

At 2560x1440, the system remains viable for less demanding games: Call of Duty: Warzone still hits 119.3 FPS, Valorant 274.8 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 95.5 FPS. However, many AAA titles drop below 45 FPS (Cyberpunk 2077 at 31.9, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 29.0, Control at 43.0), suggesting that 1440p users should lower settings or accept sub-60 FPS gameplay in recent releases.

At 3840x2160, only the lightest games remain playable: Valorant at 223.2 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 104.5 FPS, and CS:GO at 126 FPS. Most modern AAA titles fall below 30 FPS (Cyberpunk 2077 at 23.0, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21.6, The Medium at 19.5), confirming that 4K is not a realistic target for this configuration at ultra settings.

Since dataIsMeasured is true, these figures come from actual benchmark runs rather than estimates. The system’s pair rank by FPS of 2924 out of 3732 pairs indicates it outperforms about 22% of tracked configurations in average frame rate, which is consistent with its mid-pack overall percentile of 68.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores show a balanced profile. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score of 909, 2-thread score of 1699, 4-thread score of 3067, 8-thread score of 4779, 16-thread score of 5895, and max-thread score of 5912 indicate good scaling up to 8 threads with minimal gains beyond. Cinebench scores confirm this: R15 multicore at 1759 and single-core at 244, R20 multicore at 6980 and single-core at 985, R23 multicore at 12380 and single-core at 1680. Geekbench shows 9472 multicore and 1964 single-core.

PassMark scores reveal specific strengths: multi-thread score of 19433, single-thread of 3481, integer math of 59995, floating point math of 46759, extended instructions of 15834, data compression of 233327, data encryption of 11679, physics of 1202, random string sorting of 22975, and prime number finding of 72. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19039, placing it at the 73rd percentile.

The GPU’s benchmark results are more varied. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1492. Geekbench shows Metal at 88398, OpenCL at 28850, and Vulkan at 67623. PassMark G3D scores 15096, G2D 889, compute 6554, and DirectX tests show 197 (DX9), 152 (DX11), 95 (DX10), and 51 (DX12). The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19036, at the 63rd percentile.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in percentile terms (73 vs 63), meaning the processor has more headroom for future GPU upgrades. The CPU’s nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 avg score with 0% delta, Intel Core 3 201E at 19056 with -0.1% delta) show it sits at a performance parity point with recent mobile and embedded parts. The GPU’s nearest rivals (Quadro K6000 at 19030 with 0% delta, RTX 4050 Mobile at 19049 with -0.1% delta) similarly show it aligns with workstation and mobile parts from different generations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². It runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with no ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), uses the Intel Socket 1700, and has no integrated graphics (the "F" suffix indicates this). It was released in January 2022 with a launch MSRP of $174, and the multiplier is locked.

The benchmark data shows strong single-thread performance for a 6-core part: the 3DMark single-thread score of 909 and PassMark single-thread score of 3481 indicate excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1680 places it competitively against recent processors, while the multi-core score of 12380 shows it handles multi-threaded workloads effectively.

The 12 threads provide good multi-tasking capability: the 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 and max-thread score of 5912 show near-identical performance, indicating the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads and doesn’t benefit from additional threads beyond its 12. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19433 and Geekbench multicore of 9472 confirm this pattern.

In real workloads, the CPU excels in data compression (233327 PassMark score) and integer math (59995), making it suitable for file archiving, compilation, and general productivity. The floating point score of 46759 supports scientific and financial applications, while the extended instructions score of 15834 benefits from modern SIMD operations. The physics score of 1202 and prime number finding of 72 represent more specialized workloads where the processor’s moderately high clock speed helps but core count is less relevant.

FAQ

Q: What resolution is this system best suited for?

A: The measured data shows the system performs best at 1920x1080, with an average of 93.9 FPS across all tested games at ultra settings. At 2560x1440, many AAA games drop below 60 FPS, and at 3840x2160, only esports titles remain playable (Valorant at 223.2 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 104.5 FPS).

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 28 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 suggests ray tracing performance is modest. In practice, users should expect to lower ray tracing settings or use lower resolutions, as the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth limit heavy RT workloads.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in gaming?

A: At 1080p, the GPU is the primary bottleneck in demanding titles — evidence includes Cyberpunk 2077 dropping from 41.6 FPS at 1080p to 23.0 FPS at 4K. In esports titles, the CPU keeps up (Valorant maintains 223.2 FPS even at 4K), showing the processor has more headroom than the graphics card.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The choice between them affects overall system performance, but the CPU’s memory controller accommodates either type depending on the motherboard selected.

Q: How does this build compare to similar configurations?

A: The combined percentile is 68, placing it above the majority of tracked builds. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 63rd percentile indicate a balanced pairing, with the CPU outperforming the GPU relative to their respective categories.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this system?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, supporting 12th Gen Core processors. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so a faster GPU could be installed later, but the 300 W suggested PSU would need consideration for higher-power cards. The CPU’s 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom, but the GPU’s 132 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector limit GPU upgrades to those within similar power envelopes.

Q: Is this system suitable for content creation?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 and PassMark multi-thread score of 19433 support 1080p video editing and 3D rendering. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 performance assist with effects, but 4K projects or heavy 3D scenes may exceed the GPU’s capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports 12th Gen Core processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in motherboard and memory selection. The PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU’s TDP of 65 W is modest, allowing for compact air coolers and efficient power delivery. The GPU’s TDP of 132 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W means the entire system can run on a mid-range power supply, though the 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU should be matched to available PSU cables. The GPU’s dimensions (190 mm length, 110 mm height, 40 mm width) fit in most mid-tower cases, and the dual-slot design requires typical clearance.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests prioritizing the GPU. The CPU’s 73rd percentile versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile indicates the processor has more headroom. A GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth would improve 1440p and 4K performance, which is currently limited — evidenced by the steep frame rate drops at higher resolutions (e.g., Control at 61.8 FPS at 1080p dropping to 31.2 FPS at 4K). However, any GPU upgrade must respect the 300 W suggested PSU or include a PSU upgrade.

The CPU’s locked multiplier prevents overclocking, but the 2.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost clocks provide adequate performance for most workloads. The 18 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core support the measured performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The production status is active for the CPU, meaning availability should be maintained, while the GPU is end-of-life, so builders may need to source it from remaining inventory or consider alternatives.

The platform’s DDR4 and DDR5 support means existing DDR4 memory can be reused for a budget-conscious build, while DDR5 offers a path to higher bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures compatibility with future high-speed storage devices, though current GPUs use PCIe 4.0. Overall, this pairing represents a solid 1080p gaming platform with reasonable upgrade options, primarily through GPU replacement within the 300 W power envelope or a full platform change in the future.