SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

80,762 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 paired with the AMD Radeon 780M is a high-end mobile computing platform that prioritizes processor throughput over graphics fidelity. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the integrated GPU is a competent but mid-range graphics solution, placing in the 61st percentile. Consequently, this build is best suited for demanding professional workloads, software development, and productivity tasks, rather than high-end gaming. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: the processor is the star, and the graphics solution is adequate for mainstream use but will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the AMD Radeon 780M and the CPU's overall capability. The Radeon 780M's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 33683 indicate that it is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles. Its 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the range of a capable entry-level discrete GPU, but it is not designed for high refresh rates or maximum detail in AAA games.

The GPU's 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32 ROPs provide a baseline for understanding its rasterization throughput. In esports titles, which are typically less graphically demanding, the 780M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 60 FPS with adjusted settings. However, for modern AAA games, the data suggests that users should expect to lower resolution to 1080p and reduce graphical presets to achieve smooth gameplay. The absence of a dedicated memory bus, relying instead on system-shared LPDDR5X memory with a 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, means performance will be sensitive to memory speed and allocation.

Comparing the 780M to its nearest rivals clarifies its position: it sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.2% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.3% behind) in average benchmark scores. This is a surprising data point, but it places the 780M in a performance tier that can handle 1080p gaming competently for many titles. The 12 ray tracing cores offer some hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but given the overall compute power, enabling such features will likely result in significant frame rate drops. In summary, the gaming experience is best described as a solid 1080p-capable platform for mainstream and competitive games, with the understanding that it is not a high-end gaming solution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results are exceptional. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 35061 in multi-core and 2012.5 in single-core tests. The multi-core score places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, demonstrating its prowess in heavily threaded workloads. Its Passmark multithread score of 51502 and floating-point math score of 120533 further corroborate its strength in compute-intensive tasks. For single-threaded performance, a Passmark score of 4078 indicates strong per-core efficiency, which is crucial for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

The GPU's benchmark results are more modest. Its average benchmark score of 17588 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 18602, and in Vulkan, it scores 33683. These scores indicate a GPU that is more than adequate for general graphics acceleration and light gaming but is not in the same league as the CPU. The combined picture is one of a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level to mid-range GPU. The combined percentile for this pairing is 78, reflecting the dominance of the CPU in the overall performance profile.

When comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly contested field. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an average benchmark score of 80762. Its closest competitor, the Intel Xeon 638, scores 80723, a negligible 0% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 81103, placing the 395 just 0.4% behind, and the Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81115, also 0.4% ahead. This indicates that the 395 is directly competitive with top-tier desktop and workstation processors in synthetic benchmarks, a remarkable feat for a 55W mobile part.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation and server environments where data integrity is paramount.

Q: What is the integrated GPU in the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395?

A: The integrated graphics are an AMD Radeon 8060S, which is distinct from the discrete AMD Radeon 780M that is also part of this build configuration.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and its closest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an average benchmark score of 80762, which is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 638 at 80723 (0% difference) and within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the platform have?

A: The platform supports Quad-channel LPDDR5X memory, providing a total memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the graphics performance percentile of the Radeon 780M?

A: The Radeon 780M ranks in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17588.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the CPU is not designed for manual overclocking.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, which is notably low for a 16-core, 32-thread processor and contributes to its suitability for mobile workstations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is built for the AMD Socket FP11, a mobile platform. The CPU supports Quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and includes ECC support. For storage and expansion, it provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are the Radeon 8060S, and the platform is designed as a high-performance mobile solution.

For the Radeon 780M, the upgrade path is straightforward but limited by the laptop form factor. The GPU's TDP is listed as 15 W, and it uses system-shared memory, so there is no discrete VRAM to upgrade. The suggested PSU is null, which is typical for an integrated graphics solution that draws power from the motherboard. In a laptop build, the primary upgrade path is not the GPU but the system memory, which directly impacts the iGPU's performance due to the shared memory architecture.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to maximize the amount and speed of the LPDDR5X memory, as this will directly benefit both the CPU and the integrated Radeon 780M. Since the CPU's memory bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s, populating all Quad-channel slots ensures the iGPU has sufficient bandwidth for its operations. Beyond memory, the platform is a closed system typical of mobile workstations, meaning the CPU and GPU are not user-upgradeable. The 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes can accommodate a fast NVMe SSD, which would improve load times and overall system responsiveness.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not the target use case for this platform. The Radeon 780M's 61st percentile ranking and its proximity to the AMD Radeon Pro 560 in benchmarks indicate that it cannot sustain high frame rates at high refresh rates in modern titles. Users seeking 144Hz or higher gaming experiences will need a discrete GPU.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, along with its 95th percentile ranking, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 639356 suggests strong performance for encoding tasks. However, the GPU will limit the game's visual settings, which may reduce stream quality.

Video Editing: The platform excels here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061 and the Passmark multithread score of 51502 will handle 4K video editing timelines and rendering tasks with ease. The high memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is beneficial for scrubbing and previewing high-resolution footage. The GPU can accelerate effects, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU's multi-core performance is exceptional for CPU-based rendering. The Passmark floating-point math score of 120533 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle complex 3D calculations. The Radeon 780M can offer some GPU acceleration in compatible renderers, but its 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest compared to dedicated rendering GPUs.

Software Development: This is a prime scenario for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. The high single-core Passmark score of 4078 ensures fast compilation of individual files, while the massive multi-core throughput will significantly reduce full-build times. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases and virtualized environments.

Student and Office Work: The platform is overwhelmingly overqualified for basic office tasks. The 55W TDP and integrated graphics ensure efficient power consumption for a mobile workstation, and the CPU's single-core performance provides a snappy experience for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis. The main limitation is the lack of a robust discrete GPU for any graphics-heavy academic or office applications.

Who Should Build It

This build is designed for professionals and power users who require extreme multi-core CPU performance in a mobile form factor. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 95th percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for developers compiling large codebases, engineers running complex simulations, and video editors rendering high-resolution projects. The 55W TDP makes it suitable for high-performance laptops where thermal management is a priority.

Content creators working with 4K or 8K video will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061, which directly translates to faster export times. Software developers, particularly those working with large codebases, will see significant reductions in build times thanks to the 32 threads and high Passmark multithread score of 51502. The ECC memory support is a critical selling point for small business workstations and researchers who need to ensure data integrity over long compute sessions.

For gamers, this build is only suitable for those who play less demanding or competitive titles at 1080p. The Radeon 780M is comparable to an entry-level discrete GPU, placing it in the 61st percentile. Users targeting high refresh rates or high-detail settings in AAA games should look elsewhere. For students, this is an over-specification for standard academic work, but it provides a future-proof platform for engineering or computer science coursework that involves heavy computation, provided the software can leverage the CPU rather than requiring a powerful GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports Quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with ECC, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

This CPU is a compute powerhouse. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061 places it in the 95th percentile, meaning it outperforms 95% of all CPUs in the database. This score is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, a high-end mobile gaming CPU, and essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 638. For single-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 score of 2012.5 and Passmark score of 4078 indicate excellent per-core performance, thanks to the high 5.10 GHz boost clock and modern Zen 5 architecture.

In real-world workloads, the benchmark scores translate to exceptional performance in multi-threaded applications. The Passmark integer math score of 190720 and floating-point math score of 120533 demonstrate the CPU's ability to handle both general-purpose and scientific computing tasks. The data compression score of 639356 is particularly high, indicating strong performance in file archiving and data processing. The 64 MB of L3 cache is a significant asset for workloads that require frequent data access, such as database operations and virtualization. The CPU's 55W TDP is remarkably efficient for this level of performance, making it a standout choice for mobile workstations.

Build Overview

This build pairs the flagship AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 mobile CPU with the AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU. The build class is explicitly listed as "laptop," confirming this is a mobile platform. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range integrated solution, ranking in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile for this pair is 78, reflecting a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance.

The Radeon 780M is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, with 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It operates at a boost clock of 2900 MHz and provides 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. It is an integrated GPU with system-shared memory, meaning its performance is dependent on the system's LPDDR5X memory speed and bandwidth. Its benchmark scores, including a Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602, place it in the same performance tier as the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, based on average score comparisons.

Overall, this is a workstation-class mobile platform. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking makes it one of the most powerful mobile processors available, suitable for demanding professional workloads. The GPU, while competent for a mobile iGPU, is the weaker link in the pairing. This build is not designed for high-end gaming but rather for users who prioritize CPU compute power for tasks like software development, 3D rendering, and video editing, with the GPU serving as a capable tool for general graphics and light gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this build is clearly lopsided in favor of the CPU. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile ranking creates a significant gap in capability. The data indicates that the CPU will bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios; the CPU can generate frames far faster than the Radeon 780M can render them. This means that in CPU-bound games, the frame rate will be limited by the GPU's rendering capabilities, not the CPU's processing speed.

Conversely, in professional workloads that rely on multi-core processing, the GPU is not a bottleneck. For tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering that are CPU-intensive, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 will operate at its full potential, and the GPU's lower performance will have minimal impact. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU only when the workload is graphics-heavy, such as in gaming or GPU-accelerated effects.

Evidence for this dynamic is seen in the benchmark scores. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 51502 is among the highest in the database, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 is modest. In a balanced system, these scores would be closer in percentile. The FPS scaling in games would show that at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU has ample headroom, but as resolution and detail increase, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, causing frame rates to drop. For this build, the sensible approach is to accept the GPU's limitations and configure games for 1080p, where the 780M can deliver playable performance, rather than expecting high-fidelity 1440p or 4K gaming.