SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
83%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100F

17,653 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-13100F is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It runs at a 3.40 GHz base clock and boosts up to 4.50 GHz, with a 58 W TDP. The cache layout includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier chip, meaning overclocking headroom is not available, but the boost clock behavior is consistent for sustained workloads.

Benchmark data shows this CPU performs competitively within its class. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12458 multi-core and 1758 single-core. The single-core score is particularly strong, placing it in the 71st percentile among all CPUs. This suggests excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software. The multi-core score, while lower in absolute terms due to the 4-core configuration, still delivers solid throughput for a budget-oriented chip. PassMark multithread score of 14687 and single-thread score of 3609 reinforce this picture.

The nearest rival comparisons confirm its positioning. The i3-13100F scores 17653 average benchmark, essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-1255U (17656, 0% delta) and Intel Core i3-14100T (17648, 0% delta). It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 9374F. This means the i3-13100F sits in a narrow performance band where small architectural differences matter more than raw core counts.

Real workload interpretation: the 4-core/8-thread design handles everyday productivity with ease. Data compression in PassMark scores 168043, indicating fast file archiving and backup operations. Floating point math at 33510 and integer math at 43038 show balanced arithmetic capability. Extended instructions score 11407, which benefits modern encryption and multimedia codecs. The 8496 data encryption score is adequate for full-disk encryption without major performance penalties. For software development, compilation tasks will use the multi-core headroom effectively, but heavily parallel rendering or simulation workloads will hit the 4-core ceiling quickly.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the i3-13100F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 creates a distinct balance profile. The GPU is a 16 GB GDDR6 workstation card based on Turing architecture, with 3072 shading units and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. Its benchmark scores are substantial: PassMark G3D at 15616 and Geekbench OpenCL at 78999. The CPU, sitting at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, provides enough single-thread performance to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the 4-core limit becomes the constraint in multi-threaded game engines.

Bottleneck analysis from percentiles: the GPU is at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is at the 71st percentile. This near-equal standing suggests a reasonably balanced pairing for general compute tasks. However, the CPU's multi-thread ceiling (12458 in Cinebench R23) will throttle frame pacing in games that utilize more than 4 cores heavily. The GPU's massive 16 GB VRAM buffer means texture-heavy scenes will not hit memory limits, but the CPU may struggle to issue draw calls fast enough in CPU-bound scenarios.

FPS scaling evidence comes from the benchmark scores themselves. With no measured FPS data for this exact combination, estimates must derive from component strengths. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 is about 1% below the GTX 1060 6 GB (21856 average, -1% delta), indicating this is a mid-range performer by today's standards, not a high-end gaming card. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3609 ensures that frame timing in lightly-threaded games will be smooth, but the 4-core limit means background tasks like streaming or Discord overlays will compete for the same execution resources.

For workstation use, the balance shifts. The GPU's compute score of 6525 in PassMark GPU Compute and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 performance are substantial for rendering and simulation. The CPU is sufficient to feed these workloads in most cases, but for real-time ray tracing or physics simulation, the 4-thread limit may create stalls. The practical advice: this is a workstation-first pairing where the GPU leads, with the CPU providing a competent but not exceptional foundation.

FAQ

Q: How does the i3-13100F compare to its nearest rivals in multi-core performance?

A: The i3-13100F has an average benchmark score of 17653, which is 0% different from the Intel Core i7-1255U (17656) and 0% from the Intel Core i3-14100T (17648). It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (17614) and 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 9374F (17693).

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other cards?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 sits at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 21629. It is 1% below the GTX 1060 6 GB (21856), 1.2% above the RTX A4000 Mobile (21379), 1.8% above the Radeon HD 8970M (21237), and 2.3% above the RX Vega M GL (21153).

Q: Can this CPU handle gaming while streaming?

A: The CPU has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 14687. This is sufficient for gaming plus a single streaming encoder, but the 4-core limit means any additional background load will cause frame drops. The GPU's NVENC capabilities (Turing architecture with 384 tensor cores) can offload encoding, but the CPU still needs to manage game logic and streaming overhead.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU and does it matter?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth across a 256-bit bus with 16 GB GDDR6 memory. This is ample for 4K texture sets and large datasets in professional applications. The bandwidth is a defining feature for GPU compute tasks, as it directly impacts how fast data can be fed to the 3072 shading units.

Q: Is this CPU good for software development?

A: Yes, for most development tasks. The single-thread score of 3609 in PassMark and 1758 in Cinebench R23 ensure fast IDE responsiveness and quick compilation of small to medium projects. The multi-core score of 12458 in Cinebench R23 helps with parallel builds, though very large codebases will take longer than with higher-core-count CPUs.

Q: What does the combined percentile of 69 mean?

A: The combined percentile of 69 indicates that this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 69% of all tested desktop configurations. This places it firmly in the mid-range tier, suitable for professional work and moderate gaming, but not at the high-end performance level.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the i3-13100F does not support ECC memory. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. For workstation use requiring error correction, this is a limitation to consider.

Who Should Build It

The i3-13100F + Quadro RTX 5000 combination targets professionals who need GPU compute power without requiring a high-core-count CPU. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle large datasets in 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific visualization. The CPU's 71st percentile single-thread performance ensures smooth interaction in these applications, while the 4-core multi-thread capability handles moderate parallelism.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find this pairing adequate for most titles. The GPU's 67th percentile standing means it delivers playable frames at high settings, but not high-refresh-rate performance in demanding games. The CPU's strong single-thread score prevents major bottlenecks in most game engines, though CPU-intensive titles like strategy games will stress the 4-core limit.

Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes benefit most from this build. The GPU's FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS accelerates rendering and AI-assisted tools, while the 16 GB VRAM allows for large texture caches. The CPU handles timeline scrubbing and encoding tasks adequately, but render farms or heavy multi-task workflows would need more cores.

Software developers, particularly those working on game engines or graphics applications, will appreciate the balance. Students in computer science or engineering programs can use this for coursework involving CUDA or OpenCL programming, as the GPU's compute score of 6525 in PassMark provides a capable platform for learning. Small business workstations handling CAD, BIM, or data analysis will find the reliability of workstation drivers and the large VRAM buffer valuable.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Quadro RTX 5000's 15616 PassMark G3D score can push 144 Hz in esports titles, but the CPU's 4-core limit may cap frame rates in more demanding games. Expect 60-100 FPS in most AAA titles at high settings, with the GPU being the primary limiter at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The GPU's Turing architecture includes 384 tensor cores that accelerate encoding. The CPU's 14687 PassMark multithread score can handle game logic plus encoding, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration leaves little headroom for chat apps or browser overlays. Use NVENC to offload encoding for best results.

Video editing: The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth allow smooth 4K timeline editing with multiple effect layers. The CPU's single-thread score of 3609 ensures responsive scrubbing, while the 12458 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates export times. Expect reasonable but not exceptional render speeds.

3D rendering: The GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 performance provide strong ray tracing and rasterization throughput. The CPU's 4 cores will bottleneck complex scene setup and physics simulation, but GPU-based renderers like Octane or Redshift will operate efficiently.

Software development: The CPU's 1758 Cinebench R23 single-core score makes for snappy compile-test-debug cycles. The GPU's compute capabilities enable local testing of CUDA code or machine learning models. Data encryption at 8496 PassMark ensures secure development workflows without major slowdowns.

Student and office work: The CPU's 3609 PassMark single-thread score handles document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing effortlessly. The GPU's 709 PassMark G2D score ensures crisp 2D display output. For general productivity, this configuration is overkill but provides headroom for future demanding applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The Quadro RTX 5000's PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it at the 67th percentile, while the CPU's 71st percentile single-thread and 4-core configuration set the frame pacing.

At 1080p ultra settings, most games will run between 60 and 100 FPS. The GPU's 116.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 348.5 GTexel/s texture rate handle high-resolution textures well. The CPU's 4.50 GHz boost clock ensures single-threaded game logic runs smoothly. However, games that scale across 6 or more cores will see reduced performance due to the 4-core/8-thread limit.

At 1440p ultra, expect 50-80 FPS in most titles. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents VRAM bottlenecks, but the 3072 shading units will struggle with very demanding effects. The CPU remains adequate at this resolution since the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck.

At 4K ultra, frame rates drop to 30-50 FPS. The GPU's 67th percentile standing is the limiting factor here. The 16 GB VRAM prevents texture pop-in, but raw compute throughput is insufficient for high refresh rates at this resolution. For competitive gaming, drop to 1080p medium settings to achieve 144+ FPS in esports titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 17653, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12458 multi-core and 1758 single-core. Geekbench results show 7655 multi-core and 2056 single-core. PassMark tests reveal strengths in data compression (168043) and integer math (43038), with moderate floating point performance (33510).

The GPU's average benchmark score is 21629, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78999, and Vulkan scores 92309. PassMark G3D is 15616, with GPU compute at 6525. The DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 12 score of 59 indicate that this is not a gaming-first card, but rather a compute-oriented workstation GPU.

The combined percentile is 69, meaning this pairing outperforms 69% of all desktop configurations. The CPU's 71st percentile and GPU's 67th percentile are closely matched, indicating no severe bottleneck in either direction for most workloads. The GPU's nearest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 21856 (-1% delta), confirming the Quadro RTX 5000 is a mid-range performer. The CPU's nearest rival, the i7-1255U, scores 17656 (0% delta), showing the i3-13100F punches above its core count.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i3-13100F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes (CPU only), allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible but may limit performance with newer PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 GPUs.

The GPU has a 230 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. It uses 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot design at 267 mm length. This leaves headroom for a more power-hungry GPU upgrade, but the PSU size should be considered when planning. The CPU's 58 W TDP means total system draw is moderate, around 300-400 W under load, so a 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom.

A sensible next upgrade path: first, upgrade the CPU to a higher-core-count 13th-gen or 14th-gen chip on the same LGA 1700 socket, as the platform supports it. This would address the 4-core limitation in multi-threaded workloads. Second, consider a GPU upgrade to a newer architecture with better DirectX 12 performance, since the Quadro RTX 5000 scores only 59 in PassMark DirectX 12, which is notably low for modern gaming. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means you can choose either based on budget and availability.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i3-13100F (Raptor Lake, 4 cores/8 threads) with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Turing, 16 GB GDDR6). The CPU is a budget-oriented 13th-gen chip at the 71st percentile, while the GPU is an end-of-life workstation card at the 67th percentile. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 69, placing this configuration in the upper-mid range of desktop performance.

The CPU was released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $109, representing a modern, efficient processor with strong single-thread performance. The GPU was released in August 2018 with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD, indicating it was a high-end workstation card at launch but is now several generations old. This pairing is best described as a workstation-focused build where GPU compute capability takes priority over CPU multi-threading, making it suitable for professional applications like 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific computing, with moderate gaming capability as a secondary use case.