SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

72%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100T

3,277 Benchmark Score

Top 28% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-12100T and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that combines a low-power, four-core Alder Lake processor with a high-end workstation GPU. This is a study in contrast: the CPU sits near the middle of the performance distribution at the 53rd percentile, while the GPU ranks in the top 5% of all graphics cards at the 95th percentile. The combined system percentile is 74, indicating that the graphics subsystem heavily skews the overall capability of this build. This analysis will walk through the architectural details, benchmark scores, and practical implications of this specific configuration, using only the data provided.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100T is a desktop processor built on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features 4 physical cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The thermal design power is a modest 35 W, which is notably low for a desktop chip and suggests a focus on power efficiency. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and has a die size of 163 mm². Cache memory is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache.

Benchmark data for this chip shows a clear split between single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 1481 points in single-core and 10490 points in multi-core. The single-core score is relatively strong, reflecting the high 4.10 GHz boost clock, while the multi-core score is limited by the physical core count. In Geekbench, the scores are 1957 for single-core and 6055 for multi-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 3277.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i3-12100T is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 (0% delta) and the Intel Xeon E-2374G (0% delta). It is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-11500T and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3. These small deltas indicate that the i3-12100T performs in a tight cluster with these other processors, despite having fewer cores than some. The 53rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms this is a mid-pack processor for general computing tasks.

For real workloads, the data suggests that the CPU will handle everyday productivity, web browsing, and office applications with ease, as those are not heavily multi-threaded. However, for heavily threaded tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the 4-core/8-thread configuration will be a limiting factor, as evidenced by the multi-core scores being significantly lower than high-end desktop chips. The 12 MB L3 cache helps with data reuse, but the core count caps the parallel processing capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance is adequate for gaming, but the GPU will dominate this pairing. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile ranking suggests it can push high frame rates, but the i3-12100T may struggle to keep up in CPU-bound scenarios at high refresh rates. The 4.10 GHz boost clock helps, but the 4 cores may bottleneck in modern titles that use more threads. Expect the GPU to be the primary driver of FPS, with the CPU potentially capping performance in less optimized titles.

Streaming: Streaming requires both CPU resources for encoding and GPU resources for rendering. The i3-12100T has 8 threads, which is sufficient for a single game plus a software encoder, but the 35 W TDP suggests thermal constraints. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, which can offload encoding tasks via NVENC, but the benchmark data does not specify encoder performance. The CPU's mid-pack percentile (53) indicates it is not a high-end streaming chip, so using GPU-based encoding would be advisable.

Video editing: Video editing software often uses both CPU and GPU. The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 6055 is moderate, handling timeline scrubbing and basic effects. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth are excellent for rendering previews and applying GPU-accelerated effects. The 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides substantial compute for rendering, making this a capable video editing station despite the CPU's limitations.

3D rendering: This workload is heavily multi-threaded and will be limited by the i3-12100T. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10490 is far below what high-core-count CPUs achieve, so CPU-based rendering will be slow. However, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS and 6144 shading units can accelerate GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane, which would be significantly faster than CPU rendering. The 20 GB VRAM is a major advantage for large scenes and textures.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis are multi-threaded tasks that will benefit from the CPU's 8 threads, but the 4 cores limit parallelism. The Geekbench multi-core score of 6055 suggests decent performance for smaller projects. The 12 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. For developers, this build is adequate for day-to-day coding and testing, but large builds may be slower than with higher-core-count CPUs.

Student and office work: This scenario is well-served by the i3-12100T. Word processing, spreadsheets, email, and web browsing are largely single-threaded, and the single-core scores (1481 in R23, 1957 in Geekbench) are strong. The 35 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, ideal for a dorm room or small office. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, but the RTX 4000 Ada is vastly overkill for this use case.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, codenamed AD104, contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2175 MHz. Memory is 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

The compute configuration is substantial: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. This translates to pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-rate penalty. The card is single-slot, 245 mm long and 112 mm high, and requires a single 16-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and a Vulkan score of 123842, with an average benchmark score of 135218. The GPU sits at the 95th percentile versus all GPUs, placing it in the top tier of graphics hardware. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA A10M (0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (-0.1% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (-0.4% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 (-0.9% delta). These tiny deltas mean the RTX 4000 Ada is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in compute benchmarks.

For rendering workloads, the 20 GB VRAM is the standout feature, allowing large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex 3D scenes to reside entirely in memory. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth supports this capacity, though it is not the highest available. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, while the 192 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like DLSS and denoising. The FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS is suitable for scientific computing and professional visualization.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a professional who needs workstation-grade graphics but does not require a high-end CPU. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking makes it ideal for tasks like 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific visualization, where the 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS are directly applicable. Content creators working with large 4K or 8K footage will benefit from the GPU acceleration, even if the CPU slows down encoding or effects that are CPU-bound.

Gamers at high resolutions (1440p or 4K) will find the RTX 4000 Ada capable of pushing high frame rates, as the GPU is rarely the bottleneck at those resolutions. However, the CPU's 53rd percentile ranking means that at 1080p with low graphics settings, the i3-12100T could limit performance in CPU-intensive titles. This build is less suited for competitive esports players who demand maximum frame rates at 1080p.

Developers working on AI models or simulations will appreciate the 192 tensor cores and 26.73 TFLOPS FP16 performance. The 20 GB VRAM is sufficient for many machine learning models that do not fit in smaller memory pools. Students in engineering or computer graphics programs can use this for coursework, though the CPU may limit compile times for large codebases. Small business workstations for CAD, architectural visualization, or medical imaging would benefit from the GPU's professional capabilities, and the CPU's low power draw makes it suitable for always-on systems.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 1057, single-core 149; Cinebench R20 multi-core 4405, single-core 622; Cinebench R23 multi-core 10490, single-core 1481; Geekbench multi-core 6055, single-core 1957. The average CPU benchmark score is 3277, placing it at the 53rd percentile.

The GPU scores are: Geekbench OpenCL 146593 and Geekbench Vulkan 123842, with an average of 135218, placing it at the 95th percentile.

The combined system percentile is 74, which is closer to the CPU percentile than the GPU percentile, indicating that the CPU drags down the overall score. The GPU's performance is excellent, outperforming its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon PRO V620, by 0.9%, while being essentially tied with the NVIDIA A10M and AMD Radeon PRO W6800. The CPU is tied with the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Intel Xeon E-2374G, but trails the Intel Core i5-11500T by 0.3%.

In practical terms, the GPU is a top-tier performer, while the CPU is an average performer. The data shows that this is not a balanced system; the GPU vastly outclasses the CPU. For workloads that are GPU-accelerated, the system will perform excellently. For CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at a mid-pack level.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking versus all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100T is at the 53rd percentile versus all CPUs, indicating it is a mid-range performer.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation have?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 135218, placing it at the 95th percentile versus all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i3-12100T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though it is dual-channel.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is very low for a desktop processor.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 10490 in multi-core and 1481 in single-core in Cinebench R23.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 74, reflecting the strong GPU but weaker CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The GPU at the 95th percentile vastly outperforms the CPU at the 53rd percentile. This means that in most workloads, the CPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10490 is modest, and any task that uses all 4 cores and 8 threads will be CPU-bound. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance is nearly unmatched, so it will sit idle waiting for the CPU to feed it data in many scenarios.

For gaming, the bottleneck depends on the resolution and settings. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance (1481 in R23) may cap frame rates in games that rely heavily on one or two threads. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the RTX 4000 Ada will be fully utilized. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the percentile difference strongly suggests a CPU bottleneck at lower resolutions.

For productivity tasks, the bottleneck is clear. Video encoding, 3D rendering on the CPU, and software compilation will all be limited by the i3-12100T's 4 cores. However, tasks that are GPU-accelerated, such as GPU rendering, AI inference, and video effects, will perform at the GPU's high level. The 20 GB VRAM allows for massive datasets, but the CPU may struggle to prepare the data fast enough to keep the GPU busy.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU does not support ECC memory. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This platform is compatible with newer 12th-generation and 13th-generation Intel Core processors, so a sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as an i5 or i7, which would alleviate the CPU bottleneck.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU runs at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, so the total system power draw is low, meaning a modest power supply is sufficient. The GPU is single-slot and 245 mm long, requiring a case that can accommodate its length.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-end Alder Lake or Raptor Lake chip, which would improve multi-core performance and reduce the bottleneck. The existing Socket 1700 motherboard would support this, and the DDR4 or DDR5 memory could be retained. Alternatively, adding more memory could help with large datasets, though the CPU's memory bandwidth is not specified.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a low-power, entry-level CPU with a high-end workstation GPU. The Intel Core i3-12100T is a 4-core, 8-thread processor with a 35 W TDP, designed for efficiency. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a professional graphics card with 20 GB of VRAM, 6144 shading units, and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The combined system percentile is 74, indicating a system that is above average overall, but heavily skewed toward graphics performance.

The CPU's 53rd percentile and the GPU's 95th percentile create an unusual tier: the system is a top-tier graphics workstation but a mid-tier general-purpose PC. This is not a balanced gaming build, but rather a specialized tool for tasks that leverage the GPU's massive compute and memory resources. The CPU's low TDP makes it suitable for compact or low-noise systems, while the GPU's single-slot design allows for dense workstation configurations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's 95th percentile ranking and its 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capable of high frame rates in most modern games at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The 20 GB VRAM ensures that even the most demanding textures will fit in memory without stuttering. The 48 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, and the 192 tensor cores can accelerate DLSS, which increases performance.

However, the CPU's 53rd percentile ranking means that at 1080p with low graphics settings, the i3-12100T may become the bottleneck. The 4.10 GHz boost clock helps, but the 4 cores may not be enough for games that use 6 or more threads. At 1440p and above, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, and the system will perform closer to the GPU's potential. In CPU-heavy titles like simulation games or strategy games, expect lower frame rates regardless of resolution. In GPU-heavy titles like first-person shooters or action-adventure games, expect high frame rates at 1440p and 4K. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU may cap frame rates, and a higher-core-count CPU would be needed to unlock the GPU's full potential.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12100T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds