SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400

18,683 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is a classic desktop combination that targets high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance. The data shows a balanced pairing where the GPU handles the graphical load and the CPU provides ample headroom for modern game engines.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It packs 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1968 MHz, with a game clock of 2359 MHz and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. Complementing the core is 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective.

For ray tracing and compute, the card includes 32 dedicated ray accelerators, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The theoretical performance figures are substantial: 10.60 TFLOPS for FP32 and 21.21 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compliant with the latest API standards.

Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24442. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 1804. The Geekbench results show 88720 in Metal, 80503 in OpenCL, and 72417 in Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score is 16461, while the GPU compute score is 7520. These numbers indicate a strong DirectX 12 performer. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6600 XT sits within a narrow band. It is 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, 0.8% ahead of the GTX 780 Ti, and 1.1% ahead of the RTX 2080 SUPER. However, it trails the Intel Arc A350M by 0.8%. This data suggests the RX 6600 XT punches above its class, particularly when considering the age of the comparisons.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 and FP16 performance are adequate for entry-level 3D rendering and GPU-accelerated effects. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large textures at high resolutions, but for 1080p and most 1440p scenarios, it is sufficient. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is the more critical constraint, as it can bottleneck performance in texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 had a launch MSRP of $199, and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT had a launch MSRP of 379 USD.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance compared to its multi-threaded performance?

A: The CPU scores 910 in the 3DMark single-thread test and 5890 in the max-threads test, indicating that multi-threaded scaling is strong, though single-thread performance is still the foundation for most gaming workloads.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6600 XT includes 32 ray accelerators, which are dedicated hardware units for ray tracing calculations, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate's ray tracing features.

Q: What is the CPU's memory architecture?

A: The i5-12400 supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's interface and power requirement?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a TDP of 160 W. The suggested PSU for a system with this GPU is 450 W.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The build's combined percentile is 71, which places it above the majority of all system configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU perform in the Cinebench R23 benchmark?

A: In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15989 in multi-core and 2257 in single-core, demonstrating a strong balance for both multi-threaded productivity and single-threaded tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The CPU features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory but does not support ECC. The processor includes UHD Graphics 730 as integrated graphics, though the discrete GPU will handle all rendering tasks. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). It has a TDP of 65 W and is unlocked for overclocking? No, the multiplier is not unlocked.

Benchmark results show the CPU at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18683. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 910 in single-thread, 3012 in 4-threads, 4745 in 8-threads, and 5890 in max-threads tests. The Cinebench R23 results are particularly informative: 15989 in multi-core and 2257 in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 8564 multi-core and 1848 single-core.

The nearest rivals show a tight competition. The CPU is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 7643, 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-1355U, and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330. It is 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i3-14100F. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the i5-12400 delivers performance comparable to a high-end server chip in certain workloads and is competitive with newer mobile and desktop parts.

For real-world workloads, this CPU handles productivity tasks like video editing, 3D modeling, and software compilation with ease. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is a sweet spot for gaming and streaming simultaneously. The single-core performance is critical for games that rely on high IPC, and the 2257 Cinebench R23 single-core score suggests responsive gameplay. The 18 MB L3 cache helps with gaming performance by reducing latency in frequently accessed data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-12400 and RX 6600 XT is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1920x1080, the GPU is often the primary bottleneck in graphically intensive titles, as the CPU can feed frames quickly. In Counter-Strike 2, the system delivers 155.1 FPS at 1080p, while at 2560x1440 it drops to 105.3 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it falls to 58.2 FPS. This scaling is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario as resolution increases.

Conversely, in a title like Ark: Survival Ascended, the system only achieves 21.2 FPS at 1080p, which is a significant drop from other games, indicating the GPU is heavily constrained by the game's engine and the RX 6600 XT's 8 GB VRAM. The CPU's performance headroom is evident in older, less demanding titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, where the system hits 343 FPS at 1080p.

The pair's ranking by FPS is 2655 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all games of 101.8. This suggests that while the pairing is capable, it is not at the top tier for raw FPS output. The CPU's percentile (72) is slightly higher than the GPU's percentile (70), meaning the CPU is marginally more capable relative to its peers than the GPU is to its own peers. This means the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in CPU-light, GPU-heavy scenarios, while the CPU will be the limiting factor in high-FPS esports titles where the GPU is not fully utilized.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of this build is defined by the CPU's 72nd percentile and the GPU's 70th percentile, with a combined percentile of 71. The CPU's average benchmark score is 18683, while the GPU's average score is 24442. These scores place the system in the upper-midrange tier of desktop performance.

In the 3DMark suite, the CPU's single-thread score of 910 and max-threads score of 5890 show good scaling across cores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The Passmark scores are also telling: the CPU's multi-thread score is 18747, while the GPU's G3D score is 16461.

The combined picture is one of a strong, balanced system. The CPU is not holding back the GPU in most scenarios, and the GPU is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and playable rates at 1440p. The system is not designed for 4K gaming, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient for ultra settings at that resolution.

The data shows that this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors. The average FPS across all measured games is 101.8, which means the system can typically drive a 100 Hz monitor at ultra settings in many titles. For 1440p, the performance is still good for competitive shooters but may require lowering settings in AAA titles to maintain high frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1920x1080. The data shows that in popular esports titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2, the system delivers 354.1 and 155.1 FPS at 1080p, respectively. These numbers are perfect for high-refresh-rate monitors. For 1440p gaming, the system is still capable, as seen in Call of Duty: Warzone (120.2 FPS) and Rainbow Six Siege (121 FPS), but it may struggle with the most demanding AAA titles at ultra settings.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15989 means video encoding and rendering tasks will be handled efficiently. The GPU's compute performance (7520 in Passmark GPU compute) can accelerate effects in Adobe Premiere Pro and similar software.

Developers compiling code will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance sufficient for most projects, with the 18 MB L3 cache helping with repeated compilation tasks. The system's 12 threads can handle multiple virtual machines or containers for testing.

Students and small business workstations can benefit from this build's versatility. It handles office productivity, web browsing, and light photo editing without issue. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, though the system is designed to use the RX 6600 XT.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the motherboard choice determines which type is used. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), so a future GPU upgrade to a PCIe 5.0 card is possible, though the RX 6600 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU has a TDP of 160 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. This leaves headroom for a more power-hungry GPU in the future, as long as the PSU has the appropriate connectors. The current GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

A sensible next upgrade would be a faster GPU, such as a higher-tier Radeon RX 6000 series card or an NVIDIA RTX 30 or 40 series card, provided the PSU has enough wattage. The CPU has enough performance to support a more powerful GPU without becoming a major bottleneck. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means that a larger cooler is not required, but a capable air cooler is recommended for sustained loads.

For memory, the platform's dual-channel support is fully utilized with two DIMMs. Users who built with DDR4 can keep their existing memory, while new builds can opt for DDR5 for potentially higher bandwidth, though the performance difference is minimal in gaming.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class configuration that pairs a 6-core, 12-thread Intel Alder Lake CPU with an AMD RDNA 2.0 GPU. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that this system outperforms the majority of all tracked builds, placing it in the upper-midrange tier.

The i5-12400 is a solid foundation with strong single-threaded performance (2257 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and respectable multi-threaded performance (15989 in Cinebench R23 multi-core). The RX 6600 XT is a capable 1080p performer with the 70th percentile in GPU benchmarks, and it can handle 1440p gaming with adjusted settings.

The system's class is desktop, and its overall tier is upper-midrange based on the percentiles. The average FPS of 101.8 across all games confirms that this is a high-performance build for 1080p gaming, with enough power for 1440p esports titles. This is a balanced system that does not have a glaring bottleneck, making it a reliable choice for a wide range of users.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured (dataIsMeasured is true), shows the system's performance across a wide range of games and resolutions at ultra settings.

At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles. Valorant leads with 354.1 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 343 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 184 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 155.1 FPS. These numbers are ideal for competitive gaming on high-refresh-rate monitors.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the performance is still strong. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 136 FPS, Minecraft at 153 FPS, and Roblox at 198.6 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (43.5 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (42 FPS) require lower settings to hit 60 FPS, but the system is playable.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains competitive for many titles. Valorant still hits 302.6 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 236 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 122.9 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 120.2 FPS, making it playable at high frame rates. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36.4 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 31 FPS, indicating that these titles are best played at 1080p or with reduced settings.

At 3840x2160, the system is not suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming. Most games drop below 60 FPS, with Valorant being the exception at 238.5 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 58.2 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone hits 98.7 FPS. Heavier titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (9.4 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (25.9 FPS) are unplayable, confirming that this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12400

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds