SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400

18,683 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing of an Intel Core i5-12400 with an AMD Radeon RX 7600 lands at the 65th combined percentile, which tells you it is a balanced mid-range desktop configuration rather than a lopsided one. The CPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile among all graphics cards. That gap matters: the processor is noticeably stronger relative to its own market than the graphics card is relative to its market, which means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphically demanding scenarios.

Benchmark results confirm this division of labor. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores are solid for a six-core part, but the GPU’s average benchmark score of 15171 places it just below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199, -0.2% delta) and just above the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15082, +0.6%). In gaming, the measured FPS data shows the GPU struggling at 4K in heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (21.2 FPS at 3840x2160) while the CPU is clearly not the constraint in those frames. Conversely, at 1080p in esports titles like Valorant (356 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (344.1 FPS), the CPU keeps up easily, and the GPU is still delivering high frame rates without bottlenecking the processor.

The bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the GPU is usually the primary limiter in AAA games, as seen in Red Dead Redemption 2 (42 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (45.1 FPS) at ultra settings — these are GPU-bound results. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes severely constrained, with many titles dropping below 30 FPS. The CPU, with a single-thread score of 910 in 3dmark and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2257, has enough headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions but not to rescue frame rates at 4K. The data shows a classic mid-range pairing where the GPU dictates gaming performance, and the CPU handles productivity workloads without breaking a sweat.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 18683, which is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 7643 (18697, -0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i7-1355U (18730, -0.3% delta). That places the i5-12400 in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing for a mainstream desktop processor. Its multi-threaded performance is respectable: 15989 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 6715 in Cinebench R20 multicore, and 5873 in 3dmark 16-thread tests. Single-thread performance is also competitive, with 2257 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 910 in 3dmark single-thread.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15171, sitting at the 57th percentile. Its best result is in Passmark G3D (16634), with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 and a 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310. The GPU trails the RTX 3050 OEM by only 0.2% in average score, making them effectively peers. In gaming, the pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 104.1, ranking 2527 out of 3732 pairs — solidly mid-pack.

Combined, the CPU and GPU deliver a system that is stronger on the processor side. The CPU’s 72nd percentile versus the GPU’s 57th percentile means that in CPU-light, GPU-heavy workloads like 4K gaming, the system underperforms its potential. But in CPU-heavy tasks like code compilation or spreadsheet work, the i5-12400 punches above its class. The pair’s 65th combined percentile reflects a system that is capable but not exceptional, with the GPU holding back the CPU in graphics-bound scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a six-core, twelve-thread desktop processor built on the Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The CPU does not have an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not officially supported, but it does include integrated UHD Graphics 730 for basic display output.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks relative to its multi-threaded performance. The Passmark single-thread score of 3456 is strong, and the 3dmark 2-thread score of 1692 indicates good low-thread responsiveness. Multi-threaded scaling is typical for a six-core part: the 3dmark 8-thread score of 4745 rises to 5890 at max threads, showing diminishing returns beyond eight threads. Real-world implications: this CPU handles office productivity, web development, and light content creation with ease. The Passmark data compression score of 226908 and integer math score of 58366 suggest fast file archiving and general computation. The data encryption score of 11418 is decent for a mid-range chip, and the floating-point math score of 45494 supports moderate scientific or financial workloads.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are telling. It matches the AMD EPYC 7643 (a server chip) within 0.1%, and it beats the Intel Core i3-14100F by 0.9%. That means the i5-12400 offers near-flagship-level average performance for a fraction of the core count, which reflects Alder Lake’s efficiency. The 72nd percentile ranking confirms this is a top-quartile processor, making it a suitable foundation for a workstation that also games.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need a balanced desktop for mixed workloads. Gamers at 1920x1080 will find it capable of high refresh rates in competitive titles — Valorant hits 356 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 hits 156 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 185 FPS at 1080p ultra. At 2560x1440, the GPU still delivers playable frame rates in most games, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 120 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 67.1 FPS. For 4K, the system is only suitable for less demanding games or those willing to lower settings.

Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-threaded scores adequate for moderate workloads — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15989 handles 1080p video export and basic 3D scenes, though it is not a heavy render monster. Software developers benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the Passmark extended instructions score of 15399, which supports modern compiler optimizations. Students and small business users get a responsive system for office tasks, with the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 18747 ensuring smooth multitasking across browser tabs, spreadsheets, and document editors.

The 65th combined percentile means this is not a high-end enthusiast build, but it is a dependable mid-range workstation. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks over GPU-heavy gaming will find the balance favorable, while those who want maximum gaming performance at 1440p or above should look at a stronger GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (Navi 33 chip) using a 6 nm process from TSMC. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card draws 165 W and requires a 450 W PSU, with a single 8-pin power connector. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 57th percentile, with an average score of 15171. Its Passmark G3D score of 16634 is the strongest result, but the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 shows limited performance in modern DirectX 12 workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 indicates decent compute capability for a mid-range card. The GPU’s nearest rival is the RTX 3050 OEM, which scores 15199 (-0.2% delta) — essentially a tie. This means the RX 7600 offers comparable performance to NVIDIA’s entry-level ray tracing card, but without the RTX feature set advantage.

For rendering and compute, the FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS is respectable for a 165 W card, suitable for GPU-accelerated effects in video editors or light 3D rendering. The lack of dedicated tensor cores is irrelevant for this class; the 32 ray tracing cores handle basic RT effects in games like Cyberpunk 2077, but the 45.1 FPS at 1080p ultra with RT disabled suggests RT will significantly reduce frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming today, but the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth for 4K textures, as seen in the steep FPS drops at 3840x2160.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400 a good match for the RX 7600?

A: Yes, the CPU’s 72nd percentile and the GPU’s 57th percentile make a balanced pairing, with the CPU slightly stronger. The combined 65th percentile confirms it is a well-matched mid-range desktop, though the GPU will limit frame rates in demanding games.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171, which is 0.2% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199). This makes them performance peers, with the RX 7600 edging out the AMD Radeon Pro 560X by 0.6% (15082).

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles. In Cyberpunk 2077, it delivers 21.2 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 21 FPS. Only lighter titles like Valorant (245.6 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (101 FPS) remain playable at 4K.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance like?

A: The i5-12400 scores 910 in 3dmark single-thread and 2257 in Cinebench R23 single-core. This is strong for a six-core chip, supporting fast response in everyday tasks and games that rely on single-core performance.

Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for modern games?

A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth, contributing to significant performance drops at 4K in titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (6.5 FPS).

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded capability?

A: The six-core, twelve-thread CPU scores 15989 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 18747 in Passmark multithread. This handles moderate video editing and 3D rendering, but it is not a high-core-count workstation part.

Q: Is this build suitable for competitive esports?

A: Yes, at 1080p ultra, the system delivers 356 FPS in Valorant, 344.1 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, and 185 FPS in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege. These are excellent results for high-refresh monitors.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) shows strong 1080p performance in competitive titles. Valorant reaches 356 FPS at 1920x1080, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 344.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 186.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, these drop to 308 FPS, 238.9 FPS, and 123.8 FPS respectively, still excellent for high-refresh gaming. At 3840x2160, Valorant manages 245.6 FPS, but Counter-Strike 2 drops to 58 FPS.

For AAA games, 1080p ultra settings are mostly playable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 135 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 91.8 FPS, and Minecraft at 153 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 (45.1 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (42 FPS) are borderline for smooth gameplay at ultra. At 1440p, these drop to 36.5 FPS and 31 FPS respectively, making medium settings necessary. At 4K, most demanding titles fall below 30 FPS — Cyberpunk 2077 at 21.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 6.5 FPS.

The average FPS across all tested games is 104.1, ranking 2527 out of 3732 pairs. This indicates the system is above the median for gaming performance but not exceptional. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, this is a capable setup; for 1440p, it requires settings adjustments in heavy titles; for 4K, it is only viable for esports or older games.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-12400 with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 in a desktop form factor. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S processor on Socket 1700, while the GPU is a RDNA 3.0 Navi 33 card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 65 places this in the upper-mid range of all builds. The CPU’s 72nd percentile is notably higher than the GPU’s 57th percentile, creating a system where the processor outperforms the graphics card relative to their respective markets.

This is a mainstream desktop configuration, not a high-end enthusiast rig. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $199, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 269 USD, but the actual value comes from the balanced performance. The pair’s average benchmark score of 18683 (CPU) and 15171 (GPU) shows a system that can handle productivity and gaming at 1080p with ease, with some capability at 1440p. The overall tier is solidly mid-range, suitable for users who want one machine for work and play without spending flagship money.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p ultra, the system delivers 356 FPS in Valorant and 344.1 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, making it ideal for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, competitive titles still exceed 100 FPS, but AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 36.5 FPS, requiring settings reductions.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 15989 Cinebench R23 multicore score handle software encoding for 1080p streams while gaming, though the GPU’s 57th percentile means game performance will take a hit. The Passmark data compression score of 226908 supports smooth stream encoding without stutter.

Video editing: The CPU’s 18747 Passmark multithread score and 45494 floating-point math score provide adequate performance for 1080p video timelines and basic effects. The GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates rendering in compatible software, but 8 GB VRAM limits 4K editing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15989 handles moderate CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 supports GPU-accelerated renderers. This is suitable for hobbyist projects, not professional-scale scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 910 (3dmark) and 3456 (Passmark single-thread) ensure fast compilation for small to medium codebases. The Passmark extended instructions score of 15399 supports modern compiler optimizations, and the 12 threads handle parallel builds reasonably well.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 1848 Geekbench single-core score and 8564 multicore score deliver snappy responsiveness for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, but the RX 7600 handles any light graphics work. This is a dependable workstation for academic or small business use, with the CPU’s 72nd percentile ensuring longevity for everyday tasks.