SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

73%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12300

3,532 Benchmark Score

Top 27% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-12300 is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in a strategic position for future upgrades. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility depending on motherboard choice and budget constraints at the time of assembly. The memory controller runs in dual-channel mode, which is standard for this class of processor and sufficient for feeding the four cores with data.

The platform's PCIe implementation is notable: the CPU provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This means the primary graphics card slot can run at PCIe Gen 5 speeds, though the RTX 5000 Ada Generation GPU in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully backward compatible. The extra bandwidth headroom from Gen 5 is essentially future-proofing for storage devices or other expansion cards, as the GPU itself will not saturate a Gen 4 link, let alone Gen 5.

The CPU's TDP is 60 W, which is modest by desktop standards. Paired with the GPU's 250 W TDP, the system's total power draw is manageable. The GPU's suggested PSU is 600 W, which provides ample headroom for the entire system, including the motherboard, storage, and fans. A quality 600 W unit will run this combination comfortably, and there is room for minor overclocking on the GPU if the user chooses, though the CPU's multiplier is locked.

For a sensible next upgrade, the path is clear. The LGA 1700 socket supports higher-tier 12th Gen processors, which would slot into the same motherboard with a BIOS update. Given that the i3-12300 sits at the 55th percentile among all CPUs, upgrading to a higher-core-count part from the same generation would directly address multi-threaded workload limitations without requiring a platform change. The 60 W TDP of the current CPU means the cooling solution and power delivery on most motherboards will have significant headroom for a more powerful chip.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU with specifications that place it in the top tier of available graphics hardware. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD102 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 125.3 million per square millimeter.

Memory configuration is generous: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This amount of VRAM is critical for professional workloads such as large 3D scenes, high-resolution texture work, and machine learning inference, where the dataset must reside in GPU memory.

The compute core configuration is substantial. The GPU has 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation processors. Ray tracing is handled by 100 dedicated RT cores, while 400 tensor cores accelerate AI and deep learning tasks. The raw throughput figures are impressive: FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, and FP16 matches that at 65.28 TFLOPS with 1:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds are set at 1155 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost. The boost clock is the more relevant figure for sustained workloads, as the GPU will hold near that frequency under load given adequate cooling. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, and 112 mm tall, requiring one 16-pin power connector. Display output is handled by four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 98th percentile among all GPUs, which is near the top of the performance hierarchy. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286, and the Vulkan score is 194,041. The average benchmark score is 184,664. For rendering workloads, these numbers indicate that the GPU can handle real-time viewport rendering at high settings and can accelerate offline rendering through CUDA and OptiX paths. The 32 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for GPU-accelerated rendering where scene complexity often exceeds what consumer cards with 8-16 GB can handle.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU present two very different performance profiles. The Intel Core i3-12300 achieves moderate scores in Cinebench testing. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1,230 in multi-core and 173 in single-core. Moving to R20, the scores are 5,128 multi-core and 724 single-core. In R23, the latest of the three, it scores 12,211 multi-core and 1,724 single-core. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 3,532, placing it at the 55th percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms roughly half of all processors in the database, which is respectable for a budget quad-core.

The GPU's performance is in a different league entirely. With an average benchmark score of 184,664, it sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183,725 (0.5% slower), the A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147 (1.3% faster), the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182,109 (1.4% slower), and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178,050 (3.7% slower). This places the RTX 5000 Ada Generation in the company of the fastest accelerators available, whether for gaming or professional use.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU sits near the middle of the pack, while the GPU is near the top. When considering the combined percentile of 77, this reflects a system that is held back by its processor in many workloads. It is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion must therefore be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that this pairing is CPU-limited in most scenarios. The CPU's 55th percentile position against the GPU's 98th percentile means the processor will struggle to feed the graphics card in frame-rate-sensitive tasks. In gaming, the GPU has enormous headroom that will go unused in many titles, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor.

The CPU's single-core scores are actually quite strong relative to its multi-core performance. The R23 single-core score of 1,724 is competitive with much more expensive processors, which means lightly-threaded tasks will run well. However, the multi-core score of 12,211 reveals the limitation of a 4-core/8-thread configuration. Modern games increasingly use 6-8 cores, and productivity applications like video editing or 3D rendering will scale across many cores. In these workloads, the CPU will be the primary bottleneck.

The GPU, by contrast, is unlikely to be the limiting factor in any workload this system can run. With 32 GB of VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, it can handle massive datasets and complex compute tasks. The only scenario where the GPU might be underutilized is when the CPU cannot issue instructions fast enough, which will happen in most gaming scenarios and some lightly-parallelized professional applications.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. A GPU at the 98th percentile should push very high frame rates in most titles, but only if the CPU can keep up. Given that the CPU is at the 55th percentile, it is likely that frame rates will be capped by the CPU in many games, especially at 1080p or 1440p where the GPU is not the constraint. At 4K, the GPU will be more fully utilized, as the resolution shift puts more load on the graphics card relative to the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance relative to its multi-core performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1,724, while the multi-core score is 12,211. The single-core score is strong for a 4-core part, indicating good per-thread performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 184,664 on average, which is 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's 183,725. These are effectively equivalent in overall benchmark performance.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i3-12300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory controller runs in dual-channel mode for either type.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked by adjusting the multiplier. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz is the maximum frequency the chip will reach under load.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU, and what power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested power supply for the system is 600 W, which provides sufficient headroom for the entire build.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which is 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on Alder Lake architecture, specifically Alder Lake-S, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 163 mm².

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system will deliver high frame rates in most games, provided the resolution is high enough to engage the GPU. At 1080p or 1440p, the CPU's single-core strength will help, but the 4-core limit may cap performance in modern titles that use more threads. The GPU's 98th percentile position means it can push well beyond 144 Hz in many esports titles, but the CPU may hold it back in demanding AAA games.

Streaming: Streaming adds CPU overhead for encoding. The i3-12300 with 8 threads can handle 1080p streaming at moderate bitrates, but the GPU's NVENC encoder can offload this work. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has dedicated encoder hardware, so streaming quality will be high without burdening the CPU.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and high compute throughput will accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering in applications like DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere Pro. The CPU's multi-core score of 12,211 in R23 is adequate for timeline editing, but export times will be longer than with a higher-core-count processor.

3D rendering: This is the strongest scenario for the system. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 100 RT cores will handle real-time viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated offline rendering with ease. The 32 GB VRAM allows for large scenes that would exceed the memory of most consumer GPUs. The CPU will be a bottleneck for CPU-based rendering, but GPU rendering will dominate.

Software development: The CPU's single-core performance is decent for compilation, but multi-core builds will be slow with only 8 threads. The GPU can accelerate certain development tasks like shader compilation or machine learning model training, but the overall experience will be limited by the CPU.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-core score is more than sufficient for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The GPU's power is unused in these scenarios, but the system will be responsive and smooth.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a niche audience: professionals who need the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's compute and memory capabilities but are working within a platform that has a modest CPU. The primary users are 3D artists and animators working with large scenes that require the 32 GB VRAM. Video editors handling 4K or 8K timelines with heavy effects will benefit from the GPU's acceleration, though they may find the CPU limiting during export. Machine learning practitioners who need high FP32 throughput and large memory for model training or inference will find the GPU suitable, but they should be aware that the CPU may slow data preprocessing.

Gamers at 4K resolution will see the best results from this system, as the GPU will be fully utilized at that resolution. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will experience CPU bottlenecks in many titles. Small business workstations that run CUDA-accelerated applications, such as financial modeling or scientific computing, will benefit from the GPU's performance. Students in engineering or computer science programs who need CUDA for coursework will find the system capable, though the CPU is not ideal for multi-threaded compilation tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop system pairing the Intel Core i3-12300 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, while the GPU is a workstation-class accelerator from the Ada Lovelace generation. The combined percentile is 77, reflecting a system that is strong overall but unbalanced, with the GPU vastly outperforming the CPU.

The i3-12300 is a budget processor with a launch MSRP of $143. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a professional GPU with no launch MSRP listed. The system's overall tier is mid-range due to the CPU's 55th percentile position, despite the GPU's 98th percentile standing. This is not a balanced gaming rig, but rather a workstation configuration where the GPU is the primary investment and the CPU is a cost-saving measure.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12300 is a quad-core processor with 8 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting to 4.40 GHz under load. The TDP is a modest 60 W, making it easy to cool with a capable air cooler.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a total of 320 KB L1 and 5 MB L2 across all four cores. The L3 cache is shared, which helps with inter-core communication and reduces memory latency. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the exact bandwidth depends on the memory modules installed. ECC memory is not supported.

Benchmark performance shows a processor that is strong in single-threaded tasks but limited in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,724 is excellent for a budget chip, indicating that the Alder Lake architecture has high IPC (instructions per clock). The multi-core score of 12,211 is roughly 7 times the single-core score, which is expected for a 4-core/8-thread part with good scaling. The average benchmark score of 3,532 places it at the 55th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon W-1290TE (0% delta), Core i5-10600K (0% delta), Xeon W-2135 (0.1% faster), and Core i3-12300T (0.2% slower).

For real workloads, this means the CPU will handle everyday tasks with ease, including web browsing, office applications, and light programming. Gaming performance will be adequate, particularly in titles that favor single-thread performance. However, tasks that scale across many cores — video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and multitasking — will be limited by the 4-core configuration. The CPU is not the bottleneck in this system for GPU-accelerated workloads, but it will cap performance in CPU-bound scenarios. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 is present but will not be used when the discrete GPU is installed. The CPU's socket is LGA 1700, and it is currently listed as active in production.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12300

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds