SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 8060S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

43,326 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8060S

55,757 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 pairs an 8-core Zen 5 processor with the AMD Radeon 8060S integrated graphics in a laptop-class build. The CPU lands at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 87th percentile, and the combined system at the 88th percentile. No measured frames-per-second data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is a mobile processor built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, using the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache layout is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. A Radeon 8050S integrated GPU is also present on the die.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded part. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 28424 in the multi-core test and 4012 in the single-core test. The older Cinebench R20 and R15 runs produce 11938 and 2865 multi-core scores, with single-core scores of 1685 and 404, respectively. PassMark tests add context: integer math scores 105056, floating point math 69580, extended instructions 31442, and random string sorting 40784. Data compression reaches 379448, while data encryption scores 18978. The multi-thread PassMark score is 32075, and the single-thread score is 3995. Physics processing is 1711, and finding prime numbers scores 157.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 43326. That places it in the 88th percentile, meaning it outperforms 88% of all CPUs. The nearest rivals confirm the tight competition. The Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 43431, putting the Max PRO 385 just 0.2% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 43210, which the Max PRO 385 edges by 0.3%. The Ryzen 7 170 scores 43689, a 0.8% gap, and the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scores 43704, a 0.9% gap. In practical terms, the CPU is within 1% of four other modern mobile parts, so the differences are small enough to be irrelevant in most workloads. The high multi-core score suggests strong rendering, video encoding, and compilation performance, while the single-core score supports responsive day-to-day use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket. Upgrades on the same socket are not a realistic option, as laptop platforms are typically soldered. The memory is LPDDR5X, which is also soldered, so there is no user-accessible memory slot. The memory bus is quad-channel, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is high for a mobile platform. ECC memory is supported, a feature that benefits data integrity in workstations.

The PCIe configuration is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Radeon 8060S GPU, despite being an integrated part, is listed with a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. This is the interface the GPU uses to communicate with the system. The GPU has no power connectors and occupies a single IGP slot, meaning it draws power through the motherboard rather than a separate PSU cable. The TDP for both the CPU and the GPU is 55 W. No suggested PSU is listed, which is expected for an integrated solution. The power draw is modest enough that a standard laptop power adapter handles the load. The lack of a user-swappable CPU, memory, or GPU means the upgrade path is limited to the next complete system, not a component swap.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, along with LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The Radeon 8060S delivers 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and the same 14.85 TFLOPS for FP16.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Radeon 8060S have?

A: The GPU has 40 RT cores and 2560 shading units.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 43326, which is the 88th percentile among all CPUs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 8060S sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, and the CPU’s single-core score of 4012 in Cinebench R23 indicates enough per-thread performance to keep frame rates high in games that rely on one or two cores. The GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 and 40 RT cores provide a solid base for demanding titles, though the lack of measured FPS means the exact refresh rate depends on the game and resolution.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU can handle encoding and overlays, while the GPU’s 40 RT cores and RDNA 3.5 architecture can offload some rendering. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is useful for moving large frames. The 55 W TDP for both components keeps thermal headroom for long streaming sessions.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28424 indicates strong export and rendering performance. The PassMark integer math score of 105056 and floating point score of 69580 support color processing and effects. The GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 helps with GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded score of 28424 in Cinebench R23 is a strong indicator for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS and 40 RT cores can handle ray-traced scenes. The shared 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that textures and geometry can be accessed quickly.

Software development: The integer math score of 105056 and the random string sorting score of 40784 point to strong compilation and data-processing throughput. The 8 cores and 16 threads allow parallel builds, while the single-thread score of 3995 in PassMark ensures responsive editor and IDE.

Student and office work: The 55 W TDP makes this a power-efficient processor for laptops. The single-thread performance of 4012 in Cinebench R23 is more than enough for web browsing, documents, and spreadsheets. The 88th CPU percentile means it will handle occasional heavier tasks like photo editing without slowing down.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is aimed at laptop users who want a high-performing CPU and integrated GPU in one package. Gamers who play at high refresh rates will benefit from the 87th GPU percentile and the 88th CPU percentile, which together place the system in the top tier of mobile hardware. Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will find the multi-core score of 28424 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 useful. Software developers who compile large projects will appreciate the 8 cores, 16 threads, and integer math score of 105056. Students and small business users who need a single machine for office work, light media creation, and occasional gaming will be well served, as the system handles all those tasks with no weak point. The 55 W TDP on both components makes it suitable for a thin and light laptop, and the 88th combined percentile places it above the majority of existing systems.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming numbers are estimates. The Radeon 8060S has an average benchmark score of 55757, which places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which it edges by 0.1%, the RTX 5080, which is 0.6% faster, the Radeon Pro W5700X, which it beats by 1.7%, and the RTX 4080, which it beats by 2.8%. The GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 and 40 RT cores suggest it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high frame rates, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 4012 in Cinebench R23 reduces the risk of a CPU bottleneck. However, because the GPU is an integrated part with shared memory, the actual frame rate will depend on the system’s memory bandwidth, which is 256.0 GB/s, and the specific game’s optimization. Users should expect a high-performance laptop experience rather than a desktop with discrete graphics, but the measured benchmark scores place it in the same class as the RTX 4080, which is a desktop discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched, with percentiles of 88 and 87, respectively. The CPU’s average score of 43326 and the GPU’s average score of 55757 show that both parts are high-tier, but the CPU is slightly more dominant. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression, the 8-core/16-thread design and the high integer math score of 105056 will be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolution, the GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS and 40 RT cores will be the primary driver. The shared memory architecture is a potential bottleneck for graphics, as the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is shared between the CPU and GPU. In texture-heavy games, the GPU may be starved for bandwidth, but the CPU’s 4012 single-core score helps keep the system responsive. The combined percentile of 88 suggests that neither component is drastically better or worse than the other, so the system will not be severely unbalanced for most workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 with the AMD Radeon 8060S. The CPU is a Zen 5 part with 8 cores and 16 threads, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated part with 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with 14.85 TFLOPS FP32. The GPU has no dedicated memory; it uses the system’s LPDDR5X memory. The combined system sits at the 88th percentile, which places it in the top 12% of all hardware configurations. The CPU and GPU are both 55 W, making this a power-efficient high-performance laptop platform. The production status is active for both parts, and the release date is January 5, 2025.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s exact benchmark scores are: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2865, single-core 404; Cinebench R20 multi-core 11938, single-core 1685; Cinebench R23 multi-core 28424, single-core 4012. PassMark tests show integer math at 105056, floating point math at 69580, data compression at 379448, data encryption at 18978, extended instructions at 31442, find prime numbers at 157, multi-thread at 32075, physics at 1711, random string sorting at 40784, and single-thread at 3995. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 43326, and its percentile is 88.

The GPU’s benchmark results are 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162, Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 80483. The average benchmark score is 55757, and the percentile is 87. The GPU is 0.1% faster than the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, 0.6% slower than the RTX 5080, 1.7% faster than the Radeon Pro W5700X, and 2.8% faster than the RTX 4080. The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU is 88, meaning the system sits in the top 12% of all laptop configurations. The CPU’s multi-threaded and single-threaded scores, together with the GPU’s high FP32 and ray tracing capabilities, produce a balanced high-end laptop solution.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 8060S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

AMD Radeon 8060S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds