SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400

18,683 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a classic mid-range desktop pairing, targeting 1080p and 1440p gaming with strong productivity headroom. The processor, built on the Alder Lake architecture and the 10 nm process node from Intel, provides six performance cores and twelve threads. With a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, this CPU is designed to deliver responsive single-threaded performance while maintaining sufficient multi-threading capability for modern workloads. The GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 22 chip, is a 7 nm part from TSMC that delivers high rasterization performance. This analysis examines the benchmark data, measured game performance, and system balance to determine the strengths and weaknesses of this configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Core 12th Gen series, utilizing the Alder Lake-S codename. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and features a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 18 MB L3 cache. This cache configuration is critical for gaming performance, as it allows the CPU to store frequently accessed data closer to the cores, reducing latency and improving frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with a strong balance between single-threaded and multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 2257 points in the single-core test and 15989 points in the multi-core test. The single-core score is particularly impressive, indicating strong IPC (instructions per clock) performance that is essential for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score, while lower than higher-core-count parts, is more than adequate for productivity tasks like video editing and software compilation. This is further supported by Geekbench scores of 1848 for single-core and 8564 for multi-core, which align with the Cinebench results.

The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 72, placing it in the upper tier of processors. Its average benchmark score of 18683 places it in close competition with the AMD EPYC 7643, which has an average score of 18697 and a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core i7-1355U, with a score of 18730 and a delta of -0.3%. This indicates that the i5-12400 performs nearly identically to these very different processors in aggregate benchmarking, despite having fewer cores than the EPYC part and being a desktop chip compared to the mobile i7. The i5-12400 is 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i3-14100F, which has an average score of 18519, showing a meaningful generational uplift in the same price tier.

In real workloads, the 12 threads and 18 MB of L3 cache allow the CPU to handle multi-tasking and modern game engines that can utilize more than six cores. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5873 and the max-thread score of 5890 show that scaling is efficient when all threads are utilized. The 2-thread score of 1692 and the 4-thread score of 3012 confirm excellent scaling in lower-thread-count scenarios, which is typical for gaming. The Passmark single-thread score of 3456 is high, reinforcing the CPU's strength in tasks that rely on a single core, such as legacy software and certain simulation games.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system, with a combinedPercentile of 72, sits comfortably in the mid-to-high range of desktop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score is 18683, and the GPU's average benchmark score is 26011, with the GPU achieving a percentile rank of 71 against all GPUs. The CPU's percentile rank is 72 against all CPUs. These two components are well-matched in terms of their overall performance class, ensuring that neither is drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other.

Looking at specific GPU benchmarks, the Radeon RX 6750 XT achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 16360 in OpenCL, 98089 in Vulkan, and 137249 in Metal. The Vulkan score is notably high, indicating strong driver optimization and hardware support for modern graphics APIs. The Passmark G3D score is 20700, which is a strong result, while the G2D score is 972, which is less critical for gaming but relevant for desktop rendering and 2D applications. The GPU compute score of 9550 shows adequate performance for compute-accelerated tasks, though it is not a primary strength of this architecture.

The pairRankByFps data places this system at rank 1668 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all measured games of 128.2. This high average frame rate indicates that the system is capable of delivering smooth gameplay in a wide variety of titles, particularly at 1080p and 1440p. The combination of a strong single-threaded CPU and a capable mid-range GPU results in a balanced system that can push high frame rates in esports titles while still handling demanding AAA games at playable settings. The data is measured, not estimated, providing a reliable picture of real-world performance.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across three resolutions provides a comprehensive view of the system's gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and less demanding titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 432 FPS, Valorant at 433.7 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS. These high frame rates are ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, allowing for extremely smooth and responsive gameplay. In more demanding titles, the system still performs admirably; Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 135 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 achieves 60.8 FPS, which is right at the threshold for smooth gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system remains very capable, though frame rates naturally decrease. Valorant drops to 379 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 297 FPS, still excellent for competitive play. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 120 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 44.5 FPS, which is playable but may require some settings adjustments for a smoother experience. More demanding titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 run at 39 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 18 FPS, indicating that ultra settings at 1440p are not viable for the most graphically intensive games.

At 3840x2160, the system is pushed to its limits. Valorant remains highly playable at 301.4 FPS, but most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 31 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS. These results show that 4K gaming is only feasible for lighter titles or with significant graphical compromises. The system is clearly optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers a smooth and immersive experience across a broad range of games.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a well-balanced system where the CPU and GPU complement each other effectively. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and Passmark single-thread score of 3456, ensures that it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's high pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s allow it to handle the rendering workload without being starved of data from the CPU.

Evidence of balance can be seen in the FPS scaling across resolutions. In Counter-Strike 2, the system runs at 193.1 FPS at 1080p, 126.8 FPS at 1440p, and 70.2 FPS at 4K. This shows a clear progression where the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. If the CPU were a bottleneck, the frame rates would be more similar across resolutions, especially at 1080p where the CPU is more heavily utilized. The fact that frame rates scale down consistently with resolution indicates the GPU is the primary performance driver in most games.

However, there are some instances where the CPU may be the limiting factor. In games like Valorant and CS:GO, which are highly CPU-bound, the frame rates are exceptionally high (433.7 FPS and 432 FPS at 1080p), suggesting the CPU is performing at its limit. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 1692 and 4-thread score of 3012 are crucial for these games, and while they are strong, they set a ceiling on performance. In these scenarios, a faster CPU could potentially push frame rates even higher, but the practical benefit is minimal since the system is already delivering far more frames than most monitors can display. The system's pairRankByFps of 1668 out of 3732 pairs indicates that this configuration performs better than the average pair, confirming its balanced nature.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is a high-end graphics card from the Radeon RX 6000 series, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process node from TSMC, with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. It also includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in supported games.

The memory subsystem is robust, featuring 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, providing an effective data rate of 18 Gbps, which results in a total bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are beneficial for high-resolution textures and modern game assets, allowing the GPU to handle 1440p gaming with ease and 4K textures without excessive stuttering. The clock speeds are set at a base of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, allowing for significant performance headroom.

In terms of compute performance, the GPU delivers 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 26.62 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. These figures support strong performance in rasterized gaming and moderate performance in compute-accelerated tasks. The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 and the Passmark G3D score of 20700 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance, which is essential for modern games. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089 is particularly high, showing excellent performance in Vulkan-based titles and applications.

The GPU's percentile rank of 71 against all GPUs places it above average. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, has an average score of 25891, which is 0.5% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 1.1% higher. This indicates that the RX 6750 XT is positioned competitively against other high-end parts from its generation, offering a strong balance of performance and features for its class.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that it can push over 200 FPS in esports titles like Valorant (433.7 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (432 FPS at 1080p), making it ideal for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. In more demanding AAA games, it still delivers high frame rates, such as 135 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread CPU provides sufficient headroom for streaming while gaming. The Passmark multi-thread score of 18747 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15989 indicate that the CPU can handle the encoding workload alongside game rendering. The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM also helps when using hardware encoding, as it reduces the load on the CPU. While a dedicated streaming encoder might offer better quality, this setup can handle casual streaming without major performance hits.

Video Editing: The combination of the i5-12400 and RX 6750 XT is capable for video editing. The CPU's multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6715, is sufficient for rendering and exporting projects. The GPU's compute performance, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 9550, can accelerate effects and color grading in supported software. The 12 GB of VRAM is also beneficial for handling large projects and high-resolution video files.

3D Rendering: For 3D modeling and rendering, the CPU's 12 threads are usable, but not exceptional. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1611 and R20 score of 6715 show that it can complete render tasks, but it will not be as fast as higher-core-count CPUs. The GPU's FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering in software like Blender, providing a significant speedup for viewport and final renders. This system is suitable for hobbyist or entry-level professional work.

Software Development: The CPU's strong single-threaded performance is excellent for software development tasks like code compilation and running virtual machines. The Passmark integer math score of 58366 and data encryption score of 11418 show that it can handle heavy compile workloads and secure data processing. The 12 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 18 MB of L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed code and data close to the cores, improving responsiveness.

Student and Office Work: This system is vastly overqualified for standard student and office tasks like web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures that applications launch quickly and run smoothly, and the GPU's G2D score of 972 is sufficient for desktop rendering. The system can handle multiple virtual desktops and productivity suites without any performance issues, making it a powerful and responsive workstation for any academic or office environment.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This provides flexibility for users, allowing them to choose between more affordable DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 depending on their motherboard and budget. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU, ensuring that high-speed NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards will have the necessary bandwidth. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for users requiring error-correcting memory for professional work.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low and makes it easy to cool, even with a capable air cooler. The GPU has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. A quality 600 W power supply will provide sufficient headroom for the entire system, including the CPU, GPU, and other components. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, which are standard on most modern power supplies.

For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider increasing the system memory to take advantage of the dual-channel architecture, especially if using DDR4, as this can improve performance in memory-sensitive games. Alternatively, replacing the CPU with a higher-core-count 12th Gen part, such as an i7 or i9 model, would provide a significant boost in multi-threaded workloads like video editing and 3D rendering, while maintaining compatibility with the existing motherboard and memory. The GPU can also be upgraded later to a higher-tier card if the user moves to 4K gaming or requires more compute power, as the 600 W PSU provides some headroom for a more powerful GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the system's overall performance ranking?

A: The system has a combinedPercentile of 72, and the CPU and GPU have percentile ranks of 72 and 71 against all CPUs and GPUs, respectively. Its average FPS across all measured games is 128.2, placing it at rank 1668 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 18683. It is 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i3-14100F, which scores 18519, and is nearly identical in performance to the AMD EPYC 7643, which has a delta of -0.1%.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This configuration provides a total memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Measured FPS data shows that 4K gaming is only viable for less demanding titles. For example, Valorant runs at 301.4 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 runs at only 31 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS. The system is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. Its architecture is RDNA 2.0, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this system?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, so a 600 W power supply provides adequate headroom for the entire system.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT system is an ideal choice for gamers targeting high-refresh-rate 1080p and smooth 1440p gameplay. The measured FPS data shows it excels in esports titles like Valorant and CS:GO, delivering over 400 FPS at 1080p, and it handles demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 at playable frame rates. This makes it perfect for competitive players who want a responsive experience without sacrificing visual quality.

Content creators who work with video editing and photo manipulation will find this system capable, thanks to the CPU's 12 threads and the GPU's compute performance. The 12 GB of VRAM is beneficial for large projects, and the system can handle 1080p and 1440p video editing workflows. Software developers will appreciate the strong single-threaded performance for compilation and the multi-threading for running virtual machines.

Students and small business users looking for a powerful, responsive workstation for office applications, web development, or data analysis will find this system overqualified for their daily tasks, ensuring it remains fast and responsive for years. The system's balance and upgrade path make it a solid foundation for a long-lasting PC. It is not recommended for users seeking 4K gaming at high settings, as the performance data indicates that frame rates drop below playable levels in most AAA titles. Similarly, users with heavy 3D rendering workloads may want more cores, but the system is suitable for hobbyist or entry-level professional work.