SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

43,326 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 890M: A High-Performance Laptop IGP Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 paired with the AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics represents a notable laptop configuration, sitting at the 67th combined percentile across all CPU and GPU pairings. This is not a measured FPS dataset — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact combination — so all gaming frame rates discussed below are estimates derived from the raw benchmark scores. The CPU is a Zen 5 architecture part on TSMC's 4 nm process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with 1024 shading units. Together, they form a platform that targets mobile productivity and moderate gaming, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting at the 88th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU lagging at the 45th percentile among all GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with base and boost clocks of 3.60 GHz and 5.00 GHz respectively. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus, yielding a substantial 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with ECC memory support included. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this chip at the 88th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43326. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 28424, while the single-core score is 4012. These figures indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for a mobile part. The R20 results show 11938 multicore and 1685 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 2865 multicore and 404 single-core. PassMark results reinforce the picture: multithread score of 32075, single-thread score of 3995, integer math at 105056, floating-point math at 69580, and extended instructions at 31442.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 sits almost exactly level with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, which scores 43431, a delta of -0.2%. It edges out the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H by 0.3% (that chip scores 43210). The AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 43689, putting this part 0.8% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scores 43704, a 0.9% gap. The differences are negligible — within a rounding error in real-world terms. This means the CPU delivers performance parity with those competing mobile parts, with no single rival holding a meaningful advantage.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28424 suggests strong sustained performance for compile jobs, video encoding, or 3D scene rendering. The single-core score of 4012 indicates snappy responsiveness in lightly threaded applications like web browsing or office suites. The PassMark physics score of 1711 and data compression score of 379448 point to solid integer-heavy throughput. The floating-point math score of 69580 shows respectable SIMD performance for scientific or engineering calculations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465?

A: The average benchmark score is 43326 for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 versus 43431 for the Ryzen AI 9 465, a delta of -0.2%, meaning performance is effectively identical.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile position?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M sits at the 45th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 9210.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and the memory type is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's shading unit count and boost clock?

A: The Radeon 890M has 1024 shading units and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with a base clock of 400 MHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960?

A: The Radeon 890M's average benchmark score is 9210 versus 9273 for the GTX 960, a delta of -0.7%, so they perform nearly identically.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 67, indicating it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores place it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with an average score of 43326. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, scores 43431, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the two are statistically tied. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H trails by 0.3% with a score of 43210. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 lead by 0.8% and 0.9% respectively, with scores of 43689 and 43704. These deltas are all under 1%, so the CPU's position is firmly in a performance cluster with no clear winner.

The GPU, the AMD Radeon 890M, holds the 45th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 9210. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Vega 8, scores 9221, a delta of -0.1%. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 scores 9273, a 0.7% lead, while the GTX 465 scores 9294, a 0.9% lead. The GTX 850M scores 9302, a 1% lead. The GPU is essentially tied with these older discrete parts, which contextualizes its capability: it performs like a mid-range GPU from several generations ago.

In specific 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 590. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 37254 and 40808 respectively. PassMark G3D score is 8076, while G2D is 979. The GPU compute score is 4157. The combined picture is a CPU that leads the platform, with the GPU presenting a moderate capability that will handle lighter workloads well but will struggle with demanding titles. The 0.3% CPU advantage over the Core Ultra 9 386H and the 0.7% GPU deficit to the GTX 960 paint a platform that is CPU-bound in most scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 45th percentile and scores similar to the GTX 960 suggest that high-refresh gaming at 1080p is achievable only in lighter or older titles. Esports games with low graphical demands could reach high frame rates, but modern AAA titles will likely require reduced settings to approach 60 FPS, let alone 120+ FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28424, can handle encoding workloads while gaming. The 8-core/16-thread configuration provides headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding, though the GPU's moderate compute score of 4157 may limit hardware encoding options.

Video Editing: The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is a significant asset for timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The CPU's PassMark floating-point score of 69580 supports efficient codec processing, while the GPU's 1024 shading units can accelerate effects and color grading in compatible software.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28424 places the CPU in a strong position for CPU-based rendering engines like Blender's Cycles. The GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest, meaning GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower but still viable for previews or simple scenes.

Software Development: The PassMark integer math score of 105056 and data compression score of 379448 indicate rapid code compilation and build times. The 16 threads handle parallel build systems effectively, and the single-thread score of 3995 ensures fast syntax highlighting and IDE responsiveness.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 88th percentile and single-core score of 4012 make everyday tasks like document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing exceptionally smooth. The GPU's G2D score of 979 ensures crisp 2D rendering for desktop compositing, while the 55 W TDP keeps power draw reasonable for a laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The platform exhibits a clear CPU-favorable imbalance. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 45th percentile among all GPUs. This 43-percentile gap means the CPU will frequently wait on the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the GPU's performance, comparable to the GTX 960, will be the limiting factor for frame rates in most titles. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 32075 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS of compute throughput.

For non-graphics workloads, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU's role is minimal. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth benefits both components, but the GPU's shared memory architecture means system-dependent bandwidth, potentially creating a bottleneck in memory-heavy tasks. The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, points to the GPU as the primary constraint: a 0.7% deficit to the GTX 960's average score of 9273 means the GPU will cap gaming performance well below what the CPU could otherwise support.

In professional applications that use GPU compute, such as OpenCL or Vulkan workloads, the GPU's scores of 37254 and 40808 respectively indicate it can offload some work, but the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1711 and extended instructions score of 31442 suggest the CPU handles physics and SIMD tasks efficiently, reducing GPU reliance. Overall, the bottleneck shifts by workload: GPU-bound in gaming and rendering, CPU-bound in compilation and data processing.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets laptop users who need robust CPU performance for productivity and content creation, with gaming as a secondary consideration. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU adequate for older titles or esports games, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 28424 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, though GPU-accelerated tasks will be limited.

Software developers will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 105056 and 16 threads for build parallelism. Students and small business users get a capable all-rounder: the 88th percentile CPU handles spreadsheets, reports, and presentations without lag, and the GPU's G2D score of 979 ensures clean 2D output. The 67th combined percentile means this is a mid-to-upper-tier laptop platform, suitable for professionals who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over graphics performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK confirms dataIsMeasured is false. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, particularly the GPU's average score of 9210 and its parity with the GTX 960 (9273 score, -0.7% delta). The GPU's 45th percentile position indicates it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in many titles, achieving 60 FPS in less demanding games.

For esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4012 and the GPU's 2900 MHz boost clock should push frame rates well above 60 FPS, potentially reaching 100+ FPS at 1080p with optimized settings. Modern AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield will likely require low to medium settings to maintain playable frame rates, given the GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 16 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 590 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 suggests ray-traced workloads will be heavy.

At 1440p, the GPU's 45th percentile will struggle; even medium settings may dip below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps reduce stutter, but the GPU's compute performance is the binding constraint. Frame rates at 1080p are the realistic target for this platform, with expectations set by the GTX 960 comparison — a card known for 60 FPS 1080p gaming in its era, but now outclassed by modern titles.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass is "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 CPU with the AMD Radeon 890M integrated GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 part on the Strix Halo codename, using TSMC's 4 nm process, with a 55 W TDP. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5 architecture integrated solution with 1024 shading units on a 4 nm process. The combined percentile is 67, placing this platform above about two-thirds of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

The CPU's 88th percentile and the GPU's 45th percentile create a platform that is top-tier for processing tasks but mid-tier for graphics. The 0.2% CPU delta to the Ryzen AI 9 465 and the 0.7% GPU delta to the GTX 960 define the performance envelope. This is not a gaming-first machine; it is a productivity-first laptop with respectable integrated graphics.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The boost clock is 2900 MHz with a base of 400 MHz. Memory is system shared, with bandwidth dependent on the system configuration. The GPU achieves 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 185.6 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance of 5.939 TFLOPS.

Benchmark results show the GPU at the 45th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 9210. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 590. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 37254 and 40808 respectively. PassMark G3D score is 8076, with DirectX 11 and 12 scores of 73 and 37. The nearest rival is the Radeon Vega 8 (9221, -0.1%), while the GTX 960 leads by 0.7% with a score of 9273.

For rendering, the GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS FP32 is modest, comparable to older discrete GPUs. The 16 RT cores enable ray tracing but at limited performance. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern game compatibility. The GPU's 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die reflect a dense design, but the "System Shared" memory means performance varies with system memory speed and capacity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, a mobile-only socket with soldered components, meaning CPU upgrades are not feasible in the traditional sense. Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus, with the memory soldered on most laptops, so memory upgrades are typically impossible. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP indicate a modest power envelope, suggesting that a substantial PSU headroom exists if this were in a desktop chassis, but as a laptop, the power delivery is fixed. The suggestedPsu field is null, and the GPU's power connectors are "None" since it is an IGP. A sensible next upgrade would be to a laptop with a discrete GPU for significantly higher graphics performance, as the CPU's 88th percentile means it can support a much more capable graphics solution without bottlenecking.

Given the soldered nature of the platform, the upgrade path is limited to purchasing a new laptop. The CPU's performance parity with the Ryzen AI 9 465 and Core Ultra 9 386H means it will remain competitive for several years on the CPU side. The GPU, however, is the weak link, and users needing better gaming or GPU compute performance should consider a configuration with a discrete GPU, such as those in the 90th+ GPU percentile range. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a strong foundation, but the GPU's shared memory architecture caps its potential.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 890M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds