SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-13100 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-13100

18,380 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-13100 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop build that combines a budget-oriented quad-core processor with a flagship GPU. This combination creates a significant performance disparity, with the CPU scoring at the 72nd percentile and the GPU at the 92nd percentile, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 82. The data indicates that this pairing is heavily GPU-bound in most scenarios, making it a specialized configuration for users who prioritize raw graphics fidelity over CPU-driven tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i3-13100 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 pairing is 82, placing it above the majority of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core i3-13100 has an average benchmark score of 18380. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 7 360, has an average score of 18374, showing a 0% delta. The Intel Core 5 330 trails by 0.2%, and the Intel Core i3-14100 is 0.3% behind.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79842, indicating it is near the top of the performance hierarchy.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100 features 4 cores and 8 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each component?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100 has a launch MSRP of $134, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has a launch MSRP of 1,999 USD.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU. The Core i3-13100 achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11986 and a single-core score of 1692. In PassMark, it scores 13726 in multithread and 3460 in single-thread tests. These figures place the CPU at the 72nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 18380, positioning it as a mid-tier performer that is competitive with the Intel Core 7 360, which has a nearly identical average score.

The RTX 5090, on the other hand, is an absolute powerhouse. It scores 18355 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and in Geekbench it achieves 334370 in OpenCL and 376728 in Vulkan. Its PassMark G3D score is a massive 39650, with a GPU compute score of 26756. This performance places the GPU at the 92nd percentile, with an average score of 79842. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, is 1.4% ahead, while the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB is 0.3% behind.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is a solid entry-level performer, but the GPU is a top-tier enthusiast part. The combined percentile of 82 reflects the high GPU contribution, but the CPU's lower standing means it will struggle to feed the GPU in many workloads. The data shows that this is not a balanced system; it is a GPU-dominant configuration where the processor is the primary limiting factor for overall system performance in CPU-bound tasks.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is problematic. The RTX 5090 is capable of producing incredibly high frame rates at resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck, but the Core i3-13100's 4-core, 8-thread design will limit performance in CPU-intensive titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1692 is decent, but its multicore score of 11986 is modest. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's limitations will become more apparent, potentially preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential in many esports and action titles.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The GPU has dedicated hardware for encoding, which can offload the video encoding work from the CPU. However, the CPU must still handle the game logic and the streaming software overhead. With only 8 threads, the i3-13100 may struggle to maintain smooth frame times while streaming and gaming simultaneously, leading to potential stutters. The high PassMark data compression score of 161424 helps, but the overall thread count is a concern for this workload.

Video editing is where the GPU shines. The RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will accelerate rendering and effects processing significantly. The CPU's role is less critical here, as many modern editors leverage GPU acceleration. The i3-13100's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5034 is workable for basic timeline editing, but the GPU will carry the heavy lifting for exports and heavy effects.

3D rendering is also strongly GPU-favored. The RTX 5090's 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores will excel in ray-traced workloads. The CPU's performance in this area is less relevant, but the i3-13100's PassMark integer math score of 41313 suggests it can handle basic scene preparation and physics calculations. However, for complex scenes with heavy CPU-side simulation, the quad-core design will be a bottleneck.

Software development is a scenario where the CPU's limitations are noticeable. The 4-core, 8-thread design will compile code slower than higher-core-count processors. While the PassMark single-thread score of 3460 is respectable for snappy UI responses, the multicore score of 13726 means build times will be longer. The RTX 5090 offers no benefit for typical code compilation, making this pairing inefficient for developers.

Student and office work is a clear overkill scenario. The i3-13100 is more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The UHD Graphics 730 integrated GPU can handle these tasks without the discrete RTX 5090 even being utilized. The 60W TDP of the CPU makes it efficient, but the 575W TDP of the GPU is entirely wasted for these tasks, making this a highly impractical build for this use case.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous. The CPU, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, is the limiting factor in this pairing. The GPU's average benchmark score of 79842 is dramatically higher than the CPU's 18380, creating a massive performance gap. In gaming, the CPU will cap frame rates in scenarios where the game logic and draw calls are CPU-bound. The GPU's ability to render frames at high resolutions is far beyond what the CPU can feed it at lower resolutions.

The data shows that the GPU is in the 92nd percentile, while the CPU is in the 72nd percentile. This 20-point gap indicates that the GPU is a much stronger component relative to its peers. In GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or heavy rendering, the RTX 5090 will operate at near full capacity, and the CPU will not be a limiting factor. However, in CPU-bound workloads like 1080p gaming at high refresh rates or physics-heavy simulations, the i3-13100 will cap performance, leaving the GPU underutilized.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, suggests that the i3-13100 will bottleneck the RTX 5090 in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 170 and multicore score of 1208 are indicative of its modest capabilities. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 39650 is in a completely different class. This imbalance means that users will not see a linear scaling of performance from the GPU; instead, they will hit a CPU-imposed ceiling.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-13100 is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has a 60W TDP.

The benchmark results indicate a processor that is strong for its class but not for this pairing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11986 shows that it can handle moderate multi-threaded workloads, but the 4-core design limits its scaling. The PassMark single-thread score of 3460 is good for everyday tasks, but the multithread score of 13726 is modest. The data compression score of 161424 is a highlight, showing that the CPU is capable in specific tasks.

For real workloads, the i3-13100 is suitable for entry-level gaming, basic productivity, and light content creation. Its single-core performance is adequate for most applications, but its multicore performance will be a bottleneck in video rendering, software compilation, and heavy multitasking. The lack of ECC memory support and the locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) further define it as an entry-level part. In this build, it is clearly outmatched by the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build is not recommended for the typical gamer. The RTX 5090 is a 92nd-percentile GPU, but the CPU is only at the 72nd percentile. At 1080p or 1440p resolutions, gamers will see significant CPU bottlenecks, leading to inconsistent frame rates in CPU-intensive games. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary driver, but the CPU will still cause stutters in games with heavy physics or AI. This is a poor investment for high-refresh gaming.

Content creators who rely heavily on GPU acceleration, such as 3D artists using ray tracing or video editors using GPU-accelerated effects, could see benefits. The RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 power will make rendering times shorter. However, these users will still be hampered by the CPU in the export phase, where the i3-13100's modest multicore performance will slow things down.

Software developers should avoid this build. The 4-core, 8-thread CPU will make compilation times painfully slow. The PassMark integer math score of 41313 is not competitive for large codebases. The GPU offers no advantage for this workload, making this a lopsided and inefficient system for development work.

Students and small business workstations are ill-served by this pairing. The i3-13100 is sufficient for word processing and spreadsheets, but the RTX 5090 is a massive waste of resources for such tasks. The UHD Graphics 730 integrated GPU is enough for these tasks, and the discrete GPU will only add heat and power consumption. This is an impractical and expensive build for basic office work.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a monolithic giant, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process. It has a die size of 750 mm² and contains 92,200 million transistors. The GPU features 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. It has 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. The boost clock is 2407 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz, providing 28 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem is formidable, with 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, giving a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. This is critical for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The GPU achieves 104.8 TFLOPS in FP32 and FP16 (1:1). The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results confirm its top-tier status. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355 is excellent. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 376728 and OpenCL score of 334370 are among the highest recorded. The PassMark G3D score of 39650 and GPU compute score of 26756 are exceptional. The GPU's 92nd percentile ranking is well-earned.

For rendering, the RTX 5090 is a beast. The 170 RT cores will accelerate ray tracing dramatically, and the 680 tensor cores will speed up AI-based denoising and upscaling. The 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensures that large texture sets and complex scenes are handled without stutter. This GPU is designed for the most demanding visual workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a low-end CPU with the highest-end GPU. The Intel Core i3-13100 is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the 13th generation, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the flagship of the 50-series. The combined percentile of 82 reflects the GPU's massive contribution, but the CPU's 72nd percentile drags the overall score down from what the GPU alone could achieve.

The pairing is fundamentally unbalanced. The CPU is an entry-level part with a 60W TDP, while the GPU is a 575W behemoth. The data shows that the GPU is in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a configuration for a user who wants the absolute best graphics performance and is willing to accept a severe CPU bottleneck.

The overall tier of this build is high due to the GPU, but the CPU prevents it from being a top-tier system. It is a GPU-first build that will excel in GPU-bound tasks and struggle in CPU-bound tasks. Users should be aware that they are paying a premium for the GPU while the CPU is a budget part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-13100 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving users flexibility in their memory choice. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 730. The CPU has a 60W TDP, which is very low.

The RTX 5090 requires a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is supported by the platform. The GPU has a TDP of 575W and a suggested PSU of 950 W. This is a substantial power requirement, and the system will need a robust power supply to handle the GPU's demands.

The most sensible next upgrade is the CPU. The Socket 1700 platform supports more powerful processors, and moving to a higher-core-count CPU would alleviate the bottleneck. The data shows that the i3-13100 limits the GPU, so upgrading to a processor with more cores and threads would balance the system. The platform's memory support for DDR5 would allow for faster memory speeds with a new CPU.

The GPU is already at the top of its class, so an upgrade there is not necessary. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that the RTX 5090 has the bandwidth it needs. The power supply headroom is a concern; the 950 W PSU is the suggested rating, and users should ensure they have a high-quality unit to handle transient power spikes. The upgrade path is clear: replace the CPU to unlock the full potential of the RTX 5090.