SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400

18,683 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring a GB202 chip with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. This is a flagship-class GPU with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate. These specifications place the card in the highest tier of graphics hardware for data-intensive workloads, particularly those requiring large framebuffers and rapid texture streaming.

The GPU's compute configuration is substantial: 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 raster output units, 170 ray tracing cores, and 680 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate reaches 1,636.8 GTexel/s. Raw compute throughput is rated at 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is notable because it indicates no half-rate penalty for mixed-precision workloads. The base clock is 2017 MHz, boosting to 2407 MHz.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504 points. This result places the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 59% of the database's tracked graphics cards. The nearest rival comparison is telling: the NVIDIA T400 scores 16,508 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16,415 (0.5% behind), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16,408 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,361 (0.9% behind). The delta percentages are extremely tight — all within 0.9% of each other — suggesting that in this particular synthetic test, the RTX 5090 D V2 performs at a level comparable to a range of professional and consumer cards. However, the percentile ranking at 59 indicates that while this is a strong score, it is not at the absolute top of the performance hierarchy.

For rendering workloads, the 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores are the key differentiators. The ray tracing hardware accelerates path tracing and real-time ray-traced effects, while the tensor cores handle AI-accelerated denoising and DLSS-style upscaling. The 24 GB VRAM capacity is particularly relevant for large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and GPU-accelerated rendering engines that must hold geometry and material data in memory. The 1.34 TB/s bandwidth ensures that this large memory pool can be fed quickly, reducing stalls during texture-heavy renders.

The dual-slot design and 575 W TDP indicate that this is a power-hungry card requiring robust cooling and a substantial power supply. The 1x 16-pin power connector and suggested 950 W PSU underline the electrical demands. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern high-refresh-rate and high-resolution displays.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU, an Intel Core i5-12400, achieves an average benchmark score of 18,683 across all tests, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, achieves an average benchmark score of 16,504 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this desktop pairing is 66, indicating that the overall system sits above the midpoint of tracked builds but is not at the extreme high end.

Looking at the CPU's individual benchmark results reveals a mixed picture. In 3DMark threading tests, the scores scale from 910 (single-thread) to 5,890 (max threads), with intermediate results of 1,692 (2 threads), 3,012 (4 threads), 4,745 (8 threads), and 5,873 (16 threads). This scaling shows that the 6-core, 12-thread processor gains performance up to about 16 threads, after which additional threads provide minimal benefit — consistent with a part that has 12 logical threads total. The Cinebench results tell a similar story: R15 multicore scores 1,611, R20 multicore scores 6,715, and R23 multicore scores 15,989. Single-core Cinebench scores are 227 (R15), 947 (R20), and 2,257 (R23).

The Geekbench scores are 8,564 multicore and 1,848 single-core. PassMark results show specific workload strengths: integer math at 58,366, floating point math at 45,494, extended instructions at 15,399, data compression at 226,908, data encryption at 11,418, physics at 1,105, random string sorting at 22,366, and prime numbers at 68. The multithread PassMark score is 18,747, while single-thread is 3,456.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-12400 is positioned very closely to several other CPUs. The AMD EPYC 7643 scores 18,697 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18,730 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18,811 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18,519 (0.9% lower). The deltas are all under 1%, meaning the i5-12400 performs at essentially the same level as these four rivals in aggregate benchmark terms.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that sits comfortably above average (72nd percentile) paired with a GPU that is above average but not elite (59th percentile). The 66th combined percentile suggests that the whole system outperforms two-thirds of tracked desktop builds. The GPU's benchmark score in Steel Nomad is a single data point, and the tight clustering of its nearest rivals — all within 0.9% — indicates that this particular test does not separate the RTX 5090 D V2 from a broad range of other GPUs.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all tracked processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 72% of the processors in the database based on its average benchmark score of 18,683.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D V2's GPU benchmark score compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GPU scores 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 (0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (0.5% behind), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408 (0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361 (0.9% behind). All are within 0.9% of each other.

Q: What memory configuration does the RTX 5090 D V2 use?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, operating at 28 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the i5-12400 support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. However, the fact pack does not specify a maximum bandwidth figure.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 575 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 950 W.

Q: Is the i5-12400's multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), meaning the CPU is not designed for manual overclocking via multiplier adjustment.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, indicating that this desktop build outperforms 66% of tracked systems in the database.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a significant imbalance between the CPU's 72nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking. In aggregate, the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, which suggests that in many workloads the GPU will be the limiting factor. However, the nature of the bottleneck depends heavily on the specific task.

For CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulation, data compression, encryption, and single-threaded applications — the i5-12400's 72nd percentile position indicates it performs above average, but it is not a top-tier part. The PassMark physics score of 1,105 and prime number score of 68 are modest, indicating that heavy single-threaded integer workloads will not be this system's strength. In contrast, the data compression score of 226,908 and integer math score of 58,366 are strong, suggesting that multi-threaded productivity tasks are handled well.

For GPU-bound workloads — such as high-resolution rendering, ray tracing, and large texture streaming — the RTX 5090 D V2's 59th percentile is the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 is the only GPU benchmark available, and it places the card just above the midpoint. In gaming at high resolutions, the GPU would typically be the bottleneck, as the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for most game logic while the GPU handles the graphical load.

The FPS scaling picture is constrained by the fact that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores. The CPU's strong 3DMark threading scores — particularly the jump from 4,745 (8 threads) to 5,873 (16 threads) — suggest that the processor can feed a GPU adequately in multi-threaded scenarios. However, the single-thread score of 910 in 3DMark and 2,257 in Cinebench R23 indicate that in lightly-threaded games, the CPU may not deliver the highest possible frame rates.

The combined percentile of 66 versus the CPU's 72 and GPU's 59 shows that the pairing is slightly better than the GPU alone would suggest, but worse than the CPU alone. This indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter in most graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU is the limiter in highly parallel compute workloads that exceed 12 threads. For a system with a 575 W GPU, the 65 W CPU is a minor power draw by comparison, meaning thermal and power constraints are dominated by the GPU.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This desktop build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and a capable GPU for graphics-intensive work, but it is not aimed at those requiring the absolute fastest GPU available. The CPU's 72nd percentile and GPU's 59th percentile suggest a system that handles a broad range of tasks competently without excelling in any single extreme.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions would benefit from the CPU's solid single-thread performance (3,456 in PassMark single-thread) and multi-thread capabilities, though the GPU's mid-pack ranking means it may not drive the highest frame rates at 4K with maximum settings. The 24 GB VRAM is generous for high-resolution textures, but the GPU's overall compute position suggests it is better suited to 1440p gaming than to pushing 4K at ultra settings in the most demanding titles.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would find the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads adequate for multi-threaded export tasks — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,989 and PassMark multithread score of 18,747 are respectable. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 24 GB VRAM are well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering and large scenes, though the 59th percentile indicates it is not the fastest option.

Software developers compiling code would appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 58,366 and data compression score of 226,908, which indicate strong performance in build and packaging tasks. The 12 threads handle parallel compilation well, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long build sessions.

Students and small business workstations would find this build effective for general productivity, data analysis, and light-to-moderate graphics work. The CPU's 72nd percentile ensures snappy response in office applications and web browsing, while the GPU's 24 GB VRAM supports large datasets in visualization tools. The dual-slot GPU and 304 mm length require a roomy case, but the system's overall capability is well-rounded for professional use.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame data for the Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. Therefore, all FPS figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504, the system's gaming performance is expected to be moderate. The GPU's 59th percentile among all GPUs suggests it will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, with settings at high or ultra. At 4K, the GPU's mid-pack position means frame rates will be lower, and users may need to adjust settings or rely on upscaling technologies.

The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for modern games that typically use 4-8 threads. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 4,745 and 16-thread score of 5,873 show good scaling, meaning the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. However, the single-thread score of 910 is modest, so games that are heavily dependent on single-core performance may see reduced frame rates.

The GPU's 24 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are ample for high-resolution textures and large game worlds. The 170 ray tracing cores support ray-traced effects, though the GPU's overall performance tier suggests that enabling full ray tracing at 4K may be demanding. For competitive gaming at 1080p with high refresh rates, the system should perform well, but the GPU's percentile position indicates it may not reach the highest frame rates in esports titles when compared to faster cards.

Users should treat these FPS figures as rough estimates. The lack of measured data for this exact pairing means actual performance could vary based on game optimization, driver maturity, and system configuration. The benchmark scores indicate a system that is capable for gaming but not at the extreme high end.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-S desktop variant. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads relative to its single-thread performance. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 910 (single-thread) to 5,890 (max threads) — a 6.5x improvement from 1 to 12 threads, which is near-linear scaling for a 6-core/12-thread part. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,989 is strong for a 65 W processor, and the Geekbench multicore score of 8,564 confirms solid parallel performance.

In real workloads, the PassMark scores are particularly informative. The data compression score of 226,908 indicates fast file archiving and decompression. The integer math score of 58,366 is strong for code compilation and spreadsheet calculations. The floating point math score of 45,494 supports scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 15,399 shows good support for SIMD workloads like multimedia encoding. However, the prime numbers score of 68 and physics score of 1,105 are low, indicating that the CPU is not ideal for heavy single-threaded integer loops or complex physics simulations.

The single-thread performance, as measured by 3DMark (910), Cinebench R23 (2,257), and PassMark (3,456), is adequate but not exceptional. This places the i5-12400 in a position where it handles everyday tasks and most games well, but it may lag behind higher-tier CPUs in applications that are poorly multi-threaded. The 72nd percentile among all CPUs confirms that this is an above-average processor, but the nearest rivals — all within 0.9% in average score — show that it is tightly clustered with a wide range of other CPUs.

The 65 W TDP is a key advantage, making this CPU easy to cool with a capable air cooler and keeping power consumption low. The locked multiplier means no manual overclocking, but the boost clock of 4.40 GHz is already respectable. The 10 nm process and 163 mm² die size indicate a mature, power-efficient design.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-12400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is an active socket with a range of compatible processors. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory type — though the fact pack does not specify a maximum memory bandwidth. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for fast NVMe storage and future GPUs.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which pairs well with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes. The GPU's power requirements are substantial: a 575 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested 950 W PSU. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves significant headroom in the power budget, meaning the 950 W PSU is sized primarily for the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be to the CPU, as the 72nd percentile position leaves room for improvement. The Socket 1700 platform supports newer 12th Gen and later processors, and upgrading to a higher-core-count part would improve multi-threaded performance. However, the current CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are already sufficient for most workloads, and the tight clustering of its nearest rivals (all within 0.9%) suggests that a modest CPU upgrade would not yield dramatic gains.

For the GPU, the 59th percentile suggests there is headroom for a faster card, but the RTX 5090 D V2 is already a substantial piece of hardware with 24 GB VRAM. The 950 W PSU provides enough capacity for a more powerful GPU if one becomes necessary, though the fact pack does not list a successor's specifications. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is future-proof, and the 1x 16-pin power connector is the current standard.

Memory upgrades are another path: the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means users can choose the memory type that fits their budget and performance needs. The 18 MB L3 cache is not upgradeable, but the platform's memory support allows for capacity increases. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed, though it is not designed for gaming.

The platform's active production status means both the CPU and GPU are currently available, and the Socket 1700 socket has a range of compatible parts. The 950 W PSU provides ample headroom for overclocking the GPU (if the card supports it) or adding additional peripherals.

# Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-12400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is an Alder Lake-S 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB GDDR7 memory and a 575 W TDP. The combined percentile is 66, meaning this system outperforms 66% of tracked desktop builds in the database.

The CPU's 72nd percentile among all CPUs places it in the upper-middle tier of processors — above average but not in the top quartile of elite parts. The GPU's 59th percentile among all GPUs places it just above the midpoint — a mid-pack performer that is outclassed by roughly 41% of tracked graphics cards. The asymmetry between the two percentiles is notable: the CPU is a stronger relative performer than the GPU.

This pairing is best described as a balanced mid-to-upper-tier desktop system. It is not a high-end enthusiast build — the GPU's 59th percentile and the CPU's 72nd percentile both indicate that more powerful components exist. However, the system is well above average, and the 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth make it capable for demanding graphics workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP and 575 W GPU TDP combine to require a 950 W PSU, which is a significant power draw but manageable with a quality power supply.

The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores, but the overall tier suggests a system that handles 1080p and 1440p gaming well, with 4K gaming possible at reduced settings. For productivity, the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores and the GPU's compute throughput make this a versatile workstation. The active production status of both components means this build is currently purchasable, and the Socket 1700 platform offers upgrade potential.

In summary, this is a desktop system with a slightly stronger CPU than GPU, sitting at the 66th combined percentile. It is a solid choice for users who need a balanced machine for gaming, content creation, and professional work, without reaching for the absolute highest-performing components available.