SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

81 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
72%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100T

3,198 Benchmark Score
Top 28% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-13100T is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a thermal design power of just 35 W. This low-power design makes it suitable for compact and thermally constrained builds, though its modest core count places it firmly in the entry-level segment of Intel's 13th-generation lineup.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform choice. The CPU lacks ECC memory support and is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is restricted. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated UHD Graphics 730 is included, which can serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks when no discrete GPU is installed.

Benchmark data shows the i3-13100T achieving a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,840 and a single-core score of 1,530. In Geekbench, it scores 4,993 multi-core and 1,780 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 3,198, placing the chip at the 53rd percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms slightly more than half of all processors in the database, a respectable position for a low-power quad-core part.

The nearest rivals paint a clear picture of its standing. The Intel Core i7-9700E scores an average of 3,197, a 0% delta. The Intel Core i5-1240P scores 3,202, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Xeon E-2136 scores 3,193, 0.2% higher. The Intel Atom P5342 scores 3,217, 0.6% lower. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the i3-13100T performs essentially identically to these four alternatives in aggregate benchmarks. This is notable because the i7-9700E and Xeon E-2136 are older, higher-tier parts, while the i5-1240P is a mobile chip. The fact that a 35 W desktop i3 can match these chips says more about the efficiency of Raptor Lake than about raw performance leadership.

For real workloads, the 4-core/8-thread configuration means the i3-13100T will handle single-threaded tasks with strong competence, as evidenced by its 1,530 Cinebench R23 single-core score. Multi-threaded workloads will be more constrained due to the limited core count, but the 10,840 multi-core score still represents usable performance for light to moderate productivity tasks. The 53rd percentile ranking indicates that while it is not a high-end part, it is also not a bottom-tier one; it sits squarely in the middle of the performance distribution.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern of solid single-core performance paired with moderate multi-core throughput. Cinebench R15 scores are 1,092 multi-core and 154 single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 4,552 multi-core and 642 single-core. The R23 results of 10,840 multi-core and 1,530 single-core align with expectations for a quad-core Raptor Lake chip at these clock speeds.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504. This places the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score equal to that single result. The nearest rivals for the GPU include the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (0.5% lower), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361 (0.9% lower). The deltas here are small, but the pattern is different from the CPU: the GPU is matching or slightly beating these specific rivals, though the rivals are themselves a mixed bag of workstation and older gaming cards.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 56, which sits just above the midpoint of all systems in the database. This combined figure reflects the CPU's 53rd percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile, with the overall system landing between the two. The interpretation is straightforward: neither component is a performance outlier, and the pairing produces a system that is slightly above average in the broader context of all benchmarked builds.

Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, frame rate figures must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 53rd percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile suggest a system that can handle modern games at reasonable settings, but the specific FPS numbers will depend heavily on resolution, game title, and workload characteristics. The data indicates a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other in percentile terms, but the GPU holds a slight edge in relative standing.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i3-13100T and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is unusual when viewed through the lens of their percentiles. The CPU sits at the 53rd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile. This 6-point gap suggests that the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its peers. In practical terms, this means the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where CPU overhead dominates.

However, the magnitude of this imbalance is modest. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,530 indicates it has enough single-threaded throughput to feed most GPUs in a general sense, but the four physical cores may struggle in titles that scale well beyond that count. The 53rd percentile ranking confirms that many CPUs outperform it, and games that are heavily multi-threaded will see the i3-13100T fall behind more capable processors.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 and its 59th percentile ranking indicate that it is capable of high levels of graphics throughput. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming with ultra settings, the RTX 5090 D V2 would be the primary determinant of frame rates. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios, such as 1080p gaming with lower graphics settings, the i3-13100T would constrain performance. The 6-percentile-point gap between the two components is not extreme, but it does suggest that builders prioritizing high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p might find the CPU limiting, while those gaming at higher resolutions would see the GPU as the primary driver.

The absence of measured FPS data means that exact bottleneck quantification is impossible, but the percentile data provides a clear directional signal. The system is reasonably balanced, with a slight lean toward GPU-limited behavior at higher resolutions. Builders should expect the CPU to be the limiting factor in CPU-intensive workloads like physics simulation or AI-driven game logic, while the GPU will dominate in pure rendering tasks.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing of a 35 W quad-core CPU with a high-end GPU targets a specific niche: users who want substantial graphics performance without a high-power CPU. The i3-13100T's 35 W TDP makes it attractive for small-form-factor or low-noise builds where heat output is a concern, while the RTX 5090 D V2's 59th percentile GPU ranking ensures strong graphical capabilities. The combined 56th percentile system ranking places it above the midpoint of all builds, making it a viable option for users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU throughput.

Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K resolutions would benefit most from this pairing, as these settings shift the performance burden onto the GPU. The CPU's 53rd percentile standing is sufficient for many gaming titles, especially those that are not heavily multi-threaded. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated rendering or video encoding would also find value here, as the RTX 5090 D V2's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth can handle large textures and complex scenes. However, creators who rely heavily on CPU-based rendering would be better served by a processor with more cores.

Software developers compiling code or running virtual machines would find the 4-core/8-thread configuration adequate for light to moderate workloads, though large builds would benefit from additional cores. Students and office workers running productivity suites, web browsing, and document editing would find this system more than sufficient, with the GPU providing future-proofing for any graphics-intensive tasks. Small business workstations that need reliable graphics performance for CAD or design software could also benefit, provided the software scales well with the GPU rather than requiring high CPU core counts.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with high refresh rates, the i3-13100T's 53rd percentile CPU ranking may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The RTX 5090 D V2's 59th percentile GPU ranking can produce high frame rates, but the CPU's four cores could become the constraint. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the system can deliver smoother experiences.

Streaming: The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and high bandwidth can handle encoding and rendering simultaneously, but the CPU's modest core count may struggle with software encoding while gaming. Hardware encoding via the GPU's dedicated encoders would be the recommended approach, leveraging the GPU's strengths rather than the CPU's limitations.

Video editing: GPU-accelerated effects and timeline rendering would perform well given the RTX 5090 D V2's strong benchmark score. CPU-based tasks like export encoding would be slower due to the quad-core design, but the 10,840 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is sufficient for basic editing workflows.

3D rendering: GPU-based renderers would excel with this system, as the RTX 5090 D V2's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 170 RT cores provide substantial compute power. CPU-based rendering would be significantly slower, and users in this category should rely on GPU-accelerated pipelines.

Software development: Compilation times would be moderate, with the 4-core CPU handling typical development workloads without major issues. The 4,993 Geekbench multi-core score suggests adequate performance for most coding tasks, though large parallel builds would benefit from more cores.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the GPU provides headroom for any future graphics-intensive coursework or projects. The CPU's 35 W TDP contributes to a system that runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial in shared or quiet environments.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-13100T support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What memory types does the i3-13100T support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i3-13100T includes UHD Graphics 730, which can provide display output without a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 0.9% higher than the RX 5700 XT's 16,361.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system ranks at the 56th percentile among all builds in the database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, so frame rates must be estimated from benchmark scores.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with the GB202 chip containing 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The transistor density of 122.9M per mm² reflects a dense, modern design. Base clock is 2,017 MHz with a boost clock of 2,407 MHz, and memory operates at 1,750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. This is configured with 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines. The GPU includes 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

Power requirements are significant, with a TDP of 575 W and a suggested power supply of 950 W. The card uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor. Physical dimensions are 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 16,504, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This ranking is notable given the large number of GPUs in the database; a 59th percentile means it outperforms a majority of graphics cards. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA T400, scores 16,508 (0% delta), while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16,415 (0.5% lower), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16,408 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,361 (0.9% lower). These close deltas suggest that in this specific benchmark, the RTX 5090 D V2 performs on par with these cards, despite being a newer architecture.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's large VRAM and high bandwidth make it well-suited for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The 170 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, and the 680 tensor cores enable AI-based features like DLSS and other neural network workloads. The 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance indicates strong raw compute capability for GPU-based rendering and simulation.

# Build Overview

This system pairs the Intel Core i3-13100T, a 35 W quad-core desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, a 575 W flagship-tier GPU. The build class is desktop, meaning this is a traditional desktop configuration using standard components. The combined percentile of 56 places this system slightly above the midpoint of all builds in the database.

The CPU's 53rd percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile create an overall tier that is upper-midrange when compared to all possible configurations. This is not a top-tier system in aggregate, but it is also far from entry-level. The pairing is characterized by a low-power CPU designed for efficiency and a high-power GPU designed for maximum graphics throughput. This creates an interesting dynamic where the system's overall performance tier is determined more by the GPU than the CPU, but the CPU still plays a critical role in determining what workloads the system can handle effectively.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $134, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. These figures reflect the very different market positions of the two components. The system as a whole is a desktop configuration that prioritizes GPU performance while keeping CPU power consumption minimal, making it suitable for builds where heat and noise are concerns but graphics performance is not negotiable.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data clearly indicates that the system's gaming performance will be driven primarily by the GPU at higher resolutions, while the CPU will play a larger role at lower resolutions.

The RTX 5090 D V2's 59th percentile GPU ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 suggest that it can handle demanding games at high settings. The 24 GB of VRAM provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 170 RT cores indicate strong capability for both traditional rasterization and ray-traced effects.

The i3-13100T's 53rd percentile CPU ranking and its single-core score of 1,530 in Cinebench R23 suggest that it can handle the per-thread demands of most games. However, the four-core design may limit performance in games that scale well beyond four threads. At 1080p, the CPU could become the bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles, capping frame rates below what the GPU could otherwise deliver. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the system's frame rates would be more consistent with the GPU's performance class.

Given the percentile data, estimated frame rates at 1080p would be high but potentially CPU-limited in some titles, while 1440p and 4K would show the GPU's full capabilities. The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative estimates, but the benchmark scores provide a solid foundation for predicting that this system can deliver playable frame rates at high settings across most modern games, with the caveat that CPU-bound scenarios may show limitations.