SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100TE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

72%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100TE

3,111 Benchmark Score

Top 28% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i3-13100TE's performance tier relative to all desktop CPUs?

A: The Core i3-13100TE sits at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs, placing it squarely in the mid-range of the desktop processor landscape. Its average benchmark score of 3111 puts it within 0.8% of the Intel Xeon W-2133 and within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U, indicating it trades blows with established mid-range parts from both camps.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to other high-end GPUs?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation ranks in the 98th percentile among all GPUs, making it a top-tier workstation graphics solution. Its average benchmark score of 184664 places it 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, while trailing the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the i3-13100TE?

A: The i3-13100TE is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, with a 35 W TDP and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory and expansion capabilities does the i3-13100TE offer?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has ECC memory support enabled. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and it integrates Intel UHD Graphics 730 for basic display output.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, which underpins its strong performance in memory-intensive workloads.

Q: What is the RT and tensor core configuration of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The GPU features 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, alongside 12800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation processors. It achieves a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s, and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 compute.

Q: Does the benchmark database contain measured gaming FPS for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data does not include measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false, so all gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-13100TE is a modest 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor from the Raptor Lake generation, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². Its base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.10 GHz are unremarkable for a desktop part, but the 35 W TDP signals a focus on efficiency rather than raw throughput. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3, which is a reasonable allocation for a quad-core design.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the middle of the pack. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10054 and single-core score of 1419 indicate a processor that handles everyday productivity and lightly threaded applications competently but will not set records in heavily threaded workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 5703 and single-core score of 1739 corroborate this picture. The average benchmark score of 3111 places the i3-13100TE at the 52nd percentile, which means it outperforms roughly half of all CPUs in the database.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i3-13100TE is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, which scores 3122 and is 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U, which scores 3124 and is 0.4% ahead. It leads the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U by 0.5% and the Intel Xeon W-2133 by 0.8%. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the i3-13100TE is functionally comparable to a cluster of mid-range mobile and desktop processors from the previous generation.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 scores of 4222 multicore and 595 single-core suggest that the CPU can handle source code compilation, spreadsheet analysis, and office productivity with ease. The R15 scores of 1013 multicore and 142 single-core reinforce that this is not a content-creation powerhouse; video encoding or 3D rendering on the CPU alone will be serviceable but slow compared to higher-core-count parts. The 4.10 GHz boost clock helps single-threaded responsiveness, which is noticeable in daily use and in applications that rely on a few fast cores.

The 35 W TDP and LGA 1700 socket make this an appealing option for compact desktop builds or small form factor systems where thermal and power constraints are paramount. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in platform cost and performance tuning, though the dual-channel memory bus limits bandwidth compared to higher-end platforms. ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation or small server use cases, adding a layer of reliability that consumer CPUs often lack.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process with a massive 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The AD102 chip is the largest in NVIDIA's professional lineup, and the specifications confirm its high-end positioning: 12800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The clock speeds are substantial, with a base of 1155 MHz and a boost of 2550 MHz, driving a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

Memory capacity is a defining feature. The 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus yields 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is essential for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and AI model training. The 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for deep learning inference, training, and ray-traced rendering. FP32 and FP16 performance both sit at 65.28 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio, which means the GPU does not sacrifice half-precision throughput for full-precision work — a rarity that benefits scientific computing and machine learning workloads.

The benchmark data underscores the GPU's dominance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 contribute to an average benchmark score of 184664, placing the RTX 5000 Ada Generation in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. This is a top-tier result, and the nearest rivals confirm the company it keeps. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183725, 0.5% lower, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187147, 1.3% higher. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182109, 1.4% lower, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050, 3.7% lower. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation thus sits in the same performance echelon as NVIDIA's flagship data center accelerators and the most powerful consumer gaming GPU, while offering 32 GB of memory that exceeds what most of those rivals provide.

For rendering workloads, the combination of high FP32 throughput and 32 GB of VRAM means the GPU can handle complex 3D scenes, GPU-accelerated rendering, and large texture sets without spilling to system memory. The RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects in DCC applications, and the tensor cores enable AI-accelerated denoising and upscaling. The 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 12800 shading units at high resolutions, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor professional setups. The dual-slot design and 250 W TDP are reasonable for a card of this performance class, with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested 600 W PSU.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This combination is overkill for gaming at high refresh rates. The GPU's 98th percentile performance can drive frame rates well beyond 144 Hz at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, but the CPU's 52nd percentile ranking may limit frame pacing in esports titles that are CPU-bound. The i3-13100TE's single-core score of 1419 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can keep up with mid-range gaming demands, but the pairing is clearly oriented toward professional work rather than pure gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for encoding 1080p streams with x264 at moderate presets, but the GPU's NVENC encoder — implicit in the Ada Lovelace architecture — offloads the work entirely, leaving the CPU free for game logic. The RTX 5000 Ada's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP16 compute and 400 tensor cores can handle AI-based encoding enhancements, making this a capable streaming platform despite the modest CPU.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10054 will handle timeline scrubbing and basic effects, but the GPU is the workhorse here. The 32 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for smooth playback of 4K and 8K footage, real-time color grading, and GPU-accelerated effects. Export times will be dominated by the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of compute, which accelerates encoding and rendering in modern NLEs.

3D rendering: The i3-13100TE's 10054 multicore score in Cinebench R23 is modest for CPU-based rendering, but the RTX 5000 Ada's 100 RT cores and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute make it a render monster. In GPU-accelerated renderers like Octane or Redshift, the CPU becomes a secondary factor, and the 32 GB of VRAM allows for scenes that would crash lesser GPUs. The data shows this is a professional rendering solution, not a hobbyist one.

Software development: The CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads, with a 4.10 GHz boost clock, are adequate for compiling smaller projects and running IDEs, but large builds will be slow. The Geekbench multicore score of 5703 indicates that parallel compilation will not scale well beyond 8 threads. The GPU's compute power is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this an unbalanced choice for pure coding workloads — a cheaper CPU would suffice.

Student and office work: The i3-13100TE's 52nd percentile ranking and 35 W TDP make it an efficient choice for everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 can handle display output, but pairing it with the RTX 5000 Ada is excessive for this scenario. The 4-core design is more than enough for office productivity, and the low power draw is a plus for campus or small office environments.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 3111 places it at the 52nd percentile, with a narrow spread against its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS leads by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U by 0.4%, and the i3-13100TE leads the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U by 0.5% and the Intel Xeon W-2133 by 0.8%. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the i3-13100TE is not a performance outlier; it is a dependable mid-range part that will not embarrass itself in everyday tasks.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 184664 places it at the 98th percentile, a stark contrast to the CPU's 52nd percentile. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5%, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 1.4%, and the RTX 4090 D by 3.7%, while trailing the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3%. This is elite company, and the GPU's position within 1.5% of the fastest accelerators in the database confirms its status as a top-tier professional compute part.

The combined percentile for this build is 75, which reflects the massive disparity between the two components. The CPU pulls the average down from the GPU's stratospheric 98th percentile, while the GPU drags it up from the CPU's middling 52nd percentile. The combined picture is a workstation that excels at GPU-bound tasks but is bottlenecked by the CPU in scenarios that require significant host-side processing. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1013 and single-core score of 142, along with the R20 multicore score of 4222, paint a consistent picture of a CPU that is adequate but not exceptional, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 show a GPU that is near the top of its class.

# Gaming Performance

The benchmark database contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU and GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise measurements.

Based on the GPU's 98th percentile ranking and its 3.7% lead over the GeForce RTX 4090 D in average benchmark score, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is capable of running virtually any modern game at maximum settings. The 32 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth are more than sufficient for 4K textures and high-resolution rendering, and the 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can drive high frame rates at 1440p and 4K.

The CPU, however, is the limiting factor. The i3-13100TE's 52nd percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1419 suggest that in CPU-bound scenarios — such as open-world games with heavy physics or strategy titles with complex AI — the frame rate may be constrained by the processor. At 1080p, where the GPU is less taxed, the CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads may struggle to maintain high refresh rates in the most demanding titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck for most games, and the CPU's weaknesses are less apparent.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the 4.10 GHz boost clock should deliver high frame rates, but the 52nd percentile CPU ranking means it will not match the performance of higher-end gaming CPUs. For AAA single-player games at 4K, the RTX 5000 Ada's 98th percentile performance should provide a smooth experience, but users should expect CPU-related frame dips in heavily threaded scenes. The overall gaming picture is one of a GPU that is overkill for gaming, paired with a CPU that is merely adequate — a combination that is efficient for professional work but unbalanced for pure gaming.

# Who Should Build It

This build is for professionals who need massive GPU compute and memory capacity but do not require high CPU throughput. The primary target is 3D artists and animators working with GPU-accelerated renderers, where the RTX 5000 Ada's 32 GB of VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will handle scenes that would otherwise require a render farm. The 98th percentile GPU ranking means this system can tackle architectural visualization, product design, and film-quality VFX.

AI researchers and data scientists will also find this pairing compelling. The 400 tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP16 compute are well-suited for training and inference, and the 32 GB of memory can hold large models and datasets. The CPU's 52nd percentile ranking is less relevant for GPU-bound training workloads, though the 4 cores and 8 threads may slow data preprocessing and model loading.

Students and small business workstations can benefit from the CPU's efficiency — the 35 W TDP and integrated graphics make it a low-power base for office tasks — but the GPU is far beyond what these workloads require. This build is not for gamers, as the CPU will bottleneck the GPU in many titles, and the price of the RTX 5000 Ada is not justified by gaming performance alone. It is a specialist tool for GPU-centric professional work, and the modest CPU is a cost-saving measure that does not compromise the primary workloads.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i3-13100TE, a 4-core, 8-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a workstation GPU with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The CPU is a mid-range part at the 52nd percentile, while the GPU is a top-tier part at the 98th percentile. The combined percentile of 75 reflects the significant imbalance between the two components, with the GPU dominating the overall performance profile.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary workstation rather than a portable laptop. The CPU's LGA 1700 socket and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide platform flexibility, while the GPU's dual-slot design and 250 W TDP require a chassis with adequate airflow and a 600 W PSU. The overall tier is a professional workstation, with the GPU's 98th percentile ranking placing it among the fastest graphics solutions available, and the CPU's 52nd percentile ranking positioning it as a budget-conscious choice for host processing.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a pronounced imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 3111 and 52nd percentile ranking are dwarfed by the GPU's average benchmark score of 184664 and 98th percentile ranking. In GPU-bound workloads — rendering, machine learning, video encoding — the GPU will be the primary driver of performance, and the CPU's limitations will have minimal impact. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth are the dominant factors in these scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads, the tables turn. The i3-13100TE's 4 cores and 8 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10054, will bottleneck the GPU in tasks like physics simulation, data compression, or single-threaded application logic. The GPU's 98th percentile performance cannot compensate for a CPU that sits at the 52nd percentile. This is most evident in gaming, where the CPU's single-core performance of 1419 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in titles that rely on a few fast threads.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis. At lower resolutions, the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 32 GB of VRAM ensures that memory capacity is never a constraint in gaming, but the CPU's mid-range ranking means that frame rates will not scale linearly with the GPU's raw power in all scenarios. This build is balanced for GPU-centric professional workloads, where the CPU's modest performance is acceptable, but it is unbalanced for gaming or CPU-heavy tasks, where the GPU's power is wasted.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100TE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-13100TE

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds