SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100

18,380 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-13100 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a study in contrasts: a four-core entry-level CPU from the Raptor Lake generation alongside a flagship-tier GPU built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. This combination produces a desktop system that is defined by its extremes, where the GPU’s raw rendering might is frequently held back by the CPU’s modest multi-threaded throughput. The data shows a system that excels in specific, latency-sensitive tasks but struggles in heavily threaded productivity workloads. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark scores and specifications to outline where this pairing makes sense and where it falls short.

Usage Scenarios

The benchmark results indicate this system is a specialist, not a generalist. For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 5090 D V2’s immense pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s provide the foundation for extreme frame rates. However, the Core i3-13100’s single-thread score of 3460 in Passmark suggests it can feed the GPU in many scenarios, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration will likely bottleneck at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is higher. This pairing is best suited for 4K gaming, where the GPU’s massive bandwidth (1.34 TB/s) and memory size (24 GB) become the primary drivers of performance.

For streaming, the system faces a significant challenge. The CPU’s multi-threaded score of 13726 in Passmark is low by modern standards, meaning software encoding (x264) will consume a large portion of its resources. While the GPU supports NVIDIA’s NVENC (a feature not detailed in the pack but implied by the GeForce series), relying on it shifts the encoding load to the GPU, which is already under heavy load during gaming. Benchmark results suggest that streaming at high bitrates while gaming will be a tightrope walk, with the CPU becoming a limiting factor in CPU-bound titles.

Video editing is a mixed bag. Single-threaded performance is adequate for timeline scrubbing and effects that use a single core, but the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 11986 is nearly half of what a mid-range 6-core part would achieve. Export times and rendering previews will be slow, and the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM can help with GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will still bottleneck the overall workflow. This is not a professional editing workstation.

3D rendering is where the pairing fails hardest. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1208 and R20 multicore score of 5034 are indicative of a part that will take significantly longer to render CPU-based scenes compared to any modern 6-core or 8-core processor. While the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-based renderers (like Blender Cycles or Octane), the CPU remains the primary bottleneck for scene preparation and physics simulations. This system is not recommended for serious 3D work.

For software development, the results are more favorable. Compilation tasks are often multi-threaded, and the 4-core/8-thread CPU will handle small to medium projects without issue. The Passmark data encryption score of 8049 and extended instructions score of 11053 indicate decent cryptographic and SIMD performance, which is useful for code signing and scientific computing. The high single-thread score of 3460 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness and fast build times for single-file changes. This is a serviceable, if not ideal, developer machine.

Student and office work is where this system is massively over-provisioned. The GPU is entirely wasted on document editing, spreadsheet work, or web browsing. The CPU’s 60W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 730 mean the system would be efficient for these tasks, but the cost of the GPU makes no sense for this use case. The benchmark data shows a system that is extremely fast in single-threaded office tasks, but the pairing is economically irrational for this scenario.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU’s benchmark data is limited to a single test: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 16504. This places it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16504. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 (score 16508, delta 0%), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (score 16415, delta 0.5%), and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (score 16408, delta 0.6%). The data shows the RTX 5090 D V2 is essentially tied with these cards in this specific test, which is surprising given its flagship positioning, suggesting the Steel Nomad test may not be fully utilizing its unique features.

The CPU’s benchmark picture is broader. Its average benchmark score is 18380, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core 7 360 (score 18374, delta 0%), Intel Core 5 330 (score 18345, delta 0.2%), Intel Core i3-14100 (score 18318, delta 0.3%), and Intel Core 3 305 (score 18302, delta 0.4%). The delta percentages are all within 0.4%, indicating that the i3-13100 performs nearly identically to these other entry-level parts in aggregate. The combined percentile for this system is 66, which reflects the GPU’s relatively low percentile dragging down the CPU’s higher one.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU’s 72nd percentile is significantly higher than the GPU’s 59th percentile, but in gaming, the GPU is typically the dominant component. The data suggests that in CPU-heavy workloads, the system will perform like a mid-range PC, while in GPU-heavy workloads, it will perform like a high-end PC, but the CPU will prevent it from reaching the GPU’s full potential.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-13100 is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a 60W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and features PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 is present, and the chip is not multiplier-unlocked.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 1692 in single-core and 11986 in multi-core. The single-core score is strong, indicating excellent per-thread performance that benefits gaming and lightly threaded applications. The multi-core score, however, is modest, reflecting the limited core count. The Passmark single-thread score of 3460 confirms the strong per-core performance, while the multithread score of 13726 shows the scaling limits of only 4 physical cores.

The data shows that in real workloads, this CPU excels at tasks that are latency-sensitive and single-threaded, such as gaming, web browsing, and application startup. It struggles with parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and large-scale data processing. The Passmark data compression score of 161424 is decent, but the find prime numbers score of 52 is very low, indicating weak integer-heavy multi-threaded performance. This CPU is a classic entry-level part: great for everyday tasks, but not a workhorse.

Who Should Build It

This system is for a very specific user: a gamer who plays at 4K resolution and prioritizes maximum graphical fidelity over frame rates. The RTX 5090 D V2’s 24 GB of VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are overkill for 1080p but become relevant at 4K with high-resolution textures and ray tracing. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that it won't hold back the GPU in most 4K titles, where the GPU is the bottleneck. This is not a system for competitive esports players who need 500+ FPS at 1080p, as the CPU will limit frame rates in those scenarios.

Content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated applications, such as DaVinci Resolve or Blender (GPU render mode), could benefit from the GPU’s power, but they must accept the CPU’s limitations in scene setup and file I/O. Software developers working on small to medium-sized codebases will find the system responsive, but large builds will be slow. Students and office workers should avoid this pairing entirely, as the GPU is wasted and the CPU is sufficient for their needs, making the system unnecessarily expensive. Small business workstations that run single-threaded database applications or light CAD software could see good performance, but the GPU is not justified.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the CPU as the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU’s percentile of 72 is higher than the GPU’s 59, but this does not mean the CPU is faster; it means the CPU is better relative to its peers. In practice, the GPU is capable of rendering frames far faster than the CPU can issue draw calls and process game logic. The 4-core/8-thread configuration is the limiting factor in CPU-bound workloads, such as high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p or 1440p, where frame rates are often limited by the CPU’s single-thread speed.

The GPU’s FPS scaling will be inconsistent. In GPU-bound scenarios (4K, ultra settings, ray tracing), the GPU will be fully utilized, and the CPU will not bottleneck. In CPU-bound scenarios (1080p, low settings, competitive shooters), the GPU will be underutilized, waiting for the CPU to catch up. The benchmark scores do not provide FPS figures, but the CPU’s low multi-thread score (13726) compared to its single-thread score (3460) suggests that frame rates will be highly variable depending on the game’s threading model. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 16504 is high, but it cannot compensate for a CPU that is maxed out.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i3-13100 a good match for the RTX 5090 D V2?

A: No. The CPU’s 4-core/8-thread configuration (with a Passmark multithread score of 13726) will bottleneck the GPU in CPU-bound workloads, preventing it from reaching its full potential. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 16504 is high, but the CPU’s modest multi-core performance limits the system’s overall capability.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-threaded performance like?

A: The CPU scores 3460 in Passmark single-thread and 1692 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These are strong scores, indicating excellent per-core performance that is well-suited for gaming and everyday tasks.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing a platform.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s. This is substantial and beneficial for high-resolution textures and GPU-accelerated computing.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in the 3DMark Steel Nomad test?

A: The GPU scores 16504, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA T400 (16508, 0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16415, 0.5% delta), and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16408, 0.6% delta).

Q: What is the system’s overall performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 66, reflecting the CPU’s higher percentile (72) and the GPU’s lower percentile (59).

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 730, which can serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks if the discrete GPU is removed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data indicates that at 4K resolution with ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary determinant of performance, and frame rates are expected to be very high, likely in the range that exceeds 60 FPS in most titles. The GPU’s 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance are strong indicators of 4K capability.

At 1440p, the CPU begins to play a larger role. The single-thread score of 3460 suggests that the CPU can keep up in many titles, but in games that utilize multiple cores heavily, the 4-core CPU may cause frame rate dips. At 1080p, the CPU will be a significant bottleneck, and frame rates may not scale with the GPU’s power. The estimated frame rates should be treated as rough guides: expect excellent 4K performance, good 1440p performance with some caveats, and variable 1080p performance where the CPU limits the GPU’s output.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the entry-level Intel Core i3-13100 with the flagship NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The system’s combined percentile is 66, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of overall performance. The CPU is a 4-core/8-thread part from the Raptor Lake family, while the GPU is a massive Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 21760 shading units and 170 RT cores. The pairing is highly unusual, creating a system that is capable of extreme GPU-bound performance but is held back by the CPU in multi-threaded tasks.

The RTX 5090 D V2 is a dual-slot card that is 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide. It requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 950W power supply. The CPU’s 60W TDP is minimal, meaning the system’s total power draw is dominated by the GPU’s 575W TDP. This is a system built around a single, overpowering component, with the CPU chosen for its low cost and high single-thread speed rather than its multi-core prowess.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides an upgrade path to newer 13th or 14th generation Core processors that use the same socket. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-core-count CPU, such as a Core i5 or i7 from the same generation, which would alleviate the multi-threaded bottleneck. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes is fully utilized by the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bandwidth limitations.

The GPU’s 575W TDP and the system’s suggested 950W PSU provide significant headroom for future upgrades. The PSU is sufficient for a more power-hungry CPU, as the total system draw would still be below the 950W rating. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM is future-proof, and the GDDR7 memory type is modern. The upgrade path is clear: replace the CPU with a higher-tier 13th or 14th generation part to unlock the GPU’s full potential. The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that memory can be carried over or upgraded independently, offering flexibility.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-13100

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds