SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

73%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12300T

3,525 Benchmark Score

Top 27% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i3-12300T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation — Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines a 35 W, 4-core Intel Alder Lake processor with a 70 W, 20 GB workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, resulting in a desktop system that occupies the 75th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU sits at the 55th percentile among all processors while the GPU reaches the 95th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a significant performance asymmetry where the graphics subsystem vastly outclasses the processor in raw compute capability. The data shows a desktop-class build designed for compact, power-efficient workstations rather than extreme gaming or high-end multi-threaded content creation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-12300T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in the Alder Lake desktop generation. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits depending on motherboard selection. The platform does not support ECC memory, which limits its appeal for certain server-style workloads but is standard for consumer and mainstream workstation use. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes from the processor, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The power envelope is notably low: the CPU has a 35 W TDP while the GPU has a 70 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 250 W. This means the entire platform can run on a modest power supply, and the GPU requires no external power connectors, drawing all its power from the motherboard slot. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is off the table, but the low TDP suggests that even a basic air cooler would suffice for thermal management. A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a higher-core-count Alder Lake or newer-generation processor on the same Socket 1700, though builders should verify motherboard compatibility for newer chips. The GPU's compact dual-slot design and 168 mm length make it suitable for small form factor cases, and the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation setups.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores show a clear split between single-core and multi-core capability. In Cinebench R23, the i3-12300T scores 11118 points in multi-core and 1569 points in single-core, while in Geekbench it achieves 6782 multi-core and 2123 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 3525, placing the CPU at the 55th percentile among all processors. The nearest rivals illustrate the competitive landscape: the Intel Atom x7213RE scores 3520 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon W-2135 scores 3530 (0.1% behind), and the Intel Core i3-12300 scores 3532 (0.2% behind). This clustering indicates that the 12300T's performance is nearly identical to its non-T sibling and even some older Xeon parts, meaning the low-power design does not sacrifice much raw throughput.

The GPU, in contrast, is a heavyweight. It scores 124812 in Geekbench OpenCL and 109364 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 117088, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GB10 at 117393 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 at 118976 (1.6% ahead), and the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 114395 (2.4% behind). The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation essentially trades blows with these much larger and power-hungry cards, which speaks to the efficiency of the Ada Lovelace architecture. The combined picture is one of extreme GPU dominance: the graphics card outperforms 95% of all GPUs while the CPU only beats 55% of all processors, creating a system that is far more capable in graphics-accelerated tasks than in CPU-bound workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of where the bottleneck lies. With the GPU at the 95th percentile and the CPU at the 55th percentile, the processor will limit the system in most CPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's multi-core score in Cinebench R23 of 11118 is respectable for a 4-core part, but it is far below what high-end desktop processors achieve. In gaming, the CPU's single-core score of 1569 in Cinebench R23 and 2123 in Geekbench will determine frame rates at lower resolutions, while the GPU's massive compute power will be underutilized in those scenarios. The data suggests that at 1080p with a fast GPU, the CPU will frequently be the limiting factor, while at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the percentile gap. A GPU at the 95th percentile paired with a CPU at the 55th percentile means that the CPU will cap frame rates in many games, especially those that rely heavily on single-threaded performance. Conversely, in GPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or machine learning inference, the GPU will operate at near-full utilization while the CPU handles data preparation and scheduling. The 20 GB of VRAM and 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU further exacerbate the imbalance, as the CPU's memory bandwidth (not specified but dual-channel DDR4/DDR5) will not saturate the GPU's data requirements. For balanced performance, users would need either a stronger CPU or accept that the GPU will be starved in certain workloads.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU compute over CPU throughput. For gamers, the system is best suited to 1440p or 4K gaming where the GPU's power is fully utilized, though the CPU will limit high-refresh-rate 1080p play. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated rendering, such as video editors using hardware encoders or 3D artists using ray tracing, will see excellent performance from the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. Software developers who need to run CUDA-accelerated workloads, particularly those involving deep learning inference, will benefit from the 20 GB VRAM which allows larger models to fit in memory. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the GPU for assignments, though the 4-core CPU may struggle with heavily parallelized compilation tasks. Small business workstations that require compact, low-power systems with high-end graphics for CAD or scientific visualization will find this pairing attractive, given the 35 W CPU and 70 W GPU TDPs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12300T is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². It has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that is remarkably low for a desktop processor. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output, though the discrete RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation will handle all graphics duties.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that punches above its power class. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1569 is competitive with much higher-TDP parts, indicating that Alder Lake's architecture delivers strong IPC at low power. The multi-core score of 11118 is respectable given the 4-core configuration, and the Geekbench scores of 6782 multi-core and 2123 single-core align with expectations for a modern budget quad-core. The average benchmark score of 3525 places it at the 55th percentile, which means it outperforms roughly half of all CPUs, an impressive feat for a 35 W part. Real-world workloads that are single-threaded, such as web browsing, office applications, and light coding, will feel responsive due to the high boost clock. Multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering will take longer than on higher-core-count processors, but the GPU can offload many of these tasks, mitigating the CPU's limitations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores, providing substantial compute capability for both graphics and AI workloads. The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The base clock is 720 MHz with a boost clock of 1560 MHz, yielding 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 19.17 TFLOPS of FP16 performance in a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s.

The benchmark results are outstanding for a 70 W GPU. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 place it at the 95th percentile, meaning it outperforms 95% of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GB10 at 117393 (0.3% ahead) and the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 at 118976 (1.6% ahead), both of which are larger, higher-power cards. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation also outperforms the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB by 2.4% (114395), a data center GPU with far higher power consumption. This efficiency is the hallmark of Ada Lovelace. For rendering, the 48 RT cores accelerate ray tracing workloads, while the 192 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based denoising. The 20 GB VRAM is generous for a compact GPU, allowing large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and machine learning models to reside entirely in GPU memory. The lack of external power connectors and the 250 W suggested PSU make installation trivial in most systems.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking suggests it can handle demanding games at high settings, while the CPU's 55th percentile ranking indicates it will be the limiting factor in many gaming scenarios. At 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance will cap frame rates well below what the GPU can deliver, potentially bottlenecking high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1440p, the balance shifts more toward the GPU, and frame rates will be higher relative to the CPU's limitation. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the system will deliver frame rates consistent with the GPU's raw compute power.

Given the GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation should handle modern titles at 1440p with high or ultra settings, though the 160-bit memory bus may limit performance in memory-heavy games. The 20 GB VRAM ensures that even future titles with large texture packs will not run out of memory. The CPU's 4.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-core scores (1569 in Cinebench R23, 2123 in Geekbench) suggest it can maintain playable frame rates in most games, but esports titles at 1080p with high frame rates will likely be CPU-bound. Ray tracing performance, accelerated by the 48 RT cores, should be strong, though the GPU's workstation focus means gaming drivers may not be as optimized as GeForce counterparts.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 75, placing it in the top quarter of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 3525, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Atom x7213RE (3520), 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon W-2135 (3530), and 0.2% ahead of both the Intel Core i3-12300 and Intel Xeon W-1290TE (each at 3532).

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the GPU require external power connectors?

A: No, the GPU has no power connectors and draws all its power from the motherboard slot, with a 70 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though it does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB?

A: The GPU scores 124812 in Geekbench OpenCL and 109364 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 117088, which is 2.4% ahead of the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB's average score of 114395.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and boost clock?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, featuring 4 cores and 8 threads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile performance can drive high frame rates, but the CPU's 55th percentile ranking will cap FPS at 1080p, making this pairing better suited for 1440p or 4K gaming at 60 Hz rather than competitive 240 Hz esports.

Streaming: The GPU's 192 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture support hardware encoding, allowing efficient game capture and streaming, though the CPU's 4 cores may struggle with simultaneous gaming and encoding if software encoding is used.

Video editing: The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate timeline rendering and effects, while the CPU's single-core score of 1569 in Cinebench R23 handles basic editing tasks, but export times will be longer than on higher-core-count systems.

3D rendering: The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provide excellent ray tracing and AI denoising performance, and the GPU's 95th percentile ranking means render times will be short, while the CPU handles scene management adequately.

Software development: The CPU's 4.20 GHz boost clock and 2123 Geekbench single-core score make compilation and IDE usage responsive, while the GPU can accelerate CUDA-based development and testing, though large parallel builds will be slower.

Student and office work: The 35 W CPU and 70 W GPU create a low-power system that is quiet and efficient for everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets, with the GPU providing headroom for occasional GPU-accelerated tasks.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i3-12300T, a 4-core, 8-thread Alder Lake processor with a 35 W TDP and a 55th percentile ranking, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, a 70 W workstation GPU with 20 GB VRAM and a 95th percentile ranking. The combination occupies the 75th combined percentile, indicating a system that is far stronger in graphics than in CPU throughput. The 10 nm CPU with 12 MB of L3 cache and the 5 nm GPU with 35,800 million transistors represent a generational leap in efficiency, allowing high-end graphics performance in a compact, low-power form factor. This is a desktop workstation-class build for professionals who need GPU compute power for rendering, AI, and scientific workloads, but who do not require high-core-count CPU performance. The 250 W suggested PSU and lack of GPU power connectors make it exceptionally easy to integrate into small form factor systems, while the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The overall tier, at the 75th percentile, places it above the majority of systems in the database, with the GPU being the primary driver of that ranking.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12300T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds