SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh represents a laptop configuration that sits at the 72nd percentile overall among all recorded system pairings. This places the combination firmly in the upper-middle tier of mobile computing performance, though the two components occupy very different positions within their respective categories.

The CPU is the standout performer in this pairing. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 achieves an average benchmark score of 63,765, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs tested. This is a remarkable position for a mobile processor, placing it in the top 7% of all processors in the database. The nearest rival comparisons show just how tightly contested this space is: the Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051, a mere 0.4% ahead, while the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, only 0.7% ahead. Conversely, the Ryzen AI 7 450G trails by 0.7% at 63,331, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX comes in 0.9% behind at 63,173. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is trading blows with desktop-class flagship processors from both AMD and Intel.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828 demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability. The single-core score of 1,976 in the same test shows competitive single-threaded performance that will handle everyday responsiveness well. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3,918 in multicore and 303 in single-core, consistent with the newer results.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The multithread score of 42,912 reinforces the multi-core strength, while the single-thread score of 3,967 shows solid per-core efficiency. Floating-point math scores 94,666, integer math reaches 148,508, and extended instructions hit 40,888. Data compression scores an impressive 506,170, while data encryption achieves 26,027. Prime number finding scores 323, random string sorting reaches 55,248, and physics processing scores 2,773.

The GPU presents a starkly different picture. The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh sits at exactly the 50th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it is precisely average in the distribution. It has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and no nearest rival comparisons, making its relative position harder to contextualize. The combined package therefore leans heavily on the CPU's strength while the GPU provides mid-pack graphics capability.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the 93rd-percentile CPU and 50th-percentile GPU creates a clear bottleneck structure. In CPU-bound workloads, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 will push through tasks with exceptional speed, rivaling desktop flagship processors. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828 and PassMark multithread score of 42,912 indicate that compute-heavy applications will rarely be constrained by the processor.

However, in graphics-intensive scenarios, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh becomes the limiting factor. With its mid-pack percentile position, it cannot match the relative performance ceiling of the CPU. The GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are respectable but not class-leading figures, especially when paired with a CPU that outperforms the i9-13900KS by 0.4% and matches the EPYC 7343 within 0.7%.

The memory architecture of the CPU partially mitigates this imbalance. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a mobile processor. This feeds the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads effectively, but the GPU has its own dedicated 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, so the two components do not contend for the same memory resources.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck will almost always be the GPU. The CPU's 93rd-percentile standing means it can feed frames to the GPU far faster than the GPU can render them in most titles. This is not necessarily a negative configuration — it means the system has headroom for future GPU upgrades or for tasks that are purely CPU-bound, such as compilation or data processing. For users who primarily game, though, the GPU will cap performance well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104B chip, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process. This is a professional-grade mobile GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The chip contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0 million per square millimeter.

The GPU's clock speeds are modest by current standards: a base clock of 1035 MHz and a boost clock of 1530 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The compute configuration includes 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. For accelerated workloads, it offers 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI inference respectively.

The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 9.400 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 18.80 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics APIs. It draws up to 110 W and connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, with display outputs described as "Portable Device Dependent."

The 50th-percentile ranking means this GPU is exactly average in the database. In rendering workloads, the 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will handle professional 3D applications competently, though not spectacularly. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for mobile and will accommodate large textures and complex scenes without memory swapping. The 384 tensor cores provide acceleration for AI-assisted rendering features, while the 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the Turing implementation is older and slower than newer architectures.

The 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for the GPU's compute throughput, and the 256-bit bus width provides balanced memory access. For a professional mobile GPU, this represents a capable configuration that will handle moderate rendering workloads, though it will not compete with the higher-tier GPUs in the database.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the database. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate discussions must be considered estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 50th-percentile position and FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, most titles would run at playable frame rates, likely in the 40-60 FPS range for demanding games and higher for esports titles.

At 1440p, the GPU's mid-pack standing means frame rates would drop further, with AAA games potentially falling below 60 FPS on ultra settings. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for 1440p textures, so memory capacity is unlikely to be the limiting factor — raw compute throughput will be. The 48 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the Turing implementation is the first generation of RT hardware, and enabling ray tracing at 1440p would significantly impact performance.

At 4K, the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most modern titles at ultra settings. The 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is simply insufficient for the pixel throughput required at 4K with high detail levels. Users would need to reduce settings to medium or lower, or use upscaling technologies, to achieve acceptable performance at 4K.

The CPU's exceptional performance — 93rd percentile, with a PassMark multithread score of 42,912 — ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, with no CPU-induced stuttering. The 12 cores and 24 threads of the Zen 5 architecture are more than sufficient for modern game engines that can utilize six to eight cores. The single-thread score of 3,967 in PassMark indicates strong per-core performance that will handle game logic and physics threads efficiently.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The 50th-percentile GPU cannot consistently deliver the frame rates needed for high-refresh displays at 1440p or above. At 1080p, esports titles may approach 144 FPS in lighter games, but demanding AAA titles will fall short. The CPU will never be the bottleneck.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread CPU with a 93rd-percentile ranking provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The CUDA cores in the GPU can also offload encoding tasks, and the 384 tensor cores offer AI acceleration for stream enhancement features.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828 and PassMark multithread score of 42,912 will handle timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance will accelerate effects and color grading, though not at the level of higher-tier GPUs.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong given the processor's performance. GPU-accelerated rendering with CUDA will be moderate — the 9.400 TFLOPS is workable for previews and light production renders, but heavy final-frame renders will be slow compared to higher-end GPUs.

Software Development: The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, will accelerate compilation and test execution. The 93rd-percentile CPU ranking means build times will be competitive with desktop-class systems.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is substantially overpowered for typical student and office workloads. Document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing will be instant, with the CPU barely breaking a sweat. The 16 GB GPU memory is irrelevant for these tasks but does not hurt.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU performance in a laptop form factor and are willing to accept mid-pack GPU performance. The 93rd-percentile CPU makes this system ideal for developers who compile large codebases, researchers running computational workloads, and professionals who work with data-heavy applications. The PassMark data compression score of 506,170 and integer math score of 148,508 indicate strong performance in data processing tasks.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound workflows — such as video encoding, 3D scene preparation, or software development — will benefit from the processor's capabilities. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is useful for loading large models or textures in creative applications, even if the compute throughput is not top-tier.

Gamers at 1080p will find this system adequate, particularly for esports titles where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,967 in PassMark single-thread) ensures high minimum frame rates. However, gamers seeking 1440p or 4K high-refresh experiences should look elsewhere, as the 50th-percentile GPU will be the limiting factor.

Students in STEM fields — particularly those studying computer science, engineering, or data science — will find the CPU performance valuable for coursework involving compilation, simulation, and data analysis. The laptop form factor with a 55 W TDP CPU means this is a portable workstation, though the GPU's 110 W TDP contributes to overall system power draw.

Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications — accounting software with heavy batch processing, database operations, or engineering tools — will perform exceptionally well. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means these workloads will complete faster than on the vast majority of systems.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The AMD processor scores 63,765 on average, which is only 0.4% behind the i9-13900KS's 64,051. This places the two processors within statistical noise of each other, meaning real-world performance will be nearly identical.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, placing it exactly in the middle of the performance distribution.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU have?

A: The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What architecture does the GPU use?

A: The GPU is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104B chip, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 48 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, along with 384 tensor cores for AI workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this system?

A: The CPU+GPU pairing ranks at the 72nd percentile overall among all recorded system combinations.

Q: Is measured gaming FPS data available for this configuration?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance figures must be considered estimates based on benchmark scores.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process node, while the GPU is a professional Turing-architecture mobile graphics solution with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The overall system ranks at the 72nd percentile among all recorded pairings, placing it in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations. This ranking obscures a significant split: the CPU is exceptional at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is merely average at the 50th percentile. The system is therefore best characterized as a CPU-dominated laptop that excels in processor-intensive workloads while providing competent, though not outstanding, graphics performance.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename, representing AMD's latest mobile processor generation. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node, which contributes to its 55 W TDP — a reasonable power envelope for a 12-core mobile processor. The CPU features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not supported.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing memory latency and improving performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The memory controller supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory, making this suitable for professional and scientific computing where data integrity is critical.

The CPU's 93rd-percentile ranking is its defining characteristic. With an average benchmark score of 63,765, it outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G by 0.7% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.9%, while trailing the Intel Core i9-13900KS by 0.4% and the AMD EPYC 7343 by 0.7%. These rival comparisons span desktop enthusiast processors and server-class chips, demonstrating that this mobile CPU delivers desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor.

The integrated Radeon 8050S GPU provides a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is not in use, though the primary graphics workload will run on the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, providing adequate bandwidth for the discrete GPU and peripherals.

In real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828 indicates strong multi-threaded performance for rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. The single-core score of 1,976 ensures responsive everyday use. PassMark results confirm this pattern: multithread at 42,912 and single-thread at 3,967 both reflect a processor that handles parallel and sequential workloads with equal competence. The floating-point math score of 94,666 and integer math of 148,508 show balanced compute capabilities across different instruction types.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds