SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

72%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100T

3,277 Benchmark Score

Top 28% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100T is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. With a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, this chip is designed for efficiency-first systems, as reflected in its 35 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part (no overclocking headroom), and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 730.

Benchmark results place this processor at the 53rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3277. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10490 and single-core score of 1481 reveal a processor that performs much better in single-threaded workloads than in heavily threaded ones. The Geekbench scores of 6055 (multi-core) and 1957 (single-core) reinforce this profile. Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core i3-12100T is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 (0% delta) and the Intel Xeon E-2374G (0% delta). The Intel Core i5-11500T is 0.3% faster, and the older Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 trails by 0.4%. This clustering within a fraction of a percent indicates that the i3-12100T sits at a well-established performance level for its class.

For real workloads, the single-core strength of 1481 in Cinebench R23 suggests responsive day-to-day operations and solid performance in lightly threaded applications such as office suites, web browsing, and general productivity. The multi-core score of 10490, while respectable for a 4-core part, will be the limiting factor in rendering, video encoding, and other all-core workloads. The 53rd percentile standing means this CPU outperforms roughly half of all processors in the database, a notable achievement for a low-power, 35 W part. The architecture's efficiency is the key differentiator here—this is a chip that prioritizes thermal headroom and power economy over raw throughput.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core i3-12100T compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516?

A: The two processors have identical average benchmark scores of 3277, representing a 0% performance delta. In practical terms, they are interchangeable in raw compute performance, though the i3-12100T offers higher boost clocks and a different feature set.

Q: What is the significance of the 53rd percentile ranking for this CPU?

A: This percentile indicates that the Core i3-12100T outperforms 53% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. It is a mid-pack performer, not a high-end compute part, but it outpaces a majority of processors, which is notable given its 35 W TDP.

Q: Does the Core i3-12100T support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so the CPU runs at its factory-defined clocks (2.20 GHz base, 4.10 GHz boost) without user adjustment. Performance tuning would be limited to memory and platform settings.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this CPU?

A: The Core i3-12100T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, depending on motherboard selection.

Q: How does the i3-12100T's multi-core score compare to its single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The multi-core score of 10490 is approximately 7.1 times the single-core score of 1481. Given that the chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, the scaling is below the theoretical 8-thread maximum, indicating some efficiency loss in all-core workloads, likely due to the 35 W power limit.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of this processor?

A: The launch MSRP is $122, positioning it as an entry-level desktop part within Intel's 12th Gen lineup.

Q: Which rival CPU is the closest competitor in terms of average score?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2374G matches the i3-12100T with an average score of 3278, a 0% delta. This comparison is purely on synthetic benchmarks, not platform features or power consumption.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing places it at the 56th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms a majority of configurations in the database. The CPU's average benchmark score is 3277, and it holds the 53rd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. On the surface, this looks like a reasonably balanced pairing, but the underlying data reveals a different story.

The RTX 5090 D V2's nearest rivals are instructive. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16508 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415 (0.5% slower), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408 (0.6% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361 (0.9% slower). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, suggesting that the RTX 5090 D V2's measured performance in this specific 3DMark test is firmly in a narrow competitive band. The GPU's percentile rank of 59 means it sits just above the median, which is unexpected for a card with "5090" in its name.

The CPU's benchmark scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Geekbench show a consistent pattern: strong single-thread performance relative to its class, and moderate multi-thread performance. The R15 multi-core score is 1057, single-core 149; R20 multi-core is 4405, single-core 622; R23 multi-core 10490, single-core 1481; Geekbench multi-core 6055, single-core 1957. The average benchmark score of 3277 aggregates these into a single metric, but the dispersion between single-core and multi-core results is what defines this CPU's character. For a 4-core, 8-thread part, the R23 multi-core score of 10490 is respectable, but it pales in comparison to higher-core-count alternatives.

The combined 56th percentile is pulled up by neither component—both CPU and GPU sit in the low-to-mid 50s percentile range. This suggests a system that is competent but unremarkable in synthetic benchmarks. Notably, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. Any gaming frame rate discussions must therefore be treated as estimates derived from the underlying benchmark scores, not from direct game testing.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a complex picture of balance between the Core i3-12100T and the RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU's 53rd percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile are close, but the nature of the workloads matters more than the aggregate percentiles. In CPU-limited scenarios—such as physics simulation, AI logic, or heavily threaded general compute—the i3-12100T's 4 cores and 8 threads will be the constraint. The R23 multi-core score of 10490, while decent, is far below what a high-core-count CPU would deliver, and this will manifest in games or applications that scale beyond 8 threads.

Conversely, in GPU-limited scenarios—high-resolution rendering, ray tracing, or graphically intense gaming—the RTX 5090 D V2's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 suggests it can push substantial frame rates, but only if the CPU can feed it. The 3DMark score's percentile rank of 59 is modest for a GPU with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 21760 shading units, indicating that something is holding it back in this specific test—likely the CPU's single-thread performance or the test's sensitivity to CPU overhead.

The FPS scaling story is incomplete because no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. However, based on the CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 1957 and the GPU's raw compute capabilities, the system will likely exhibit a CPU bottleneck at lower resolutions where frame rates are high, and a more balanced profile at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's 2.20 GHz base clock is conservative, and while the 4.10 GHz boost helps in burst workloads, sustained all-core loads will be throttled by the 35 W TDP. This means that in multi-threaded game scenes or background tasks, the CPU may struggle to maintain peak throughput, capping the GPU's utilization.

The practical bottleneck in this pairing is the CPU. The RTX 5090 D V2 has a 575 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 950 W, indicating it is a power-hungry, high-end component. Pairing it with a 35 W entry-level CPU creates an imbalance: the GPU has vastly more compute headroom than the CPU can feed in most scenarios. In GPU-bound workloads at 4K resolution, the system will perform adequately because the GPU's work per frame is high enough to mask CPU limitations. In CPU-bound scenarios, the i3-12100T will be the ceiling, and the GPU will sit partially idle.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so treat these as directional expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1481 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504, this system should handle esports titles and lighter games at high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread performance is its strongest asset, and games that rely on one or two threads will see reasonable performance. However, the 4-core, 8-thread configuration will limit modern AAA titles that scale across many cores. The R23 multi-core score of 10490 is roughly one-third of what a high-end 16-core CPU might achieve, and frame rates in CPU-intensive scenes will reflect this.

At 1080p, the CPU will be the primary limiter. The RTX 5090 D V2 is capable of extremely high frame rates, but the i3-12100T's boost clock of 4.10 GHz and modest core count will cap performance in many titles. Expect playable frame rates in most games, but with noticeable frame time inconsistencies in scenes with heavy AI or physics. At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU, and at 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, allowing the system to deliver smoother experiences in GPU-bound titles.

The RTX 5090 D V2's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for any current game at maximum settings, but the CPU's ability to maintain minimum frame rates will be tested. Games with large open worlds or complex simulations will show the CPU's limitations more than linear, scripted titles. Overall, this is a system that can game, but it will not deliver the consistent high-refresh experiences that the GPU's specs might suggest, because the CPU cannot always keep up.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core strength (1481 in Cinebench R23) supports high frame rates in lighter titles, but the 4-core limit will cause drops in demanding games. The GPU's 3DMark score of 16504 suggests it can render frames quickly, yet the CPU's 53rd percentile rank caps the system's ability to sustain 144+ FPS in modern AAA titles.

Streaming: This is a weak scenario for the i3-12100T. Streaming while gaming requires multi-threaded headroom for encoding, and the 4-core, 8-thread CPU has limited spare capacity. The R23 multi-core score of 10490 is insufficient for smooth simultaneous gaming and software encoding; a dedicated capture card or GPU-based encoding would be necessary.

Video editing: The 4-core CPU will struggle with timeline scrubbing and export times. The R20 multi-core score of 4405 indicates that multi-threaded rendering tasks will be slow, though the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects and color grading. Expect a lopsided experience: GPU-accelerated tasks are fast, but CPU-bound encoding steps are sluggish.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be bottlenecked by the 4-core, 8-thread configuration. The R15 multi-core score of 1057 and R23 multi-core score of 10490 place this CPU in the lower half of render-capable processors. The GPU can offload some rendering via RTX acceleration, and the 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores are substantial, but any CPU-bound portion of the pipeline will drag.

Software development: Compilation times will be moderate. The single-core score of 1957 in Geekbench handles editing and IDE responsiveness well, but large builds that scale across cores will take longer than on higher-core-count CPUs. The 12 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, but the 35 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost clocks during long compiles.

Student and office work: This is where the i3-12100T shines. The 53rd percentile CPU performance is more than adequate for word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and video conferencing. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides display output without a discrete GPU, and the 35 W TDP keeps cooling requirements minimal. The GPU's presence is overkill for this scenario, but the CPU alone is well-suited to it.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who already own or are committed to a high-end GPU but are working with a constrained CPU budget. The system sits at the 56th combined percentile, which means it outperforms a majority of builds, but the imbalance is clear. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit most, because the GPU's 24 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are well-matched to high-resolution textures, and the CPU bottleneck is less pronounced at higher resolutions. At 1080p or 1440p, the CPU's 53rd percentile will hold back the GPU's 59th percentile, leading to frame rate caps.

Content creators who rely heavily on GPU-accelerated workflows—such as video editors using RTX-accelerated effects or 3D artists using RTX-based rendering—could find this build acceptable, provided their CPU-bound tasks are minimal. The RTX 5090 D V2's 21760 shading units and 170 RT cores provide significant compute power for these workloads. However, creators who frequently export or encode video will be frustrated by the CPU's multi-core limits.

Software developers who work in lightweight editors and run small builds may find the single-core performance sufficient, but those who compile large codebases will need more cores. Students and office workers building a general-purpose machine would be better served by the CPU alone, without the RTX 5090 D V2, as the GPU adds no value to typical productivity tasks. Small business workstations that require GPU compute for specialized tasks—such as data visualization or light AI inference—could leverage this pairing, but the CPU's 4-core limit will be a bottleneck for multi-threaded business applications.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i3-12100T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring no interface bottleneck for the RTX 5090 D V2. The platform's memory flexibility is a strength: builders can choose DDR4 for cost savings or DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the CPU's 35 W TDP and modest core count do not heavily stress memory bandwidth.

The suggested PSU for the RTX 5090 D V2 is 950 W, and the GPU's TDP is 575 W, while the CPU's TDP is 35 W. This leaves substantial power headroom for other components and future upgrades. The 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU is a modern standard, and the dual-slot cooler (304 mm length, 137 mm height, 48 mm width) requires a case with adequate clearance.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Socket 1700 CPU. The platform supports 12th Gen Alder Lake processors, and moving to a 6-core or 8-core part would address the CPU bottleneck without changing the motherboard or memory. The 12 MB L3 cache on the current CPU is modest; a higher-tier 12th Gen chip would offer more cache and more cores, better matching the GPU's capabilities. The 35 W TDP of the current CPU means the cooling solution is likely small; upgrading the CPU would require a corresponding cooler upgrade, but the motherboard and memory would carry over.

PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures that the RTX 5090 D V2 operates at full bandwidth, and future GPUs or NVMe drives using PCIe Gen 5 will also be supported. The platform's DDR5 support allows a memory upgrade path, though the current CPU's dual-channel controller does not benefit from high-end DDR5 kits as much as higher-core-count parts would.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i3-12100T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is an entry-level, low-power 12th Gen part with 4 cores and 8 threads, while the GPU is a top-tier 50-series card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 56 indicates this system outperforms 56% of configurations in the database, placing it in the upper-middle tier overall.

The pairing is defined by its imbalance. The CPU's 53rd percentile rank and the GPU's 59th percentile rank are close numerically, but the GPU's raw specifications—92,200 million transistors, 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, 1.34 TB/s memory bandwidth, 575 W TDP—are in a different class than the CPU's 35 W efficiency-focused design. This is a system where the GPU is the clear centerpiece, and the CPU serves as a budget-conscious companion that will limit the GPU's potential in many workloads.

As a desktop build, it occupies a niche: users who want the RTX 5090 D V2's compute and rendering capabilities but are not yet ready to invest in a high-end CPU. The system will excel in GPU-accelerated tasks and high-resolution gaming, but it will fall short in CPU-intensive scenarios. The overall tier, at the 56th percentile, is respectable but not exceptional, and the GPU's 59th percentile in 3DMark Steel Nomad is a modest showing for a card with this hardware.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU built on TSMC's 5 nm process node, with a die size of 750 mm² and 92,200 million transistors. The memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), and the base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost of 2407 MHz. The GPU has 21760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 raster output units, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores.

The compute throughput is notable: 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), with a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The GPU's TDP is 575 W, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 950 W. It is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504 places this GPU at the 59th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 16504. The nearest rivals are clustered tightly: the NVIDIA T400 is within 0% (score 16508), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is 0.5% slower (16415), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 0.6% slower (16408), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is 0.9% slower (16361). This narrow spread suggests that in this specific benchmark, the RTX 5090 D V2 performs at a level comparable to much less expensive or differently purposed cards.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are excellent for large textures, complex scenes, and high-resolution output. The 170 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 680 tensor cores support AI-based features like DLSS. The FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS is strong for compute-heavy rendering tasks. However, the 59th percentile score indicates that in the Steel Nomad test, the GPU does not dominate as its specifications might suggest, possibly due to driver overhead, thermal limits, or the test's specific workload characteristics. In real-world rendering, the GPU is capable of handling the most demanding workloads, but the benchmark data shows it performs within a tight band around its closest rivals.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12100T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds