SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

73%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12300T

3,525 Benchmark Score

Top 27% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-12300T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a study in extremes—a low-power, entry-level desktop processor harnessed to one of the most powerful graphics cards available. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are analytical estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing. This pairing creates a significant imbalance where the CPU’s computational ceiling is likely to constrain the GPU’s immense rendering potential in many scenarios.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty. Consequently, all frame rate expectations discussed in this section are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components, not observed results. The analysis must rely on the CPU’s single-threaded and multi-threaded capabilities alongside the GPU’s raw 3DMark performance to infer likely outcomes.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504 places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, indicating high-level rasterization performance. In contrast, the CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2123 and multi-core score of 6782, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11118, suggest a processor that is competent for daily tasks but not designed for extreme workloads. At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the CPU’s single-core score of 2123 on Geekbench will likely become a limiting factor, as lower resolutions increase the CPU’s burden in feeding frames to the GPU. The estimated frame rates could be inconsistent, with the GPU capable of far more than the CPU can deliver, leading to potential stutters in CPU-bound scenes.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU, but the CPU’s 4-core, 8-thread configuration with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz may still struggle to maintain high minimum frame rates in modern titles that favor multiple cores. The GPU’s 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are ample for ultra textures and high-resolution assets, but the CPU’s L3 cache of 12 MB shared across cores is modest, potentially increasing latency in data-heavy game logic. At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the CPU’s limitations are less pronounced, allowing the RTX 5090 D V2 to deliver its estimated maximum performance, but the overall experience will still be hampered by the CPU in any scene requiring rapid AI or physics calculations. These are estimates, and users should expect the CPU to be the primary bottleneck at all resolutions, with the effect diminishing as resolution increases.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a massive piece of silicon built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC. It houses 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is formidable: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for 4K textures and complex rendering scenes.

The GPU’s compute resources are extensive, with 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. For ray tracing, it includes 170 RT cores, and for AI-accelerated workloads, 680 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, leading to an FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504, while only at the 59th percentile, is the sole benchmark provided, yet it indicates strong performance in directX 12 titles. The nearest rival, NVIDIA T400, scores 16508 with a 0% delta, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, 0.5% lower, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, 0.6% lower.

For rendering, the data implies that this GPU can handle 3D modeling, video editing, and AI inference with ease, given the massive FP32 throughput and tensor core count. The 575 W TDP and suggested 950 W PSU indicate high power draw, but the dual-slot design and 1x 16-pin connector suggest a manageable physical footprint for a card of this class. The benchmark score, while not top-tier percentile-wise, is likely skewed by the specific test’s demands, and in real-world rendering tasks, the 24 GB VRAM and high bandwidth will be decisive advantages.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen Alder Lake architecture. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility for builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck from the slot. The CPU’s TDP is a modest 35 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 575 W, with a suggested PSU of 950 W, meaning the total system power draw is dominated by the graphics card.

The data shows that the CPU’s memory bandwidth is not specified, but the dual-channel support for DDR5 implies that memory-bound tasks could be improved by selecting faster modules. The GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, so there is no need for a motherboard upgrade to achieve full bandwidth. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful CPU within the same socket, as the current i3-12300T is likely to bottleneck the GPU in many workloads. The CPU’s percentile rank of 55 versus the GPU’s 59 suggests that while both are above average, the gap is not extreme, but the core count difference is stark.

The PSU headroom is a critical consideration; with a suggested PSU of 950 W and a combined TDP of 610 W for CPU and GPU, there is ample room for other components like drives and cooling. However, the CPU’s 35 W TDP means that a lower-wattage PSU could theoretically work, but the GPU’s requirement mandates the higher unit. For users looking to upgrade, replacing the i3-12300T with a higher-core-count 12th Gen processor would be the most straightforward path, as it would not require a motherboard or memory change, and would better match the GPU’s capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i3-12300T and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is heavily skewed toward the GPU, creating a situation where the CPU is the primary limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU’s percentile rank of 55 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3525, places it just above the midpoint, while the GPU’s percentile rank of 59 with an average score of 16504 is similarly positioned. The combined percentile is 57, suggesting a system that is above average overall, but the internal dynamics reveal a mismatch.

In gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance, as measured by Geekbench at 2123, is adequate for many titles, but the multi-core score of 6782 is low for modern games that utilize multiple threads. The GPU, with its 3DMark score of 16504, is capable of producing very high frame rates, but the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls will cap these rates. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU becomes the bottleneck more quickly, as the GPU is not fully utilized. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the CPU’s limitations are less apparent, but they still exist in CPU-intensive scenes.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU is clearly the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11118 is respectable for a 4-core part, but the GPU’s compute capabilities are vast, meaning tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding that can utilize the GPU will see the CPU struggle to feed data fast enough. The data indicates that the CPU’s L3 cache of 12 MB shared is a potential bottleneck for frequent data access, while the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is ample for large datasets. In summary, the CPU limits CPU-bound tasks, while the GPU is underutilized in such scenarios; the GPU limits only when the CPU is not the constraint, which is rare with this pairing.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of the Intel Core i3-12300T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 57, indicating the system performs better than 57% of all tested builds.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type is it?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 comes with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s base and boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i3-12300T has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a TDP of 35 W.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i3-12300T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, according to the memory support specifications.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 950 W, which is significantly higher than the CPU’s 35 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The GPU delivers 104.8 TFLOPS for FP32 computations, with FP16 performance matching at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1).

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score compared to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 3525, while its nearest rival, the Intel Atom x7213RE, scores 3520, a 0.1% difference, and the Intel Xeon W-2135 scores 3530, a -0.1% difference.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize GPU-accelerated tasks over CPU-intensive workloads, given the stark performance disparity. For gamers at 4K resolution, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are ideal for ultra settings, but the CPU’s single-core score of 2123 on Geekbench may cause framerate dips in CPU-bound titles, making this a niche choice for those who play GPU-heavy games at high resolutions. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 170 RT cores, but the CPU’s multi-core score of 11118 in Cinebench R23 will slow down tasks that are not GPU-accelerated, such as timeline scrubbing or physics simulations.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads limiting, as the multi-core Geekbench score of 6782 suggests moderate parallel processing capability, but the GPU’s tensor cores are useful for machine learning workloads. Students and small business workstations that primarily run office applications and web browsing will see adequate performance from the CPU’s 55th percentile rank, but the GPU is overkill for such tasks, making this a poor cost-effective choice. The build is best suited for users who explicitly need the GPU’s massive compute power for rendering or AI, and who are willing to accept the CPU’s constraints, or for those planning to upgrade the CPU soon.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i3-12300T is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a TDP of just 35 W, making it an energy-efficient part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but ECC is not supported, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 730.

Benchmark results show a single-core Geekbench score of 2123 and a multi-core score of 6782, placing it at the 55th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 11118, while the single-core score is 1569. These numbers indicate that the CPU is capable of decent single-threaded performance, which is sufficient for everyday tasks like web browsing and office applications, but the multi-core performance is constrained by the low core count. Real-world workloads that are heavily threaded, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, will be slower than on higher-core-count parts, but the 35 W TDP makes it suitable for low-power builds or systems where cooling is limited. The average benchmark score of 3525 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i3-12300 (3532) and Intel Xeon W-1290TE (3532), meaning this CPU is a standard performer in its class.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the `buildClass` field, combining an entry-level Intel Core i3-12300T with a flagship-tier NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU’s percentile rank of 55 and the GPU’s percentile rank of 59 result in a combined percentile of 57, which places this system in the upper-middle tier of all tested configurations. The pairing is unconventional, as the CPU is a low-power, budget-oriented part, while the GPU is a high-end, power-hungry component with a TDP of 575 W.

The CPU’s launch MSRP was $97, while the GPU’s launch MSRP was 2,299 USD, highlighting the extreme cost disparity, though this analysis does not focus on pricing. The GPU is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process and has a release date of 2025-08-14, making it a current-generation product. The CPU is based on Alder Lake-S and is still in active production. This build is characterized by a massive GPU that can handle the most demanding graphics tasks, but the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads will limit overall system performance in many scenarios. The combined percentile of 57 suggests that the system is better than average, but the individual component percentiles indicate that the GPU is pulling the combined score up from the CPU’s level.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i3-12300T achieves an average benchmark score of 3525, with a percentile rank of 55 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Atom x7213RE with a score of 3520 (0.1% delta), the Intel Xeon W-2135 with 3530 (-0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i3-12300 with 3532 (-0.2% delta). The CPU’s individual benchmark scores are: Cinebench R15 multi-core 1120 and single-core 157, Cinebench R20 multi-core 4669 and single-core 658, Cinebench R23 multi-core 11118 and single-core 1569, and Geekbench multi-core 6782 and single-core 2123.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has an average benchmark score of 16504 from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, with a percentile rank of 59. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 with a score of 16508 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 with 16415 (0.5% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell with 16408 (0.6% delta). The combined picture shows a system where the GPU’s score is nearly five times higher than the CPU’s average score, indicating that the GPU is the dominant component. In a combined benchmark context, the CPU’s 55th percentile and GPU’s 59th percentile yield a combined percentile of 57, suggesting that the system is slightly above average in overall performance, but the CPU is a clear weak point that could be upgraded to better utilize the GPU’s capabilities.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, the GPU’s 3DMark score of 16504 is more than capable of pushing high frame rates, but the CPU’s single-core Geekbench score of 2123 will likely bottleneck, preventing the system from achieving the maximum possible FPS in esports titles. This scenario is not ideal, as the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are a limiting factor.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and 24 GB VRAM can handle encoding via NVENC, but the CPU’s multi-core score of 6782 on Geekbench may struggle with simultaneous gaming and streaming overhead. The system can stream, but the CPU may cause dropped frames in CPU-intensive games.

Video editing: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS accelerates effects and rendering, but the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11118 will slow down timeline operations and export tasks that are not GPU-accelerated. The 24 GB VRAM is excellent for large projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 170 RT cores and 104.8 TFLOPS provide massive rendering power, making this a strong choice for GPU-based renderers, but the CPU’s multi-core score of 6782 on Geekbench will be a bottleneck for CPU-based rendering tasks or scene preparation.

Software development: Compilation tasks rely on CPU performance, and the i3-12300T’s multi-core score of 11118 in Cinebench R23 is modest, leading to slower build times. However, the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate machine learning development, making this suitable for AI researchers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 55th percentile rank and single-core score of 2123 on Geekbench are adequate for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is severely underutilized in this scenario, making the build inefficient for such tasks, but it will perform without issue.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12300T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds