SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

80,762 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395?

A: The CPU features 16 cores and 32 threads, built on the Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process node from TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the memory configuration and bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports LPDDR5X memory through a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-class tasks.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 35,061 points, placing it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 80,762 is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (81,103) and the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81,115), while slightly ahead of the Intel Xeon 638 (80,723) and Intel Xeon w5-2565X (80,671).

Q: What are the GPU's key specifications?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh uses the TU106 chip on the Turing architecture with a 12 nm process. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU includes 1,920 shading units, 30 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The pairing of the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh achieves a combined percentile of 73, placing it above the median for laptop configurations.

Q: What socket and PCIe capabilities does the CPU offer?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The GPU, in contrast, uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface, which may limit data transfer rates between the two components.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a substantial disparity between the CPU and GPU components of this laptop build. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 80,762. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,061 and single-core score of 2,012.5 both reinforce a top-tier processor profile. The Passmark multi-thread score of 51,502 and single-thread score of 4,078 further confirm this positioning.

By contrast, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero in the provided data (no GPU benchmarks are listed). This places the graphics component firmly in the mid-range, a stark contrast to the CPU's near-flagship status. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance, pulling the overall build down from the CPU's lofty position.

The nearest CPU rivals highlight the processor's competitive standing. The Intel Xeon 638 averages 80,723 (a 0% delta), while the Intel Xeon w5-2565X scores 80,671 (0.1% ahead of the Ryzen). On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (81,103) and Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81,115) are both 0.4% ahead. These deltas are within the noise of most benchmark runs, meaning the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 performs essentially on par with four different server and high-end mobile chips.

The Passmark suite offers granular insight into workload strengths. Integer math scores 190,720, floating point math scores 120,533, and extended instructions reach 52,067. Data compression hits 639,356, while encryption manages 32,840. The CPU also handles random string sorting at 70,150 and prime number finding at 284. These figures suggest a processor that excels at parallel integer and floating-point tasks, typical of rendering and compilation workloads.

# CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. Fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process, it represents AMD's latest mobile flagship generation. The base clock of 3.00 GHz can boost to 5.10 GHz, providing a wide dynamic range for both power efficiency and peak performance.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large shared pool benefits multi-threaded workloads that access common data structures. The 55 W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, indicating significant efficiency gains from the 4 nm node.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 5,247 multi-core and 306 single-core. The R23 results show 35,061 multi-core and 2,012.5 single-core. These scores, combined with the 95th percentile ranking, indicate a processor that rivals desktop-class silicon in multi-threaded tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,078 confirms strong per-core performance, crucial for lightly threaded applications.

The memory subsystem is a key differentiator. Quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides exceptional data throughput for a mobile part. This bandwidth advantage directly benefits workloads like video editing and 3D rendering that stream large datasets. ECC support adds reliability for professional use cases where data integrity is paramount.

The integrated Radeon 8060S GPU provides a fallback graphics solution, though the discrete Quadro RTX 3000 will handle demanding graphics tasks. The 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only) offer modern connectivity for NVMe storage and other peripherals, though the GPU's older PCIe 3.0 interface creates a potential bottleneck.

Real-world implications: the CPU can handle multi-threaded compilation, 3D rendering, and video encoding with ease. Its single-thread performance ensures responsive UI and fast application launches. The 55 W TDP allows sustained performance in thin laptop chassis, a significant advantage over higher-TDP mobile workstations.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses the AMD Socket FP11, a mobile-specific socket that is not user-upgradeable in most laptop designs. The CPU is soldered or permanently mounted, meaning the processor itself cannot be swapped for a newer model. This is typical for high-end mobile parts where thermal and power delivery are custom-tuned.

Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X via quad-channel configuration. LPDDR5X is soldered on the motherboard, so memory capacity and speed are fixed at the factory. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed asset; users cannot upgrade memory later. This makes the initial configuration decision critical.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU's 16 Gen 4 lanes. These can be allocated to NVMe SSDs, external GPU enclosures, or other high-bandwidth devices. However, the discrete GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which halves the available bandwidth compared to Gen 4. This limits the GPU's data transfer rate to 8 GT/s per lane, potentially constraining performance in texture-heavy workloads.

The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and lists "None" for power connectors, indicating it draws power entirely from the MXM slot. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP suggest a modest total system draw. Laptop power bricks in the 130–180 W range would comfortably handle this configuration, though no exact figure is provided.

The GPU is marked as "End-of-life" production status, with a successor listed as "Ampere-MW." This means the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is at the end of its availability cycle. Users seeking current-generation graphics should consider alternatives, though the existing GPU remains functional for its intended tasks.

A sensible next upgrade path is limited by the laptop form factor. The CPU and memory are not upgradeable. The GPU is an MXM module, which theoretically allows replacement, but the end-of-life status and PCIe 3.0 interface make future GPU upgrades unattractive. The most practical upgrade is external storage via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe or an external GPU enclosure for additional graphics horsepower. However, the CPU's 16 Gen 4 lanes are shared, so adding devices may reduce bandwidth available to the internal GPU.

# Gaming Performance

The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. As a result, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores, not actual measurements. Treat these as directional guidance, not definitive performance numbers.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck gaming workloads. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with 64 MB of L3 cache provides ample headroom for game logic, physics, and AI. The Passmark physics score of 3,189 indicates strong real-time simulation capability.

The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is the limiting factor. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 1920 shading units, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh targets 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings. At 1440p, users should expect lower frame rates and reduced quality settings. The 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest playable but not exceptional performance.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 2,012.5) and the GPU's 88.32 GPixel/s pixel rate should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding scenes. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, frame rates may fall to 40–60 FPS depending on the game's optimization.

Ray tracing workloads will be modest. The GPU includes 30 RT cores, but the Turing architecture's first-generation ray tracing lacks the efficiency of newer designs. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) enables hardware ray tracing, but expect significant performance penalties compared to rasterized rendering.

The 6 GB VRAM is a constraint for modern titles at high textures. Games requiring more than 6 GB will experience stutters or reduced texture quality. The 192-bit memory bus and 14 Gbps effective speed provide adequate bandwidth for the capacity, but the total VRAM pool is below the 8 GB baseline many current titles assume.

At 1080p, this pairing should handle most games at medium settings with frame rates around 60 FPS. At 1440p, users will need to drop to low or medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU's 50th percentile places it in the middle of the pack for laptops, suitable for casual gaming but not competitive high-refresh experiences.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance for compute-heavy tasks but can accept mid-range graphics. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 95th percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators who render video, compile code, or run simulations. The 35,061 Cinebench R23 multi-core score rivals desktop workstations, enabling faster project turnaround.

Software developers benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads for parallel builds and test suites. The Passmark integer math score of 190,720 indicates robust performance for code compilation and data processing. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code patterns.

Students in engineering or data science fields will appreciate the CPU's capability for MATLAB, Python, and other computational tools. The integrated Radeon 8060S provides backup graphics, while the discrete Quadro RTX 3000 handles CAD and visualization tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running analyses.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, or financial modeling will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance excessive but future-proof. The 55 W TDP enables quiet operation in office environments, while the 32 threads allow concurrent virtual machines or containerized services.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they prioritize CPU-bound titles or plan to use an external GPU. The Quadro RTX 3000's 50th percentile is adequate for 1080p gaming but not the primary selling point. This build is for professionals who occasionally game, not gamers who occasionally work.

The combined percentile of 73 indicates a well-above-average laptop. Users who value CPU performance over GPU performance will find this configuration compelling. Those needing GPU compute for machine learning or 3D rendering should consider alternatives with higher GPU percentiles.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,078 on Passmark ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 50th percentile limits overall FPS. Expect 1080p medium settings to reach 60–100 FPS in competitive titles, with lower results in AAA games. The 88.32 GPixel/s pixel rate helps maintain smooth 2D rendering.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without impacting game performance. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth support multiple concurrent streams. The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Turing architecture, offloads encoding from the CPU, though no specific encoding benchmarks are provided.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,061 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The quad-channel LPDDR5X bandwidth moves large video files efficiently. The 6 GB VRAM on the GPU may limit complex effects or 4K timeline scrubbing, but the CPU can handle most editing workloads.

3D rendering: The Passmark floating-point math score of 120,533 indicates strong geometry and physics processing. The 16 cores with 32 threads provide excellent CPU-based rendering performance in Blender or similar software. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 offers CUDA acceleration, though the 6 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The integer math score of 190,720 and extended instructions score of 52,067 support fast compilation and simulation. The 32 threads allow parallel builds that reduce iteration times. The ECC memory prevents corruption during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance handles spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease. The 55 W TDP allows fanless operation in light loads, creating a quiet study environment. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures smooth multitasking across dozens of open applications.

# Build Overview

This laptop configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, a 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-architecture professional GPU. The build class is "laptop," indicating a mobile workstation form factor.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking places it among the top 5% of all processors, with a 55 W TDP that is remarkably efficient for its core count. The GPU's 50th percentile places it in the median range, a professional-grade card with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 30 RT cores.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects the substantial CPU advantage over the GPU. This is a CPU-first build, where the processor is the star and the graphics card provides adequate but not exceptional visual performance. The 4 nm process node for the CPU and 12 nm for the GPU highlight the generational gap between the two components.

The CPU's release date of January 2025 makes it a current-generation part, while the GPU's May 2019 release and end-of-life status place it several generations behind. This temporal mismatch is the defining characteristic of the build: modern CPU performance paired with legacy GPU capability.

For laptop buyers, this configuration suits workloads that stress the processor more than the graphics card. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache provide a solid foundation for data-intensive tasks, while the 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s GPU bandwidth handle moderate graphics demands.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 sits in the 95th percentile, while the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh occupies the 50th percentile. This 45-percentile gap means the GPU is the clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 2,012.5) far exceeds what the GPU can utilize. A game running at 1080p will likely be GPU-limited, with the CPU idling while the GPU works at full capacity. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests frame rates will be mediocre, regardless of the CPU's headroom.

For compute workloads, the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads dominate. The Passmark multi-thread score of 51,502 indicates the CPU can process data far faster than the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 can render or compute. In 3D rendering, the CPU will finish its portion of the work quickly, then wait for the GPU to rasterize frames.

The memory bandwidth mismatch is notable. The CPU accesses 256.0 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X, while the GPU accesses 336.0 GB/s via its 192-bit GDDR6 bus. The GPU's higher bandwidth partially compensates for its older architecture, but the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface (8 GT/s per lane) limits data transfer from system memory to the GPU.

The 6 GB VRAM is another bottleneck. Modern games and rendering workloads increasingly require 8 GB or more. When VRAM is exhausted, the GPU must swap to system memory, which is slower due to the PCIe 3.0 interface. This can cause stutters and frame drops in demanding scenes.

For a balanced experience, users should focus on CPU-bound tasks like compilation, video encoding, and scientific computing. The GPU will handle light to moderate graphics work, but pushing it to its limits will reveal its age. The combined percentile of 73 accurately reflects this imbalance—above average overall, but far below what the CPU alone could achieve.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing-architecture GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process. The TU106 chip contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die, with a transistor density of 24.3 million per mm². This is a mature design that predates the CPU by several generations.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 945 MHz and boosts to 1380 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed across a 192-bit bus, yielding 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 6 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is adequate for 1080p gaming but limiting for higher resolutions or large textures.

Compute resources include 1,920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output processors. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance reaches 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.60 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These figures place the GPU in the mid-range tier of its generation.

Ray tracing is supported via 30 dedicated RT cores, part of the Turing architecture's first-generation RT implementation. Tensor cores number 240, enabling AI-accelerated features like DLSS, though no specific benchmark scores are provided for these capabilities. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 80 W TDP is modest for a discrete GPU, allowing the MXM module to operate in thinner laptops. The absence of power connectors means the GPU draws power solely from the MXM slot, simplifying installation. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support.

As a professional Quadro card, this GPU targets CAD, scientific visualization, and content creation rather than gaming. The 50th percentile ranking indicates average performance among all GPUs, suitable for entry-level professional work. The end-of-life status with a successor in "Ampere-MW" suggests users should consider that newer architecture for future purchases.

The FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS handles moderate compute tasks, while the 240 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for compatible applications. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for most professional workloads at 1080p, but 4K rendering will exceed the frame buffer. Overall, the GPU is a competent but aging component that complements the CPU's strengths without matching its performance tier.