SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

43,326 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration, sitting at the 78th percentile for combined performance among all builds. The CPU, a Zen 5 Strix Halo part, is a powerhouse for multi-threaded work, while the GPU is a capable Ada Lovelace chip that competes with desktop-class graphics cards from the previous generation. This analysis relies strictly on the benchmark data available; no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming and real-time performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the synthetic scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool. This configuration is designed for workloads that scale with core count, as evidenced by its Cinebench results.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong sustained performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28424 places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors. For context, its average benchmark score of 43326 puts it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 43431 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 43210 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 43689 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scores 43704 (0.9% higher). This indicates the 385 is essentially performance-parity with these competing high-end mobile parts, with the differences falling within noise margins.

Single-thread performance is equally robust. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4012 reflects strong IPC (instructions per clock) from the Zen 5 architecture. This is corroborated by the PassMark single-thread score of 3995 and the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1685. For real-world workloads, this means snappy application responsiveness and strong performance in lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software that cannot leverage multiple cores.

The data also reveals specific computational strengths. The PassMark integer math score of 105056 and floating-point math score of 69580 indicate strong general-purpose arithmetic capabilities. More specialized tasks show high throughput: data encryption scores 18978, extended instructions (SIMD) score 31442, and random string sorting scores 40784. The data compression score of 379448 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance for file archiving, compression tools, and database workloads. However, the find prime numbers score of 157 is notably lower, indicating that this processor is not optimized for that specific type of integer bottleneck.

For power efficiency, the TDP is rated at 55 W, which is modest for an 8-core Zen 5 part. This suggests the laptop can maintain high performance without an extreme cooling solution, though sustained all-core loads will still require adequate thermal management. The memory support is LPDDR5X across a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth—a critical factor for the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics and for CPU tasks that are memory-bandwidth sensitive.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The AD107 chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. Crucially, it includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This matches the CPU's system memory bandwidth, which is an interesting balance point; it ensures the GPU is not starved for data when accessing textures and geometry. The memory clock is listed at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective throughput. The GPU clock speeds are 1545 MHz base and 1890 MHz boost.

Compute performance is substantial for a mobile part. The FP32 throughput is 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 90.72 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 181.4 GTexel/s. These figures translate to strong performance in rasterization and compute shaders. The GPU's average benchmark score is 22729, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are interesting: the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22549 (0.8% lower), the Intel Arc B580 scores 23021 (1.3% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435 (1.3% lower). This places the RTX 4060 Mobile roughly on par with a desktop RTX 2080, which is a remarkable achievement for a laptop GPU.

Specific benchmark results show the GPU's capabilities across different API levels. PassMark G3D score is 17469, which is the primary gaming-oriented metric. The DirectX 12 score of 73 and DirectX 11 score of 157 are lower-level API tests that indicate driver overhead and raw draw call throughput. The Vulkan score via Geekbench is 89569, and OpenCL is 89420, both indicating strong compute capabilities for non-gaming tasks. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6816 is a more sustained compute test. The G2D score of 730 is modest, but that is expected for a discrete GPU focused on 3D rendering.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest game engines and graphics APIs. Power consumption is rated at 115 W TDP, which is typical for a high-performance mobile GPU. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the GPU's memory bandwidth needs. The 8 GB VRAM is a current-generation sweet spot for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though it may become a limiting factor for 4K textures or heavy AI workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU combination presents an interesting balance. The CPU scores at the 88th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile. This asymmetry means the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, or heavily-threaded physics simulations, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 will be the primary driver. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28424 and PassMark multithread score of 32075 indicate it can feed even a fast GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

Conversely, the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming and 3D rendering scenarios. The RTX 4060 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 17469 is respectable, but it is significantly below the CPU's percentile standing. In a game that is GPU-bound, the CPU will have spare capacity. This is not inherently a problem—it means the system will perform consistently without stutters caused by CPU limitations, but it also means the GPU will reach its limits first.

The memory configuration is a key balancing factor. Both the CPU and GPU have access to 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For the CPU, this is system memory (LPDDR5X); for the GPU, this is dedicated VRAM (GDDR6). Having matching bandwidth ensures that neither component is starved for data when the other is heavily loaded. This is particularly important for the GPU, as it cannot borrow system memory bandwidth without a significant performance penalty.

Given the absence of measured FPS data, we must estimate gaming performance. The GPU's score relative to the RTX 2080 suggests that at 1080p, this system should handle most titles at high settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4012 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame times will be consistent, avoiding the micro-stutters that plague weaker processors. However, at higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and raw compute will be the limiting factor, making the CPU's headroom irrelevant in most scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The GPU's performance is on par with a desktop RTX 2080, which is more than capable of driving 144Hz displays in most competitive titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 4012 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal frame time variance. At 1440p, expect to dial back settings to high rather than ultra to maintain frame rates above 100 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with the GPU's NVENC encoder (included in the Ada Lovelace architecture), make this a capable streaming machine. The PassMark multithread score of 32075 indicates the CPU can handle game encoding alongside streaming overhead without significant frame drops. The 55 W TDP means sustained streaming sessions should not cause thermal throttling if the laptop has a decent cooling solution.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 28424) and the GPU's compute capabilities (OpenCL 89420) make this a fast video editing platform. Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering will be smooth, and export times will be competitive with desktop systems. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing timelines, though heavy effects stacks may require more.

3D rendering: The GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 24 RT cores will accelerate renderers that support CUDA or OptiX. The CPU's high integer math score (105056) also helps with CPU-based rendering. For Blender or similar software, expect render times that are significantly faster than integrated graphics laptops, though a desktop RTX 4080 or better would still be substantially quicker.

Software development: The CPU's compilation speed is excellent, with data compression score of 379448 indicating fast file I/O and build processes. The 16 threads handle parallel builds well, and the single-thread performance keeps interactive IDEs responsive. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases that have temporal locality.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic productivity, but it excels at it. The single-thread score of 3995 in PassMark means instant application launches and smooth multitasking. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that memory-heavy tasks like large spreadsheets or database queries are handled without delay. The integrated Radeon 8050S in the CPU provides a fallback for power savings when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern of high performance. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2865, and single-core is 404. The R20 scores are 11938 multi-core and 1685 single-core. The R23 scores are 28424 multi-core and 4012 single-core. These scores scale as expected with the workload intensity. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 32075, a single-thread score of 3995, and a physics score of 1711. The CPU's average benchmark score is 43326, which is at the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's benchmark results are similarly comprehensive. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 89420, and Vulkan is 89569. The PassMark G3D score is 17469, while the G2D score is 730. The DirectX scores are as follows: DirectX 10 at 107, DirectX 11 at 157, DirectX 12 at 73, and DirectX 9 at 216. The GPU compute score is 6816. The GPU's average benchmark score is 22729, placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer relative to its peers, while the GPU is a solid mid-to-high-tier performer. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this, indicating a system that is better than 78% of all builds in the database. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score, showing that this is a very competitive processor in its class. The GPU's nearest rivals include both desktop and mobile parts, and it holds its own within a 1.3% margin of all of them.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compare to the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an average benchmark score of 43326, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H's score of 43210. This makes them nearly identical in overall CPU performance.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 Mobile faster than a desktop RTX 2080?

A: No, the RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, which is 0.7% lower than the desktop RTX 2080's score of 22895. They are effectively performance peers, with the desktop card having a slight edge.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and GPU?

A: Both the CPU's system memory (LPDDR5X) and the GPU's dedicated VRAM (GDDR6) have a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, ensuring balanced data throughput for both components.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes the Radeon 8050S integrated graphics, which can be used for power-saving tasks when the discrete RTX 4060 Mobile is not required.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type and does it support overclocking?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11 and the multiplier is not unlocked, so it does not support overclocking.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU is built on TSMC's 5 nm process.

Q: How does the GPU's ray tracing performance compare to its direct successor?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile's average score is 22729, which is 1.3% higher than the RTX 5060 Mobile's score of 22435, indicating the older card is slightly faster in overall benchmark performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed on AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform. This limits CPU upgrades to other FP11 parts, but given the performance tier of the 385, there is unlikely to be a significantly faster option available later. The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory, which is typically soldered on mobile boards, meaning memory upgrades are likely not possible post-purchase. The ECC memory support is a professional-grade feature that is uncommon in laptops.

The GPU is a mobile part and is not upgradeable. The system is a laptop class build, so the entire platform is fixed. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is standard for mobile. The CPU provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, so there is no bottleneck from the interface. The GPU's power requirements are 115 W, and the CPU is 55 W, totaling 170 W for the core components. This suggests the laptop requires a substantial power adapter, but the exact PSU headroom is not specified in the data.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to move to a newer laptop generation, as the RTX 4060 Mobile's successor (RTX 5060 Mobile) is already in the market. However, the data shows the 4060 Mobile is slightly faster than the 5060 Mobile in average benchmark score (22729 vs 22435), so an upgrade to the latter would not be an improvement. The CPU's nearest rival, the Ryzen AI 9 465, is also only 0.2% faster, so CPU upgrades within the same generation offer no practical benefit. The most meaningful upgrade would be to a new platform with a higher-tier GPU.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor, ranking at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is a mid-to-high-end mobile part, ranking at the 67th percentile. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 78, indicating this system outperforms 78% of all builds in the database.

The CPU's strengths lie in multi-threaded productivity tasks, with its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28424 placing it in the top tier of mobile processors. The GPU's strengths are in 1080p gaming and general compute, with its performance roughly matching a desktop RTX 2080. The system is well-balanced in terms of memory bandwidth, with both CPU and GPU accessing 256.0 GB/s. This is not an entry-level or budget configuration; it is a premium laptop component pairing designed for users who need significant compute power in a portable form factor.

The absence of measured FPS data means the gaming performance is estimated, but the synthetic scores suggest a capable 1080p gaming machine. The CPU is powerful enough to avoid becoming a bottleneck, and the GPU is strong enough to run modern titles at high settings. For users who need a machine that can handle both demanding productivity work and serious gaming, this pairing offers a compelling balance.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who play at 1080p and want high frame rates in competitive titles. The GPU's performance on par with a desktop RTX 2080 means it can handle esports titles at 144Hz or higher, and the CPU's strong single-thread score ensures consistent frame times. Gamers who prioritize 1440p will also find this system capable, though they may need to adjust settings from ultra to high in the most demanding titles.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and graphic design will benefit from the CPU's 8-core/16-thread configuration and the GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The PassMark multithread score of 32075 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 89420 indicate strong performance in Adobe Premiere, Blender, and similar applications. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 4K video timelines and medium-complexity 3D scenes.

Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases, will appreciate the CPU's data compression score of 379448 and integer math score of 105056, which speed up compilation and testing loops. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code.

Students in technical fields—engineering, computer science, data science—will find this system capable of running simulations, virtual machines, and heavy IDE workloads. The ECC memory support is a bonus for those doing numerical analysis where data integrity is critical. Office workers and small business users will find this system far more powerful than needed for spreadsheets and document editing, but it offers headroom for future, more demanding applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds