SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400

18,683 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 represents a classic mid-range desktop build that balances a capable six-core processor with a high-end graphics card from the previous generation. This combination sits at the 67th percentile overall, indicating it outperforms a majority of systems tested while remaining accessible in the broader market. The data shows a pairing designed for smooth 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the RTX 3070 doing the heavy lifting in most scenarios and the i5 providing solid, reliable CPU performance across a range of workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture using an 8 nm process from Samsung, featuring a GA104 chip with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU ships with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical figure for high-resolution texture loads. The base clock runs at 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, while the memory operates at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. These specifications allow the card to achieve a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s, making it well-suited for detailed scene rendering.

The RTX 3070 includes 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. For ray tracing, it has 46 dedicated RT cores, and for AI-accelerated workloads, it includes 184 tensor cores, enabling features like DLSS. The FP32 performance is rated at 20.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating strong compute capability for both standard and reduced-precision tasks. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results place the RTX 3070 at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17208. In the PassMark G3D test, it scores 22214, which is a strong showing, while its PassMark GPU compute score of 11195 highlights its parallel processing power. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 further confirms its compute capabilities. However, the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 85 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 182, suggesting that while the card handles legacy APIs well, its performance in newer, more complex rendering workloads may be more variable. For rendering tasks, the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance are the key metrics, as they directly influence how quickly textures and geometry are processed. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most current titles at 1440p, but data indicates it could be a limiting factor at 4K in VRAM-intensive scenarios.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system percentile is 67, placing it above two-thirds of all tested builds. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 18683, while the GPU averages 17208. In terms of FPS across a range of games, this pairing ranks 1566 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 134.6 across all tested games at ultra settings. This figure suggests a system that can handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and remain playable at 1440p.

The CPU’s 3DMark scores show a clear scaling pattern: 1692 for 2 threads, 3012 for 4 threads, 4745 for 8 threads, and 5873 for 16 threads, with a max score of 5890. The single-thread score is 910, indicating strong per-core performance. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 15989 and single-core is 2257, which are respectable numbers for a six-core part. The PassMark multithread score of 18747 and single-thread score of 3456 reinforce the CPU’s balanced nature. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3162, which is a modern benchmark that stresses the card’s raw capabilities. When viewed together, the CPU and GPU scores suggest a system where the GPU is the primary driver of gaming FPS, but the CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios, as evidenced by the high average FPS across the game suite.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 12th-generation desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-S codename. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The processor is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 163 mm². It has a TDP of 65 W, making it a power-efficient choice for a mid-range build. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which is crucial for keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

The i5-12400 supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in platform choice, though it does not support ECC memory. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 is present, but the presence of a discrete GPU like the RTX 3070 makes it largely irrelevant for this build. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited, but its boost clock is sufficient for most workloads. Its launch MSRP was $199.

Benchmark results show the i5-12400 at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms nearly three-quarters of all tested processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7643, has an average score of 18697, which is just 0.1% higher, indicating the i5 is essentially on par with a high-end server chip in this specific aggregate metric. The Intel Core i7-1355U is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is 0.7% faster, while the Intel Core i3-14100F is 0.9% slower. These small deltas show that the i5-12400 sits in a competitive performance band.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6715 and single-core score of 947 indicate that the CPU can handle both multi-threaded rendering and single-threaded tasks like web browsing or office applications with ease. The PassMark data compression score of 226908 and data encryption score of 11418 show strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The floating-point math score of 45494 and integer math score of 58366 suggest the CPU is capable in scientific and financial computations. The extended instructions score of 15399 indicates good support for modern instruction sets like AVX2, which is beneficial for video encoding and certain productivity apps. Overall, the i5-12400 is a well-rounded CPU that excels in gaming and handles content creation tasks competently, though it is not a high-core-count workstation part.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12400 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7643?

A: The i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 18683, which is just 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 7643’s score of 18697. This puts the two processors effectively on par in aggregate performance, despite the EPYC being a server-class chip.

Q: What is the RTX 3070’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The RTX 3070 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, delivered via 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. This high bandwidth is critical for maintaining high frame rates at 1440p, as seen in games like Call of Duty: Warzone, which hits 120 FPS at that resolution.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance, and why does it matter?

A: The CPU’s single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 2257, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 910. This matters because many games and everyday applications rely on single-thread performance for responsiveness, and the data shows this chip handles those tasks well.

Q: How does this system perform in 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, the system is often playable but not always smooth. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30.4 FPS, while Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 101 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and the GPU’s compute power are the limiting factors at this resolution, as the CPU’s performance is sufficient.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all tested games at ultra settings is 134.6. This places the pair at rank 1566 out of 3732 pairs, indicating solid performance in the upper half of all tested combinations.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in gaming?

A: Based on the data, the CPU is rarely the bottleneck. In games like Counter-Strike 2, the FPS at 1080p is 210.4, which is high, but the GPU still manages to push 75.2 FPS at 4K. The CPU’s 72nd percentile ranking suggests it has enough headroom for the GPU in most scenarios.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and what does it mean for future games?

A: The RTX 3070 is at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This means it is better than 61% of all GPUs tested, but it is not a top-tier card. For future games, it should handle 1080p and 1440p well, but 4K gaming may require lowering settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-12400 and the RTX 3070 is generally well-matched, but the data reveals which component limits which workload. In CPU-intensive games like Counter-Strike 2, the CPU’s single-thread performance (910 in 3DMark single-thread) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU still manages to push 210.4 FPS at 1080p, showing neither is a strict bottleneck. However, in GPU-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops to 61.3 at 1080p and 30.4 at 4K, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking compared to the CPU’s 72nd percentile suggests the CPU has more headroom relative to other CPUs than the GPU does relative to other GPUs.

At 4K resolution, the bottleneck shifts almost entirely to the GPU. For example, in Red Dead Redemption 2, the FPS at 1080p is 55.9, which is low, but at 4K it drops to 26.4. This shows that the RTX 3070’s 8 GB VRAM and compute power are stretched thin at higher resolutions. Conversely, in lighter games like Valorant, the FPS at 4K is 323.2, which is still very high, showing that the CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU even at high resolutions. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K across games like Fortnite (101.7 to 62.2 to 33.1) shows a clear GPU-bound pattern, as the CPU’s performance remains constant while the GPU’s workload increases. For productivity tasks, the CPU’s 72nd percentile and the GPU’s compute scores (11195 in PassMark GPU compute) suggest a balanced system where neither holds back the other in most workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with a range of 12th-generation motherboards. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders the option to choose based on budget and performance needs. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is a future-proofing feature for high-speed SSDs and next-generation GPUs, though the RTX 3070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low, and the GPU has a TDP of 220 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This means the system requires a modest power supply, leaving headroom for future upgrades.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the first component to replace, given its 61st percentile ranking and end-of-life production status. The RTX 3070’s successor, the GeForce 40 series, would offer better performance, but the current card is still capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU, on the other hand, has room to grow, as it sits at the 72nd percentile and could handle a more powerful GPU without becoming a significant bottleneck. Upgrading the CPU would require a new motherboard, as the Socket 1700 is limited to 12th-generation parts. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a platform upgrade would also involve a memory choice, but the current system’s dual-channel support is adequate. The power connectors on the GPU are a single 12-pin, which may require an adapter for some PSUs, but the 550 W suggested PSU provides enough headroom for the 220 W card.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and want high frame rates in competitive titles. The data shows that in esports games like Valorant, the system achieves 436.4 FPS at 1080p and 404.5 FPS at 1440p, making it excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. For AAA titles, the system handles 1440p well, with Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 120 FPS and Control reaching 63.9 FPS, which is smooth. At 4K, the system is playable in less demanding games but struggles in heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077, so it is not ideal for 4K gaming without lowering settings.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15989 and the GPU’s compute capabilities (20.31 TFLOPS FP32) sufficient for moderate workloads. The system can handle tasks like photo editing, light video rendering, and 3D modeling, but it is not a top-tier workstation. Developers and students will benefit from the fast compile times and multitasking abilities, as the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 18747 and 12 threads provide solid performance for coding and running virtual machines. Small business workstations that run office applications, databases, and financial software will find this build more than capable, given the CPU’s strong single-thread and data compression scores. The integrated GPU is present but unused, so the system relies entirely on the RTX 3070 for display output.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a mid-range, six-core CPU with a high-end enthusiast-grade GPU. The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 12th-generation desktop processor, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a 30-series card based on the Ampere architecture. The combined system percentile is 67, indicating it outperforms two-thirds of all tested builds. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 18683 and sits at the 72nd percentile, while the GPU has an average score of 17208 and sits at the 61st percentile. This places the overall tier of the build in the upper-mid range, suitable for serious gaming and content creation, but not at the absolute top of the performance spectrum. The build class is desktop, confirming it is a stationary system rather than a laptop.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings shows a clear picture of this system’s gaming capabilities at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in competitive titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 462.6 FPS and Valorant reaching 436.4 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 248 FPS, and Roblox runs at 268.2 FPS. For AAA games, the system still delivers high frame rates, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 135 FPS and Minecraft at 206 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is the most demanding title, with 61.3 FPS, which is playable but not at high refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, the system remains very capable. Valorant still hits 404.5 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 120 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 140.7 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 42.7 FPS, which is still smooth for a single-player game. Control runs at 63.9 FPS, and Fortnite at 62.2 FPS, both of which are playable. At 3840x2160, the system struggles in demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.4 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at only 10 FPS. However, lighter games still perform well, with Valorant at 323.2 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 101 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 185.8 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 134.6, which is a strong figure, but the data shows that 4K gaming is only viable for less demanding titles or with reduced settings. The data is measured, so these figures represent real-world performance expectations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds