SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

73%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12300

3,532 Benchmark Score

Top 27% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Usage Scenarios

The Intel Core i3-12300 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM forms a desktop combination that lands at the 56th percentile overall, suggesting it sits comfortably in the mid-range tier of system performance. For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this pairing offers a plausible path to triple-digit frame rates in less demanding titles, but the data composition here — with the CPU's 55th percentile and GPU's 57th percentile — indicates neither component dramatically outperforms the other, so the system's ceiling is set by their cooperation rather than by a single standout part.

Streaming workloads would lean heavily on the GPU's NVENC capabilities, though the fact pack does not include specific encoder benchmarks. The RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom for encoding overhead while gaming, but the CPU's modest 4-core, 8-thread configuration with a 3.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost clock suggests software encoding would strain the processor in demanding scenes. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12211 and single-core score of 1724 indicate balanced throughput, but streaming while gaming typically demands more threads for simultaneous encode and game logic.

Video editing with software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve would find the i3-12300 acceptable for 1080p timelines, given its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5128 and single-core score of 724. The GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 72 tensor cores assist with GPU-accelerated effects and AI-based tools, though the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth could limit 4K timeline scrubbing with multiple layers. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 173 suggests responsive timeline playback, while the multi-core score of 1230 indicates render tasks will be workable but not class-leading.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya would rely on the GPU's 2304 shading units and 18 RT cores, which handle ray-traced scenes at entry-level quality. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 86 place this GPU in a modest position, meaning final-frame renders at high samples will be slow but feasible for hobbyist projects. The CPU's 12 MB shared L3 cache helps with geometry processing, but the 4-core design means physics simulations and complex scene graphs will bottleneck before the GPU reaches saturation.

Software development workloads — compiling, running tests, and local virtualization — benefit most from the CPU's single-core strength, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1724. The i3-12300's 4.40 GHz boost clock and 10 nm Intel process deliver snappy build times for small-to-mid projects, while the DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel memory support allows flexible platform choices. Yet multi-threaded compilation across many files would expose the 4-core limitation, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5128 indicating roughly a 7x scaling from single to multi-core — decent but not exceptional for a modern desktop chip.

Student and office work falls well within this system's comfort zone. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, and the CPU's 55th percentile ranking versus all CPUs means spreadsheet calculations, document editing, and web browsing are handled with ample responsiveness. The RTX 3050 OEM's PassMark G2D score of 973 indicates strong 2D acceleration for UI rendering, and the 60 W CPU TDP combined with 130 W GPU TDP keeps the thermal footprint manageable for dorm rooms or small offices.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where neither component dominates the other, but their interaction defines the performance envelope. The CPU's average benchmark score of 3532 places it at the 55th percentile, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 15199 lands at the 57th percentile — a nearly identical percentile ranking that suggests a well-matched pairing where bottlenecks shift depending on workload type. The combined percentile of 56 reinforces this equilibrium.

In gaming scenarios, the RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as the CPU's single-core performance — ranked near the Intel Core i5-10600K with a 0% deltaPct — should keep pace with the GPU's rasterization throughput at 1080p. However, the GPU's PassMark DirectX 9 score of 137 versus DirectX 12 score of 58 hints that older API titles may run surprisingly well, while modern DX12 workloads expose the GPU's architectural limits.

For CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or AI pathfinding, the i3-12300's 4 cores and 8 threads become the bottleneck. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12211 is roughly 7x its single-core score of 1724, and this scaling factor indicates the processor's multi-threaded efficiency is good for its core count but cannot compete with 6-core or 8-core rivals. The nearest rivals list includes the Intel Xeon W-1290TE and Intel Core i5-10600K both with a 0% deltaPct, suggesting the i3-12300 punches at the level of older 6-core workstation chips in aggregate benchmarks.

Memory bandwidth could also act as a hidden bottleneck. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, but the fact pack does not specify the maximum speed, and the GPU's 128-bit bus width limits its bandwidth to 224.0 GB/s — a figure that could starve the 2304 shading units in texture-heavy scenes. The RTX 3050 OEM's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 with a 0.2% deltaPct, likely enjoys wider memory bandwidth, making this NVIDIA card's memory subsystem a potential weak link.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12300 is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Alder Lake-S architecture using Intel's 10 nm process. It operates at a 3.50 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.40 GHz, with a 60 W TDP that keeps power consumption modest. The die size of 163 mm² houses 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache — a configuration that provides low-latency access to frequently used data.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs strongly in single-threaded tasks but modestly in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1724 and multi-core score of 12211 reveal a 7.1x scaling factor, which is typical for a 4-core/8-thread design with hyperthreading. The Cinebench R20 scores — 724 single-core and 5128 multi-core — follow the same pattern, while the older Cinebench R15 tests show 173 single-core and 1230 multi-core. These numbers place the CPU at the 55th percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 3532.

The nearest rivals provide context: the Intel Xeon W-1290TE and Intel Core i5-10600K both match the i3-12300's average score with a 0% deltaPct, while the Intel Xeon W-2135 trails by 0.1% and the Intel Core i3-12300T by 0.2%. This clustering indicates that the i3-12300 delivers performance equivalent to older 6-core Xeon and Core i5 parts in aggregate benchmarks, despite having fewer physical cores — a signal of its higher clock speeds and newer architecture. The processor's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, along with PCIe Gen 5 and 20 lanes, provides modern platform features, and its integrated UHD Graphics 730 offers basic display output without a discrete GPU.

The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported, but the 4.40 GHz boost clock already approaches the practical limits of the Alder Lake architecture on this process node. The production status is active, and the launch MSRP of $143 positions it as an entry-level desktop part.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who need a balanced, no-frills desktop for everyday computing, light gaming, and productivity work. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium-to-high settings would find the RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for current titles, and the CPU's single-core strength ensures smooth frame pacing in games that rely heavily on a single thread. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and the CPU's 55th percentile ranking suggest this system handles eSports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends comfortably, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates cannot be confirmed.

Content creators working with 1080p video or 2D graphics would benefit from the GPU's 72 tensor cores for AI-assisted editing tools and its 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance for effects rendering. The CPU's 12 MB L3 cache and 4.40 GHz boost clock keep preview renders responsive, while the 8 GB GDDR6 memory handles 1080p timelines with multiple effects layers. For 3D hobbyists, the 18 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, though the 128-bit memory bus limits complex scene rendering.

Software developers building small-to-medium projects would appreciate the CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1724, which translates to fast compile times for incremental builds. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows cost-effective memory configurations, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface future-proofs storage and expansion. Students and office workers would find this system more than adequate for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing, with the integrated graphics serving as a reliable backup.

Small business workstations running accounting software, CRM tools, or light database applications would see consistent performance from the 4-core/8-thread CPU, and the GPU's compute capability (PassMark GPU compute score of 5779) could accelerate CUDA-based workloads like financial modeling or data visualization. The 60 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP make cooling straightforward, and the suggested 300 W PSU keeps system power requirements low — though the fact pack does not provide specific wattage figures beyond these.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system at the 56th percentile, with the CPU at 55th and GPU at 57th — a tightly matched duo. The CPU's average benchmark score of 3532 places it alongside the Intel Xeon W-1290TE (0% deltaPct), Intel Core i5-10600K (0% deltaPct), Intel Xeon W-2135 (0.1% deltaPct), and Intel Core i3-12300T (0.2% deltaPct). This near-tie with the i5-10600K is notable: the i3-12300 matches a 6-core processor from the previous generation using only 4 cores, thanks to its higher clock speeds and architectural efficiency.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 15199 ranks it at the 57th percentile, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 leading by 0.2%, while the AMD Radeon 680M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 trail by 0.5%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 trails by 0.6%. This places the RTX 3050 OEM in the company of mid-range cards from both AMD and NVIDIA, though the RTX 2060's slight disadvantage in aggregate score suggests the newer card holds its own in mixed workloads.

Specific GPU benchmarks reveal its character: Geekbench OpenCL scores 60740 and Vulkan scores 57103, indicating strong compute throughput for a card of this class. PassMark results show DirectX 9 at 137, DirectX 11 at 86, DirectX 12 at 58, and DirectX 10 at 61 — a pattern where older APIs perform better relative to the GPU's raw power, implying driver overhead or architectural limitations in modern DirectX 12 titles. The G3D score of 11857 and G2D score of 973 confirm solid 3D and 2D performance, while the GPU compute score of 5779 shows moderate compute capability.

The CPU's Cinebench results — R15 multi-core 1230, R15 single-core 173, R20 multi-core 5128, R20 single-core 724, R23 multi-core 12211, R23 single-core 1724 — provide a complete picture of its processing power. The consistency across Cinebench versions suggests good thermal management under load, and the 60 W TDP supports sustained boost clocks without excessive power draw.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — the data contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's rasterization throughput must be extrapolated to predict gaming behavior.

Based on the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1724 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857, 1080p gaming at high settings should deliver playable frame rates in most titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures, though the 128-bit memory bus may cause stuttering in games with large texture packs. The RTX 3050 OEM's DirectX 11 score of 86 versus DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests that games using DX11 — a common API for many popular titles — will perform relatively better than DX12-native games.

At 1440p, the GPU's modest bandwidth and shading unit count (2304) would likely push frame rates below 60 FPS in demanding titles, while the CPU's 4 cores could bottleneck in games that utilize multiple threads heavily. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5128 indicates the CPU can feed the GPU at 1080p, but at higher resolutions the GPU becomes the primary constraint. Ray tracing performance, supported by the 18 RT cores, would be limited to light effects at playable frame rates; the GPU's FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS provides the compute foundation, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth limits RT scene complexity.

Esports titles and older games would fare best, with the DirectX 9 score of 137 hinting that legacy games run exceptionally well. The CPU's 4.40 GHz boost clock ensures high minimum frame rates, reducing stutter in CPU-bound scenarios. For modern AAA games at 1080p medium settings, the system should achieve 60 FPS in many cases, but this remains an estimate — users should treat these figures as directional rather than definitive.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 56, with the CPU at the 55th percentile and the GPU at the 57th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i3-12300 compare to the Intel Core i5-10600K?

A: The i3-12300 has an average benchmark score of 3532, matching the i5-10600K's score of 3533 with a 0% deltaPct, indicating nearly identical aggregate performance.

Q: What memory types does the i3-12300 support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though specific speed ratings are not provided.

Q: What is the RTX 3050 OEM's closest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average score of 15171, a 0.2% deltaPct from the RTX 3050 OEM's 15199, making it the closest competitor.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the i3-12300?

A: The launch MSRP is $143.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i3-12300 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, creating a balanced mid-range system at the 56th combined percentile. The CPU, a 4-core/8-thread Alder Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, and the GPU, an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, complement each other in performance tier — both hover near the 55-57th percentile range, avoiding significant bottlenecking.

The system's tier is decidedly mainstream: not entry-level, given the discrete GPU and modern CPU architecture, but not high-end, as the component scores place it below enthusiast-class hardware. The CPU's nearest rivals include workstation and previous-generation gaming chips, while the GPU competes with mid-range AMD and NVIDIA cards. This combination suits users seeking dependable 1080p gaming and productivity without chasing extreme frame rates or render times.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-12300 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the RTX 3050 OEM's bandwidth needs. The 60 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300 W, leave headroom for modest upgrades without requiring a new power supply.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as a 6-core or 8-core Alder Lake part, which would improve multi-threaded performance in rendering and streaming workloads — the current 4-core design's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12211 is the primary weakness. However, the fact pack does not list specific compatible CPUs, so users must verify socket compatibility independently. The GPU could be upgraded to a card with wider memory bandwidth, as the RTX 3050 OEM's 224.0 GB/s and 128-bit bus are potential bottlenecks; the nearest rival, the RX 7600, hints at what a modest GPU upgrade could offer. The 300 W PSU recommendation suggests limited capacity for much larger GPUs, so users should consider PSU upgrades alongside GPU swaps.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is an Ampere-architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process, with a GA106 chip containing 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It operates at a 1515 MHz base clock and 1755 MHz boost clock, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth — a figure that limits high-resolution texture throughput but suffices for 1080p gaming.

The GPU's 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.087 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), with 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores enabling ray tracing and DLSS support. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs best in older API workloads: PassMark DirectX 9 scores 137, DirectX 11 scores 86, but DirectX 12 drops to 58. This pattern suggests the architecture handles legacy titles with ease but struggles with modern graphics features. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 60740 and 57103, respectively, indicate solid compute throughput, while the PassMark G3D score of 11857 and GPU compute score of 5779 confirm mid-range positioning. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, leads by 0.2% in average score, suggesting the RTX 3050 OEM is competitive but slightly behind its modern AMD counterpart. The card's 57th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 15199, places it firmly in the mid-range tier for rendering workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12300

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds