SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400

18,683 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT: Benchmark Database Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT forms a desktop-class configuration that sits at the 69th percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings tracked in this database. The CPU alone ranks at the 72nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 65th percentile position among all graphics cards. This pairing represents a mainstream 1080p-focused gaming platform with solid content creation capabilities, delivering an average of 107.3 FPS across all tested titles at various resolutions, placing it at rank 2360 out of 3732 tracked pairs.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this configuration delivers exceptional results in competitive titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 161 FPS, Valorant reaches 370 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege produces 192 FPS at 1920x1080. Esports players seeking 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors will find this pairing capable of driving those refresh rates in most competitive scenarios, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 910 points in 3dmark_single_thread supporting high frame rates.

Streaming and content creation workloads benefit from the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, which produce a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15989 and a Passmark multithread score of 18747. The combination of fast single-thread performance and adequate multi-threading makes this suitable for simultaneous gaming and streaming, though the 65W TDP processor will handle encoding tasks without excessive thermal headroom concerns in typical desktop cases.

Video editing workflows see solid performance from both components. The GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 280.3 GB/s memory bandwidth accelerate effects and preview rendering, while the CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6715 handles timeline operations. The 8 GB VRAM capacity supports 1080p and 1440p video editing timelines with multiple layers, though 4K projects may require careful proxy management.

3D rendering tasks benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, with Cinebench R15 multicore reaching 1611 and Geekbench multicore scoring 8564. The GPU's Passmark GPU compute score of 7532 indicates moderate acceleration in renderers that support OpenCL or Vulkan. Smaller scenes and architectural visualizations will render efficiently, while larger production workloads would benefit from more cores.

Software development environments leverage the CPU's balanced performance profile. Compilation tasks use the Passmark integer math score of 58366 and data compression score of 226908 effectively. The single-thread score of 3456 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE interactions, while the 12 threads handle parallel build processes. This is a capable workstation for developers working on moderate-sized codebases.

Student and office workloads are more than adequately served by this configuration. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3456 and the GPU's Passmark G2D score of 918 ensure smooth desktop responsiveness, document processing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, while the discrete GPU handles any light 3D or video tasks that arise in academic projects.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 18683 places it near several notable rivals in the database. The AMD EPYC 7643 scores 18697, a negligible 0.1% difference, while the Intel Core i7-1355U trails by 0.3% at 18730. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 leads this group slightly at 18811, 0.7% ahead, and the Intel Core i3-14100F comes in at 18519, 0.9% behind. This clustering places the i5-12400 in a competitive position for its performance class.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU demonstrates consistent scaling from 2 to 16 threads. The 3dmark scores progress from 1692 at 2 threads to 3012 at 4 threads, 4745 at 8 threads, and peak at 5890 with max threads. The 16-thread score of 5873 shows near-optimal scaling from the 8-thread result, indicating the 12 threads are well-utilized. Single-thread performance at 910 in 3dmark confirms the architecture's efficiency.

The GPU's benchmark results show a balanced compute profile. The Passmark G3D score of 17166 represents strong DirectX performance, with DirectX 11 scoring 169 and DirectX 12 at 62 in the Passmark legacy tests. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 81306 and OpenCL score of 10111 demonstrate API versatility. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 provides a modern gaming workload reference.

Combined, the CPU's 72nd percentile and GPU's 65th percentile produce a system at the 69th combined percentile. The average FPS across all tested games at all resolutions is 107.3, with the pair ranking 2360th out of 3732 tracked configurations. This indicates a platform that outperforms the majority of tracked systems while remaining short of high-end enthusiast territory.

Gaming Performance

Measured data at ultra settings reveals distinct performance tiers across resolutions. At 1920x1080, competitive shooters excel: Valorant hits 370 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 357 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X produces 195.1 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 161 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 134.8 FPS. These results confirm 1080p high-refresh capability for esports and fast-paced multiplayer.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for less demanding titles. Valorant still delivers 316 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 120.3 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 107 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X hits 128.6 FPS, and Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 103 FPS. However, AAA titles show strain: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 32 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become limiting factors. Valorant still achieves 252 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone manages 99.4 FPS, but most AAA titles fall below playable thresholds. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. The Medium produces 22 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator drops to 34 FPS. This resolution is only viable for less demanding or well-optimized titles.

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a typical GPU-bound pattern. In Fortnite, FPS drops from 78.2 to 46.8 to 27.1 respectively. Grand Theft Auto V scales from 74 to 50 to 29. The CPU maintains sufficient headroom that the GPU becomes the primary limiter at higher resolutions, evidenced by the consistent resolution-based scaling across most titles.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays represent the primary audience for this configuration. The measured 161 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 370 FPS in Valorant, and 195.1 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X make it ideal for competitive play on 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. Call of Duty: Warzone at 134.8 FPS and Minecraft at 159 FPS further support this use case.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will find the combination sufficient. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15989 handles preview rendering and export tasks, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading. Software developers benefit from the 12-thread processing and Passmark integer math score of 58366 for compilation workloads.

Students and small business users receive a responsive system for productivity tasks. The single-thread Passmark score of 3456 ensures snappy application launches, while the GPU's 918 G2D score provides smooth 2D acceleration for office suites and web browsing. The dual-slot card and 65W CPU create a manageable thermal profile for standard desktop cases.

Users seeking a balanced mid-range workstation for 3D modeling or light rendering will find adequate performance. The GPU's Passmark compute score of 7532 and the CPU's Geekbench multicore of 8564 handle modest scenes. However, those working with large assemblies or complex simulations should consider higher-tier components given the 65th GPU percentile and 72nd CPU percentile rankings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a well-balanced pairing for 1080p gaming with the CPU providing adequate headroom. The CPU's 72nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile suggests the processor slightly outpaces the graphics card in overall capability. This balance manifests in the resolution scaling: frame rates drop predictably as resolution increases, indicating GPU-bound behavior at higher settings.

At 1080p in CPU-light games, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Valorant's 370 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive's 357 FPS approach the practical limits of the CPU's single-thread performance of 910 in 3dmark_single_thread. However, in more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 48 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, the GPU's compute throughput of 10.79 TFLOPS constrains performance.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores suggest it can feed the GPU in gaming workloads. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 5873 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 15989 indicate sufficient processing power for game logic and physics at 1080p. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU at 1440p and 4K, where the 128-bit memory bus and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth limit texture throughput.

For productivity tasks, the CPU handles multi-threaded workloads well, while the GPU accelerates compute tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 226908 and floating point math of 45494 indicate strong CPU throughput, while the GPU's 7532 compute score handles parallel workloads. The 176W GPU TDP relative to the 65W CPU TDP shows the graphics card draws significantly more power, suggesting it is the more demanding component in sustained workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for builds at different price points. The dual-channel memory controller accommodates either memory type, allowing users to choose based on availability and performance preferences. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes offers headroom for future high-bandwidth devices.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for the RDNA 2 architecture. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 280.3 GB/s bandwidth represents the primary upgrade target for users seeking higher resolutions or texture-heavy workloads. A GPU with more VRAM and wider memory bus would relieve the primary bottleneck identified at 1440p and 4K.

The suggested PSU of 450W for the GPU combined with the CPU's 65W TDP leaves headroom for additional components. Users upgrading to a more powerful graphics card would need to reassess power requirements, but the current configuration operates comfortably within standard desktop PSU specifications. The single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation and cable management.

The CPU's locked multiplier prevents overclocking, but the architecture's efficiency at stock settings provides solid performance. Users seeking more CPU performance would need to move to an unlocked K-series processor or a higher-tier Alder Lake chip. The platform's active production status for the CPU and end-of-life status for the GPU suggest the GPU is the first component likely to require replacement.

Memory upgrades represent the most straightforward performance improvement path. The dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support allows users to increase capacity or bandwidth without changing the platform. The 18 MB shared L3 cache benefits from faster memory access, particularly in gaming scenarios where data throughput is critical.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The base clock of 2.50 GHz boosts to 4.40 GHz, delivering strong single-thread performance with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 910. The die size of 163 mm² contains 80 KB L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB L2 per core, with 18 MB shared L3.

The CPU's benchmark profile shows consistent performance across different test methodologies. Cinebench scores progress from R15 multicore at 1611 to R20 at 6715 and R23 at 15989, demonstrating strong scaling with workload intensity. Geekbench multicore of 8564 and single-core of 1848 provide additional context for mixed workloads.

Passmark results reveal specialized strengths. The data compression score of 226908 indicates strong file archiving and database performance. Integer math at 58366 and floating point at 45494 show balanced arithmetic capability. The extended instructions score of 15399 supports modern workloads requiring AVX and related instruction sets.

The 65W TDP makes this an efficient processor for desktop use. The 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it above the majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include server-class and mobile parts, showing the i5-12400 competes effectively across market segments despite its mainstream positioning.

The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output capability without a discrete GPU, serving as a useful fallback for troubleshooting or low-power operation. The dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing system builders to select memory based on platform cost and performance goals.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs Intel's mainstream 6-core processor with AMD's mid-range RDNA 2 graphics card. The CPU's 72nd percentile and GPU's 65th percentile rankings combine for a 69th percentile overall system ranking, placing it ahead of most tracked configurations while remaining below enthusiast-tier hardware.

The pairing excels at 1080p gaming, as evidenced by the measured average of 107.3 FPS across all games and resolutions. The rank of 2360 out of 3732 pairs places it in the upper-middle tier of tracked systems. The CPU's strong single-thread performance complements the GPU's raw throughput for balanced gaming workloads.

This build class targets desktop users seeking a versatile system for gaming and productivity. The 65W CPU and 176W GPU create a manageable thermal footprint suitable for standard ATX cases. The dual-slot GPU with a single 8-pin connector simplifies installation in most chassis.

The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, combined with PCIe Gen 5, provides modern connectivity options. The combination of Intel's Alder Lake architecture and AMD's RDNA 2 architecture represents a mature, well-supported ecosystem with broad software compatibility.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-12400 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 18683 places it within 0.9% of the Intel Core i3-14100F (18519), 0.1% of the AMD EPYC 7643 (18697), 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-1355U (18730), and 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (18811).

Q: What is the maximum measured frame rate at 1080p?

A: Valorant achieves the highest measured 1080p frame rate at 370 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 357 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at 195.1 FPS.

Q: Is this configuration suitable for 4K gaming?

A: Most AAA titles do not reach playable frame rates at 3840x2160. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. Less demanding titles like Valorant at 252 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 99.4 FPS remain playable.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6650 XT have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 280.3 GB/s bandwidth, which proves sufficient for 1080p and most 1440p gaming but limits 4K texture-heavy workloads.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 450W. The GPU has a 176W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector, while the CPU has a 65W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-12400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory controller, allowing system builders to choose either memory type.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RX 6650 XT ranks at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19765. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla K40m, scores 19885 with a 0.6% difference.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT utilizes the Navi 23 chip built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The RDNA 2.0 architecture features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The 32 ray accelerators provide hardware ray tracing support, though the implementation targets entry-level RT workloads.

Base clock of 2055 MHz boosts to 2635 MHz, with a game clock of 2410 MHz for sustained gaming performance. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 2190 MHz with an effective 17.5 Gbps throughput, delivering 280.3 GB/s bandwidth across the 128-bit bus. This memory configuration balances capacity and bandwidth for 1080p and mid-range 1440p gaming.

Compute performance reaches 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS FP16 with 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s support high-detail rendering at moderate resolutions. The GPU's 176W TDP requires a 450W PSU recommendation, with a dual-slot cooler design and single 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. The Passmark G3D score of 17166 demonstrates strong DirectX gaming performance across generations, with DirectX 9 at 215, DirectX 10 at 109, DirectX 11 at 169, and DirectX 12 at 62 in legacy tests. Modern APIs perform well: Geekbench Vulkan scores 81306 and OpenCL scores 10111, while 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 reaches 1859.

The GPU's 65th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range tier, with an average benchmark score of 19765. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla K40m at 19885 (0.6% ahead) and AMD FirePro W7000 at 19905 (0.7% ahead), while the AMD FirePro D300 at 19637 (0.7% behind) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 at 19602 (0.8% behind) trail slightly. This positioning confirms the RX 6650 XT as a competitive mid-range option for 1080p gaming, with the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus defining its resolution ceiling.