SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a laptop configuration that presents a stark contrast in generational capability. The data shows a processor with top-tier multi-threaded performance sitting alongside a GPU that is now several generations old, creating a system whose overall character is defined by this imbalance. The CPU is a modern powerhouse, while the GPU is a legacy professional part; benchmark results indicate that the workload dictates which component becomes the limiting factor, and for most demanding graphical tasks, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance ceiling of this build is heavily constrained by the GPU in graphics-intensive scenarios, while the CPU exhibits exceptional headroom that will rarely be fully utilized in gaming. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 63765 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier processing capability. In contrast, the GPU’s percentile rank is a middling 50th percentile. This significant gap suggests that in gaming and 3D rendering, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh will almost certainly be the limiting factor, preventing the system from achieving the high frame rates that the CPU could otherwise support.

The CPU’s multi-threaded might is evident in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828, a figure that rivals desktop-class processors. This level of performance means that for CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or complex data analysis, the processor will not be a bottleneck. However, the GPU’s 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6 GB of VRAM are modest by modern standards, suggesting that any workload leveraging the GPU will hit a performance wall well before the CPU is challenged.

The data indicates a system where the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU is the limiting factor for visual and parallel compute tasks. For a user primarily engaged in productivity, the balance is favorable, as the CPU will accelerate most tasks. However, for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system’s overall performance will be dictated by the Quadro GPU, and the CPU’s potential will remain largely untapped. This is a classic example of a bottleneck where the processor’s capabilities far outstrip the graphics subsystem’s ability to keep pace in real-time graphics workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 delivers exceptional processor performance, with an average benchmark score of 63765 and a percentile rank of 93 among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828 is a strong indicator of heavy multi-threaded lifting, while the single-core score of 1976 ensures responsive day-to-day operation. The processor’s Passmark multithread score of 42912 and integer math score of 148508 further confirm its prowess in parallel processing tasks. Data-heavy operations also benefit, as shown by the Passmark data compression score of 506170 and encryption score of 26027.

Comparing against its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-13900KS, with a negligible performance delta of -0.4%. It also slightly edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G by 0.7% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.9%. This places the CPU in elite company, performing on par with some of the best desktop processors available. The single-thread performance, measured at a Passmark single_thread score of 3967, is competitive and indicates strong per-core efficiency, which is crucial for legacy software and lightly-threaded applications.

The GPU portion of the equation is less impressive. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh holds a 50th percentile rank among all GPUs and has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no standardized benchmark data was available for this specific part. Its FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS is a modest figure, suggesting that its compute capabilities are not on par with modern gaming or workstation GPUs. The combined picture is a system with a top-10% CPU paired with a mid-pack GPU, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 72. This indicates a system that is excellent for CPU-intensive tasks but only average for graphics-intensive applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a professional mobile GPU based on the Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The GPU is equipped with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-enhanced features, though the performance of these first-generation RT cores is limited compared to newer designs. The chip, TU106, contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die.

Memory configuration is a critical limitation. The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. While this was adequate for professional tasks at its launch, the memory capacity is now a significant constraint for modern workloads, especially high-resolution texture sets and complex 3D scenes. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. This configuration is a clear bottleneck for rendering and other VRAM-intensive tasks.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are defined by its 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.60 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1). These figures are modest, indicating that the GPU will struggle with modern, demanding rendering workloads. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. While the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, its raw computational throughput is a limiting factor. This is a workstation part designed for professional applications like CAD and ISV certifications, but its age is reflected in its performance metrics. Its TDP is rated at 80 W, and it uses an MXM Module slot width.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an average benchmark score of 63765, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900KS, 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics in the form of a Radeon 8050S.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Is the GPU capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is equipped with 30 RT cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU pairing is 72, indicating a system that is above average but not top-tier overall.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory via a quad-channel interface, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. Manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, this CPU is designed for high-performance laptops. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The processor supports ECC memory and is fitted for the AMD Socket FP11.

The benchmark data reveals a CPU with exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828 places it in the top tier of processors, rivaling desktop parts. This is corroborated by its Passmark multithread score of 42912 and its performance in specific workloads like floating-point math, where it scores 94666, and integer math, where it scores 148508. The Passmark data compression score of 506170 and encryption score of 26027 further highlight its strength in data-intensive tasks. Its percentile rank of 93 among all CPUs confirms its elite status.

Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1976 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3967. This ensures snappy performance in everyday applications and games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The processor’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that frequently access the same data. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 63765 is within 1% of the Intel Core i9-13900KS, demonstrating that this mobile chip can match a top-tier desktop processor in overall performance. This makes the CPU an outstanding foundation for a workstation laptop, but its potential is often left unrealized in this specific build due to the GPU's limitations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not an ideal scenario for this build. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, with its 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6 GB of VRAM, is the limiting factor. The CPU is more than capable of feeding frames, but the GPU will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles, making high-refresh gaming a poor fit.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828, are excellent for software encoding. The GPU's NVENC encoder is absent, so the CPU would handle the encoding workload, which it can do without major performance hits. This is a viable scenario, though the gaming experience itself may be limited by the GPU.

Video Editing: The CPU will excel in video editing, as its Passmark multithread score of 42912 and data compression score of 506170 are ideal for handling large video files and effects. However, the GPU’s limited 6 GB of VRAM and 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance may slow down GPU-accelerated effects and rendering timelines. The system is capable, but the GPU is a bottleneck for complex projects.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed bag. The CPU will render scenes quickly in CPU-based render engines, evidenced by its top-tier Cinebench scores. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh’s modest compute power and 6 GB of VRAM will be a significant constraint, leading to longer render times and potential out-of-memory errors on complex scenes.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390’s 12 cores and 24 threads are perfect for compiling large codebases, and its high single-thread score of 3967 ensures fast, responsive compilation times for smaller projects. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a highly effective workstation.

Student and Office Work: This is a massive overkill for this scenario. The CPU’s 93rd percentile performance is wasted on word processing and spreadsheets. The system’s battery life would likely suffer due to the powerful components, but performance for these tasks would be flawless. The GPU provides no benefit here, making this a costly and inefficient choice for basic productivity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the benchmark database. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual component scores. The gaming potential of this system is dictated almost entirely by the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. With a 50th percentile rank and 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, this GPU is positioned as a mid-range part by modern standards. Its 6 GB of VRAM is also a concern for modern games at high settings.

The CPU’s performance is not a limiting factor for gaming. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828 and a single-core score of 1976, it can easily handle game logic and physics. The bottleneck will be the GPU’s ability to render frames. For esports titles and older games, the system will perform adequately, but for demanding AAA titles at 1080p with high settings, the frame rates are expected to be modest. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be severely challenged, and the 6 GB VRAM buffer may be exceeded, causing stuttering. The overall gaming experience is expected to be limited to 1080p medium to high settings, with lower frame rates than a modern gaming laptop would provide.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build featuring a pairing of an AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 processor and an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh graphics card. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with a 93rd percentile ranking, while the GPU is a legacy professional part with a 50th percentile ranking. The combined percentile for this build is 72, indicating it sits above the average desktop or laptop configuration but far from the top tier.

The system is a unique hybrid: a modern, ultra-powerful CPU paired with an older, professional-grade GPU. This suggests it is designed as a mobile workstation where CPU-heavy tasks like software development, data analysis, and CPU-based rendering are the priority, while GPU acceleration is a secondary, less critical feature. The CPU’s performance is comparable to the Intel Core i9-13900KS, making it a top-tier processing platform. However, the GPU’s age prevents this from being a top-tier general-purpose or gaming machine. The build’s overall tier is defined by its CPU strength, making it a specialist tool for specific workloads rather than a balanced performer.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is targeted at professionals and power users whose primary workloads are heavily reliant on CPU performance. Software developers will find the 12-core, 24-thread Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 to be an exceptional tool, as its high Passmark multithread score of 42912 will dramatically reduce compilation times. Data scientists and analysts working with large datasets will benefit from the CPU’s strong data compression score of 506170 and floating-point math score of 94666. Video editors working with CPU-based codecs will also see excellent performance, though they will be limited by the GPU for effects.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data-heavy fields would also benefit from the CPU’s power, though it is more than they would likely need. Small business workstations that run complex simulations, financial modeling, or heavy multitasking would be well-served by the CPU’s capabilities. However, gamers or 3D artists expecting high-end graphics performance will be disappointed. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is not suited for modern gaming at high settings, and its 6 GB of VRAM is insufficient for professional 3D rendering. This build is for users who need a mobile supercomputer for the CPU and are willing to accept a modest GPU for basic display and light acceleration tasks. It is a specialist tool for compute-intensive, non-graphical workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds