SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

80 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 20% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
70%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100TE

2,475 Benchmark Score
Top 30% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing of an Intel Core i3-12100TE with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a study in extremes, combining a low-power, entry-level CPU with an ultra-high-end GPU. The data indicates a system where the GPU is the clear dominant performer, while the CPU serves as a potential bottleneck in many scenarios. Benchmark results show the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 49th percentile, and the combined system percentile is 54. This analysis relies strictly on the provided FACT PACK data, noting that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all performance discussions are framed as estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1700 platform, anchored by the Intel Core i3-12100TE. This CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in choosing memory modules, though the specific memory bandwidth is not detailed in the data. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is a modern standard that supports the latest high-bandwidth devices. The GPU connects via a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's lane configuration, ensuring the graphics card can operate at its intended bus width.

The platform's power requirements are a critical consideration. The CPU has a 35 W TDP, indicating a very power-efficient processor. In contrast, the GPU has a 575 W TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 950 W. This means a power supply must be chosen to handle the substantial demands of the GPU, leaving considerable headroom for the rest of the system. The power connectors on the GPU are a single 16-pin, which should be a key compatibility check when selecting a PSU.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the CPU as the primary component to replace. The Core i3-12100TE is a modest 4-core, 8-thread processor, and its benchmark scores are in the mid-range of all CPUs. Upgrading to a higher-core-count CPU on the same Socket 1700 platform would be a logical step to better balance the system's overall capability, especially in multi-threaded workloads where the current CPU is a limiting factor. The platform itself supports modern memory and PCIe standards, so a CPU swap would be the most impactful change without requiring a full platform overhaul.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's performance is defined by its Cinebench scores. It achieves 8,558 points in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1,208 points in single-core. In R20, it scores 3,594 multicore and 507 single-core, while in R15, it scores 862 multicore and 121 single-core. These results place the processor at the 49th percentile compared to all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 2,475, which puts it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-1540, 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i5-8600, but 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-9500T and 0.9% behind the Intel Core i5-1155G7. This indicates the i3-12100TE's performance is closely matched with these older or lower-power processors, making it a mid-tier performer.

The GPU presents a starkly different picture. Its single benchmark score is 16,504 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This score places the RTX 5090 D V2 at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, which is a high position. However, its nearest rivals are surprisingly close: it is essentially tied with the NVIDIA T400 (0% delta), 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. This data suggests that while the GPU is a high performer, the specific benchmark used shows it clustered with a diverse group of cards, some of which are not in the same performance class.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The system's combined percentile is 54, reflecting a slight pull-down from the CPU's lower 49th percentile against the GPU's higher 59th percentile. In a gaming context, the GPU would likely be underutilized in many titles due to the CPU's lower processing power, while in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution rendering, the system could still deliver exceptional performance. The data clearly shows the GPU as the dominant component in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100TE features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is equipped with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-9500T?

A: The Core i3-12100TE is 0.7% behind the Core i5-9500T in average benchmark score, indicating a nearly equivalent performance level.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU and what power supply is suggested?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 575 W, and a power supply with a 950 W rating is suggested for the system.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK indicates that ECC memory is not supported by the Intel Core i3-12100TE.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s, which is a direct specification from the FACT PACK.

Who Should Build It

This system is not for a general-purpose user. The data suggests it targets two distinct user profiles. First, a gamer who primarily plays at high resolutions where the GPU's massive 24 GB VRAM and high texture rates are beneficial. In such scenarios, the CPU bottleneck is less pronounced, and the GPU can flex its muscles. Second, a content creator or professional who works with GPU-accelerated rendering, such as 3D modeling or video encoding, where the RTX 5090 D V2's computational power is directly leveraged. Students or small business users running standard office applications would find this build excessive, as the CPU's mid-range benchmark scores are more than sufficient for those tasks, but the GPU's cost and power are unjustified.

The target user is someone who prioritizes GPU performance above all else and has workloads that scale with it. The data shows the GPU is at the 59th percentile, a strong position, while the CPU is at the 49th percentile. This suggests a build for a user who knows their primary applications are GPU-bound. It is not a balanced build for general productivity; it is a specialized tool for GPU-intensive tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100TE is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a 35 W TDP, making it a very power-efficient chip, and includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics. The cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

The benchmark scores reveal its performance tier. With a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8,558, it is positioned just above the mid-range of all CPUs, at the 49th percentile. Its single-core score of 1,208 is respectable but not class-leading. The average benchmark score of 2,475 places it in a four-way tie with its nearest rivals, all of which are within a 1% performance delta. This indicates that the i3-12100TE offers performance comparable to processors like the Intel Core i5-8600 and i5-9500T.

For real workloads, this means the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks and light to moderate productivity. It can handle web browsing, office applications, and even some coding work. However, for multi-threaded tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the 4-core design will struggle to keep up with higher-core-count CPUs. In gaming, the single-core performance is decent, but the overall processing power will likely limit frame rates in CPU-intensive titles, especially at lower resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a behemoth of a graphics card. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, featuring a massive 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The memory subsystem is formidable, with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, resulting in a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s. The GPU is equipped with 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores.

The clock speeds are listed as a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The compute capabilities are outstanding, with an FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s. These specifications point to a card designed for extreme workloads.

However, the benchmark data tells a nuanced story. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 16,504, placing it at the 59th percentile. The nearest rivals are a strange mix, including the NVIDIA T400, AMD Radeon PRO W7500, and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, all with a performance delta of 0.6% or less. This suggests that in this specific test, the card's performance is not as dominant as its specs would imply, or the benchmark does not fully utilize its capabilities. For rendering and other compute-heavy tasks, the 24 GB VRAM and high FP32 throughput are the key assets, allowing for large textures and complex scenes. The 170 RT cores also provide substantial ray tracing acceleration.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's 49th percentile performance will likely bottleneck the GPU, preventing it from reaching its full potential. The data suggests that frame rates would be limited by the processor's 4-core design in many titles. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and its massive texture and fill rates would be the main factors in achieving high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 threads are insufficient for handling both a game and a software encoder. The GPU's built-in encoders (implied by its architecture) would be essential. The system would rely on the GPU's capabilities for streaming, as the CPU lacks the multi-threaded headroom to do both tasks effectively.

Video Editing: In non-linear editors, the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and high compute performance would accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering. However, the CPU's 8,558 Cinebench R23 multicore score would slow down timeline scrubbing and export processes, making it a secondary bottleneck. The system would be faster than a CPU-only system but not as balanced as one with a stronger processor.

3D Rendering: This is where the system shines. The GPU's FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS would be a massive acceleration for GPU-based renderers. The 24 GB VRAM allows for very large scenes. The CPU would only be relevant for scene preparation and physics calculations, where its 4 cores would be a limiting factor, but the render time would be dominated by the GPU's speed.

Software Development: For compiling code, the CPU's multi-core performance is a bottleneck. The 8,558 R23 score is modest, so large projects would take a long time to build. The GPU offers no benefit for standard compilation. This is a poor fit for a developer working on large codebases.

Student and Office Work: This is massively overpowered for such tasks. The CPU is more than capable of handling spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The GPU would be completely idle. A student or office worker would be paying for performance they never use, making this an inefficient choice.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a low-power, entry-level CPU with a flagship-tier GPU. The Intel Core i3-12100TE is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the 12th Gen series, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a high-end graphics card based on the Blackwell architecture. The system's combined performance percentile is 54, placing it in the middle of all systems. This is a direct result of the imbalance between the CPU, at the 49th percentile, and the GPU, at the 59th percentile.

The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional tower PC. The pairing is unusual, as the CPU is a budget-oriented part (with a launch MSRP of $125) while the GPU is a top-tier component (with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD). The overall tier, based on the percentiles, is mid-range, but this is skewed by the CPU. The GPU's performance is in the upper half of all GPUs, but the CPU pulls the system down. This is a build that is defined by its GPU, and its overall performance in GPU-heavy tasks would be high, but its CPU performance is strictly average.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the CPU. The data shows a 10-percentile gap between the CPU (49th) and GPU (59th), indicating a significant imbalance. The CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads will be a limiting factor in any workload that requires high processor throughput. This is most evident in gaming, where frame rates are often dependent on single-core performance and the ability to process game logic quickly. The CPU's single-core score of 1,208 in R23, while decent, will not be able to keep up with the GPU's capacity to render frames at very high speeds.

The GPU is the dominant component. In workloads that are heavily parallel and scale with the GPU, such as 3D rendering, the system will perform exceptionally well. The 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the 1.34 TB/s memory bandwidth ensure that the GPU can process data far faster than the CPU can feed it. This means that in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will be waiting for the GPU, resulting in high utilization of the graphics card.

This imbalance means the system will not deliver balanced performance. In CPU-bound tasks, the GPU will be underutilized, wasting its potential. In GPU-bound tasks, the CPU will be a bottleneck only in the initial stages, but the overall throughput will be high. The data suggests this is a system for a specialist who understands that its performance is heavily skewed toward GPU-accelerated tasks and who is willing to accept the CPU's limitations.