SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
81%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100F

13,494 Benchmark Score
Top 19% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs a 4-core Intel Core i3-12100F with the flagship-class AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, creating a desktop system where the GPU is the undisputed performance leader. The benchmark data shows a configuration that delivers exceptionally high frame rates in most titles, but also reveals a significant imbalance where the CPU's 4-core/8-thread design limits performance in heavily threaded scenarios. The following analysis breaks down the strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases for this pairing based solely on the provided measurements.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a 5 nm part from TSMC with a massive 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1387 MHz, a boost clock of 2394 MHz, and a game clock of 2025 MHz. Memory runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed across a 320-bit bus, yielding a substantial 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 20 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is a key asset for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The rendering pipeline is robust. With 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs, the card provides raw throughput of 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. The 84 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing workloads, though the data does not include specific RT benchmarks. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

Benchmark scores reflect a strong, though not top-tier, performer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623, while Geekbench Vulkan reaches 71068. Passmark G3D scores 29009, and GPU compute is 16828. The passmark DirectX 11 score of 340 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 110, which is an unusual pattern in the data. The GPU sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, which is 1.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile are 0.5% behind. This places the RX 7900 XT in a competitive mid-to-upper tier, but not at the absolute peak.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data provided is measured, not estimated. The measured FPS at ultra settings shows a wide variance across games and resolutions, highlighting the CPU's influence.

At 1920x1080, the pair excels in esports and lighter titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 605 FPS, Valorant reaches 432.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 325 FPS. Roblox runs at 353.4 FPS, and Minecraft at 270 FPS. Even Counter-Strike 2 manages 274.3 FPS. These numbers indicate a setup capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors in competitive gaming.

However, heavier titles at 1080p show the CPU bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 82.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 73 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to a mere 38.7 FPS. The Medium is particularly low at 55.6 FPS. This pattern suggests that while the GPU is powerful, the 4-core CPU cannot feed it adequately in CPU-intensive scenes.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain playable for most games. Valorant still hits 406.7 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 178.6 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone performs well at 118.7 FPS, and Control at 87.8 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 57.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 55 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 26.7 FPS, making it borderline unplayable at this resolution. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is not linear, with some games losing over 30% of their frame rate, which points to the CPU being a limiting factor in certain titles.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant, but the CPU bottleneck persists. Valorant remains high at 377 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 is at 100.5 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone holds at 99.9 FPS, and Control at 59.4 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 38.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 36 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is nearly unplayable at 11.5 FPS. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 170, with a pair rank of 750 out of 3732 pairs, placing this configuration in the top 20% of all tested pairs.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 10 nm Alder Lake-S desktop part from Intel, with 4 cores and 8 threads. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The TDP is 58 W. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but does not support ECC memory. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The die size is 163 mm². Cache is structured as 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark scores show a CPU that is strong in single-threaded tasks but limited in multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score is 893, while the 2-thread score is 1659, 4-thread is 2859, 8-thread is 4026, and max-threads is 4023. The 16-thread score of 4051 is nearly identical to the 8-thread score, confirming that additional threads beyond 8 provide no benefit. This is expected given the 4-core/8-thread design.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 11860, while single-core scores 1674. Geekbench multicore is 7252, and single-core is 1932. Passmark multithread scores 14015, and single-thread scores 3444. In specific workloads, the CPU shows strengths in data compression (160452) and integer math (40978), but is weak in physics (985) and prime number finding (60). The average benchmark score is 13494, placing it at the 68th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core 3 N355 has an identical average score (13492), with a 0% delta. The Intel Core i5-9500 is 0.3% behind, and the Intel Core 5 120UL is 0.7% ahead. The Intel Core i7-1250U is 1.1% ahead. This indicates the i3-12100F performs comparably to older 6-core parts in synthetic averages, but its real-world multi-threaded capabilities are capped by the physical core count.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly shows a CPU bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's 55th percentile and the CPU's 68th percentile suggest the CPU is relatively stronger in synthetic benchmarks, but the FPS data tells a different story. At 1080p, the CPU is often the limiting factor, as evidenced by the drastic frame rate drops in CPU-heavy games like Ark: Survival Ascended (38.7 FPS) and The Medium (55.6 FPS) compared to esports titles.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K provides further evidence. In Valorant, the drop from 432.4 FPS at 1080p to 406.7 FPS at 1440p to 377 FPS at 4K is minimal, indicating a GPU-bound scenario. In contrast, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 274.3 FPS at 1080p to 178.6 FPS at 1440p to 100.5 FPS at 4K, showing a more significant scaling that still points to GPU limits at higher resolutions. However, in Cyberpunk 2077, the drop from 82.6 FPS at 1080p to 57.9 FPS at 1440p to 38.1 FPS at 4K is steep, suggesting that neither component is fully utilized at 1080p due to the CPU's inability to push more frames.

The Passmark physics score of 985 is particularly low, which is a strong indicator of CPU limitation in physics-heavy games. The CPU's 8-thread score of 4026 being close to the max-thread score of 4023 confirms that the 4-core design is the ceiling. For GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution rendering, the RX 7900 XT can stretch its legs, but the CPU will still hold back minimum frame rates and 1% lows in many scenarios. The pair rank of 750 out of 3732, with an average FPS of 170, shows that this is a capable combination, but the bottleneck is real and measurable.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 13494, placing it at the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 3 N355 with a score of 13492, a 0% delta. The GPU's average benchmark score is 13745, placing it at the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT with a score of 13543, a 1.5% delta (meaning the RX 9070 XT is 1.5% ahead).

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 62. This places the overall system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop configurations. The CPU's 68th percentile is higher than the GPU's 55th percentile, which is unusual in a gaming-focused build. This suggests that while the CPU is a competent part, the GPU is relatively less impressive in its own peer group, possibly due to the inclusion of iGPU-based rivals in the GPU percentile list.

The combined picture is one of a system that is stronger in CPU-bound synthetic tasks than in GPU-bound gaming. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 1674) is excellent, but the GPU's 55th percentile indicates it is not a top-tier performer relative to all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 is solid, but not elite. For a user prioritizing high-refresh esports gaming, the CPU's strength is beneficial. For 4K AAA gaming, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth are the key assets, but the CPU becomes a limiting factor at lower resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7900 XT have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games?

A: The pair achieves an average FPS of 170 across all games and resolutions tested.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile rank among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7900 XT sits at the 55th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i3-12100F does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The CPU scores 11860 in Cinebench R23 multicore.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 899 USD.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize high frame rates in esports and competitive titles at 1080p or 1440p. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 1674) and the GPU's massive bandwidth (800.0 GB/s) make it ideal for games like Valorant (432.4 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike 2 (274.3 FPS at 1080p). Gamers with high-refresh-rate monitors will benefit from the ability to push well over 200 FPS in lighter titles.

Content creators working with 4K video or large 3D scenes will appreciate the 20 GB VRAM, which can hold large textures and assets. The GPU's FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS is substantial for rendering tasks. However, the CPU's 4-core limit will be a bottleneck in multi-threaded rendering engines, making this a less ideal choice for heavy CPU-based workloads like physics simulations or complex compiling. For software developers, the CPU's data compression score of 160452 is useful for build tools, but the core count limits parallel compilation. Students and office workers will find this system overkill for basic tasks, but it provides a smooth experience for any productivity suite.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i3-12100F with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The CPU is a 4-core Alder Lake-S part, while the GPU is a high-end RDNA 3.0 card. The combined percentile of 62 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds. The CPU's 68th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 55th percentile, indicating that the processor is relatively stronger within its own market segment.

The pairing is unconventional, as the GPU is a flagship-level product while the CPU is an entry-level quad-core. This creates a system that is heavily GPU-biased in theory, but the data shows the CPU asserts its influence in many gaming scenarios. The average FPS of 170 across all games is strong, but the variance is high, with some titles exceeding 600 FPS and others falling below 40 FPS. This build is best described as a high-performance gaming rig with a known CPU limitation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory modules. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU's TDP is 58 W, and the GPU's TDP is 300 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

The most sensible next upgrade is to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count part on the same socket, as the motherboard platform can support other 12th-gen CPUs. The RX 7900 XT has a TDP of 300 W, so there is headroom for a more powerful CPU without changing the power supply, as long as the total system draw stays within the 700 W suggested PSU rating. The GPU is end-of-life, so future GPU upgrades will require a new card, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is compatible with newer cards. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the system can be built with either type, but a future CPU upgrade would require matching the memory type already installed.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing excels in esports titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 605 FPS and Valorant reaching 432.4 FPS at 1080p. The CPU's boost clock of 4.30 GHz and strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 1674) support high frame rates, while the GPU's 800.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures textures load quickly. At 1440p, Valorant still hits 406.7 FPS, making this a viable system for 240 Hz monitors.

Streaming: The GPU's hardware encoder is not specified, but the CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads may struggle to handle both gaming and encoding simultaneously. In a game like Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p (133.3 FPS), the CPU overhead from streaming could cause frame drops. The Passmark physics score of 985 suggests limited headroom for simultaneous CPU-intensive tasks.

Video Editing: The 20 GB VRAM is ample for 4K video timelines, and the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and exports. However, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 is modest, so rendering timelines with many CPU-based effects will be slow. The Geekbench multicore score of 7252 confirms this limitation.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 performance is excellent for GPU-accelerated renderers. The RX 7900 XT's 5376 shading units and 84 RT cores provide strong compute throughput. However, the CPU's 4-core design will be a bottleneck in CPU-based renderers, where the 8-thread score of 4026 is far below what a 16-core part would achieve.

Software Development: The CPU's data compression score of 160452 is beneficial for build tools and asset bundling. The 12 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. For compilation, the 4-core limit means parallel builds will be slower than on 8-core or 16-core CPUs, but single-threaded tasks like code analysis will be fast.

Student and Office Work: This system is vastly overpowered for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth are irrelevant for these tasks, and the CPU's 68th percentile is more than sufficient. The system will be silent and cool under light loads, but the cost is unjustified for this use case.