SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
72%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100T

3,198 Benchmark Score
Top 28% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i3-13100T's performance class?

A: The i3-13100T sits in the 53rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3198. This places it nearly exactly level with the Intel Core i7-9700E (3197, 0% delta) and just 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-1240P (3202).

Q: How does the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 holds the 67th percentile of all GPUs, averaging 21629 across tests. It is 1% slower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856) but 1.2% faster than the RTX A4000 Mobile (21379) and 1.8% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237).

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and core configuration?

A: It is a 4-core, 8-thread Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock. The 35 W TDP and LGA 1700 socket define its low-power desktop positioning.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so the 4.20 GHz boost clock is the maximum achievable frequency. The data shows no unlocked multiplier option.

Q: What memory and PCIe features does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with no ECC memory support. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The GPU, however, interfaces via PCIe 3.0 x16.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and compute capability?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. It features 3072 shading units, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores, with FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS.

Q: Are there measured gaming FPS figures for this exact combination?

A: No. The fact pack contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming frame-rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this desktop pairing is 60, placing it above the midpoint of all systems but below the top tier. Breaking this down, the CPU's 53rd percentile and the GPU's 67th percentile create a configuration where the graphics card is the stronger component by a meaningful margin.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 3198 is a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i7-9700E matches it at 3197 (0% delta), while the Intel Core i5-1240P edges ahead at 3202 (-0.1%). The Intel Xeon E-2136 trails at 3193 (0.2% delta), and the Intel Atom P5342 leads at 3217 (-0.6%). These sub-1% differences mean the i3-13100T is effectively interchangeable with those processors in synthetic workloads. The spread across all four rivals is only 24 points, which is negligible in real-world terms.

The GPU's average score of 21629 tells a similar story of tight competition. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB scores 21856, a 1% advantage, while the RTX A4000 Mobile (21379), Radeon HD 8970M (21237), and Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153) trail by 1.2%, 1.8%, and 2.3% respectively. This places the Quadro RTX 5000 in a dense performance band where no single rival dominates.

Looking at individual GPU benchmarks, the picture is more nuanced. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 is robust, but the DirectX 12 result of 59 is markedly lower than the DirectX 11 score of 140. The DirectX 10 score is 113, and DirectX 9 reaches 195. This suggests the Turing architecture excels in older API workloads but struggles with modern DirectX 12 titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 indicate strong compute performance, which aligns with the workstation positioning.

The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1530 is solid for a 4-core part, while the multi-core score of 10840 reflects the limitations of the core count. The Geekbench single-core score of 1780 and multi-core score of 4993 corroborate this pattern. The average benchmark score of 3198 across all CPU tests masks the variance between single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, but the percentile position of 53 suggests a balanced mid-range result.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-13100T is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz, boosting to 4.20 GHz under load. The 10 nm process node and 163 mm² die size are modest by modern standards, yet the 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic — this is a low-power part designed for efficiency-constrained systems.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for the core count: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This 12 MB L3 is generous for a quad-core, allowing the processor to keep more working set data close to the cores. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though the fact pack lists no specific memory bandwidth figures.

Benchmark data shows the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 10840 is respectable but not class-leading. The single-core score of 1530 in the same test indicates strong per-thread performance, which is crucial for lightly-threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 4993 and single-core score of 1780 reinforce this dual nature — capable single-threaded execution with moderate multi-threaded throughput constrained by the 4-core limit.

The 53rd percentile ranking among all CPUs positions this chip in the middle of the pack. The near-identical scores with the i7-9700E (3197) and i5-1240P (3202) suggest that generational improvements in IPC are offset by core count differences. The i7-9700E has more cores but older architecture, while the i5-1240P is a mobile part with different power characteristics. The i3-13100T's 4.20 GHz boost clock is the key advantage — it allows the chip to punch above its weight in single-threaded tasks.

For real workloads, this means the CPU excels in tasks that rely on a few fast cores: web browsing, office productivity, light coding, and older games. Multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and heavy compilation will be limited by the 4-core design, though the 8 threads help mitigate the worst of it. The 35 W TDP makes it suitable for compact builds where thermals and power draw are primary concerns.

Who Should Build It

This desktop pairing targets users who need professional-grade graphics compute without a top-tier CPU. The Quadro RTX 5000's 67th percentile GPU ranking and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory make it a workstation-class card, while the i3-13100T's 53rd percentile CPU ranking provides adequate single-threaded performance for driving that GPU.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated workflows are the primary audience. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 indicate strong compute throughput for rendering, video effects, and AI inference tasks. The CPU's 4 cores are sufficient for orchestration and light multi-tasking, though heavy CPU-side rendering would bottleneck.

Developers and software engineers benefit from the single-core strength — the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1530 and Geekbench single-core score of 1780 ensure snappy compilation for smaller projects, while the 8 threads handle parallel builds adequately. The 12 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code paths.

Students and small business workstation users find a balanced system for general productivity. The CPU handles office suites, spreadsheets, and web apps with ease, while the GPU accelerates any compute-heavy tasks like data visualization or CAD work. The 35 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, suitable for shared workspaces.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who prioritize GPU features over CPU-centric esports titles will find this pairing viable. The GPU's 67th percentile ensures high settings in most games, though the DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests modern titles may underperform expectations. The CPU's single-core performance is adequate for most game engines, but 4-core limits may show in CPU-bound scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000's PassMark G3D score of 15616 supports high frame rates at 1080p, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 is a significant concern for modern titles. The i3-13100T's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1530 ensures the CPU can feed frames in most scenarios, but 4-core limitations may cause stutter in heavily threaded game logic. Expect playable but not exceptional performance at 1440p, with 1080p being the safer bet for smooth gameplay.

Streaming: The GPU's 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features, though the fact pack lists no specific encoding benchmarks. The CPU's 8 threads can handle the streaming overhead while the GPU focuses on rendering. The 35 W CPU TDP means thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions, but the 4-core limit may require lowering in-game CPU load.

Video editing: The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 accelerates timeline rendering, effects, and exports in GPU-accelerated editors. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large projects and high-resolution timelines without swapping. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 10840 handles proxy generation and audio processing, though final exports will be faster with more cores.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth make it a capable renderer for GPU-based engines. The 16 GB GDDR6 accommodates complex scenes. CPU-based rendering will be slow due to the 4-core limit — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10840 is below typical workstation CPUs, making GPU rendering the preferred path.

Software development: The single-core Geekbench score of 1780 ensures fast IDE responsiveness and quick compilation of small-to-medium projects. The 8 threads and 12 MB L3 cache handle parallel builds of moderate size. Larger codebases with heavy multi-threaded compilation will expose the core count limitation, but the overall experience is productive for individual developers.

Student and office work: The CPU's 35 W TDP and 4-core design deliver more than enough performance for document editing, spreadsheets, presentations, and web research. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but its presence enables occasional compute tasks like data analysis or light 3D modeling. The system runs quietly and efficiently, suitable for dorm rooms and shared offices.

Gaming Performance

The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 and its 67th percentile ranking, this system is capable of 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. The nearest GPU rival, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB with a 1% higher average score, was a popular 1080p gaming card, suggesting similar performance levels. However, the Quadro RTX 5000's DirectX 12 score of 59 is notably lower than its DirectX 11 score of 140, indicating that modern DirectX 12 games may run significantly worse than older titles.

At 1440p, expect moderate settings for demanding games, with the 16 GB VRAM preventing texture-related stutter but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth limiting high-resolution performance. The CPU's single-core performance is sufficient for most game engines at these resolutions, where the GPU is typically the bottleneck. However, CPU-heavy games that scale poorly beyond 4 cores may see frame rate dips.

The GPU's strong DirectX 9 score of 195 and DirectX 10 score of 113 suggest excellent performance in older games and esports titles. The DirectX 11 score of 140 indicates solid performance for the current generation of DirectX 11 games. The weak DirectX 12 result of 59 is the main concern for future-proofing, as more titles transition to DX12.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the stronger component. The Quadro RTX 5000's 67th percentile versus the i3-13100T's 53rd percentile creates a 14-point gap, meaning the CPU is the limiting factor in many workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 21629 is roughly 6.8 times the CPU's 3198, though direct comparison across different benchmark suites is not perfectly apples-to-apples.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on the title. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1530 can drive high frame rates in most games, but the 4-core limit becomes the constraint in games that use more than 4 threads heavily. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that in DX12 games, the GPU may be the bottleneck at lower resolutions, while the CPU takes over at higher resolutions where frame rates drop.

For compute workloads, the GPU's OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 indicate it can handle massive parallel workloads with ease. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 10840 is dwarfed by the GPU's compute capability, so any CPU-bound rendering or simulation will be the limiting factor. GPU-accelerated tasks will see the CPU waiting on the GPU rather than vice versa.

The FPS scaling pattern from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the CPU may limit frame rates in less demanding games, while at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. This is a typical balance for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end workstation GPU — the CPU provides adequate single-threaded performance, but multi-threaded scaling is restricted.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-13100T uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports a range of 12th and 13th generation processors. Users can upgrade to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake CPU without changing the motherboard, though the fact pack does not list specific compatible models. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so existing DDR4 kits can be retained, or a switch to DDR5 is possible with a compatible motherboard.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but the Quadro RTX 5000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16. This means the GPU is not utilizing the full bandwidth available, but the practical impact is minimal for most workloads. A future GPU upgrade to a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 card would take advantage of the platform's capabilities.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, and its TDP is 230 W. The CPU's TDP is 35 W, so the total system power draw is well within the 550 W recommendation, leaving headroom for additional components. The power connectors are 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin, which standard PSUs support.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, which would alleviate the multi-threaded bottleneck without requiring a new motherboard or memory. The GPU, while end-of-life, remains capable with 16 GB VRAM, so a GPU upgrade is less urgent unless DirectX 12 performance becomes a critical issue. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the system for faster storage and next-generation GPUs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i3-13100T with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The combined percentile of 60 places it above the median system but below the top 40% of configurations. The CPU is a low-power 4-core part with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is a workstation-class card with 16 GB VRAM and a 230 W TDP — a significant power and performance asymmetry.

The overall tier is mid-range, with the GPU being the standout component. The Quadro RTX 5000's 67th percentile makes it a strong performer for GPU-accelerated tasks, while the CPU's 53rd percentile is adequate but not exceptional. This is a system that prioritizes graphics and compute throughput over CPU-heavy workloads.

The build is best characterized as a workstation-oriented desktop with gaming potential. The GPU's 16 GB memory and compute scores position it for professional use, while the CPU's single-core strength keeps the system responsive. The 35 W CPU TDP enables compact, efficient system designs, though the GPU's dual-slot form factor and 267 mm length require a suitably spacious case.

The end-of-life status of the GPU and the active production status of the CPU create an interesting dynamic — the platform is current, but the graphics card is from a previous generation. This is a configuration that makes sense for users who need the GPU's specific capabilities today and plan to upgrade the CPU later, or for those who found the Quadro RTX 5000 at a compelling price point relative to its performance class.