SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

72%

GPU

98%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100TE

3,111 Benchmark Score

Top 28% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i3-13100TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a study in extremes, pitting a low-power, budget-oriented four-core processor against one of the most powerful graphics cards ever produced. The data in the FACT PACK reveals a system with a combined percentile of 72, indicating it outperforms 72% of all tracked builds, yet this figure masks a profound internal imbalance. This analysis will dissect the benchmark scores, architectural characteristics, and performance implications of this unconventional desktop configuration, which is defined by the absence of any measured FPS data for the combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-13100TE is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake processor, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It is a desktop-class chip with a modest 4 cores and 8 threads, a base clock of 2.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The processor’s thermal design power (TDP) is a highly efficient 35 watts, which is a defining characteristic for this chip, suggesting a focus on low power consumption and heat output rather than raw performance. The architecture features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes support for ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation reliability.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a clear picture of its performance class. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 10054 points in multi-core and 1419 points in single-core tests. Its Geekbench scores are 5703 multi-core and 1739 single-core. These numbers place the CPU at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it sits almost exactly in the middle of the performance distribution. The average benchmark score of 3111 further contextualizes its position. The nearest rivals in this scoring band are the AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS with an average score of 3122 and a delta of -0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U at 3124 (-0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U at 3096 (+0.5%). The Intel Xeon W-2133 is also nearby, scoring 3087 with a delta of 0.8%. This indicates that the i3-13100TE's overall compute capability is statistically indistinguishable from these other processors, despite its different core configuration and power envelope. The single-core score of 1419 in Cinebench R23 suggests adequate performance for lightly-threaded tasks, but the multi-core score of 10054 reveals a clear limitation for heavily-threaded workloads. Real-world implications point to a CPU that can handle everyday productivity, web browsing, and office applications with ease, but it will struggle to keep up with high-core-count processors in video rendering, complex compilation, or other heavily parallelized tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 72, meaning it performs better than 72% of all tracked desktop configurations in the database.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the Intel Core i3-13100TE?

A: The CPU has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz.

Q: How much memory does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What are the key benchmark scores for the RTX 5090?

A: The GPU scores 18355 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 334370 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 376728 in Geekbench Vulkan.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS figures must be considered estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the power consumption (TDP) of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 575 W. The suggested power supply unit for this build is 950 W.

Q: What socket does the i3-13100TE use, and what memory does it support?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a stark contrast between the two components. The CPU's average benchmark score is 3111, placing it at the 52nd percentile, while the GPU's average benchmark score is a staggering 79842, placing it at the 92nd percentile. This 92nd percentile position indicates the RTX 5090 is in the top 8% of all GPUs, a claim supported by its individual scores: 18355 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 334370 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 376728 in Geekbench Vulkan. The GPU's closest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB with an average score of 79605 (deltaPct 0.3%), the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79396 (0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78940 (1.1%). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is slightly ahead with an average of 80959 (-1.4% delta). This shows the RTX 5090's raw compute performance is in a league of its own, eclipsing the CPU's contribution to the system's overall capability.

The combined picture is one of severe imbalance. The system's combined percentile of 72 is likely dragged down by the CPU's mediocre performance, as the GPU is far more powerful. In CPU-bound scenarios, the i3-13100TE will be the limiting factor, preventing the system from achieving its full potential. The data implies that while the GPU can process massive amounts of graphical data, the CPU may not be able to feed it instructions fast enough in many tasks. The CPU scores, such as the 10054 multi-core score in Cinebench R23, represent a bottleneck for workflows that require both strong CPU and GPU performance, like modern gaming at high frame rates or complex physics simulations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific combination of the Intel Core i3-13100TE and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Therefore, all statements regarding gaming performance are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the components. The RTX 5090's extraordinary compute power, evidenced by its 92nd percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18355, suggests it is capable of extremely high frame rates in nearly all games, even at maximum settings. The GPU's massive 32 GB VRAM buffer and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for any current game title.

However, the gaming experience will be heavily dictated by the CPU. The i3-13100TE's single-core score of 1419 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for many game engines, but its four-core/8-thread configuration is a significant constraint. In modern games that are optimized for more than 4 cores, the CPU can become the limiting factor, causing frame rate drops or stuttering, particularly in scenes with many characters or dynamic physics. At lower resolutions like 1080p, where the GPU is less burdened, the CPU bottleneck will be more pronounced, potentially preventing the system from achieving the high frame rates the RTX 5090 is capable of. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the primary workload, and the system is more likely to be GPU-bound, allowing the RTX 5090 to shine. Ultimately, the system's gaming performance is an estimate, but it points to a situation where the GPU is vastly overqualified for the CPU's capabilities in most gaming scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data paints a clear picture of a system that is severely bottlenecked by its CPU. The RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, while the i3-13100TE sits at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs. This massive gap in relative performance means the CPU will almost certainly be the limiting component in many workloads. In gaming, the CPU's role is to process game logic and prepare draw calls for the GPU. With only 4 cores and 8 threads, the i3-13100TE cannot generate these instructions fast enough to saturate the RTX 5090's immense processing power. The result is that the system's frame rates will be constrained by the CPU's speed, not the GPU's capabilities, particularly in CPU-intensive scenarios.

The bottleneck is less severe in GPU-bound workloads, such as rendering a highly complex 3D scene or running compute-intensive tasks that rely on the GPU's tensor cores. In these cases, the RTX 5090 can operate at full capacity, and the CPU's slower performance has less of an impact. The FPS scaling, which is estimated due to lack of measured data, would likely show minimal differences between a 1080p and 1440p resolution in some games, as the CPU is the limiting factor. The imbalance is so significant that it suggests the system's overall performance is largely dictated by the CPU's modest capabilities, making the RTX 5090 a component whose full potential is left untapped.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is a poor match for most users. The data suggests it would not be suitable for gamers seeking high-refresh-rate experiences, as the CPU's 52nd percentile performance would create a significant bottleneck. The system would be unbalanced, as the RTX 5090's power would be wasted in most gaming scenarios. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would find the CPU's 4-core/8-thread configuration to be a major hindrance, as these tasks are heavily reliant on multi-core processing power, where the i3-13100TE's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10054 falls short of what is needed to feed the GPU efficiently.

For software developers, the 4 cores might be sufficient for light coding and compilation, but larger projects would suffer from slow build times. Students and small business workstations performing office tasks, web browsing, and spreadsheets would find the CPU more than adequate, but the RTX 5090 is an unnecessary expense for such workloads. The only scenario where this pairing might make sense is for a user who prioritizes GPU compute tasks above all else, such as running specific AI inference models or GPU-accelerated scientific simulations, but even then, the CPU's slow data handling could hamper performance. The data indicates this build is best suited for a niche workstation that does not exist in the mainstream consumer market, making it an impractical build for gamers and general-purpose users.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a monster of a graphics card, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features a massive 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The GPU is clocked at a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). Its memory subsystem is the most striking feature: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, yielding an unprecedented bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The GPU has 21760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 176 raster output units (ROPs). It also contains 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI processing, respectively.

The benchmark scores reflect this immense hardware. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355 and the 92nd percentile ranking place it among the top-tier GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334370 and Vulkan score of 376728 indicate exceptional compute throughput. The Passmark G3D score of 39650 further confirms its dominance. For rendering, the 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it can handle the most demanding 3D workloads and high-resolution textures without breaking a sweat. The 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate ensures smooth performance at high resolutions. The presence of 170 RT cores means real-time ray tracing is a core strength, and the 680 tensor cores are designed to accelerate DLSS and other AI-based technologies. The GPU's TDP is 575 W, requiring a suggested PSU of 950 W, highlighting its power-hungry nature.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a low-power, entry-level CPU with a flagship, ultra-high-end GPU. The Intel Core i3-13100TE is a 35 W processor designed for efficiency, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a 575 W behemoth designed for absolute performance. The combined percentile of 72 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of overall performance, but this is a misleading metric. The system's true nature is defined by its extreme imbalance. The CPU is at the 52nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 92nd percentile, creating a configuration where one component is a performance king and the other is a performance average. The build is a desktop PC, but its component pairing is unusual, combining a power-sipping CPU with a power-hungry GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-13100TE is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which offers a clear upgrade path. Users can replace the CPU with a more powerful 12th or 13th-generation Intel processor on the same socket, such as a higher-core-count i5 or i7 model. The CPU's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory means the platform is flexible, though the motherboard choice will dictate which memory type is used. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are compatible with the RTX 5090's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the CPU. The RTX 5090 is already at the top of the GPU hierarchy, so upgrading it would yield little benefit. A CPU upgrade to a model with more cores and higher clock speeds would alleviate the bottleneck and allow the GPU to perform closer to its potential. The system's power delivery is also a consideration; the suggested PSU of 950 W is necessary to handle the RTX 5090's 575 W TDP, and it provides headroom for a more power-hungry CPU. The platform's longevity is a positive point, as the LGA 1700 socket supports a range of processors, making a CPU swap a straightforward path to a more balanced system.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is severely compromised by the CPU. The RTX 5090's power suggests it could drive high frame rates, but the i3-13100TE's 52nd percentile ranking will likely bottleneck at high refresh rates, preventing the system from achieving its full potential in most titles.

Streaming: The lack of CPU cores is a major drawback. Streaming requires encoding the video feed, which can be handled by the GPU's dedicated NVENC encoder, but the CPU must still manage the game and streaming software. The 4-core/8-thread configuration may struggle to handle both simultaneously, leading to performance issues.

Video Editing: The RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM and high compute scores will accelerate effects and rendering. However, video editing software often relies on the CPU for timeline scrubbing and encoding. The i3-13100TE's 10054 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core indicates it will be a bottleneck, making the editing process slower than it would be with a more powerful CPU.

3D Rendering: The RTX 5090 is a rendering powerhouse, as evidenced by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18355 and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance. For GPU-based renderers, this system would be very fast. However, if the rendering engine is CPU-based or uses the CPU for scene preparation, the i3-13100TE's limited cores will be a significant bottleneck.

Software Development: For development tasks, the CPU is the primary workhorse. Compilation is multi-threaded, and the i3-13100TE's 4 cores will result in longer build times compared to higher-core-count processors. The system is adequate for light coding, but it is not ideal for complex, large-scale projects.

Student and Office Work: This is the one scenario where the system is overkill. The CPU is more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The RTX 5090 is entirely unnecessary for these tasks, making this a highly inefficient and expensive solution for a use case that would be better served by a far more modest GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-13100TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds