SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-14100F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-14100F

18,519 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

70,829 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-14100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE represents a highly capable, balanced desktop platform that sits in the upper tier of overall performance, with a combined percentile of 82. The data indicates a system where the CPU and GPU are exceptionally well matched, delivering strong 1080p gaming and efficient productivity without a significant bottleneck in either direction. This analysis interprets the benchmark results to show a pairing that excels in value-oriented performance, targeting gamers and mainstream users who prioritize frame rates at standard resolutions over raw multi-core compute.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-14100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and can boost up to 4.70 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 58 W. This is a desktop-class chip on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, and it does not feature integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache.

The benchmark results show a processor that is clearly optimized for single-threaded responsiveness, a critical factor for gaming. In Cinebench R23, the i3-14100F scores 1847 points in single-core and 13084 points in multi-core. The single-core score is particularly strong, indicating that the chip can handle the primary game thread with ease. The multi-core score, while lower than higher-core-count parts, is still respectable for a 4-core chip, suggesting it can handle modern game engines that utilize multiple threads. The Geekbench scores reinforce this, with a single-core score of 2105 and a multi-core score of 7598. The PassMark single-thread score of 3778 is a standout figure, placing the i3-14100F in an elite class for single-thread performance, which is a strong indicator for gaming and lightly threaded applications.

The CPU's overall average benchmark score is 18519, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. This places it in the upper echelon of processors, though not at the very top. The nearest rivals in the data provide context: the i3-14100F is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-13420H (avg score 18511, deltaPct 0), and it is a mere 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE (avg score 18505). It is also 0.8% ahead of both the Intel Core i3-13100 (avg score 18380) and the Intel Core 7 360 (avg score 18374). This indicates that the i3-14100F is at the very top of its performance class, matching or slightly exceeding the previous generation and competitor equivalents. For real workloads, this means snappy application launches, fluid system navigation, and strong performance in games that are not heavily multi-threaded, making it a solid foundation for a mainstream gaming PC.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the components. The data clearly shows a system designed for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming. The CPU's exceptional single-thread score of 3778 in PassMark is a key enabler, as it ensures the processor can keep up with the GPU's output in most titles. The GPU's performance, detailed in the next section, is the primary determinant of frame rates.

Based on the GPU's 91st percentile ranking and its strong average benchmark score of 70829, expectations for 1080p gaming are high. For competitive titles like first-person shooters and multiplayer online battle arenas, the combination of a top-tier single-thread CPU and a high-percentile GPU should comfortably push frame rates into the 100-144 Hz range on high or ultra settings. The RX 6600 LE's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, and its 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents bottlenecks at this resolution. For more demanding AAA titles, the system should still deliver very playable frame rates, likely exceeding 60 FPS on high settings and approaching 60 FPS on ultra, with adjustments to specific settings like shadow quality or anti-aliasing ensuring a smooth experience. At 1440p, the system would remain capable, but users would likely need to dial back settings to high or medium to maintain high frame rates, as the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU's compute power (8.942 TFLOPS FP32) become more constrained at higher resolutions. The estimates point to a system that is purpose-built for 1080p gaming, delivering an excellent balance of CPU and GPU capability for that resolution.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE is a desktop graphics card based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, utilizing the Navi 23 chip manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster operation units (ROPs). The GPU is equipped with 28 ray accelerators, providing hardware support for ray tracing effects. It has a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2045 MHz, and a boost clock of 2495 MHz, with a TDP of 132 W and a suggested power supply of 300 W.

The card is configured with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory operates at an effective speed of 14 Gbps. This configuration is well-suited for 1080p gaming, where the memory capacity is sufficient for current game assets and the bandwidth is adequate to feed the GPU's cores. The pixel rate is 159.7 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 279.4 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for a card in this class. The FP32 performance is 8.942 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 17.88 TFLOPS (2:1), showing solid compute capability for rendering workloads.

In GPU benchmarks, the RX 6600 LE scores 69229 in Geekbench OpenCL and 72428 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 70829. This places it at the 91st percentile of all GPUs, a very strong showing. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile (avg score 70140, deltaPct 1), the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg score 69986, deltaPct 1.2), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg score 69870, deltaPct 1.4), with the RX 6600 LE being 1.3% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6650M (avg score 71768, deltaPct -1.3). This data confirms the RX 6600 LE sits at the top of its performance tier, slightly ahead of several professional and mobile competitors. For rendering, the GPU delivers strong 1080p performance and is a capable entry point for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though users should not expect high-end ray tracing performance. The card's dual-slot design and 1x 8-pin power connector are standard, and its 190 mm length makes it compatible with a wide range of cases.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core i3-14100F?

A: The i3-14100F has an average benchmark score of 18519 and sits at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, placing it in the upper-mid range. It is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-13420H and is 0.8% faster than the Intel Core i3-13100.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the Radeon RX 6600 LE have?

A: The RX 6600 LE has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus operating at an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

Q: Is the Core i3-14100F suitable for overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked in the traditional sense. Its performance is defined by its stock boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: Does the RX 6600 LE support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest game engines and features.

Q: What kind of power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6600 LE is 300 W. The CPU has a TDP of 58 W, so a quality 300 W power supply is sufficient for the combined system, though more headroom is often preferred.

Q: What is the processor's single-thread performance like?

A: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score is 3778, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1847. These scores are very high, indicating excellent performance for tasks that rely on a single core, such as gaming.

Q: How does the RX 6600 LE compare to the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile?

A: The RX 6600 LE has an average benchmark score of 70829, which is 1% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile's score of 70140. This indicates the RX 6600 LE is slightly faster in general GPU compute benchmarks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture of this system is one of high capability and balance. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 18519, placing it at the 72nd percentile. Its key results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13084 and a single-core score of 1847, a Geekbench multi-core score of 7598, and a PassMark single-thread score of 3778. These figures illustrate a processor that is a top performer in its class, particularly in single-threaded tasks.

The GPU, meanwhile, achieves an average benchmark score of 70829, placing it at the 91st percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 69229, and its Vulkan score is 72428. This percentile ranking is significantly higher than the CPU's, indicating that the GPU is the stronger of the two components relative to their respective markets. The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, which reflects the overall strength of the build. The data shows that while the CPU is a strong performer, the GPU is the standout component, offering top-tier performance for its segment. This creates a system where the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios, but the CPU is more than capable of supporting it in CPU-bound tasks.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideally suited for gamers targeting high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming. The combination of the CPU's exceptional single-thread performance and the GPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures high frame rates in competitive and AAA titles at this resolution. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, and the overall balance of the system means users can expect a smooth, stutter-free experience. This build is less ideal for 1440p or 4K gaming, where the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute power would become more significant bottlenecks.

Beyond gaming, this pairing is a solid choice for students and for general-purpose desktop use. The CPU's strong single-thread performance makes it responsive for office applications, web browsing, and coding. For content creators, the system is capable of handling light to moderate workloads like photo editing and 1080p video editing, but the 4-core CPU will be a limitation for heavy multi-threaded rendering tasks. The GPU's compute performance can accelerate some workloads, but it is not a primary workstation card. Small business workstations that require a responsive system for productivity software would also benefit from this build. In short, the target user is a gamer or a general user who wants a high-performing 1080p system without the cost or power requirements of a high-end multi-core workstation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data suggests a well-balanced system with the GPU being the primary performance driver. The CPU, at the 72nd percentile, is a strong performer, but the GPU, at the 91st percentile, is clearly the more dominant component relative to its peers. This implies that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor when pushing higher resolutions and graphics settings, which is the expected and desirable behavior for a gaming PC. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p, ensuring the GPU is not waiting on the processor.

Evidence for this balance is found in the FPS scaling expectations. The CPU's top-tier single-thread score (3778 in PassMark) is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles. The GPU's high average benchmark score (70829) and memory bandwidth (224.0 GB/s) are the primary determinants of frame rates at 1080p. If the user were to upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model, the CPU might start to become a bottleneck in very CPU-intensive games. Conversely, the GPU is the clear bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or heavy rendering. For the intended use case of 1080p gaming, the balance is nearly ideal, with the GPU being the first component to reach its limit, which is the correct behavior for maximizing graphical performance.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i3-14100F desktop processor with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE desktop graphics card. It is a desktop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing represents a mainstream gaming configuration, leveraging a strong budget-oriented CPU with a high-performance GPU. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread part from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is a RDNA 2.0-based card from AMD's RX 6000 series.

The overall tier of this system is high, as indicated by the combined percentile of 82. This places it in the upper segment of all desktop systems. The individual percentiles show a CPU at the 72nd percentile and a GPU at the 91st percentile, which means the GPU is the standout component, offering near-top-tier performance while the CPU provides a solid, capable foundation. This is a system that punches above its weight in gaming performance, offering a high level of capability for 1080p gaming and general use. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $109, which provides a reference point for its market position. The combination of a high-percentile GPU and a capable, affordable CPU makes this a very effective pairing for its intended purpose.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700. The Core i3-14100F supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for a budget desktop chip. The TDP of the CPU is 58 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 132 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W, leaving significant headroom for a more power-hungry GPU in the future.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be the GPU. Given the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support, the CPU is capable of supporting a significantly more powerful graphics card. A user could upgrade to a higher-tier GPU without needing to change the motherboard or CPU, as the 300 W suggested PSU does not represent a hard limit, but rather a minimum recommendation. The CPU's memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so a user on DDR4 could migrate to a DDR5 motherboard if they also upgraded the CPU, but this would be a more involved change. In the short term, the upgrade path is clear: the GPU is the component that can be swapped to gain the most performance, as the CPU will not bottleneck a mid-range to upper-mid-range GPU upgrade. The platform's support for modern PCIe Gen 5 ensures that future storage and expansion cards will also be compatible.