SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

81%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100F

13,494 Benchmark Score

Top 19% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing represents a focused desktop build that prioritizes high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p while maintaining respectable performance at higher resolutions. The data indicates a balanced system where the CPU’s four performance cores provide strong single-threaded throughput, while the GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture handles the graphical load. This analysis examines the benchmark results to determine the strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases for this combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a TDP of 58 W. The cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel for both DDR4 and DDR5, and the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Benchmark results show a clear strength in single-threaded workloads. The 3dmark single-thread score of 893 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1674 indicate strong per-core performance for a budget-oriented chip. This translates well to everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications. In multi-threaded benchmarks, the scores scale predictably with its core count: the 3dmark 8-thread score of 4026 is nearly identical to the max-threads score of 4023, confirming that the processor’s 8 threads are fully utilized. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 and Geekbench multicore score of 7252 suggest the processor can handle moderate productivity workloads, though it will not compete with higher-core-count parts.

The processor’s overall average benchmark score is 13494, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 3 N355 with an average score of 13492 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-9500 at 13452 (0.3% ahead), and the Intel Core 5 120UL at 13594 (0.7% behind). This places the 12100F in a competitive position against older mid-range and newer low-power chips. For real workloads, the data implies that this CPU excels in gaming and general responsiveness, while multi-threaded tasks like video rendering will see the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings across three resolutions provides a comprehensive picture of this build’s gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates strong performance in esports titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 408.3 FPS, while Valorant reaches 418.7 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 219 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 182.2 FPS. These results indicate the pairing is well-suited for competitive gaming at high refresh rates.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance is solid but more variable. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 54.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 46.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 25.7 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone performs well at 132 FPS, while Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 66 FPS. These figures suggest that the system can handle demanding games at playable framerates, though some titles may require settings adjustments for smoother gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down as expected. Valorant still achieves 357.7 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 278.4 FPS. Warzone remains smooth at 119.2 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 42.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 36.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system struggles with the most demanding titles—Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.6 FPS—but lighter games like Valorant (285.5 FPS) and CS:GO (167.7 FPS) remain playable. The data shows that this build is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being viable only for less demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a balanced pairing where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU holds its own in single-threaded tasks. The CPU’s 68th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking suggest they are well-matched in overall capability. The combined percentile for this build is 65, indicating a cohesive system.

Evidence of the bottleneck dynamic comes from the FPS scaling across resolutions. In Valorant, the frame rate drops from 418.7 FPS at 1080p to 357.7 FPS at 1440p—a 14.6% reduction—but the CPU’s single-thread score of 893 is sufficient to feed the GPU at these high frame rates. In contrast, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 54.3 FPS at 1080p to 42.1 FPS at 1440p, a 22.5% reduction, suggesting that the GPU is the limiting factor as resolution increases. The CPU’s 4-thread score of 2859 and 8-thread score of 4026 indicate that it can handle the game logic and draw calls, but the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become constraints at higher resolutions.

At 1080p, the CPU can become a bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles. The 3dmark 2-thread score of 1659 and 4-thread score of 2859 are modest, and games that rely heavily on a few threads may see performance limited by the processor. The data suggests that for most games, the GPU is the limiting factor at 1440p and above, while at 1080p, the balance shifts depending on the title’s engine and thread utilization.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh-rate 1080p play and are willing to accept medium-to-high settings in the most demanding AAA titles. The measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant (418.7 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (408.3 FPS) makes it an excellent choice for competitive players who need maximum frame rates. The 1440p performance, with Warzone at 119.2 FPS and most titles above 40 FPS, also suits gamers with 1440p monitors who are willing to compromise on some settings.

Content creators who work with light to moderate workloads will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 and Passmark multithread score of 14015 adequate for tasks like video editing in 1080p or simple 3D rendering. The GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for AI-assisted workflows and rendering in applications that support NVIDIA’s ecosystem. However, the 8 GB VRAM will limit large texture sets or complex scenes.

Software developers and students will benefit from the system’s responsiveness in compilation tasks, given the Passmark integer math score of 40978 and data encryption score of 8071. The single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3dmark single-thread score of 893 and Passmark single-thread score of 3444, ensures snappy code editing and quick build times for smaller projects. For small business workstations, the system handles office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and database work without issue, as indicated by the Passmark data compression score of 160452.

FAQ

Q: Can this build run Cyberpunk 2077 at high settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, the system achieves 54.3 FPS, which is playable. At 2560x1440, it drops to 42.1 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls to 28.9 FPS. For smoother performance at higher resolutions, settings would need to be lowered.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K performance is limited. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the system achieves 100.6 FPS at 3840x2160, but in Cyberpunk 2077 it drops to 28.9 FPS, and in Red Dead Redemption 2 to 26.6 FPS. This build is not recommended for 4K gaming in demanding titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to similar processors?

A: The i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, placing it in the 68th percentile. It is nearly identical to the Intel Core 3 N355 (13492, 0% delta), slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452, 0.3% ahead), and slightly behind the Intel Core 5 120UL (13594, 0.7% behind).

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth supported?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel memory for both DDR4 and DDR5. The specific memory bandwidth is not provided in the data, but the dual-channel configuration is standard for this platform.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i3-12100F does not have integrated graphics. The "F" suffix indicates that a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W, and the suggested power supply is 300 W. The CPU has a TDP of 58 W, so the total system draw is relatively low.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 and the GPU’s compute capabilities suggest it can handle 1080p video editing. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth support hardware acceleration in editing software, though complex 4K projects may strain the system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W, and the suggested power supply is 300 W, leaving headroom for future upgrades. The CPU’s TDP of 58 W means the power delivery requirements are modest.

The upgrade path on the Socket 1700 platform is limited to 12th and 13th generation Core processors, with the 13th generation offering higher core counts and improved performance. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, though the dual-channel configuration is the same for both types. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are currently underutilized by the RTX 4060, which uses PCIe 4.0 x8, but future GPUs could take advantage of the additional bandwidth.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck at higher resolutions. Moving to a more powerful GPU would improve 1440p and 4K performance, but the CPU’s 4-core/8-thread configuration could become a limiting factor in CPU-intensive games. Upgrading the CPU to a higher-core-count 13th-generation part would provide more headroom for multi-threaded workloads and future games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 13494, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 3 N355 with a score of 13492 (0% delta), followed by the Intel Core i5-9500 at 13452 (0.3% ahead). The CPU’s strongest results come from single-threaded tests, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3444 and a 3dmark single-thread score of 893. In multi-threaded tests, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 and Geekbench multicore score of 7252 are respectable for a 4-core part.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17639, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with a score of 17666 (0.2% behind), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (0.5% ahead). The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19545 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 demonstrate solid rasterization and compute performance.

The combined picture shows a system that performs above average in both CPU and GPU terms, with a combined percentile of 65. The pair ranks 1941st out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games, with an average FPS of 121.3. This indicates that the pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming, as the average frame rate exceeds 120 FPS across the tested game suite.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture, and the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a traditional tower form factor.

The overall tier of this build, based on the percentiles, is solidly mid-range. The CPU’s 68th percentile and GPU’s 61st percentile place it above the median for both components. The combined percentile of 65 reflects a balanced system that excels in 1080p gaming and handles 1440p well. The average FPS across games of 121.3 at ultra settings confirms that this is a capable gaming system, though it is not a high-end enthusiast build.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the AD107 chip, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process node. It has 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The base clock is 1830 MHz, with a boost clock of 2460 MHz, and the memory runs at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective).

The GPU’s 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The TDP is 115 W, and the suggested power supply is 300 W.

In benchmark tests, the GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 19545 and a Passmark GPU compute score of 9213. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 95057. For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS and the tensor cores provide acceleration for AI-based tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may limit texture quality in 4K or large 3D scenes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build excels in competitive esports titles, with Valorant hitting 418.7 FPS and CS:GO reaching 408.3 FPS at 1080p. The average FPS across all games is 121.3, making it ideal for 144Hz monitors.

Streaming: The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated encoders, and the CPU’s 8 threads handle streaming overhead. The 3dmark 8-thread score of 4026 suggests adequate processing for encoding while gaming, though the 4-core limit may impact performance in CPU-heavy titles.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 and the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance support 1080p video editing. The 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth enable hardware acceleration in editing software, though 4K projects may be slow.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI denoising. The Passmark GPU compute score of 9213 indicates solid compute performance for moderate rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 40978 and data compression score of 160452 support fast compilation and data processing. The single-thread score of 3444 ensures responsive code editing.

Student and office work: The system handles office productivity, web browsing, and spreadsheet work effortlessly. The CPU’s 68th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 61st percentile ensure smooth multitasking, while the low TDP of both components (58 W CPU, 115 W GPU) means quiet and efficient operation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12100F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds