SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-14100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-14100F

18,519 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i3-14100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

This desktop pairing combines a 4-core/8-thread Raptor Lake CPU with an Ampere-based GPU that operates on a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 57th percentile among all graphics cards, yielding a combined percentile of 65. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is suitable for 1080p esports and competitive titles where frame rates prioritize CPU throughput. The Core i3-14100F delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1847 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2105, indicating strong per-thread performance that can sustain high frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. The RTX 3050 OEM's Passmark G3D score of 11857 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (deltaPct 0.2), suggesting that at 1080p with medium-high settings, frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range are plausible for most titles, though high-refresh 144Hz monitors will require lighter settings or esports titles.

Streaming: The GPU's 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-based features, though the 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit simultaneous gaming and encoding at high bitrates. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 15420 suggests adequate headroom for software encoding at 720p60, but x264 encoding at 1080p60 will likely strain the 4-core/8-thread configuration, especially when gaming concurrently.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5495 and Passmark integer math score of 45357 indicate that timeline scrubbing and export tasks in 1080p are workable, though the 4-core design will elongate render times compared to 6-core or 8-core alternatives. The GPU's FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS accelerates effects processing and CUDA-accelerated exports in Adobe Premiere, while the 12 MB shared L3 cache helps with repeated data access during edits.

3D rendering: The i3-14100F's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13084 positions it well below workstation-class CPUs, meaning CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray will be slow but serviceable for small scenes. GPU rendering is more promising — the RTX 3050 OEM's Passmark GPU compute score of 5779 and 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide a capable entry point for OptiX-accelerated renders, though the 8 GB VRAM will cap texture complexity and scene size.

Software development: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 7598 and Passmark data encryption score of 8922 indicate that compilation of small-to-medium projects is practical, with the 12 MB L3 cache helping to reduce recompilation stalls. The Passmark extended instructions score of 11984 shows reasonable SIMD throughput for code that leverages AVX2, while the 10 nm process node keeps power draw low for sustained build sessions.

Student and office work: The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 186 and Passmark single-thread score of 3778 demonstrate snappy responsiveness for document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing. The CPU's 72nd percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly 72% of all processors in general-purpose tasks, while the GPU's 57th percentile ensures smooth 4K video playback and hardware-accelerated browser rendering — more than sufficient for academic workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The i3-14100F and RTX 3050 OEM form a reasonably balanced pairing, but workload-dependent bottlenecks emerge. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation (Passmark physics score of 1077) and data compression (Passmark data compression score of 176106), the 4-core/8-thread CPU will be the limiting factor, especially in games that spawn many AI agents or simulation entities. The GPU's 57th percentile versus the CPU's 72nd percentile suggests that, in most gaming workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM will saturate first at 1080p ultra settings, while the CPU retains headroom.

At 1440p or 4K resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes pronounced — the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 128-bit bus width constrain texture streaming and high-resolution rendering. Conversely, in esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the CPU's single-core strength (1847 in Cinebench R23 single-core) may become the binding constraint if frame rates exceed 200 FPS. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface (rather than x16) introduces a subtle bandwidth limitation that can affect texture loading in open-world games, though benchmark deltas versus rivals (0.2% ahead of the RX 7600) suggest this is not a major practical issue.

For productivity, the CPU bottlenecks multi-threaded tasks — its 13084 Cinebench R23 multicore score trails the nearest rival Intel Core i3-13100 by 0.8% and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE by 0.1%, indicating near-parity with its direct competitors. Meanwhile, the GPU's compute workloads (5779 Passmark GPU compute) will bottleneck in render tasks due to the 2304 shading units and 8 GB VRAM. The 58W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP create a power-balanced system where neither component is thermally disproportionate.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i3-14100F delivers an average benchmark score of 18519, ranking at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-13420H, scores 18511 (deltaPct 0), indicating statistical parity. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE trails by just 0.1% (18505), while the Intel Core i3-13100 scores 18380 (0.8% behind) and the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18374 (0.8% behind). The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13084 and single-core score of 1847 demonstrate balanced throughput, with the Geekbench multicore score of 7598 and single-core score of 2105 confirming strong per-thread performance for a 4-core part.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM achieves an average benchmark score of 15199, placing it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, scores 15171 (deltaPct 0.2), meaning the RTX 3050 OEM is fractionally ahead. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270 (0.5% behind the RTX 3050 OEM), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 scores 15283 (0.5% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 scores 15290 (0.6% behind). The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 highlight its DirectX 12 and compute capabilities, while the Vulkan score of 57103 confirms cross-API consistency.

Combined, the pairing yields a 65th percentile system score, indicating that this build outperforms roughly two-thirds of all desktop configurations. The CPU's 72nd percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 57th percentile, suggesting the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The deltaPct values between rivals are all within 1%, meaning the RTX 3050 OEM and i3-14100F sit in a tightly contested performance tier where small architectural differences dictate placement.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers: Players targeting 1080p with medium-to-high settings in AAA titles will find this pairing adequate, as the RTX 3050 OEM's 11857 Passmark G3D score supports smooth 60 FPS gameplay in most modern games at that resolution. Esports enthusiasts seeking 144Hz+ frame rates will need to reduce settings, but the CPU's single-core strength (3778 Passmark single-thread) keeps minimum frame rates stable.

Content creators on a budget: Entry-level video editors and 3D artists who work with 1080p footage or small scenes will benefit from the GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 and 72 tensor cores for AI-accelerated effects. The CPU's 13084 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles proxy-based editing workflows, though 4K timelines will require patience during exports.

Software developers: Programmers compiling small to medium codebases will appreciate the CPU's 7598 Geekbench multicore score and 12 MB L3 cache, while the GPU's Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support ensures compatibility with graphics debugging tools. The ECC memory support on the CPU is a notable feature for developers requiring data integrity.

Students and office workers: The 72nd CPU percentile and 57th GPU percentile translate to responsive multitasking, smooth video conferencing, and hardware-accelerated productivity suites. The dual-slot GPU with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs supports multi-monitor setups for research and writing.

Small business workstations: The 58W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP keep cooling requirements modest, while the 300W suggested PSU simplifies power delivery in compact office chassis. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM accommodates CAD visualization and light 3D modeling without excessive swapping.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-14100F is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) using Intel's 10 nm process node with a 163 mm² die size. It operates at a 3.50 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.70 GHz, with a 58W TDP and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3, totaling 12 MB of L3 cache.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that punches above its core count in single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1847 and Geekbench single-core score of 2105 indicate strong IPC (instructions per clock) for a 10 nm part, while the Passmark single-thread score of 3778 confirms excellent responsiveness. Multi-threaded performance is solid but not exceptional: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13084 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5495 place it in the lower mid-range for modern CPUs, as expected from 4 physical cores.

The Passmark suite provides granular insight: integer math scores 45357, floating-point math scores 35370, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 11984. Data compression (176106) and random string sorting (17596) show strong memory subsystem performance, while data encryption (8922) and physics (1077) reveal the limitations of 4 cores under algorithmic load. The find prime numbers score of 61 highlights the CPU's weakness in certain integer-heavy workloads. The average benchmark score of 18519 and 72nd percentile ranking place it on par with the Intel Core i5-13420H (18511, 0% delta) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i3-13100 (18380, 0.8% delta).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 support (16 lanes from the CPU only), providing a modern foundation for storage and expansion. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on motherboard selection. The platform supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation-class systems.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is half the bandwidth of a standard x16 slot but remains sufficient for this performance tier given the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 300W suggested PSU provides ample headroom over the combined 188W of CPU and GPU TDP, leaving room for additional drives or fans. The 8-pin power connector on the GPU is standard, and the dual-slot form factor (242 mm length, 112 mm height) fits most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve swapping the GPU to a higher-tier Ampere or newer architecture card, as the CPU's 72nd percentile leaves headroom for more demanding graphics. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface will not bottleneck a mid-range GPU upgrade, though top-tier cards may exceed the interface's bandwidth. Alternatively, upgrading the CPU to a 6-core or 8-core Raptor Lake part would improve multi-threaded workloads (current Cinebench R23 multicore: 13084) while retaining the same socket and memory.

FAQ

Q: Is this CPU+GPU combination good for 1440p gaming?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th GPU percentile and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest 1440p gaming is possible at medium settings, but the GPU will be the primary bottleneck — the CPU's 72nd percentile provides sufficient headroom for most titles at that resolution.

Q: How does the Core i3-14100F compare to its closest rivals?

A: The CPU scores 18519 on average, matching the Intel Core i5-13420H (18511, 0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE (18505, 0.1% delta), while outperforming the Intel Core i3-13100 (18380, 0.8% delta) and Intel Core 7 360 (18374, 0.8% delta).

Q: What is the RTX 3050 OEM's performance relative to the RTX 2060?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM (avg score 15199) is 0.6% ahead of the RTX 2060 (15290), placing them in the same performance tier despite generational differences.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though the motherboard choice will determine which memory type is used.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The pairing achieves a 65th combined percentile, meaning it outperforms approximately 65% of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: Is the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface a limitation?

A: The benchmark data shows the RTX 3050 OEM performs within 0.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 7600, indicating the x8 interface does not meaningfully hamper performance at this tier.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what PSU is recommended?

A: The CPU has a 58W TDP, and the GPU's suggested PSU is 300W, which provides sufficient headroom for the combined 188W draw plus system components.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing (buildClass: desktop) that combines Intel's 4-core/8-thread Core i3-14100F with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU, released on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $109, represents the entry point of Intel's 14th-generation desktop lineup. The GPU, an end-of-life product released on 2022-01-03, sits in the mid-low tier of the GeForce 30-series.

The combined percentile of 65 indicates this build outperforms the majority of systems in the benchmark database, though it does not enter the high-performance tier. The CPU's 72nd percentile ranking places it above the GPU's 57th percentile, meaning the processor is the more competitive component relative to its peers. This asymmetry suggests the build is CPU-heavy for its class, which benefits workloads that rely on single-threaded performance but limits raw graphics throughput.

The system's overall tier is best described as entry-level mainstream — capable of 1080p gaming and productivity tasks, but not designed for high-refresh 1440p or 4K workloads. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 2304 shading units on the GPU, combined with the CPU's 4 cores and 12 MB L3 cache, define a balanced, budget-conscious desktop configuration that prioritizes affordability and efficiency over peak performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the GA106 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process node, containing 12,000 million transistors across a 276 mm² die (transistor density of 43.5M per mm²). It operates at a base clock of 1515 MHz and boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem comprises 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU features 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, 18 RT cores, and 72 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s, texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 8.087 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 1:1 ratio of 8.087 TFLOPS). The card consumes 130W TDP, requires a 1x 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU rating of 300W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and outputs through 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a Passmark G3D score of 11857 and a Passmark GPU compute score of 5779. Geekbench OpenCL scores 60740 and Vulkan scores 57103. DirectX performance is uneven: DirectX 9 scores 137, DirectX 10 scores 61, DirectX 11 scores 86, and DirectX 12 scores 58. The G2D score of 973 reflects modest 2D acceleration. The average benchmark score of 15199 places it at the 57th percentile, with the nearest rival AMD Radeon RX 7600 scoring 15171 (0.2% behind), while the AMD Radeon 680M (15270) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15283) both trail by 0.5%, and the RTX 2060 (15290) trails by 0.6%.

For rendering workloads, the 18 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 72 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based denoising. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures and moderate 3D scenes, but the 128-bit bus limits high-resolution texture streaming. The FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS positions it as a competent entry-level GPU for CUDA-accelerated rendering, though the 57th percentile ranking indicates it sits below the median of all GPUs in the database.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the i3-14100F and RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1847 and the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 provide the basis for these projections.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th GPU percentile suggests roughly 50-70 FPS in most AAA titles, with less demanding games like esports shooters reaching 100-150 FPS. The GPU's 0.2% advantage over the AMD Radeon RX 7600 in average benchmark score indicates performance comparable to that rival, which typically achieves playable frame rates at 1080p high settings. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p ultra textures without excessive stuttering, though memory-intensive titles may require reduced texture quality.

At 1080p high settings, frame rates are estimated to increase by 15-25%, placing most games in the 60-85 FPS range. The CPU's 72nd percentile ensures that frame pacing remains stable, as the i3-14100F's single-core performance (1847 Cinebench R23) can keep up with the GPU's output in most scenarios. In CPU-bound titles like strategy games or simulators, the 4-core/8-thread configuration may cap frame rates near 90-100 FPS, but this remains within playable territory.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth limit high-resolution rendering, with estimated frame rates dropping to 35-50 FPS at ultra settings and 45-60 FPS at high settings. The CPU retains headroom at this resolution, as the GPU saturates before the processor's single-thread performance becomes a limiting factor. For 1440p gaming, users should expect to reduce settings to medium for consistent 60 FPS. At 4K, this pairing is not recommended, as the GPU's 57th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM will result in sub-30 FPS performance in most modern titles at any settings.