SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

81%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100F

13,494 Benchmark Score

Top 19% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a budget-focused 4-core desktop processor with a professional-grade workstation GPU, creating a significant performance imbalance that favors the graphics card in nearly every scenario. The Intel Core i3-12100F is a capable entry-level CPU that holds its own in single-threaded tasks, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a top-tier workstation accelerator designed for compute-heavy workloads. The data indicates a system that can handle demanding GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering and AI inference with ease, but the CPU will likely constrain performance in CPU-bound applications and high-frame-rate gaming. This analysis interprets the benchmark scores, percentile positions, and architectural details from the FACT PACK to provide a clear picture of what this system can and cannot do.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a professional workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated AD102, contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². This is a massive, complex chip designed for maximum compute throughput. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, which is substantial for handling large datasets in professional applications.

The GPU's compute resources are extensive: 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units. For ray tracing, it includes 100 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 400 tensor cores. The raw compute performance is rated at 65.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1) operations. Pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. This hardware configuration is geared toward heavy parallel workloads rather than traditional rasterization, though it excels at both.

In benchmark tests, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 175,286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194,041 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 98% of the hardware in the database. Its average benchmark score is 184,664. Comparing to its nearest rivals, it sits close to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which has an average score of 183,725 (a 0.5% difference), and it is 1.3% ahead of the A100 SXM4 40 GB (score 187,147). It also outperforms the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 1.4% (score 182,109) and the GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7% (score 178,050). For rendering, these scores indicate that the GPU will handle 3D viewport manipulation, ray-traced renders, and GPU-accelerated effects with very high efficiency. The 32 GB VRAM is a key asset for loading large scenes and textures without running out of memory, and the bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 12,800 shading units without stalling.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the benchmark performance difference between the RTX 5000 Ada Generation and the A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184,664, while the A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183,725. This puts the RTX 5000 Ada Generation 0.5% ahead of the A100 SXM4 80 GB in the database's average score metric.

Q: How does the Intel Core i3-12100F's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance?

A: In Cinebench R23, the i3-12100F scores 11,860 in multi-core and 1,674 in single-core. The multi-core score is roughly 7 times higher, reflecting that the 4 cores and 8 threads work well together, though the single-thread score indicates a strong per-core capability for a budget chip.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth, and why does it matter?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This combination is suited for large, complex datasets in professional workloads like 3D rendering and scientific computing, where memory capacity often limits scene complexity.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket type?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has a TDP of 58 W and uses the Intel Socket 1700. This low power draw makes it easy to cool with modest air coolers, and the socket is compatible with a range of 12th Gen motherboards.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's performance compare to the GeForce RTX 4090 D?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's average benchmark score is 184,664, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178,050. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 3.7% higher in average benchmark score than the RTX 4090 D.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: The FACT PACK lists the integrated graphics field as null, indicating the Intel Core i3-12100F does not include integrated graphics. A discrete GPU is required for display output, which is present here in the form of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer for modern games and applications?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with the latest graphics APIs for both gaming and professional software.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture (specifically Alder Lake-S). It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². The chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. It has a TDP of 58 W, making it power-efficient for a desktop part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $97, positioning it as an entry-level product.

Benchmark results show a CPU that performs strongly in single-threaded tasks but has limitations in heavily threaded workloads. In 3DMark, the i3-12100F scores 893 in single-thread, 1,659 in 2-thread, 2,859 in 4-thread, 4,026 in 8-thread, and 4,023 in max-threads. The plateau between 8-thread and max-thread scores (4,026 vs 4,023) indicates that the CPU's 8 threads are fully utilized and adding no further benefit, which is expected for a 4-core/8-thread part. Cinebench scores are 1,195 in R15 multi-core and 168 in single-core; R20 scores are 4,981 multi-core and 703 single-core; R23 scores are 11,860 multi-core and 1,674 single-core. Geekbench scores are 7,252 multi-core and 1,932 single-core.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 13,494, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 3 N355 with a score of 13,492 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-9500 with 13,452 (0.3% delta), the Intel Core 5 120UL with 13,594 (-0.7% delta), and the Intel Core i7-1250U with 13,351 (1.1% delta). This shows the i3-12100F is competitive with older mainstream i5 parts and newer low-power chips, but it is not a high-end processor. For real workloads, the PassMark scores are informative: floating-point math scores 31,977, integer math scores 40,978, data compression scores 160,452, data encryption scores 8,071, and extended instructions score 10,842. The multi-thread score is 14,015, and single-thread is 3,444. These numbers suggest the CPU handles everyday tasks and moderate productivity with ease, but will bottleneck high-end GPUs in CPU-intensive scenarios.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU's Geekbench scores (175,286 OpenCL, 194,041 Vulkan) and its 98th percentile ranking indicate it has raw power comparable to top-tier consumer GPUs like the RTX 4090 D, which it beats by 3.7% in average score. This suggests the RTX 5000 Ada Generation can drive high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most games, provided the CPU can keep up.

However, the Intel Core i3-12100F is a significant limiting factor for gaming. Its single-thread score of 893 in 3DMark and 1,674 in Cinebench R23 single-core are decent for a budget chip, but its 4-core/8-thread configuration will struggle in modern games that utilize more than 4 cores. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive shooters at lower resolutions or open-world games with heavy physics, the CPU is likely to cap frame rates well below what the GPU could deliver. At 1080p, the CPU bottleneck will be more pronounced, potentially holding FPS to the 60-90 range in demanding titles, while at 4K, the GPU's workload becomes more dominant, and FPS may be higher relative to the CPU's limit. These estimates indicate a system that can play games but is not optimized for high-refresh-rate esports or heavily threaded game logic.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This system is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p. The CPU's 4-core/8-thread design, scoring 4,026 in 3DMark 8-thread, will bottleneck the GPU in many titles, limiting frame rates below what a 144Hz monitor can display. The GPU's power (98th percentile) is wasted in this scenario, as the CPU cannot feed it enough data.

Streaming: Streaming demands both CPU and GPU resources. The i3-12100F's PassMark multi-thread score of 14,015 is moderate, but encoding video while gaming will likely cause frame drops or stutter. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's tensor cores could offload encoding, but the CPU's limited threads may still struggle with game logic plus streaming overhead.

Video editing: This is a strong workload for the GPU. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 65.28 TFLOPS and 32 GB VRAM will accelerate effects, rendering, and timeline scrubbing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,860 is adequate for basic editing tasks, but the GPU will carry most of the load for heavy effects.

3D rendering: This is the system's primary strength. The GPU's 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, combined with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, make it an excellent choice for ray-traced renders. The CPU will handle scene setup and physics, but the GPU's 98th percentile performance will dominate render times, making this a very capable workstation.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from multi-core CPUs. The i3-12100F's 4,981 Cinebench R20 multi-core score is modest, meaning large codebases will compile slowly. The GPU is irrelevant for most development, but the system is usable for smaller projects. The CPU's 68th percentile ranking indicates it is below average for this task.

Student and office work: This is a balanced scenario. The CPU's single-thread performance (3,444 in PassMark single-thread) handles web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets with ease. The GPU's power is overkill, but the system will be very responsive. The low 58 W TDP of the CPU means it runs cool and quiet for daily use.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is best suited for professionals in GPU-intensive fields, not gamers. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile ranking and 32 GB VRAM make it ideal for 3D artists, animators, and video editors who work with large, complex scenes. Industries such as architecture, product design, and film production would benefit from the GPU's rendering capabilities, as the 65.28 TFLOPS and 100 RT cores provide high performance for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. Content creators using GPU-accelerated software will see significant speedups.

Gamers targeting 4K resolution with high settings would benefit from the GPU's power, but they would be held back by the CPU. The i3-12100F's 68th percentile ranking means it is a bottleneck for high-refresh gaming, so this is not a recommended build for esports or competitive play. Software developers working on large codebases will find the CPU's 4 cores limiting, as compilation tasks are often multi-threaded; the 4,981 Cinebench R20 multi-core score indicates slow build times. Students and office workers will find the system very capable for everyday tasks, but the GPU is a massive overspend for such use. Small business workstations that require GPU compute for tasks like data analysis or machine learning could justify the cost, given the GPU's tensor cores and high compute throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance balance is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel Core i3-12100F sits in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. This 30-percentile-point gap indicates the CPU will be the limiting factor in most workloads. In gaming, the CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads, scoring 4,026 in 3DMark 8-thread, will cap frame rates, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not fully utilized. The GPU's potential for high FPS, as suggested by its 3.7% lead over the RTX 4090 D, cannot be realized because the CPU cannot process game logic fast enough.

In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, the CPU is the clear bottleneck. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 14,015 is modest, and the 68th percentile ranking shows it is below the median of modern CPUs. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, which is desirable. The CPU's single-thread performance (893 in 3DMark single-thread) is sufficient for basic scene setup, but the GPU handles the heavy lifting. The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the benchmark scores suggest that in GPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform excellently, while in CPU-bound scenarios, it will lag behind systems with stronger processors.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core i3-12100F, an entry-level CPU with a 68th percentile ranking, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a top-tier workstation GPU with a 98th percentile ranking. The combined percentile for this pairing is 83, which suggests that, overall, the system outperforms 83% of all configurations in the database. This is a lopsided build: the GPU is among the best available, while the CPU is a budget part. The combined percentile reflects the GPU's dominance, but it masks the CPU's limitations. This is not a balanced gaming system; it is a professional workstation where the GPU is the primary investment, and the CPU is a cost-saving measure to keep the overall price down. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $97, which is low, while the GPU has no listed launch MSRP, but its market segment is professional, indicating a high price point.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 13,494, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its key scores include 11,860 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1,674 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4,981 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 7,252 in Geekbench multi-core. The GPU's average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286, and its Vulkan score is 194,041. The combined percentile for the system is 83.

The combined picture is one of extreme GPU strength and moderate CPU capability. The GPU outperforms its nearest rival, the A100 SXM4 80 GB, by 0.5% in average score, while the CPU is essentially tied with the Intel Core 3 N355 (0% delta) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-9500 (0.3% delta). The system's overall 83rd percentile ranking is driven almost entirely by the GPU. In any workload that uses the GPU's compute resources, this system will perform at a level comparable to much more expensive professional workstations. In workloads that rely on the CPU, it will perform like a budget desktop. This is a system that prioritizes graphics and compute performance above all else, and it should be built with that singular focus in mind.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12100F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds