SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100F

17,653 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Hardware Analysis: Intel Core i3-13100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

This pairing combines Intel's entry-level 13th-generation quad-core processor with NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell-architecture graphics card, creating one of the most extreme CPU-GPU mismatches in the current desktop landscape. The RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, while the Core i3-13100F ranks at the 71st percentile among CPUs — a gap that shapes every workload discussed below. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the dataset, so all gaming frame rates in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a 32 GB GDDR7 monster built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 92,200 million transistors packed into a 750 mm² die. Its memory subsystem runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) across a 512-bit bus, yielding 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth — a figure that positions it for 4K and 8K texture-heavy workloads without memory capacity concerns. The GPU's base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost of 2407 MHz, and it achieves a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s alongside a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s.

Compute resources are staggering: 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. Raw FP32 throughput hits 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the card does not sacrifice half-precision performance. The 170 RT cores deliver hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 680 tensor cores handle DLSS and AI-accelerated workloads. For rendering, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 place this GPU at the 92nd percentile overall, just ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (delta 0.3%) and the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (delta 0.6%), while trailing the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X by 1.4%.

The PassMark DirectX scores tell a nuanced story: DirectX 11 at 341, DirectX 10 at 226, DirectX 12 at 185, and DirectX 9 at 395. These numbers, taken together with the G2D score of 1,413, suggest that the RTX 5090 excels in modern API workloads but may not show proportional gains in legacy DirectX titles — a common pattern for architectures optimized for current-generation rendering pipelines. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370 and Vulkan score of 376,728 reinforce the GPU's compute dominance, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender, Octane, or similar applications where raw throughput translates directly to reduced render times. The PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 further confirms strong general-purpose compute capability.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The dataset contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The RTX 5090's 92nd percentile GPU ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 indicate elite-level rasterization performance, while the Core i3-13100F's 71st percentile CPU ranking and multi-threaded scores suggest it may constrain frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

For ultra-settings gaming at 1080p, the expectation is that the Core i3-13100F becomes the limiting factor in many titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,458 and single-core score of 1,758 indicate adequate per-thread performance for older or lightly-threaded games, but modern titles that utilize more than four cores will likely see frame rates capped well below what the RTX 5090 could otherwise deliver. At 1440p, the GPU remains underutilized in CPU-bound scenes, but the gap narrows slightly as resolution increases and pixel-pushing demands grow.

At 4K ultra, the RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth become the dominant factors, and the CPU bottleneck becomes less severe — though it does not disappear entirely. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 185 and DirectX 11 score of 341 suggest strong performance in both API environments, but the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,609 and multi-thread score of 14,687 indicate that frame pacing in heavily threaded game engines may suffer. For esports titles at high refresh rates, the i3-13100F's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 1,758) can drive high FPS in lightly-threaded games, but the RTX 5090's raw power will be wasted in most competitive scenarios where the CPU becomes the ceiling.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i3-13100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename), manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². It runs at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts to 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 58 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a capable entry-level processor with strong single-thread performance but limited multi-thread headroom. Cinebench R23 scores of 12,458 (multi-core) and 1,758 (single-core) show a multi-to-single ratio of roughly 7:1, which is typical for a quad-core with hyper-threading. Geekbench scores of 7,655 (multi-core) and 2,056 (single-core) corroborate this profile. The PassMark suite reveals specific workload characteristics: integer math at 43,038, floating-point math at 33,510, and extended instructions at 11,407. Data compression scores 168,043 while encryption hits 8,496, and random string sorting reaches 16,569.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 17,653 places it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i7-1255U (delta 0%), Intel Core i3-14100T (delta 0%), AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (delta 0.2%), and AMD EPYC 9374F (delta -0.2%). This clustering indicates that the i3-13100F sits in a densely populated performance tier where small deltas separate many comparable parts. For real workloads, the 4-core/8-thread configuration means that heavily multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering will be slower than higher-core-count parts, but the 4.50 GHz boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance asymmetry between the RTX 5090 (92nd percentile GPU) and the Core i3-13100F (71st percentile CPU) creates a pronounced bottleneck dynamic. In gaming workloads, the CPU will limit frame rates in most scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity. The i3-13100F's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,458 is modest by modern standards, and its PassMark multi-thread score of 14,687 reflects the same constraint. When paired with a GPU that scores 39,650 in PassMark G3D, the frame rate ceiling in CPU-bound titles will be set by the processor, not the graphics card.

Evidence from the benchmark data supports this imbalance: the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and the CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 7,655 indicate that the GPU can process geometry and shading far faster than the CPU can feed it draw calls and game logic. In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering, the balance shifts — the RTX 5090's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 26,756 PassMark GPU compute score dominate, while the CPU's role is reduced to scene management and asset loading, where its 4 cores may cause occasional stalls but not catastrophic slowdowns.

For productivity tasks, the CPU becomes the limiting factor in multi-threaded scenarios: the PassMark data encryption score of 8,496 and find prime numbers score of 61 show that heavy math workloads will not scale well beyond the 4-core limit. Conversely, the GPU's compute horsepower can accelerate many of these same tasks if the software supports GPU offload, creating a workflow where the RTX 5090 compensates for the CPU's limitations in some applications but cannot in others. The combined percentile of 82 for this pairing reflects the overall system position, but the component-level data clearly shows that the GPU is underutilized in most CPU-bound workloads.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with high refresh rates, the Core i3-13100F's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 1,758, PassMark single-thread 3,609) can drive competitive frame rates in esports titles, but the RTX 5090's massive GPU headroom will go unused in most scenarios. At 1440p and above, the GPU's 92nd percentile performance becomes more relevant, though the CPU still caps frame rates in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The 4-core/8-thread CPU configuration with a PassMark multi-thread score of 14,687 may struggle with simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads, as the RTX 5090's NVENC capabilities are not reflected in the benchmark data. The GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 334,370) suggest it can handle encoding offload, but the CPU must manage the stream overhead, which may cause frame drops in demanding titles.

Video editing: The RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and timeline rendering, while the CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5,232 and PassMark integer math score of 43,038 handle codec operations. Export times will be GPU-bound in modern editors that leverage CUDA or OpenCL, making this pairing workable for 4K editing despite the CPU's modest multi-core performance.

3D rendering: The RTX 5090's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 170 RT cores deliver exceptional ray-traced rendering performance, with the PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 confirming strong compute throughput. The CPU's role in scene preparation and physics simulation will be slower than higher-core-count parts, but the GPU's dominance means render times will be competitive for GPU-accelerated engines.

Software development: The i3-13100F's 4.50 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 3,609 provide responsive compilation for small-to-medium projects, while the RTX 5090's compute capability can accelerate machine learning training and inference tasks. The CPU's 12 MB L3 cache and DDR5 support help with memory-intensive workloads, but large parallel builds will be slower than on higher-core-count CPUs.

Student and office work: The i3-13100F's 58 W TDP and 71st percentile CPU ranking deliver adequate performance for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, with the RTX 5090 providing overkill GPU acceleration for any graphics tasks. The combination is inefficient for this scenario, as the GPU's power draw and cost are not justified by office workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU compute and rendering performance above all else, with the understanding that the CPU will limit certain workloads. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution who play GPU-bound titles will see strong frame rates — the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile ranking and 18,355 3DMark Steel Nomad score support this — but they must accept that the i3-13100F will cap performance in CPU-intensive games. Content creators working in GPU-accelerated applications like video editors or 3D renderers will benefit from the RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, though the CPU's 4-core limit will slow asset loading and scene preparation tasks.

Machine learning researchers and data scientists can leverage the RTX 5090's 680 tensor cores and 26,756 PassMark GPU compute score for model training and inference, while the i3-13100F handles data preprocessing and orchestration. Small business workstations that rely on GPU-accelerated software — such as CAD, architectural visualization, or scientific computing — will see strong performance in GPU-bound workflows, but the CPU's 71st percentile ranking means general-purpose multitasking will be less impressive. Students and office users should avoid this pairing due to the extreme performance imbalance and the unnecessary GPU horsepower for their workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i3-13100F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes, while the RTX 5090 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface — a compatible combination that ensures the GPU operates at full bandwidth. The system's power requirements are substantial: the RTX 5090 has a TDP of 575 W and requires a 950 W suggested PSU, while the i3-13100F's 58 W TDP adds minimal load. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 304 mm in length.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the i3-13100F with a higher-core-count Socket 1700 processor, which would alleviate the CPU bottleneck in gaming and multi-threaded workloads without changing the motherboard or memory. The 12 MB L3 cache and 4.50 GHz boost clock of the current CPU set a baseline; a processor with more cores and similar or higher clocks would better complement the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile GPU performance. The 950 W suggested PSU provides headroom for such an upgrade, as the current CPU's 58 W TDP leaves ample power budget. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 kits would also benefit the system, given the CPU's dual-channel memory bus and the GPU's massive 32 GB VRAM footprint.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: Is the Core i3-13100F powerful enough to feed the RTX 5090 in gaming?

A: The data suggests no for most gaming scenarios. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,458 are well below the GPU's 92nd percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355, indicating the CPU will likely bottleneck frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

Q: What resolution is best for this pairing?

A: Higher resolutions (1440p and above) will better utilize the RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor rather than the CPU. At 1080p, the i3-13100F's 4-core/8-thread configuration will more frequently cap frame rates.

Q: Does the RTX 5090 support the latest PCIe standard?

A: Yes, the RTX 5090 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and the Core i3-13100F provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes from the CPU, making the connection fully compatible.

Q: What kind of power supply is required for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is rated at 950 W, driven by the RTX 5090's 575 W TDP. The i3-13100F's 58 W TDP adds minimal additional load, so the PSU requirement is determined by the GPU.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, for GPU-accelerated rendering. The RTX 5090's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, 170 RT cores, and PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 provide exceptional rendering performance, though the CPU's 4-core limit may slow scene preparation and physics simulation.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 overkill for office and student work?

A: The benchmark data indicates yes. The i3-13100F's 71st percentile CPU ranking and 3,609 PassMark single-thread score are more than sufficient for office tasks, while the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile GPU performance is far beyond what such workloads require.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5090?

A: The launch MSRP is $1,999 USD. The Core i3-13100F has a launch MSRP of $109, highlighting the extreme price disparity between the two components.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Core i3-13100F's benchmark profile includes Cinebench R15 multi-core 1,255 and single-core 177, Cinebench R20 multi-core 5,232 and single-core 738, and Cinebench R23 multi-core 12,458 and single-core 1,758. Geekbench scores are 7,655 (multi-core) and 2,056 (single-core). PassMark tests show data compression 168,043, data encryption 8,496, extended instructions 11,407, find prime numbers 61, floating-point math 33,510, integer math 43,038, multi-thread 14,687, physics 1,055, random string sorting 16,569, and single-thread 3,609. The CPU's average benchmark score is 17,653, placing it at the 71st percentile with nearest rivals all within 0.2% delta.

The RTX 5090's benchmark results include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score 18,355, Geekbench OpenCL 334,370, Geekbench Vulkan 376,728, PassMark DirectX 10 226, DirectX 11 341, DirectX 12 185, DirectX 9 395, G2D 1,413, G3D 39,650, and GPU compute 26,756. The GPU's average benchmark score is 79,842, placing it at the 92nd percentile with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (delta 0.3%), Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (delta 0.6%), AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (delta 1.1%), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (delta -1.4%).

The combined picture shows a system at the 82nd percentile overall, with the GPU's elite performance (92nd percentile) far outpacing the CPU's mid-range standing (71st percentile). The GPU's average benchmark score of 79,842 is roughly 4.5 times the CPU's 17,653, underscoring the massive performance disparity. This pairing delivers exceptional GPU-bound performance — rendering, compute, and high-resolution gaming — while the CPU caps multi-threaded productivity and CPU-bound gaming scenarios. The data clearly indicates that this is a GPU-first build where the processor serves as a placeholder for a higher-core-count upgrade on the same Socket 1700 platform.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-13100F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds